Ashley C. Johnson N877 Foundations in Education and Learning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nursing Diagnosis: Definition
Advertisements

Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
National Board Support Review of Entry 4 and Creating Videos and Writing Tips November 16, 2012.
February 2005Transition Services Preparation & Training Developing NCATE Assessment Rubrics: Modeling Best Practice For Our Students Pamela Luft Kent State.
Teaching/Learning Strategies to Support Evidence-Based Practice Asoc. prof. Vida Staniuliene Klaipeda State College Dean of Faculty of Health Sciences.
Clinical Evaluation Tools Copyright 2008 by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Mary Ann Cordeau PhD, RN. From participating in this presentation the participant should be able to: Define assessment and validation as they relate to.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Communication. Levels of Communication 3 levels: Social,Therapeutic, Collegial – Social: interactions for the purpose of accomplishing tasks or building.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
A Network Approach To Improving Teaching and Learning Center Point High School Instructional Rounds in Education.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Boys’ Literacy Me Read? No Way!. Modules ConsistentFlexible Introductory Module:Module 2: Resources #1 Key MessagesModule 3: Oral Language #5 Barriers.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Welcome Welcome to “Getting Results” A National Science Foundation project developed by WGBH with the League for Innovation and 13 community colleges from.
HE 520: Higher Education Laws and Regulations Unit One Seminar Pre-Seminar Welcome to HE 520: Higher Education Laws and Regulations, Unit One Seminar Seminar.
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
EEPD 2009: The Collaborative Inquiry Process Farmington High School November 3, 2009.
INACOL Standard D: CLEAR EXPECTATIONS PROMPT RESPONSES REGULAR FEEDBACK.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
The Research Process.  There are 8 stages to the research process.  Each stage is important, but some hold more significance than others.
Facilitate Group Learning
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
PEER Module 4: Research & Evaluation Questions
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
Planning the Learner Experience Linda Rolfe & Cerian Ayres Petroc.
RUBRICS Presented by: Dan, Chanel & Nancy. What is a rubric? For TEACHERS:a tool for assessment, for providing instructions to students, and for outlining.
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
UBC Dietetics Major Modules and Forms Update
OBSTETRIC EMERGENCY DRILLS Improve the quality of care for women having obstetric emergencies.
ASSESSMENT WITHOUT LEVELS Age Appropriate Learning.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. EVIDENCE-BASED TEACHING IN NURSING – Chapter 15 –
Critical Information Literacy
Learning Assessment Techniques
MBA CLASS CONTENT AND TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS
ASSESSMENT METHODS – Chapter 10 –.
Clinical Evaluation Tools
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Office of Planning & Development
Dean of the School of Nursing at Widener University
Prebriefing: The Final Frontier
Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report
Readiness Consultations
“An online program to enhance the quality of clinical education”.
Can Clinical Reasoning Be Taught?
Chapter 4 Developing Performance-Based Assessments
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
BUS 600 CART Lessons in Excellence-- bus600cart.com.
Assessment and Evaluation Feedback to Teams
Providing Quality Feedback for Student Success
Advanced Program Learning Assessment
The main features of assessment in the PYP
Say: Welcome to today’s professional learning session on inter-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability is essential to the teacher evaluation process.
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
Creating Coaching Cycles that Move Coach Practice Forward
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
ADCOS February.
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Developing Instructional rubrics
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
Level 2 Certificate in Fitness Instructing: Aqua
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
Presentation transcript:

Ashley C. Johnson N877 Foundations in Education and Learning Self-Debriefing Ashley C. Johnson N877 Foundations in Education and Learning

Objectives Identify the types of simulation debriefing. Discuss best practices in simulation debriefing. Define self-debriefing. Apply self-debriefing to nursing simulation. Discuss the impact of self-debriefing on nursing simulation.

