ELEC Digital Logic Circuits Fall 2014 Logic Minimization (Chapter 3)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSEE 4823 Advanced Logic Design Handout: Lecture #2 1/22/15
Advertisements

Gate-Level Minimization
ELEC Digital Logic Circuits Fall 2008 Logic Minimization (Chapter 3) Vishwani D. Agrawal James J. Danaher Professor Department of Electrical and.
ECEN 248: INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL SYSTEMS DESIGN Lecture 6 Dr. Shi Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Chapter 3 Simplification of Switching Functions
Give qualifications of instructors: DAP
Contemporary Logic Design Two-Level Logic © R.H. Katz Transparency No. 4-1 Chapter #2: Two-Level Combinational Logic Section 2.3, Switches and Tools.

1 Simplification of Boolean Functions:  An implementation of a Boolean Function requires the use of logic gates.  A smaller number of gates, with each.
1 Chapter 5 Karnaugh Maps Mei Yang ECG Logic Design 1.
Chapter 3 Simplification of Switching Functions. Simplification Goals Goal -- minimize the cost of realizing a switching function Cost measures and other.
Optimization Algorithm
Two-Level Simplification Approaches Algebraic Simplification: - algorithm/systematic procedure is not always possible - No method for knowing when the.
Examples. Examples (1/11)  Example #1: f(A,B,C,D) =  m(2,3,4,5,7,8,10,13,15) Fill in the 1’s. 1 1 C A B CD AB D 1 1.
Two Level Networks. Two-Level Networks Slide 2 SOPs A function has, in general many SOPs Functions can be simplified using Boolean algebra Compare the.
Copyright © 2004 by Miguel A. Marin Revised McGILL UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING COURSE ECSE DIGITAL SYSTEMS.
CMPUT Computer Organization and Architecture II1 CMPUT329 - Fall 2003 Topic 5: Quine-McCluskey Method José Nelson Amaral.
1 Quine-McCluskey Method. 2 Motivation Karnaugh maps are very effective for the minimization of expressions with up to 5 or 6 inputs. However they are.
Computer Engineering (Logic Circuits) (Karnaugh Map)
CHAPTER 3: PRINCIPLES OF COMBINATIONAL LOGIC
ELEC Digital Logic Circuits Fall 2015 Logic Minimization (Chapter 3) Vishwani D. Agrawal James J. Danaher Professor Department of Electrical and.
BOOLEAN ALGEBRA AND LOGIC SIMPLIFICATION
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL LOGIC
1 Example: Groupings on 3-Variable K-Maps BC F(A,B,C) = A ’ B ’ A BC F(A,B,C) = B ’ A
Digital Logic (Karnaugh Map). Karnaugh Maps Karnaugh maps (K-maps) are graphical representations of boolean functions. One map cell corresponds to a row.
CMPUT Computer Organization and Architecture II1 CMPUT329 - Fall 2003 Topic 4: Cost of Logic Circuits and Karnaugh Maps José Nelson Amaral.
Karnaugh Maps (K maps).
ECE 301 – Digital Electronics Minimizing Boolean Expressions using K-maps, The Minimal Cover, and Incompletely Specified Boolean Functions (Lecture #6)
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL LOGIC. De Morgan’s Theorem De Morgan’s Theorem.
DE MORGAN’S THEOREM. De Morgan’s Theorem De Morgan’s Theorem.
Chapter 3 Simplification of Switching Functions. Simplification Goals Goal -- minimize the cost of realizing a switching function Cost measures and other.
1 EENG 2710 Chapter 3 Simplification of Switching Functions.
EET 1131 Unit 5 Boolean Algebra and Reduction Techniques
CHAPTER 6 Quine-McCluskey Method
Lecture 6 Quine-McCluskey Method
Lecture 3: Incompletely Specified Functions and K Maps
De Morgan’s Theorem,.
DeMorgan’s Theorem DeMorgan’s 2nd Theorem
Computer Organisation
Lecture 5 Topics Canonical or Standard Forms of Functions
Lecture #6 EGR 277 – Digital Logic
Plotting functions not in canonical form
CS 352 Introduction to Logic Design
Optimized Implementation of Logic Function
EEL 3705 / 3705L Digital Logic Design
CSE 140 : Components and Design Techniques for Digital Systems
ECE 331 – Digital System Design
Lecture 3: Incompletely Specified Functions and K Maps
Chapter 6 Quine-McCluskey Method
Optimized Implementation of Logic Function
BASIC & COMBINATIONAL LOGIC CIRCUIT
ECE 331 – Digital System Design
Digital Logic & Design Dr. Waseem Ikram Lecture 12.
EECS 465: Digital Systems Lecture Notes # 2
Digital Logic & Design Dr. Waseem Ikram Lecture 13.
CHAPTER 5 KARNAUGH MAPS 5.1 Minimum Forms of Switching Functions
Combinatorial Logic Circuit
CH7 Multilevel Gate Network
Optimization Algorithm
Karnaugh Maps Introduction Venn Diagrams 2-variable K-maps
Chapter 3 Gate-level Minimization.
Function Minimization Algorithms
Optimized Implementation of Logic Function
COE 202: Digital Logic Design Combinational Logic Part 3
Minimization of Switching Functions
Overview Part 2 – Circuit Optimization
3-Variable K-map AB/C AB/C A’B’ A’B AB AB’
Laws & Rules of Boolean Algebra
Lecture 3: Incompletely Specified Functions and K Maps
ECE 331 – Digital System Design
Presentation transcript:

ELEC 2200-002 Digital Logic Circuits Fall 2014 Logic Minimization (Chapter 3) Vishwani D. Agrawal James J. Danaher Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849 http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~vagrawal vagrawal@eng.auburn.edu Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Understanding Minimization . . . Logic function: a AND b NOT AND OR F AND c AND d Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

. . . Understanding Minimization Reducing products: Distributivity Complementation Identity Distribitivity Consensus theorem Complement, identity Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

. . . Understanding Minimization Reduced SOP: b NOT OR F AND d Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

. . . Understanding Minimization Reducing literals: b d bd Absorption theorem b NOT OR F d Exercise: This circuit uses 8 transistors in CMOS technology. Can you redesign it with 6 transistors? (Hint: Use de Morgan’s Theorem.) Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Logic Minimization Generally means In SOP form: In POS form: Minimize number of products (reduce gates) and Minimize literals (reduce gate inputs) In POS form: Minimize number of sums (reduce gates) and Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Product or Implicant or Cube Any set of literals ANDed together. Minterm is a special case where all variables are present. It is the largest product. A minterm is also called a 0-implicant of 0-cube. A 1-implicant or 1-cube is a product with one variable eliminated: Obtained by combining two adjacent 0-cubes ABCD + ABCD = ABC(D +D) = ABC Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Cubes (Implicants) of 4 Variables Minterm or 0-implicant or 0-cube AB CD 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 1 1 What is this? 1 D 1 C 1 1-implicant or 1-cube ABD B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Growing Cubes, Reducing Products 1-implicant or 1-cube AB D A 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 2-implicant or 2-cube BD 1 1 D 1 1 C 1-implicant or 1-cube ABD B What is this? Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Largest Cubes or Smallest Products 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 1 1 1 1 What is this? D 1 1 C 1 1 3-implicant or 3-cube B B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Implication and Covering A larger cube covers a smaller cube if all minterms of the smaller cube are included in the larger cube. A smaller cube implies (or subsumes) a larger cube if all minterms of the smaller cube are included in the larger cube. Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Implicants of a Function Minterms, products, cubes that imply the function. A 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 1 1 1 1 D 1 1 1 C 1 B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Prime Implicant (PI) A cube or implicant of a function that cannot grow larger by expanding into other cubes. A PI A 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C C 1 1 1 1 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . B ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5 B

