EU’s CO2 Emissions Trading Scheme – Benchmarks for Free Allocation from 2013 Onwards 9 September 2010 Hans Bergman DG Climate Action European Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The EU Emission Trading System (ETS) Henriëtte Bersee Henriëtte Bersee Environment Counselor Environment Counselor Royal Netherlands Embassy Royal Netherlands.
Advertisements

European Commission: 1 Air emissions from ships – and overview of European policy Progress amending EC sulphur in fuel directive to include MARPOL Annex.
Main elements in a possible revision of the Energy Taxation Directive Informal meeting with stakeholders, 15 July 2009 European Commission, DG Taxation.
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
FOREST FUEL - RENEWABLE ENERGY. Renewable energy Today, renewable energy is an important part of the Swedish energy budget. With its share in the energy.
PRME Seminar “Responsible Management of GHG Emissions” Fri 14 October 2011 Gujji Muthuswamy Department of Management Faculty of Business and Economics.
Understanding the proposed revision of the EU ETS Thomas Bernheim DG Environment Unit C.2 European Commission.
The 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy Sustainable Development or Expensive Dreams? PRESENTATION by Michael STEURER Warsaw, 15 October 2014.
Emissions Trading (Cap and Trade) Kate Macauley. 1. Economics of emissions trading 2. Overview of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
Ad Hoc Working Group on Article 3.9 of the Kyoto Protocol Battling global climate change - the EU’s perspective (Part II) Artur Runge-Metzger European.
Interrelations between Environmental Fiscal Reform and Emissions Trading schemes : Lessons from Hungary* Pendo Maro European Environmental Bureau (EEB)
1 Brendan Devlin Adviser, Markets and Infrastructure Directorate B, DG ENER European Commission.
EU and UK experience: Lessons learned Martin Nesbit Deputy Director, Climate and Energy – Business and Transport UK Department for Environment, Food and.
Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
IFIEC EUROPE – International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers on behalf of Alliance of Energy Intensive Industries / CEFIC / IFIEC 1 ECCP Meeting,
Questions on Green Taxes
The EU Emission Trading Scheme put to the test of State aid Joëlle de Sépibus.
P ÁZMÁNY U NIVERSITY On the Policy and Politics of Climate Change Session VIII David Ellison Institute for World Economics (Budapest) Comments Welcome.
Market Mechanisms to Curb Greenhouse Gases: Challenges and Future Directions Joe Kruger February 20, 2007 Joe Kruger February 20, 2007.
The implementation status of specific mechanisms under Kyoto Protocol EU-ETS 13 May 2013 Geta Diaconu.
Energy Forum Compensation arrangements for indirect EU ETS cost effects Presented by Vianney Schyns Brussels 9 June
Overview of CPUC/CEC Proposed Decision: Recommendations for the Electricity Industry September 2008 Nancy Ryan Chief of Staff, Office of Commissioner Peevey.
Allowance allocation in the EU ETS IDDRI 16 October 2003 Fiona Mullins Associate Fellow, Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Towards an effective and efficient carbon price signal minimising leakage How to combat climate change while preserving Europe’s competitiveness European.
Climate change policy as today’s driver for energy policy IFIEC Europe’s suggestions for EU ETS post 2012 AEM XI. Autumn Conference, Prague 11 September.
Lessons from implementing the EU Emission Trading System DG Environment European Commission Side event 2009 Climate Change.
1 “Seeking Common Ground” Second consultation meeting on options for structural measures to strengthen the EU ETS on 19 April 2013 in Brussels Peter Botschek.
Avoiding the threat of competitiveness disadvantage through benchmarking Integer/EII Conference “Energy Intensive Industries & Climate Change” Brussels,
1 EU Emissions Trading Scheme – New System to allocate free Allowances from 2013 onwards IFIEC Energy Forum Brussels, 9 June 2011 Hans Bergman DG Climate.
