Retention and Graduation Rates at the Program Level - Part II Emma Gyasi, Mary Meier, and Robert M. Roe Central Michigan University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linking Program Review Data to Reports 1.Accessing & Using the Program Review Data Warehouse 2.Creating Hyperlinks in your Report 3.Exporting Colleague.
Advertisements

School Performance Measure Calculations SY Office of Achievement and Accountability.
From Recruitment to Retention: Focusing Campus Efforts to Promote Transfer Student Success National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students January.
Alignment, Action & Achievement Institutional Goals and Performance Measures.
Using SPSS in Institutional Research Presented by Joseph Meyer Director of Institutional Research Texas State University-San Marcos TAIR Pre-Conference.
June 10-15, 2012 Growing Community; Growing Possibilities Robert Sherratt Patrick Lynch University of Hull.
Building an Information Community: IT and Research Working Together Web Tools for Enrollment Management By Ken Meehan, Research, Fullerton College Bob.
© University of Reading Statistical monitoring of student performance – an early warning system Dr Karen Ayres, Dr Nick Biggs &
 Introduction to MS-Excel Introduction to MS-Excel  Entering data in EXCEL Entering data in EXCEL  Formulas & Functions in EXCEL Formulas & Functions.
DEVELOPING & USING INTERMEDIATE MEASURES: ASKING NEW & DIFFERENT QUESTIONS TO SUPPORT STUDENT SUCCESS James Sass, Rio Hondo College Agi Horspool, Fullerton.
1 Community College Feedback Reports Tuesday, November 15, 2011 Mark Williams, IL Joan Roddenberry, FL Karl Pond, NC.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
REMEDIATION IN COLORADO. COLORADO GEAR UP SUCCESS.
+ General Education Assessment Spring 2014 Quantitative Literacy.
Presenters: Yumi Takahashi-Ede Academic Advisor in the College of Arts & Sciences Halbert Bates Director of Recruitment & Retention in the Haworth College.
California State University, Sacramento Shared Solutions: A Framework for Discussing California Higher Education Finance Nancy Shulock, Director Institute.
Microsoft Office Excel By : Juan Pratama Anandika Year : 7 Project Presentation : ICT.
Academic Standing Policy Review Academic Governing Council September 10, 2013.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Revisiting Our Institution-Set Standards: Part II Bri Hays Campus-Based Researcher Presented to the Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Committee.
DIVISION II ACADEMIC REPORTING Maria DeJulio Gregg Summers.
Maximum Student Credit Hour Load per Semester POLICY 8.22.
But I Want it In Excel _____________________________________________________ Perry T Patterson June 2015 _____________________________________________________.
Web Tools for Enrollment Management
Visualization for Actionable Intelligence in STEM Retention
Topics Graduation and End of Term or Course
Tenure and Recontracting August 29, 2017
What every benchmarking coordinator needs to know
Improving Graduation Rates Using Data Insights and Predictive Modeling
UW-Superior V10.7 for Instructors
Objectives How reliable are the student success measures that are reported to the Board of Trustees? How accurate is the underlying student record data.
Initial points: Five-year post-tenure review is stipulated by both NJ Statutes and the NJ-AFT Agreement; process is governed by MOA 99 5-year review.
Faculty Inquiry Tool Presented to Foothill Academic Senate
Facebook Measurement Announcement
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
A-nother Proposed Solution for Tracking Academic Program Success Rates Nicholas J. Wagner, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research MI-AIR 2017.
Defining and Measuring Student Success Dr
Measuring the Impact of Services & Interventions on Student Success
Chronic Absenteeism Equity Profile
Mark P Chisholm September 5, 2018
Online Probation Workshop
Tenure and Recontracting February 7, 2018
Tenure and Recontracting August 27, 2018
2016 MI AIR Conference Holland Michigan Presenters:
Chapter 3 Graphical and Tabular Displays of Data.
AACRAO Transfer Conference July, 2013 Afet Dundar, PhD
Tenure and Recontracting February 6, 2018
CCSS meeting 2/1/2018.
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Tableau Makes Data COOL!!!
Bay College Located in the UP of Michigan
DQI Atlanta, June 21, 2006 Jim Halloran
Tenure and Recontracting October 6, 2017
Dr Claire Kotecki (STEM) & Dr Prithvi Shrestha (WELS)
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
MACRAO Conference 2018 Using Transfer Grades to Improve Operations
Summary measures of mortality – Life expectancy and life tables
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Wednesday March 11, 2015 Board of Trustees Meeting
Repeated Measures Balancing Practice Effects with an Incomplete Design
Jose Lema – Student Success Business Analyst
Tenure and Recontracting February 26, 2019
Disproportionate Impact Study
IEEE OU Analytics How to Navigate the Dashboards
Review - Conversion Data Dual Credit Students Who Go On To College Institutional Research Offices at Colleges can contribute to the SCWI initiative by.
Presenter Name(s) National Student Loan Cohort Default Rates
Clemson University Interactive Fact Book
EOF Appropriations History, FY1968 – 2006
Submitting and Accessing 5-year Post-Tenure Review Materials in Vibe
Presentation transcript:

Retention and Graduation Rates at the Program Level - Part II Emma Gyasi, Mary Meier, and Robert M. Roe Central Michigan University

Outline History of issue Importance Difficulties to overcome Solution Examples Rollout and next steps

History At the Port Huron MIAIR conference, Mary and Robert led a discussion about ways to measure retention and graduation by program Some issues addressed:

Some Issues Discussed People who do not work with cohorts have difficulty understanding them Why you can’t work backwards from graduates Other cohorts of interest (other than First Time at Any College (FTIAC)) Transfer Cohorts Major Cohorts Fiscal Year Cohorts

Some Issues Discussed How to interpret data - signed major cohort different than FTIAC cohort FTIAC definition of returned is enrolled fall of next year Other cohorts definition is returned in time frame that defines the cohort (e.g. FY) Majors can be signed at any time from first term to last term Students have multiple majors and change majors multiple times Unlike FTIAC no standard definition across institutions

Why We Need a Solution Program accrediting bodies often require persistence and graduation rates for students in program For example Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (ACEJMC) requires data regarding persistence and graduation rates However, they do not clearly define how to calculate those numbers

Why We Need a Solution Schools accredited by ACEJMC publish a wide range of measures to meet the requirement Some schools report years to graduation (e.g. of all journalism graduates, what is the average number of years to graduation) Some schools report the number of current and prior year majors and define retention as current divided by prior year

CMU’s Solution Define cohort as all students who signed major within fiscal year Define persist as returned at any time in the next fiscal year or previously graduated Defined graduation rate as the proportion of graduates in a FY divided by the number in the appropriate entry FY cohort

First Step The initial attempt at a solution was a pdf with persistence and graduation by program

Original Display of Data

Issues Persistence and graduation rates vary dramatically by program Some majors have early signers (in first year) while some much later (in third year) Therefore must include proportion of class level of students in each cohort

Variables Needed to Report and Understand Data Number of signed majors Class Level of signed majors Sex and ethnicity Graduation and persistence Current and historic data Need some way to display data efficiently (without using Tableau)

Data Display: MS Excel dashboard Used what we learned from Rueben’s preconference workshop last year on excel slicers and dashboards And excel macros

Cohort file for each FY(July 1-June 30) All students who signed a major in that FY and enrolled within the FY (some students sign major in the summer semester and do not enroll for class, hence they become part of the next FY cohort) If student changes major the student remains in the cohort of the initial major and also included in a new cohort for the FY in which a new major is signed Duplicates within cohort year (student signed multiple majors in the same FY are in multiple cohorts) Duplicates between cohort years (student signed multiple majors in different FY’s, or student changed major in another FY) Once cohort is defined it does not change for each FY

Data (Cohort file) Development Identify class standing at the time of signing major Track subsequent year enrollment for each cohort Track graduation in major within FY after signing major Calculate: Retention, Graduation and Persistence rate within Major for each cohort New Dashboard

Dashboard

Development of Excel Dashboard Export data to Excel Features Use Pivot tables (Insert/Pivot table tools tab) Slicers (Insert tab) Graphs (Insert tab) Buttons and macros (Developer tab)

Dashboard Buttons: Macros Pivot Tables Aggregate Data Behind Graphs Slicers

How it Works Demo of Dashboard Can look at persistence and graduation by: University (signed majors) College Department Major/Program

All of This Data! What Does it Mean? Interpreting data is difficult if no thought given to what the numbers represent For example, graduation rates reflect the rate of graduation at 1 through 8 years FROM TIME OF SIGNING MAJOR Around 60% of CBA students graduate in 4 years from signing a major This number should not be confused with the 4 year FTIAC cohort graduation rate of around 25% for CMU Why?

Data Comparison Over Time Within College or Major Can’t compare across colleges, departments, or programs as the class standing at which students sign majors varies across those factors Example:

Department Comparison

Comparison Within Program Across Years CSE

4 Years from Signing Major

Rollout and Reception Council of Deans and Deans Retreat Asked for feedback and received very little Multiple programs have used data for accreditation (Journalism) Overall reception has been positive but still working on informing programs of its existence