Essential Prime Implicant (EPI) If among the minterms subsuming a prime implicant (PI), there is at least one minterm that is covered by this and only this PI, then the PI is called an essential prime implicant (EPI). Also called essential prime cube (EPC). A 1 EPI C Why not this? B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Redundant Prime Implicant (RPI) If each minterm subsuming a prime implicant (PI) is also covered by other essential prime implicants, then that PI is called a redundant prime implicant (RPI). Also called redundant prime cube (RPC). A 1 EPI C RPI B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Selective Prime Implicant (SPI) A prime implicant (PI) that is neither EPI nor RPI is called a selective prime implicant (SPI). Also called selective prime cube (SPC). SPIs occur in pairs. A 1 EPI C B SPI Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Minimum Sum of Products (MSOP) Identify all prime implicants (PI) by letting minterms and implicants grow. Construct MSOP with PI only : Cover all minterms Use only essential prime implicants (EPI) Use no redundant prime implicant (RPI) Use cheaper selective prime implicants (SPI) A good heuristic – Choose EPI in ascending order, starting from 0-implicant, then 1-implicant, 2-implicant, . . . Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Example: F=m(1,3,4,5,8,9,13,15) A MSOP: F = AB D +A BC 4 1 12 8 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 MSOP: F = AB D +A BC + A B D + ABC D C B RPI Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Example: F=m(1,3,5,7,8,10,12,13,14) SPI A MSOP: 4 12 1 8 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 MSOP: F = A D + A D + A BC D C B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Functions with Don’t Care Minterms F(A,B,C) = m(0,3,7) + d(4,5) Include don’t care minterms when beneficial. A A 1  1  C C B B F = B C +ABC F = B C +BC Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Five-Variable Function F(A,B,C,D,E) = m(0,1,4,5,6,13,14,15,22,24,25,28,29,30,31) A = 0 B A = 1 B 1 4 12 8 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 16 20 28 1 24 17 21 29 25 19 23 31 27 18 22 30 26 E E D D C C F = ABD + A BD + B C E + C DE Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Multiple-Output Minimization Inputs Outputs A B C D F1 F2 1 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Individual Output Minimization Need five products. F1 A F2 A 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 D D C C B B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Global Minimization Need four products. F1 F2 A A D D C C B B 4 12 8 1 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 4 12 8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 D D C C B B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Minimized SOP and POS F(A,B,C,D) =  m(1,3,4,7,11) + d(5,12,13,14,15) 4 1 12  8 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 4 12  8 1 5 13 9 3 7 15 11 2 6 14 10 D D C C B B F = BD + CD + AC F = (B + D)(C + D)(A + C) F = BC +AD + C D Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

SOP and POS Circuits F(A,B,C,D) =  m(1,3,4,7,11)+d(5,12,13,14,15) F = BC +AD + C D F = (B + D)(C + D)(A + C) C A B A F C F D D B Are two circuits functionally Identical? Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