A worked example for Denmark using the proposed EU Directive rules Senior Adviser Peter Bach Danish Energy Authority EU and eceee expert seminar on measurement.
IFIEC EUROPE – International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers 1 Climate Change Policy as Today’s Driver for Energy Policy Annette Loske, IFIEC.
EXECUTIVE ROUNDTABLE SERIES Aviation in the EU Emission Trading Scheme Sophie Hagège, M&A Partner June 3, 2010 KEY LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS GOVERNING THE NEXT.
Climate and Energy Package Open Days 2008 Workshop “ Climate change and the role of regions“ 7 October 2008 Martin Weiss European Commission DG ENV, unit.
Evi Papantoniou, European Commission, DG Competition New State aid Guidelines related to ETS-3 Evi Papantoniou The views expressed are purely those of.
EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): Rationale, outcomes and ethics
Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague,
The EU Emissions Trading Scheme and its review Thomas Bernheim DG Environment, unit C.2 European Commission.
IFIEC EUROPE – International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers The way forward to a more efficient and effective EU-ETS IFIEC Europe‘s views Brussels,
Climate Action Meeting the EU’s Kyoto commitments & Avoiding a gap after 2012 Doha, 27 November 2012 Paolo CARIDI Policy Coordinator DG Climate Action.
National Allocation Plans and Cogeneration Dr Simon Minett, Managing Director, COGEN Europe Emissions Trading and Cogeneration, Milanoenergia 2005, 5 October.
ETS POST REVISION THE LIME SECTOR Ms. Eleni Despotou EuLA Secretray General.
Climate Change October Main concepts Climate change – lasting change of some or all characteristics, describing the average weather condition Greenhouse.
WG 5/6 sub-group on Benchmarking ETG Draft Position Paper Benchmarking as an allocation methodology 14 May 2007 Jim Rushworth.
Implementation of the CHP Directive - overview and outlook Talking competitiveness! New perspectives for CHP/DHC EHP Annual Conference Brussels
The Debate about Carbon taxing vs. Cap and Trade I.Cap and Trade: What is it and how does it work? II.Carbon tax: How does this work and what is the intended.
Dutch presidency agenda on ensuring industrial competitiveness Erik Janssen, Ministry of Economic Affairs The Netherlands.
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
The Low Carbon ambition in a difficult context Brussels. June 2013.
ETS Post 2020 The view of Italian steel industry on carbon leakage Flavio Bregant Director General EPP ENVI/ITRE Hearing on ETS Post 2020 Bruxelles, 4.
“Strengthen the EU ETS to cost- effectively decarbonise the EU economy” Giuseppe Montesano Chair of EURELECTRIC’s Environment & Sustainable Development.
1 Harmonised Allocation Rules in EU ETS as from 2013 General introduction and overview of NIM process DG CLIMA Unit B.2. European Commission Member State.
McCarthy Tétrault APGQ – Conference 2016
CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES OF THE KOREAN EMISSION TRADING SCHEME
Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)
The European Climate Change Programme
Introduction into Bio Based Economy
Recent Cap and Trade Programs: EU ETS and RGGI
The revision of the EU Emissions Trading System for phase 4 and the implementation process Stakeholder Meeting on the Preliminary Carbon Leakage List for.
Ефикасно коришћење енергије у металургији-IPPC
ESF Committee and Coordination Committee in the programming period
Determined to reach the target: the EC’s progress
EU climate policies delivering
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Pedro Cruz Yábar Brussels, 21st June 2016
EU plan: Supporting directives • The EU Renewable Energy Directive was adopted at the end of 2008 • EU Renewable Energy Directive.
Ontario’s New System to Price Industrial Pollution Emissions Performances Standards (EPS) March 15, 2019.
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Building the Single Market for Green Products (SMGP)
A Clean Planet for all A European strategic long term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy.
Presentation transcript:

