Evaluating Information Sources

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ms. Lewis’ Revolution Project Credibility of Resources/ Research Helps.
Advertisements

Evaluating Electronic Information
Evaluating Internet Resources: Fact Checking AccuracyAuthorityObjectivityCurrencyCoverage Things to Consider …
SOURCES finding & evaluating them. Evaluating the AUTHORITY of a source – what questions should we ask? Is the author or organization identified? What.
Evaluating Internet Sources
 Can be daunting with its volumes of resources  Takes skill & perseverance.  Should be done with prudence when: › selecting sites for your students.
Evaluating the Internet. Why is the internet (the free web) both a “good” and “bad” place to find information for a scholarly paper? “Good” Source “Bad”
Websites, Research, and Accuracy Or can you always believe what you read on the internet?
Hey there! Have you evaluated? Is that site good enough to cite?
Would you be more likely to take a piece of candy from a trusted friend or a complete stranger? Explain.
5 Point Check List  The 5 Point Check List or the CRAAP Test is a good way to identify if a website is:  worthy of using with students  or with any.
The CRAAP Way to Evaluate Credibility AP Capstone Research Mr. Linton.
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website! Ms. Fauss ens/Evaluating%20Websites.pdf.
Website Evaluation "Clip art licensed from the Clip Art Gallery on DiscoverySchool.com“
How to Analyze a Photograph How to Analyze a Political Cartoon
Evaluating Internet Sources
What is the purpose of the site or page
Evaluating Sources.
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website!
For Teachers and Students by Nicole Slinger
Is that site good enough to cite?
Evaluating Information Sources
Finding credible Sources
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
Why Evaluate? Anyone can publish anything on the Web… It is your job, as a researcher, to look for quality.
Evaluating Information Sources
Searching on web Webtruth-how reliable is the information on web?
Do Now: January 21, 2015 Sentence Composing Tools: Adjective Clause Take Notes: -What is an adjective clause? Provide multiple examples -What’s the difference.
Do Now Look over your notes from last class and write a summary at the bottom of your Cornell notes.
Using Credible Internet Sources
Evaluating Sources.
SOURCES finding & evaluating them
Reliable vs. Unreliable Web Sources
Reliability of Sources
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Internet Research WebSites
ABCs of Source Reliability
Jill Fischer Jr. High Technology Literacy
Searching the Internet
Searching the Internet
Evaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating Sources.
Evaluating Websites.
Beverly Jorgenson Library/Media Specialist John Marshall High School
Source evaluation criteria
Do you believe everything you read on the Internet?
ABCs of Website Evaluation
Evaluating Information Sources
Safe and Effective Web searchING
Evaluating Information
C. Schwartz, LMS December 2016
Is that site good enough to cite?
Evaluating Information Sources
ABC’s of Research.
Evaluating Print and Electronic Sources
Created by Karen Christensson Adapted by the SAISD Librarians
Internet Use.
Evaluating Information Sources
Verifying Sources.
Evaluation of Sources PSYCH 111 Spring 2017.
Becoming an Online Detective
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Is that site good enough to cite?
Evaluating Sources for Bias and Credibility
Evaluating Internet Resources
Mini Research Project Evaluating Sources.
CRAAP.
Conducting Credible Internet Research: C.A.R.S.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Information Sources

The Web and print sources (ex The Web and print sources (ex. books, magazines, newspaper) provide billions of pieces of information. Unfortunately not all are reliable, relevant, accurate, unbiased, or up-to-date.

Therefore before being used, information should be evaluated.

CREDIBILITY CREDIBILITY – do you trust the source? Who is the author? What are his or her credentials? Education? Experience? What evidence is offered of his or her knowledge?

ACCURACY ACCURACY – No mistakes and errors present. Can facts, statistics, or other information be verified through other sources? Do there appear to be errors on the page (i.e., spelling, grammar, facts)? Do all links work?

RELIABILITY RELIABILITY – Be aware of the purpose of the site any bias that may exist. Does the source present a particular view or bias? Is the information affiliated with an organization that has a particular political or social agenda.

DATE DATE – The time at which an information source is published or produced. Does this project need current, up-to-date information? When was this Web page created? When was it last updated?

RELEVANCE RELEVANCE – Information should be focused on one topic and make sense. Does the information directly support the thesis or help to answer the question? Can it be eliminated or ignored because it simply does not make sense?

SOURCE SOURCE – There should be documented references included. Is the information based on primary or secondary sources? Did the author document his or her sources? What kind of links or further reading did the author choose?

Another strategy designed for evaluating Web content is to examine the end or suffix of the domain name. This helps to: 1. gauge the validity of the information 2. gauge any potential bias.

Examples of Domain Suffixes .com – A commercial site. Purpose to sell a product or service. May have a built-in bias that you must be aware of. .biz – A business that could be trying to sell a product or service. May have built-in bias. .edu – A school, university, museum, or educational site. Normally reliable. .gov – A U.S. government site. Normally reliable. .int – An international institution. Normally reliable. .mil – A U.S. military site. Normally reliable. .museum – A museum. Often reliable .name – An individual Internet user. Not reliable and may have bias .net – A network service provider, Internet administrative site. .org – An organization, often non-profit. These sites can provide accurate information, but usually have bias.