How Don’t Cares Occur Consider two roads crossing: Highway with traffic signal, red (R), yellow (Y) or green (G). Rural road with red (r) or green (g) signal. Here R, Y, G, r and g are Boolean variables; a 1 implies light is on, 0 means light is off. Highway signals R, Y and G are controlled by a computer; only one light can be on. We only need to devise a digital circuit to obtain g, because r =g. Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Traffic Signals Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Completely Specified Function R Truth Table minterm R Y G g 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 G Y g = RYG R Y G g Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Incompletely Specified Function R Truth Table minterm R Y G g 1 2 3 Φ 4 5 6 7 Φ 1 Φ Φ Φ G Y g = R R g Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Absorption Theorem For two Boolean variables: A, B A + A B = A Proof: Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Consensus Theorem For three Boolean variables: A, B, C A B +A C + B C = A B +A C Proof: BC A B AB AC C Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Growing Implicants to PI F = AB +CD +ABCD initial implicants = AB +ABCD + BCD +CD consensus th. = AB + BCD +CD absorption th. = AB + BCD +CD + BD consensus th. = AB +CD + BD absorption th. A A A D D D C C C B B B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Identifying EPI Find all prime implicants. From prime implicant SOP, remove a PI. Apply consensus theorem to the remaining SOP. If the removed PI is generated, then it is either an RPI or an SPI. If the removed PI is not generated, then it is an EPI Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Example PI SOP: F = A D +AC +CD Is AD an EPI? F – {AD} =AC +CD, no new PI can be generated Hence, AD is an EPI. A D C AD B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Example (Cont.) PI SOP: F = A D +AC +CD Is CD an EPI? F – {CD } = A D +AC = A D +AC +C D (Consensus theorem) HenceC D is not an EPI (it is an RPI) A D C B CD Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Finding MSOP Start with minterm or cube SOP representation of Boolean function. Find all prime implicants (PI). Include all EPI’s in MSOP. Find the set of uncovered minterms, {UC}. MSOP is minimum if {UC} is empty. DONE. For a minterm in {UC}, include the largest PI from remaining PI’s (non-EPI’s) in MSOP. Go to step 4. Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Finding Uncovered Minterms, {UC} {UC} = ({PI} # {PMSOP}) # {DC} Where: {PI} is set of all prime implicants of the function. {PMSOP} is any partial SOP. {DC} is set of don’t care minterms. Sharp (#) operation between Boolean expressions X and Y, X # Y, is the set of minterms covered by X that are not covered by Y. Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Example: # (Sharp) Operation AD #CD = {A B C D, AB C D} CD # AD = {A BC D,ABC D} A D C AD B CD Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Minterms Covered by a Product A product from which k variables have been eliminated, covers 2k minterms. Example: For four variables, A, B, C, D Product AC covers 22 = 4 minterms: AB CD AB C D A B CD A B C D Obtained by inserting the eliminated variables in all possible ways. A (4) (2) (3) (1) D C B Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Quine-McCluskey Willard V. O. Quine 1908 – 2000 Edward J. McCluskey b. 1929 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Quine-McCluskey Tabular Minimization Method W. V. Quine, “The Problem of Simplifying Truth Functions,” American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 521-531, October 1952. E. J. McCluskey, “Minimization of Boolean Functions,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1417-1444, November 1956. Textbook, Section 3.9, pp. 211-225. Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Q-M Tabular Minimization Minimizes functions with many variables. Begin with minterms: Step 1: Tabulate minterms in groups of increasing number of true variables. Step 2: Conduct linear searches to identify all prime implicants (PI). Step 3: Tabulate PI’s vs. minterms to identify EPI’s. Step 4: Tabulate non-essential PI’s vs. minterms not covered by EPI’s. Select minimum number of PI’s to cover all minterms. MSOP contains all EPI’s and selected non-EPI’s. Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

