Customer Advocate, Army CAD/PAD US Army CAD/PAD Program Overview CAD/PAD Industrial Summit 19 April 2017 Precious V. N. Njemanze Customer Advocate, Army CAD/PAD

Sponsors Project Director, Joint Products (PD-JP), Picatinny Arsenal, NJ Project Manager, Close Combat Systems (PM-CCS), Picatinny Arsenal, NJ Project Manager, Fixed Wing, Redstone Arsenal, AL Executive Director for Ammunition, Joint Munitions Command (JMC), Rock Island Arsenal, IL Director, Security Assistance Management Directorate (SAMD), Joint Munitions Command (JMC), Rock Island Arsenal, IL 25 FMS Countries supported Project Offices for AH-64, CH-47, OH-58 & UH-60, Redstone Arsenal, AL Approximately ~ 200 US field units supported

Funding Profile PD-JP Program Objective Memorandum (POM) FY17-22 Appropriation FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FYDP Total PAA ($M) 5.600 7.441 7.984 6.103 6.225 6.350 39.70 FY17 funding cut by $1M due to poor obligation rates in FY15 Resulted from untimely response to solicitations from contractors Higher numbers in FY18 and FY19 are in preparation for new AH-64 Under Water Emergency Egress System (UEES) PM-CCS Projected POM FY17-22 Appropriation FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FYDP Total PAA ($M) 10.06 10.11 10.31 10.52 40.99 Reduced use of M500 (Cutters) since 2012 led to surplus in inventory and resulted in zeroing of POM through FY18 FY19-FY22 projections would be validated in FY18

Funding Profile Continued PM-Fixed Wing Planned Procurement Costs FY17-22 Appropriation FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total OMA ($M) 0.134 0.358 - FY17 is low due to reprogramming of labor funds stemming from missed/delayed FY16 awards FY19-FY22 not shown because out-years are firmed 2nd quarter of the preceding FY JMC Planned Ordnance Assessment Costs FY17-22 Appropriation FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total OMA ($M) 0.293 - JMC’s FY18-FY22 not shown because out-years are firmed 3rd quarter of the preceding FY SAMD’s FMS yearly funding averages about $4.6M AH-64 PMO FY17 UEES Service Release Support Funding - $68K

Significant Contractual Notes Shipments for Army must have the same MILSTRIP Document Number on contract on the Material Inspection and Receiving Report, Form DD250 There were instances where the same number was entered on DD250 for different ship-to locations There have been instances where the wrong number was entered on DD250 Such errors lead to remedial work and negatively affects materiel readiness Contractor and DCMA attention to detail in packaging items for shipment Items packaged with wrong unit pack led to unplanned cost to the government Contractor timely response to solicitations and data requirements critical Untimely responses led to PMOs not meeting quarterly OSD obligation goals None response in FY16 led to PM-Fixed Wing not executing FY16 funds SAMD burdened with ensuring FMS customers’ missions are not impacted Impacts to untimely responses Affects materiel readiness Avoidable logistics and reprogramming work for the government Loss of business to the industrial base as contract is deferred

Programmatic Highlights Delivery of low or out of stock items on Contracts Timely delivery of T-6D 0.17 second Delay Initiator, JL57 Timely delivery of replacement AH-64 Thin Layer Explosive Lines Timely delivery of (CH-47) hoist cable cutter cartridge Service Life Extensions are exhausted If not delivered on time, mission readiness and safety may be compromised AH-64 New Underwater Emergency Egress System (UEES) Aircraft retrofit planned to start in 2020 Procurement of retrofit parts planned in FY19 Procurement of some sustainment parts starts in FY18 Need prompt response to request for proposals from contractors Increased Requirements for M21 Reefing Line Cutter, M500 Industrial source (s) needed to supplement organic production Solicitations would start in FY19

QUESTIONS?