W – boson Helicity of top quark decay

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Martin zur Nedden, HU Berlin 1 WS 2007/08: Physik am LHC 5. Higgs Searches The Higgs-mechanism in the SM Yukava-coupling, masses of fermions Higgs Production:
Advertisements

Top physics at hadron colliders
Search for Large Extra Dimensions at the Tevatron Bob Olivier, LPNHE Paris XXXVI ème Rencontre de Moriond Mars Search for Large Extra Dimensions.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
W Physics at LEP Paolo Azzurri Pisa (ALEPH-CMS ) Hanoi August 7, th Rencontres du Vietnam New Views in Particle Physics.
PH599 Graduate Seminar presents: Discovery of Top Quark Karen Chen Stony Brook University November 1, 2010.
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
THE SEARCH FOR THE HIGGS BOSON Aungshuman Zaman Department of Physics and Astronomy Stony Brook University October 11, 2010.
Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
Top Quark Physics: An Overview Young Scientists’ Workshop, Ringberg castle, July 21 st 2006 Andrea Bangert.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Joseph Haley Joseph Haley Overview Review of the Standard Model and the Higgs boson Creating Higgs bosons The discovery of a “Higgs-like” particle.
August 22, 2002UCI Quarknet The Higgs Particle Sarah D. Johnson University of La Verne August 22, 2002.
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
The Discovery of the Top Quark By Ben Smith. Introduction  By 1977, the discovery of the bottom quark suggested the presence of its isospin partner,
FNAL Academic Lectures – May, –Tevatron -> LHC Physics 3 –Tevatron -> LHC Physics 3.1 QCD - Jets and Di - jets 3.2 Di - Photons 3.3 b Pair Production.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Search for a Z′ boson in the dimuon channel in p-p collisions at √s = 7TeV with CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Search for a Z′ boson in the.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Top quark properties in ATLAS Ruth Laura Sandbach X-SILAFAE-2014, Medellin, Colombia 27/11/2014 X-SILAFAE
Caroline Fletcher Advisor: Dan Karmgard.  Astrophysics  Compact Muon Solenoid.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Liu Minghui Nanjing MC study of W polarization and ttbar spin correlation Liu Minghui, Zhu Chengguang April 27, 2008.
CIPANP, June 2012 David Toback, Texas A&M University – CDF Collaboration Top Quark Properties with the Full Run II Dataset 1 October 2011 David Toback,
Top Quark Physics At TeVatron and LHC. Overview A Lightning Review of the Standard Model Introducing the Top Quark tt* Pair Production Single Top Production.
06/30/05 Mathieu Agelou – LowX’05 1 Sensitivity to PDFs at the Tevatron. Mathieu Agelou CEA – Saclay Low x workshop, Sinaia, Romania.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Particle Physics II Chris Parkes Top Quark Discovery Decay Higgs Searches Indirect mW and mt Direct LEP & LHC searches 2 nd Handout.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
10/29/2007Julia VelkovskaPHY 340a Lecture 4: Last time we talked about deep- inelastic scattering and the evidence of quarks Next time we will talk about.
Higgs in the Large Hadron Collider Joe Mitchell Advisor: Dr. Chung Kao.
A Precision Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark Abazov, V. M. et al. (D0 Collaboration). Nature 429, (2004) Presented by: Helen Coyle.
The Top Quark at CDF Production & Decay Properties
Benchmark analysis of tau-pairs
Measurement of the Top Quark Mass with the Matrix Element Method at D0
Determining the CP Properties of a Light Higgs Boson
Nady Bakhet PhD Student – Cairo University PhD Thesis Title
Searching for New Exotic Physics at the LHC
M. V. Chizhov DESY/Sofia University, Bulgaria
Top quark angular distribution results (LHC)
3rd Grenoble Top Workshop – October 25, 2008
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Elementary particles Spring 2005, Physics /24/2018 Lecture XXV.
Experimental Particle PhysicsPHYS6011 Performing an analysis Lecture 5
W boson helicity measurement
Particle physics.
Prospect for Top Properties Measurement in Atlas
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
University of Tsukuba, Japan Particle Physics Phenomenology,
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Greg Heath University of Bristol
W polarization and ttbar spin correlation study
Top quark production cross section Top quark mass measurement
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
C.M.S.:.
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
Measurement of the Single Top Production Cross Section at CDF
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
The Top Quark Search Joey Foley.
Presentation transcript:

W – boson Helicity of top quark decay Qasim Ali & Sobia khanum National Centre for Physics

Outline Top Quark: W–boson Helicity: Introduction of top quark Production of top quark Decay of top quark W–boson Helicity: What is Helicity? Fraction of the Helicity Decay angle How to measure the Helicity? Helicity in the Standard Model Distribution of the decay angle Measurement method of cosθ Flow chart of my work Histograms

Introduction What’s Special about this one? A set of Fermions and force carriers which is described by the Standard Model.

Introduction All the spin information of the top quark: transfer to its decay products Like all quarks the top quark is an elementary fermion with spin - 1/2. It almost exclusively decays to a W boson and bottom quark, and a strange quark and on the rarest of occasions, into a down quark. Discovered in 1995 by the CDF and D0 exp at Fermilab. The top quark charge is +2/3 e and is the most massive Particle in all observed elementary Particles. The SM predict its life time to be 0.5 × 10 -25 s. It’s the only quark that decay before the hadronization. life time ≈ 10 -25 s. Hadronize time ≈ 10-23 s

Introduction V CKM = twb b Top quark Top quark decay: bottom quark and W. strange quark and W. down quark and W. W d s b b spin =1/2 W+ spin=1 t spin =1/2 V-A u c t Vud Vus Vut Vcd Vcs Vcb Vtd Vts Vtb -¡ V CKM = From CKM matrix it is clear that the probability of the decay of the top into b is 99%

Top quark production at Tevatron and LHC The pair-production of the top quark was discovered in 1995 at the Fermilab Tevatron by proton- antiproton collider. Centre of mass energy is √s =1.96 TeV & cross section is 6.7 pb. The dominant process in the Tevatron quark–anti quark annihilation. qq-bar  tt-bar (85%) gg tt-bar (15%) At LHC the collision occur between proton –proton. At centre of mass energy of √s =14 TeV & cross section 833 pb. The dominant process is gluon –gluon fusion. qq-bar  tt-bar (10%) gg tt-bar (90%) pp-collision At Tevatron Collider pp -collision At LHC Collider

Top Quark Decay Channels Depending on the W decay modes the top quark decay can be classified into three channels. The Dileptonic channel The semileptonic channel The hadronic channel

Dileptonic Decay Channel If both W bosons decay into a pairs of the leptons and its relative neutrino then such type of decay mode is called the Dileptonic channel. Since τ leptons are difficult to identify. (tt →W+W-bb → lѴ lѵ bb) The Dileptonic channel has low branching ratio but a high signal to background ratio . μ- e leptons Where l τ

Hadronic Channel If both W boson decay into jet pairs, we have a total of six jets, then this is called the “Hadronic decay”. All hadronic channels have highest branching fraction but is very difficult to distinguish from background. (tt → W+W-bb → j1 j2 j3 j4bb). j1,j2 q1,q2 Where j1,j2,j3,j4 quarks j3,j4 q3,q4

Semi Leptonic channel If one W boson decay into an electron-neutrino or a muon neutrino pair, while the other decay into two jets, we have four jets and a lepton-neutrino then such type of decay mode is called the Semileptonic channel. The semileptonic channel is also called “Golden Channel "for top pair analyses due to high branching ratio &presence of high transverse momentum leptons. (tt → W+W- b+b- → lѵ j1 j2 bb)

Branching Ratio Channel b- jets Non-b jets Charged leptons Neutrinos % Dileptonic 2 5% Semileptonic 1 30% Hadronic 4 44%

W± Boson Life time → ≈ 3 × 10 -25 s Composition → elementary particle Statistics → Bosonic Interaction → weak interaction Theorized → Glashow,Weinberg,Salam(1968) Discovered → 1983 Mass → W:80.385±0.015 GeV/ c2 Electric charge → ± 1e Spin → 1 Life time → ≈ 3 × 10 -25 s

Helicity Def: The Helicity is the projection of the spin “S” of a particle on the motion of the particle “P”. H Stand for Helicity ˆ H Ξ S.P S Spin ˆ S.P ˆ Direction of motion Of the particle P There are three Helicity states : In above figure simple (open) arrow denote particle direction of motion (spin).