F(A,B,C,D) =  m(2,4,6,8,9,10,12,13,15) Q-M Step 1: Group minterms with 1 true variable, 2 true variables, etc. Minterm ABCD Groups 2 0010 1: single 1 4 0100 8 1000 6 0110 2: two 1’s 9 1001 10 1010 12 1100 13 1101 3: three 1’s 15 1111 4: four 1’s Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Q-M Step 2 Find all implicants by combining minterms, and then combining products that differ in a single variable: For example, 2 and 6, orAB CD and A B CD → A CD, written as 0 – 1 0. Try combining a minterm (or product) with all minterms (or products) listed below in the table. Include resulting products in the next list. If minterm (or product) does not combine with any other, mark it as PI. Check the minterm (or product) and repeat for all other minterms (or products). Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Step 2 Executed on Example List 1 List 2 _List 3 Minterm ABCD PI? Minterms 2 0010 X 2, 6 0-10 PI_2 8,9,12,13 1-0- PI_1 4 0100 2,10 -010 PI_3 8 1000 4,6 01-0 PI_4 6 0110 4,12 -100 PI_5 9 1001 8,9 100- 10 1010 8,10 10-0 PI_6 12 1100 8,12 1-00 13 1101 9,13 1-01 15 1111 12,13 110- 13,15 11-1 PI_7 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Step 3: Identify EPI’s Covered by EPI → x Minterms → 2 4 6 8 9 10 12 13 15 PI_1 is EPI PI_2 PI_3 PI_4 PI_5 PI_6 PI_7 is EPI Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Step 4: Cover Remaining Minterms 2 4 6 10 PI_2 x PI_3 PI_4 PI_5 PI_6 Integer linear program (ILP), available from Matlab and other sources: Define integer {0,1} variables, xk = 1, select PI_k; xk = 0, do not select PI_k. Minimize k xk, subject to constraints: x2 + x3 ≥ 1 x4 + x5 ≥ 1 x2 + x4 ≥ 1 x3 + x6 ≥ 1 A solution is x3 = x4 = 1, x2 = x5 = x6 = 0, or select PI_3, PI_4 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Linear Programming (LP) A mathematical optimization method for problems where some “cost” depends on a large number of variables. An easy to understand introduction is: S. I. Gass, An Illustrated Guide to Linear Programming, New York: Dover Publications, 1970. Very useful tool for a variety of engineering design problems. Available in software packages like Matlab. Courses on linear programming are available in Math, Business and Engineering departments. Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Q-M MSOP Solution and Verification F(A,B,C,D) = PI_1 + PI_3 + PI_4 + PI_7 = 1-0- + -010 + 01-0 + 11-1 = AC +B CD +A BD + A B D See Karnaugh map. A 1 D EPI’s in MSOP C B Non-EPI’s not in MSOP Non-EPI’s in MSOP Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Minimized Circuit A B C D PI1 D A B C PI3 F PI4 PI7 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

QM Minimizer on the Web http://quinemccluskey.com/ Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Function with Don’t Cares F(A,B,C,D) =  m(4,6,8,9,10,12,13) +  d(2, 15) Q-M Step 1: Group “all” minterms with 1 true variable, 2 true variables, etc. Minterm ABCD Groups 2 0010 1: single 1 4 0100 8 1000 6 0110 2: two 1’s 9 1001 10 1010 12 1100 13 1101 3: three 1’s 15 1111 4: four 1’s Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Step 2: Same As Before on “All” Minterms List 1 List 2 List 3 Minterm ABCD PI? Minterms 2 0010 X 2, 6 0-10 PI2 8,9,12,13 1-0- PI1 4 0100 2,10 -010 PI3 8 1000 4,6 01-0 PI4 6 0110 4,12 -100 PI5 9 1001 8,9 100- 10 1010 8,10 10-0 PI6 12 1100 8,12 1-00 13 1101 9,13 1-01 15 1111 12,13 110- 13,15 11-1 PI7 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Step 3: Identify EPI’s Ignoring Don’t Cares Covered by EPI → x Minterms → 4 6 8 9 10 12 13 PI1 is EPI PI2 PI3 PI4 PI5 PI6 PI7 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Step 4: Cover Remaining Minterms 6 10 PI_2 x PI_3 PI_4 PI_5 PI_6 Integer linear program (ILP), available from Matlab and other sources: Define integer {0,1} variables, xk = 1, select PI_k; xk = 0, do not select PI_k. Minimize k xk, subject to constraints: x4 + x5 ≥ 1 x2 + x4 ≥ 1 x3 + x6 ≥ 1 A solution is x3 = x4 = 1, x2 = x5 = x6 = 0, or select PI_3, PI_4 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Q-M MSOP Solution and Verification F(A,B,C,D) = PI_1 + PI_3 + PI_4 = 1-0- + -010 + 01-0 = AC +B CD +A BD See Karnaugh map. A 1 EPI’s in MSOP D EPI’s not selected C B Non-EPI’s not in MSOP Non-EPI’s in MSOP Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Minimized Circuit A B C D PI1 D A B C PI3 F PI4 Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5

Further Reading Incompletely specified functions: See Example 3.25, pages 218-220. Multiple output functions: See Example 3.26, pages 220-222. Fall 2014, Oct 13 . . . ELEC2200-002 Lecture 5