New Jail Screening and Mental Health Procedures Justice Bill Boyce Texas Judicial Council August 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Senate Criminal Justice Committee Interim Charge 1 June 21, 2006.
Advertisements

1 Implementation of HB 1736 September 1, OVERVIEW H.B. 1736, enacted during the 81 st Legislative Session, provided the following support for.
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
MENTALLY ILL & THE LAW Madhurima, Prison Reforms Programme,
Continuity of Care Task Force Preliminary Recommendations.
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
Criminal Justice, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Reinvestment Grant
INCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL ART. 46B.003 Lacks rational and factual understanding of the proceedings Cannot consult with counsel Presumed competent Burden.
Georgia Behavioral Health Legislative Caucus. Mental Health Courts in Georgia Appalachian Circuit Superior Court (Pickens, Gilmer and Fannin Counties)
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Mental Health: Crisis Intervention Challenges and Solutions In West Texas August 9, 2007.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY
Joint Hearing of Senate Health and Human Services and Senate State Affairs Joint Interim Charge #3 August 23, 2006.
 Which crimes were changed and how will those changes impact the State Courts?  How does the emphasis on the Accountability Courts movement affect prosecutors?
State Board of Corrections An Overview of Public Law 2008 Chapter 653.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
Mandatory Outpatient Treatment Following Involuntary Inpatient Admission Allyson K. Tysinger Office of the Attorney General May 2010.
LEON COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM.
Crisis Services Redesign Implementation Overview Texas Department of State Health Services Mental Health & Substance Abuse Division August 2, 2007.
HEALTH GENERAL ARTICLES §8-505, 8-506, 8507
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
“It’s Time for a Revolution” State Mental Health System Reorganization NAMI National Convention June 20, 2005.
Continuity of Care Task Force February 19, BACKGROUND The Texas State Psychiatric Hospital system is nearing capacity While total admissions and.
A LEGISLATIVE UPDATE ON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Mental Health Needs Council by Amanda Jones, J.D. Legislative.
Task Force on Public Safety Oregon Criminal Justice Commission November 22, 2013.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Behavioral Health Initiatives $17,000,000 seems like a large amount, however due to a lack of Medicaid funding, this money will be spent quickly. In order.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Court Services Stepping Up InitiativeStepping Up Initiative Alachua County Answers The CallAlachua County Answers The Call.
DELAWARE OFFICE OF DEFENSE SERVICES DELAWARE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE STATE OF DELAWARE PUBLIC DEFENSE COUNSEL AT PRETRIAL Hon. J. Brendan O’Neill,
Southwest RIC 5/4/16. Southwest Average LOS Southwest Total Prison Months.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
Presentation to the Senate Committee on Health & Human Services June 16, 2016 The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) Stephen.
Gathering Community Support
Jail Diversion Programs
Douglas County, KS Criminal Justice Intercept Practices
Public Policy Director
Managing Behavioral Health Crisis Patients
Criminal Procedure Amendment Bill, 2017
A Look at Statistics and Trends Based on public information available
Summit County Probation Services
Santa Barbara County Re-Alignment Strategy Study
Justice Division Strategic Planning
Bexar County Sheriff’s Office
DSHS COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS SERVICES
Eighth Judicial District Court Mental Health Court Program
Community Justice Services a Division of the
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
Fulton County Justice & Mental Health Task Force
Crisis Intervention Team Program
WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF SHERIFFS & POLICE CHIEFS
Voter Eligibility & Confirmation of Residency
Kristin S. Adams-Pelham, Psy. D. Forensic Psychologist
Mental health Act, 1987.
2014 Legislative Changes to Virginia’s Civil Commitment Laws
Existing Law: Sanctuary Cities Banned In South Carolina
Connections Abuse Prevention Plan 2018.
Outpatient Competency Restoration (OCR)
Confidentiality Frequently Asked Questions
Psychotropic Medication Use by Children in Texas Foster Care:
Georgia Judicial System
Building a Full Continuum of Integrated Crisis Services
Trends and Projections
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
Santa Fe County Behavioral Health Crisis Center
Presentation transcript:

New Jail Screening and Mental Health Procedures Justice Bill Boyce Texas Judicial Council August 2017

Roadmap Segment One: Overview Segment Two: Screening & Assessment Segment Three: Personal Bonds Segment Four: Competency Segment Five: Implementation

Segment One: Overview

The Challenges Mental health and related issues often are addressed by default as a law enforcement and court responsibility It is estimated 20 to 24 percent of the Texas inmate population has a mental health need $650 million in annual local justice system costs FY 2011: TDCJ spent more than $130 million on mental health and substance abuse services 2010: 8 adults with severe and persistent mental illness in jail or prison for every adult in a state psychiatric hospital 36,000 persons with complex needs

Long Waits Texas has seen increases in length-of-stay and waiting list at state hospitals 2,463 beds in FY 2015; deteriorating facilities Length of stay: from 58 days in 2012 to 74 days in 2015 Waiting list has more than quadrupled since 2013; as of January 2016, it stood at 424 individuals

Other Key Challenges Providing appropriate treatment for specific populations: persons with complex needs, first episode psychosis Providing appropriate local/outpatient treatment in community Addressing the shortage of mental health professionals and resources, especially in rural areas

The Big Picture: Texas Needs Effective mental health screening and information sharing across public systems Systems planning, financing, and implementation of diversion programs for mentally ill individuals in the justice system Implementation and financing of community and jail-based competency restoration

The Texas Judicial Council Mental Health Committee Created in June 2016 Charge Examine administration of civil and criminal justice for those suffering from or affected by mental illness Review approaches for diversion of individuals with mental illness from the criminal justice system Make recommendations on improving administration of justice in cases involving mental health issues; strategies for enhancing judicial leadership and education on mental health issues; creation of permanent judicial commission on mental health Make recommendations on legislative changes Recognition of need for resources to implement recommendations

Judicial Council Recommendations - 2016 3 recommendations focused on improvements to existing statutes/programs Improve screening protocols under CCP Art. 16.22; increase flexibility for bond availability for mentally ill, non-violent defendants under CCP Art. 17.032 Allow local communities to offer competency restoration and maintenance under CCP Art. 46B in safe and clinically appropriate local settings for misdemeanor defendants Outpatient residential, community inpatient, jail-based Improve procedures for reimbursing counties for a restored inmate’s medication Provide funding for jail diversion programs tailored to local needs, resources, and conditions

Multi-Branch Concern House Select Committee on Mental Health, chaired by Rep. Four Price Interim Report issued December 2016 State of the Judiciary Address 2017: Chief Justice Hecht calls for attention to procedures for mentally ill defendants Multiple mental health-related bills introduced during the 85th Legislature

The Legislature Responds Key bills passed and signed into law 2017 SB 1326 (Author: Sen. Zaffirini; Sponsor: Rep. Price, et al.) Mental health screening under CCP Art. 16.22 PR bonds under CCP Art. 17.032 Competency restoration for misdemeanor defendants under CCP Art. 46B SB 292 (Author: Sen. Huffman, et al.; Sponsor: Rep. Price, et al.): Matching grant program to reduce recidivism, arrests and incarceration among individuals with mental illness HB 13 (Author: Rep. Price, et al.; Sponsor: Sen. Schwertner): Matching grant program through HHS Commission to support community mental health programs

Other Mental Health Legislation SB 1849 (Sandra Bland Act) (Author: Sen. Whitmire; Sponsor: Rep. Coleman, et al.) Some overlap with SB 1326 provisions addressing mental health screening under CCP Art. 16.22 Add CCP Art. 16.23: “Diversion of Persons Suffering Mental Health Crisis or Substance Abuse Issue” to a “proper treatment center” if available under a “good faith effort” standard Amend Gov’t Code section 539.002: “Grants for Establishment and Expansion of Community Collaboratives” Creation of detailed jail standards, reporting requirements, procedure for investigation of jail deaths, training for jail administrators