Research

What are the best practices in debriefing undergraduate nursing students after simulation? Databases used: CINAHL PubMEd ERIC Key words: debriefing debriefing methods nursing simulation nursing simulation No exclusions were used in these searches.

Findings Debriefing is an important and quite possibly the most important part of simulation. According to the literature, debriefing is when significant learning occurs. Any structure debriefing is beneficial. There is not one particular type that is better than the other. An interesting concept is self-directed debriefing. This is an inexpensive route of standardized debriefing that does not require extra faculty, equipment or time. Literature also suggested that considering the importance of debriefing there is still very little research on the different types and more research needs to be done in this area.

Best Practices

Current best practices There are many types of debriefing: Video recording Faculty or instructor led Verbal Collective Structured debriefing of any type is better than no debriefing.

More work to be done There is still a gap in the literature. More research is needed using the various types of debriefing. A theoretical framework needs to developed to guide debriefing.

Self-Debriefing

Why self-debriefing? Colleges and universities in small towns, rural areas, limited budgets, limited clinical sites are still expected to maintain quality and uphold simulation standards. These same colleges and universities need effective simulation to replace lack of clinical facilities and experiences. Effective debriefing methods on a very small and almost non-existent budget is craved by the smaller, more rural schools. Particularly those that can’t afford expensive video debriefing systems or have the space for large, separate debriefing rooms.

Application

Assignment: Self-debrief a simulation scenario. Objectives: Reflect on the assigned simulation scenario. Analyze actions of the student and their colleagues. Identify and review lessons learned. Instructions: The undergraduate nursing student that has completed a simulation scenario must answer the following questions related to the previously completed simulation scenario. Writing should be clear and easy to read. Analysis should be accurate and relevant to the simulation scenario. It should provide clarity to the student and reader. Minimum of three pages in length is required. How did you feel throughout the simulation experience? Describe the objectives you were able to achieve? Did you have the knowledge and skills to meet objectives? Were you satisfied with your ability to work through the simulation? What did the team feel was the primary nursing diagnosis? What were the key assessments and interventions? Evaluation (of the success of implemented care) What other kinds of situations might you face that might be similar? What are you going to do differently in your practice tomorrow? Is there anything else you would like to discuss?

Grading Rubric 76% or greater = Satisfactory for lab day Performance Criteria Attribute 0 points 5 points 10 points 15 points 20 points The required elements are present for the debriefing entry. Breadth None of the required elements are present. Few of the required elements are present in each debriefing entry. Some of the required elements are present in each debriefing entry. Most of the required elements are present in each debriefing entry. All the required elements are present in each debriefing entry. The debriefing entry is clearly written (e.g. style, grammar enhance understanding). Clarity Debriefing entry is not clear. Debriefing entry is slightly clear. Debriefing entry is moderately clear. Debriefing entry is mainly clear. Debriefing entry is extremely clear. The debriefing entry is organized and all questions answered. Organization The debriefing entry is not organized. The debriefing entry is slightly organized. The debriefing entry is moderately organized. The debriefing entry is mainly organized. The debriefing entry is extremely organized. 76% or greater = Satisfactory for lab day Lower than 76% = Unsatisfactory for lab day

Where can this be used? This assignment was developed for undergraduate nursing students who have participated in a simulation scenario. New students to graduating students could use this debriefing tool. It could be adapted for graduate programs and the clinical setting.

Impact

Student learning and patient outcomes Effective debriefing would be utilized with this tool. Small faculty numbers, limited time, and/or limited resources would be able to use self-debriefing as an active learning tool. This cements learning and ensures application to real-world experiences. Patient outcomes are improved each time that learning is applied to real-world experiences.

References Jaye, P., Thomas, L., & Reedy, G. (2015). 'The Diamond': a structure for simulation debriefing. The Clinical Teacher. National League for Nursing. (2010). Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. Retrieved from National League for Nursing. Tierney, R. & Simon, M. (2004). What’s still wrong with rubrics: Focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(2) http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=