Marcus Longley Professor of Applied Health Policy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Research to Advocacy
Advertisements

What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
Formative Evaluation of the first 12 months of the PfPS Project in England & Wales Anna Allford, Project Manager, AvMA Formative Evaluation of the first.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
Evaluation Office 1 Evaluating Capacity Development David Todd Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Evaluation Office.
Reflect and Revise: Evaluative Thinking for Program Success Tom DeCaigny and Leah Goldstein Moses.
Quality in Higher Education: A Pragmatic approach King Saud University 2009 Professor Hilary Winchester.
Citizens’ contributions to the public agenda on animal cloning: project manager Ida-Elisabeth Andersen Structure of the presentation: 1.What is the Danish.
Proposed Model for Ranking Business Response to HIV/AIDS Private Sector Conference on HIV/AIDS November 2008 Presented by Gavin George.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Val Butcher.  What?  Why?  Whether?  How?  Philosophy  History of Art  The ability to work with and in relation to others through the presentation.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
Survey Of KOICA Training Programs Evaluation Dear Participants This questionnaire survey is designed to evaluate the KOICA training program you attended.
WHAT INNOVATION FOR WHAT REGIONS? Can benchmarking be a driver? Ronald POHORYLES The Interdisciplinary Centre for Comparative Research in the Social Sciences,
1 Top Challenges To Your PMO Success “You May Be Surprised” PMI-SVC PMO Forum April 2007.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
Overview of Dr Anne Graham Founding Director. What is the Centre for Children and Young People? Aim ….to contribute to research, policy and practice in.
People lives communities Supported employment for disabled people Commissioning and Contracting Training Conference 12 September 2014 Rich Watts, NDTi.
Welcome LEARN: teamwork and communication in Quality Improvement
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
What is Advocacy? ]thepressuregroup[.
Making the most of your culture surveys
Building improvement into volunteering
Resource 1. Involving and engaging the right stakeholders.
Dr Patrycja Kaszynska AHRC Cultural Value Project and the Cultural Value Scoping Project The Relevant Museum – Between Core Values and Hard Cash 1 November.
Strategies to Improve Health Equity
Customer Service, Balanced Scorecards: The Road to Becoming a Service-Oriented Organization 1.
Developing Healthy Economic Policies: Experiences of Public Health Leaders in NW England Darryl Quantz Faculty of Public Health Conference 2017
Workforce & Practice Transformation
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making
It’s not all about the tool!
Building the foundations for innovation
Lisa Dawson – Head of Student Systems Operations
WRITING AN EFFECTIVE SEF AND TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR OFSTED INSPECTION
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
USING ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS AND DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN THE CLASSROOM Presented by: Sabrina Symons.
Welcome to SSCC Structure and Roles (Workbook)
Presentation to Local Safeguarding Board · June 2015
Assessing What Matters:
Complexity Matters: Aligning the Evaluation of Social and Behavior Change with the Realities of Implementation International Social and Behavior Change.
The Moroccan Observatory on Drugs
Student QEP Workshop Developing Student Engagement in Quality Assurance and Enhancement Eve Lewis Director.
From the Ground Up: Getting Everyone Thinking About Assessment
Citizen, consumer, and patient roles in using publicly reported primary healthcare performance information Lessons from citizen-patient dialogues in three.
Administrative Division
GETTING STARTED IN SOCIAL IMPACT MEASUREMENT
Measure and Manage Your Social Value in North Wales
Purpose of Outcomes measurement
Safe at heart: HS2 Together
A Focus on Outcomes and Impact
DELIVERING BETTER SERVICES: USER-CENTRED SERVICE DESIGN AND EVALUATION
The context for community development What it is – and what it isn’t
Foster Carer Retention Project Michelle Galbraith Project Manager
Building a Great Campus Civic Action Plan
HIPAA Security A Quantitative and Qualitative Risk Assessment
Community engagement and co-design
Engaging with external evaluators
Raising the bar Meeting Europe’s future challenges
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
Program Discontinuance versus Program Discontinuance
Research for advocacy.
Public Health Development Directorate: Making impact
Identifying a Research Problem
What makes a good grant application
TIPS REGARDING FORMATTING
Conference name, location
Reviewing RIS3 in Catalonia
Conference name, location
Presentation transcript:

The purpose of research is to change the world, not just to understand it Marcus Longley Professor of Applied Health Policy Director of the Welsh Institute for Health and Social Care, University of South Wales Vice Chair, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

Three Questions Why research? What determines impact? Future direction? With a few examples…

By ‘research’ in this context I mean… The generation and dissemination of new knowledge… … relevant to current issues… … capable of being used Of good enough quality: reliable, valid, trustworthy… Using whatever methods are appropriate: quantitative, qualitative, mixed; exploratory, deliberative, evaluative, synthetic…

Three Questions Why research? What determines impact? Future direction?

Why research? Because we don’t yet know how to: Concentrate on outcomes Remodel care Make change happen In broad terms, we often know WHAT to do, the challenge is HOW to do it

For example… If we want to have a significant and sustained impact on our health, we should tackle ACEs. This is a big challenge. Therefore we need to: Concentrate on outcomes Research can highlight relative risks and benefits Remodel care Research can test the alternatives Make change happen Research can sharpen our tools and motivate us

NB for the purposes of this talk, research is… The generation and dissemination of new knowledge, relevant to current issues, and capable of being used

Three Questions Why research? What determines impact? Future direction?

Concentrate on outcomes Who is research for? Politicians* Policy makers* Managers* Practitioners* Clients/patients Public *in all relevant sectors Concentrate on outcomes Remodel care Make change happen Therefore… research needs to recognise the needs of each stakeholder, and address them

Some handy hints, if you want to make an impact… Answer the right question Think about the issue from stakeholders’ perspectives Focus on the purpose of the research Focus on ‘good enough’ Understand the ‘burden of proof’ Be timely Take people with you Communicate effectively Horses for courses Answer the questions

Please don’t… Rehearse the problems and say nothing about the solutions Give broad-brush solutions with no regard to practicality Give too many recommendations In other words, avoid analysis/paralysis, platitude and teaching grandma to suck eggs!

Three Questions Why research? What determines impact? Future direction?

Simple… All the stakeholders need to contribute to: Setting the priorities Agreeing the questions Contributing the data Using the results The research community needs to own this We’ve already got quite an infrastructure – use it Significant research expenditure Significant help (NICE, AWMSG, PHW, Royal Colleges, Think Tanks, Third Sector, WAO, Inspectorates…)

Not quite so simple Asking the right question is hard Honesty and mutual understanding; multiple stakeholders Being quick, relevant and robust isn’t easy Reliable evidence is really hard to gather You seldom get a simple answer Limited evidence, context, caveats and nuance Academic needs can conflict with the real world Conflicting priorities The urgent usually trumps the important We have varied and complex perspectives on The Truth

But there are things we can do… Expect policy to be tested by research Get researchers closer to the stakeholders Design in evaluation from the start Prove the utility of research to the stakeholders Build a more evidence-based culture Appreciate, participate and lead research

Appreciate, contribute, lead 100% of staff appreciate why research matters, and want the evidence c10% of staff do research, as part of their job 1% lead research

Thank you marcus.Longley@southwales.ac.uk 01443 483070