Segment Two: Screening & Assessment

Notice of Possible Mental Health Issue to Magistrate Notice to magistrate of reasonable cause to believe that defendant charged with Class B misdemeanor or higher has a mental illness or an intellectual disability (not limited to Class B or higher under Sandra Bland Act) Shorter timeframe than current statutory requirement of 72 hours: 12 hours Notice comes from “sheriff or municipal jailer having custody of a defendant” (no reference to “municipal jailer” in Sandra Bland Act) No new requirement to collect information, only to pass it along Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 16.22

When Magistrate Receives Notice of Potential Mental Health Issue If magistrate determines there is reasonable cause to believe defendant has a mental illness or is intellectually disabled, then magistrate shall order local MH/IDD authority or another qualified expert to: Collect information Provide written assessment on form approved by Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 16.22

Assessment Not Always Required Written assessment is not required if, within the year, defendant already has been determined to have mental illness or intellectual disability If defendant refuses to submit to information collection, then magistrate can order defendant to submit to an examination “in a jail or in another place determined to be appropriate” by the local authority “for a period not to exceed 72 hours” – instead of 21 days. Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 16.22

Written Assessment Timeline and Actions Written assessment must be provided to magistrate Not later than 96 hours after the order for a defendant who is in custody Not later than 30 days after the order for a defendant released from custody Upon receipt of assessment, court can: Resume criminal proceedings and address release on personal bond if defendant is being held in custody Resume or initiate competency proceedings under Article 46B Use assessment in connection with punishment, as part of PSI, or to set conditions for community supervision Refer defendant to appropriate specialty court Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 16.22

Required Reporting Magistrates shall submit monthly reports to OCA regarding the number of written assessments provided Magistrates shall provide copies of assessments to the trial courts Number of written assessments will be captured from trial courts on Judicial Council Monthly District and County Court Activity Reports Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 16.22

Segment Three: Personal Bonds

What is a Personal Bond? Three kinds of Bonds: Cash Bond Surety Bond, a/k/a Bail Bond Personal Bond Personal Bonds do not require defendant to put up money in advance of release Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 17.03, 17.04

Requirement to Release on Personal Bond Excluding defendants charged with 13 enumerated “violent offenses,” magistrate shall release a defendant on a personal bond notwithstanding Article 17.03(b), a bond schedule, or standing order unless good cause is shown otherwise. Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 17.032

When to Use Personal Bond Personal bond to be used if: Defendant is not charged with and has not previously been convicted of a statutorily defined “violent offense” Defendant is examined by a local MH/IDD authority or expert under CCP Art. 16.22, and written assessment Concludes defendant has mental illness/IDD and is nonetheless competent to stand trial Recommends mental health treatment or IDD services for the defendant Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 17.032

When to Use Personal Bond cont’d Personal bond to be used if: Magistrate determines that appropriate community-based mental health or intellectual disability services are available; and Magistrate finds that release on PR bond would reasonably ensure defendant’s appearance in court, and safety of community/victim, after considering all of the circumstances and a pretrial risk assessment Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 17.032

Personal Bond Conditions Unless good cause is shown, magistrate shall require outpatient or inpatient MH/IDD treatment/services as a condition of release on PR bond as recommended by local authority or another qualified MH/IDD expert In addition, magistrate may require compliance with other conditions reasonably necessary to ensure the defendant’s appearance in court and the safety of the community/victim Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 17.032

Segment Four: Competency

Key Changes to Art. 46B, Code of Criminal Procedure Promote jail-based and outpatient/local competency restoration, reduce reliance on state hospitals for restoration New procedures for competency restoration of defendants charged with Class B misdemeanors Separate approaches to medical treatment and education components of restoration

Jail-Based Competency Restoration Expand jail-based competency restoration option State-funded or county-funded HHSC developing rules to guide facilities Use jail-based option only if defendant will begin to receive competency restoration services within 72 hours of arriving at the program Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 46B.073