EU’s CO2 Emissions Trading Scheme – Benchmarks for Free Allocation from 2013 Onwards 9 September 2010 Hans Bergman DG Climate Action European Commission

Overview 1) Short on the CO2 Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) 2) Current system for allocation (2005-2012) 3) Base for new rules (2013-2020) 4) Benchmark setting 5) Next steps to get to a decision 6) How the decision will be used by the Member States

EU ETS Overview In force since January 2005, for ~10,000 large installations in the EU (~45% of EU CO2 emissions) Companies have to hand in one emission allowance for each tonne of CO2 emitted. Environmental outcome determined by putting a cap on amount of allowances. Long term reduction of the cap. Economic incentive to reduce emissions (price of carbon). This also leads to cost-effective emissions reductions, because reductions take place where cheapest.

Allocation of allowances 2005- 2012 Large part of allowances distributed for free. Allowances distributed via National Allocation Plans, mainly based on historical emissions Relatively straightforward approach, but: The more emissions, the more free allowances National variations in allocation – risk for distortion of competition within the EU Windfall profits for electricity producers To adress these problems, the revision of EU ETS agreed in December 2008 (Directive 2009/29/EC), included new allocation rules for 2013 onwards

Revised EU ETS from 2013 onwards The Revised ETS Directive sets the main rules, but requires the Commission to decide on detailed rules (implementing measure). The rules have a high economic importance for industry: Around 6 billion allowances will be allocated for 2013-2020. With a market price of 16€, total value is around 100 billion €.

Revised EU ETS from 2013 onwards The decison we talk about is thus the setting of EU-wide harmonised allocation rules to determine free allocation for industry for the period 2013-2020, to be based on CO2 efficiency benchmarks Note: No free allocation for electricity production (but allocation for heat, e.g. district heating, is also part of the decision)

Revised EU ETS from 2013 onwards Link to carbon leakage: Carbon leakage list containing 164 industry sectors was determined in December 2009 These are sectors with higher CO2 costs and higher exposure to international trade Sectors on the list will receive more allocation than those sectors not on the carbon leakage list (100% of benchmark instead of 80% -> 30% of benchmark)

Benchmarks Benchmarks are not emission limits or targets, but thresholds for what installations gets for free. A benchmark value will be multiplied with an historic production figure for an installation, to give the annual amount of free allowances (e.g. 0.3 allowances per ton product*1 million tons=0.3 million allowances/year). Total amount of allowances for all industry is limited (fixed in the Directive).

Benchmarks - Setting the benchmark values: Some principles laid down in ETS Directive: - One product = one benchmark. This means the same allocation for all equal products no matter : How a product is produced (i.e. not take differentiate due to technologies for producing the same product) With what input (different types of raw material or fuel) Where (in which Member State) - Setting the benchmark values: Starting point: Average performance of 10% most CO2-efficient installations in a (sub-)sector in 2007/08 Taking into account other aspects, such as most efficient techniques

Benchmarks In collaboration with industry we identified that some 50 product benchmarks are feasible. They will cover around 75% of relevant emissions. Benchmark setting is based on 2007/2008 emission intensity per sector. Data on emissions intensity per installation collected by European industry associations under Commission guidance, verified by third parties, and compared to best technology etc. Free allowances for products without benchmarks is based on heat or fuel consumption, and if relevant also allocation for process emissions (non fuel related).

Decision List of product benchmarks, and their values The Commission decision will i.a. contain: List of product benchmarks, and their values Benchmarks for heat and fuel use Baseline period (production figures with which to multiply the benchmarks). Specific technical rules for certain sectors (e.g. refineries) Rules on how to allocate for extra allowances for new entrants and for increased capacity Rules for reduced allocation for closure and reduction of activity

Possible reactions Possible reactions: Reaction: Benchmarks are too low, in general. Comment: We will follow what was decided in the Directive. Most benchmarks to be set on 2007/08 technology. Will be less challenging each year as installations improve. It can also be noted that there has been large overallocations in many sectors during the past years due to the recession – less emissions but unchanged allocations. These excess allowances can be banked and used in the future.

Possible reactions Possible reactions: Reaction: Difficulties for the most polluting installations. Comment: The current system favours the most polluting installations , which therefore have low incentives to improve. Those installations need to modernise. EU aims at a low carbon economy, and long term goal is to reach 80-90% reduction of emissions by 2050. Therefore change is needed, in particular for the most emitting installations.

Possible reactions Possible reactions Reaction: Difficulties for Member States using a lot of coal Comment: The ETS directive already foresees redistribution of a large amount of auctioning revenues to governments in the new Member States. These funds can be used to support investments in new technology, renewable energy, energy efficiency, biomass etc and be used to limit any social effects.

Procedure – Comitology decision Numerous meetings with industry sectors have been held Monthly meetings with Member State experts since 2 years Next step: DG CLIMA proposal for Commission-internal consultation Once agreement within the Commission,submission of Commission proposal to Member States Discussions with Member States‘ experts, with a view to reaching a favourable opinion in the Climate Change Committee 3-months scrutiny by European Parliament and Council Formal adoption by Commission College if no objection Deadline 31/12-2010 (some delay likely)

After having established harmonised rules Member States will use the Commission decision to calculate the number of free allowances per installation in their territory (by 30 September 2011). Commission to check the calculations for compliance with the decision. Commission must also ensure that the maximum total amount of free allocation is not exceeded, and calculate a reduction factor if necessary.

Thank you for your attention Any comments, questions?