Polarization state reflected in the angular distribution W direction W direction W direction Right-handed W Left-handed W Longitudinal W

Decay angle Def: The measurement method uses the cosine of the decay angle which is defined as the angle between direction of the lepton in the W -rest-frame and W in the top-rest-frame. Equation for Helicity fraction: θ The angular distribution is given by the following expression. Where F0 = Mt = 173.3 GeV/c2 F- = FR = 0.00

Measurement Method ι During the analysis the relationship b/w the mother and daughter particles is ensured. t First top quark was selected and built its 4-vector from its components px, py, pz and E. top vertex A boost vector is calculated from its 4-vector and stored in the 3-vector with the name t_rest. W b W vertex Then the decay vertex of the top quark was selected and it was ensured that this vertex is the production vertex for the “W” and “b”. ѵ ι Then the “W” and “b” were selected and built its 4-vector from its components px, py, pz and E. In leptons I take only muon. The boost transformation is applied and “W” is boosted by boost vector of top quark and is stored in the 4-vector with the name w_t.

Measurement Method After this the decay vertex of “W” was chosen and It was ensured that (ι, ѵ) were come out from the Decay vertex of the “W” boson. Then muon were chosen and built its 4-vector. The muon is boosted by using boost vector of “W” and this boost is saved as 4-vector with the name m_w. ι b ѳ t ѵ Finally angle is obtained between the two 3-vectors which are obtained from 4-vector w_t and m_w. And this angle is plotted as cosθ and the histogram is filled with this angular distribution. In the last step this angular distribution is fitted with a function. This equation is a second order polynomial in cosθ. Final fit gives the values of F0, FL and FR.

Flow Chart The analysis has been performed using proton proton collisions data which is reconstructed by CMSSW software version 4_2_9 _HLT3 patRefSel_muJets_cfg.py Histograms analyzeTopHypothesis.root patRefSel_muJets.root HypothesisAnalyzer.cc ttSemilepEvtBuilder_cfg.py analyzeTopHypotheses_cfg.py ttSemiLepEvtBuilder.root

Selection Criteria for MuHad & SingleMu data stream Muon Cut Pt > 25 Loose Muon Cut Pt > 10 eta < 2.1 Chi square < 10 Tight Muon Cut Pt > 25 Muon Cut Pt>10 eta<2.5 Loose Muon Cut Pt > 20 eta <2.1 chi square <10 Tight Muon Cut (trackIso + caloIso)/Pt<0.05

Selection Criteria for MuHad & SingleMu data stream Electron Cut et > 15 eta < 2.5 Jet cut Pt >30 Eta<2.4 Jet Cut PF pt >30 Eta <2.4 Electron cut et >15 eta<2.5 Jet Cut Pt >30 Jet Cut PF Pt>30

Distributions of (a) lep Top Pt (b) Pt of Top in CMS note

Distributions of (a) Lep Top Eta (b) Eta of Top in CMS note

Distributions of (a) lep W Pt (b) Pt of the W in CMS note

Distributions of (a) lep W Eta (b) Eta in CMS note

B Pt b a Distribution of the (a) lep B pt by data (b) show the B pt of the CMS note.

Muon Pt a b Distribution of (a) lep muon pt and (b) lep pt of muon in CMS note

Neutrino Pt a b Distribution of the (a)neutrino Pt and (b) neutrino Pt in CMS note

Costheta Distribution Fo =1.156 F- = 0.70 F+ = 0.56 a b Distribution of the Cosθ done by us and (b) Distribution in CMS note

CONCLUTION In this work we learn that what is Helicity? How experimentally these values are extracted? How to deal with the real data? The physics observabels which help us to extract W helicity. But our values are not correct as in the SM values but we are trying to improve our result.

Thank You