County-Funded Jail-Based Competency Restoration New CCP Art. 46B.091 governs county implementation of jail-based restoration programs County contracts with local mental/behavioral health authority to provide jail-based competency restoration services

Competency Restoration: Class A or Felonies If defendant is charged with a Class A misdemeanor or higher offense, court shall: Commit the defendant to a mental health facility or jail-based competency restoration program under Article 46B.073; or Release the defendant on bail to outpatient competency restoration program under Article 46B.072 using existing procedures Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 46B.071

Competency Restoration: Class B If defendant is charged with a Class B misdemeanor, court shall: Release the defendant on bail to outpatient competency restoration under new Article 46B.0711; or Commit the defendant to: a jail-based competency restoration program under Article 46B.073(e); or A mental health facility or residential care facility under Article 46B.073(f) Commit the defendant to a facility under Article 46B.073 only if jail-based competency program is not available, or a licensed/qualified MH professional determines that a jail-based program is not appropriate Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 46B.071

Outpatient Competency Restoration: Class B For defendant who is subject to restoration under Article 46B.071, court shall order release on bail and participation in outpatient competency restoration for up to 60 days – under certain circumstances “Subject to conditions reasonably related to ensuring public safety and the effectiveness of the defendant’s treatment” Court must determine that Class B misdemeanor defendant found incompetent to stand trial, is not a danger to others, may be treated safely on an outpatient basis towards goal of attaining competency to stand trial Appropriate outpatient competency restoration program is available Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 46B.0711

Outpatient Competency Restoration: Class B (cont) Court must receive and approve comprehensive plan that provides for competency restoration treatment, identifies person who will provide the treatment Court must find that the proposed treatment will be available to and will be provided to the defendant Court may require defendant to participate in outpatient competency restoration program, and an “appropriate prescribed regimen of medical, psychiatric, or psychological care or treatment” Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 46B.0711

Transfer for Competency Education Services Competency restoration consists of clinical treatment and education services Head of facility must notify court when defendant is clinically ready to be transferred for competency education services but is not yet competent to stand trial Once notified, court shall order defendant to receive competency education services in jail-based or outpatient program if appropriate and available Sheriff required to maintain medications while in custody, unless funds are not available from the state Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 46B.079, 46B.0805, 46B.0825

Trial Preference for Restored Defendants Trial of a criminal action against a defendant who has been restored to competency under Article 46B.084 shall be given preference over other matters before the court, whether civil or criminal Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 32A.01

Required Reporting Court shall submit monthly reports to OCA regarding the number of competency reports provided to the court Requirement to submit copies of competency reports to TCOOMMI repealed Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 46B.026

Segment Five: Implementation

How will New Community-Based Programs Be Funded? HHS Commission to establish matching grant program for county- based community collaboratives to: Reduce recidivism, arrest frequency, incarceration of persons with mental illness Reduce waiting time for forensic commitment of persons with mental illness to a state hospital Government Code Sec. 531.0993

Counties Eligible for Grant Funding To receive grant funds, the community collaborative must include a county; a local mental health authority that operates in the county; and each hospital district, if any, located in the county. Collaborative also may include “other local entities designated by the collaborative’s members.” Counties of less than 250,000 must provide funds from non-state sources equaling at least 50% of the grant amount Counties of more than 250,000 must provide funds from non-state sources equaling 100% of the grant amount Government Code Sec. 531.0993

Community Collaboration Grants Matching grant program for community mental health services Collaboration required with local mental health authority Match amount depends on size of county Government Code Sec. 531.0999

Implementation Steps Immediate tasks Effective date 9.1.17 Resources and information available through Office of Court Administration: www.txcourts.gov/oca/ Bench materials Competency Restoration Checklist Flowcharts for initial screening/assessment and competency restoration process

New Jail Screening and Mental Health Procedures Justice Bill Boyce Texas Judicial Council August 2017