Concluding discussion on Commissioning, Etmiss and DPD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Advertisements

Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Jet Reconstruction and Calibration in Athena US ATLAS Software Workshop BNL, 27/08/03 Ambreesh Gupta, for the JetRec Group University of Chicago Outline:
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.
US ATLAS T2/T3 Workshop at UTANovember 11, Profiling Analysis at Startup Jim Cochran Iowa State Outline: - Computing model status - Expected Early.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Full Dress Rehearsal (FDR1) studies Sarah Allwood-Spiers 11/3/2008.
News from Jet/Etmiss Monica. Jet/Etmiss meeting yesterday (25/5) at P&P week – Mostly review of conf notes for ICHEP10 – Good review to check where we.
Organisation of the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs WG Meeting - 22 Jan.09.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
D. Cavalli, S. Resconi 2 Dec 2008 EtMiss Software updates Jet/EtMiss Meeting D. Cavalli, S. Resconi.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
Where do we stand with the recommendations of the review panel ? Tancredi Carli (CERN) 1.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
1 Detector Performance and Physics talks at Bern (very selective!) Pete Watkins.
MissingETComposition Object Adam Yurkewicz (Stony Brook) Donatella Cavalli (Milan) Peter Loch (Arizona) Silvia Resconi (Milan) Rolf Seuster (MPI) Thanks.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
The “Comparator” Atlfast vs. Full Reco Automated Comparison Chris Collins-Tooth 19 th February 2006.
Fully Hadronic Top Anti-Top Decay (Using TopView) Fully Hadronic Top Anti-Top Decay (Using TopView) Ido Mussche NIPHAD meeting, Februari 9 th :
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
28/01/101 Zvv bkg, how to get an estimate with first data ? R. Brunelière Time schedule is tight. Goal : get an estimate by may/june if we get data from.
Calibration hits in Jets A proposal for a package analyzing calibration hits inside reconstructed jets Pierre–Antoine Delsart Mohsen Kharzad & Rachid Mazini.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
H Y P A T I A HYbrid Pupil’s Analysis Tool for Interactions in Atlas
OverView Rel.16 SM D3PD skimmed(130GB) for local use with custom di-lep filters requiring at least ONE pair out of e/e, e/μ, μ/μ leptons which satisfying.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
Mar 05 - hvdsOffline / HLT1  Athena SW Infrastructure  programming + applying tools wrt. dependencies between packages  developing + testing extra ideas.
Hadronic Calibration Workshop Munich - May 06 D. Cavalli – S. Resconi 1  Performance (linearity, resolution, tails) studied on: -- Rome data  Many different.
The ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter: Overview and Performance Huaqiao ZHANG (CPPM) On behalf of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Group.
4 Dec., 2001 Software Week Data flow in the LArG Reconstruction software chain Updated status for various reconstruction algorithm LAr Converters and miscellaneous.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
TrigEgamma Note L1 Plots Status Update Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 30/09/2010.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
Jet Energy Scale and Calibration Framework
Elena Bruna Yale University
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
Short Overview on calibration
EtMiss and Tau updates Meeting di gruppo ATLAS
CALGO: Software Tasks cal software:
SM Direct Photons meeting
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
W→τν Note & Tau candidates in first data
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Jimmy Proudfoot Argonne National Laboratory
ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

Concluding discussion on Commissioning, Etmiss and DPD Cosmic cleanup It is important to develop cosmic finder/rejecters for the large Et/Emiss events. (Cosmic + pp-collision overlap events are the potential background for the (exotic) searches.) Some idea were discussed (cluster Em fraction, tracks, timing, energy deposit pattern) A coordinate effort is needed on the development of the algorithm. The mechanism to flag the cosmic (clusters) is to be proposed. How/which to use is physics dependent. Effect on Etmiss (in AOD) If cell data are needed for the tool, data sample should be prepared as a DPD. 27/6/2009 K. Tokushuku for the panel members

K. Tokushuku for the panel members Cell masking The scheme to mask the bad/dead calorimeter channels is developed. Lar/Tile CAL, Jet, Emiss dedicated cell mask The mask for HLT ? LVL1 <-> HLT <-> Offline consistency? Isolated dead channel correction with the neighboring cells. All agreed? DQM Jet/Emiss DQM is set up. Close contact with the detector group and Egamma group is essential. Green/Yellow/Red flag is set according to the detector flag (at the beginning) Coverage (the size of the dead region) qualification is an issue In both cases, it is important to gain experience with the real data taking. The cosmic run starting this week is a good opportunity. Check how much improved from the last year’s runs and review before the collision data. 27/6/2009 K. Tokushuku for the panel members

Refined MET Calibration ETmiss Refined MET Calibration implementation in Athena is based on an association map between reconstructed objects and their constituent CaloCells and/or TopoClusters.  the association map allows to remove overlaps at cell level The set of METRefTools which access/fill the association map for each reconstructed object: METRefEleTool METRefTauTool METRefJetTool METRefMuoTool METRefCellOutTool Each RefTool : loop on identified Reco Objects collections for each Reco Obj backnavigate to its CaloCells fill the association map with: *CaloCell, *RecoObj, CaloCell weight calculate METRef_obj METRefCellOutTool : loop on all CaloCells in TopoClusters not associated to reco object fill the association map with: *CaloCell, *TopoCl, CaloCell weight calculate METRef_CellOut METRef_Ele METRef_ METRef_Tau METRef_BJet METRef_Jet METRef_Muo METRef_CellOut + + + + + + + MET_MuonBoy + MET_Cryo = METRef_Final cell weights depend on the type of the reconstructed object (e/, , b-jet, jet, m …) particle identification driven by MissingET package jobOptions.  each contribution is individually available in ESD/AOD, degrees of freedom in physics analysis

K. Tokushuku for the panel members ETmiss Nice summary of the current Emiss calibration flow. Roadmap from the first collision to 100pb-1 was presented Minimum bias event -> Jet-jet -> W,Z Common analysis tools for Et miss study (METPerformance Package). A great achievement of this Workshop! Still more detailed description is required, in order to access concerns such as; No double counting? Consistent handling of Jets, electron, muons? Minijet – Jet seperation (calibration consistent?) 27/6/2009 K. Tokushuku for the panel members

K. Tokushuku for the panel members Trigger/DPD Requirement on DPD : 1~2% of ESD. You need to have a design to fulfill the requirement. But more important issue is to know numbers of events to achieve xx%-level calibrations. With the numbers and their data sizes, it is arguable if you want to take them in 50 days (i.e. prescale 50) or in one day with a known detector/beam condition. The online prescale factors can also be reduced for the special run if formally request to trigger group/run coordinators. Trigger/Selection bias The effect on the calibration should be checked seriously. Some proposals emerged in this workshop are No requirement on jets for gamma-jet study. No CAL trigger requirement for the E/p study. (Min.bias + offline tracking (or HLT?)) No CAL trigger requirement for low Et jet. (Min.bias + offline jet finder (or HLT?)) Event samples: Many different samples (jet, gamma-jet, high-pt trk, W,Z) are required Do you have a complete list? (high-pt photon, fwd jet…)          Do you need full ESD information? (data volume) The requests for trigger and DPD should be made as soon as possible. More manpower (for example, a contact for each data sample) may help. 27/6/2009 K. Tokushuku for the panel members