TDE in the XMM-Newton slew survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI X-ray broad--band study A. De Rosa, L. Piro Ginga/ROSAT/ASCA IASF-Roma Universita' di Roma La Sapienza Institute of.
Advertisements

The ubiquitous UV murmurs of sleeping supermassive BHs Dani Maoz With: Neil Nagar, Heino Falcke, Andrew Wilson.
X-ray spectral variability of seven LINER nuclei with XMM-Newton and Chandra data Author: Hernandez-Garcia, L; Gonzalez-Martin, O; Marquez, I; Masegosa.
Ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) are promising candidates for intermediate-mass black holes. Here we report about the Suzaku observation of two ULXs,
A Large Catalogue of Ultraluminous X-ray Source Candidates in Nearby Galaxies Madrid: 2010 DOM WALTON IoA, Cambridge, UK In collaboration with Jeanette.
Jeanette Gladstone - University of Alberta Tim Roberts, Chris Done - Durham University Jeanette Gladstone - University of Alberta Tim Roberts, Chris Done.
Bruce Gendre Osservatorio di Roma / ASI Science Data Center Recent activities from the TAROT/Zadko network.
The Search for Type 2 Quasars Julian Krolik with: Reina Reyes, Michael Strauss, Ezequiel Treister, Nadia Zakamska.
Jets from stellar tidal disruptions by supermassive black holes Dimitrios Giannios Princeton University HEPRO3, Barcelona, June 30.
Tidal Disruptions of Stars by Supermassive Black Holes Suvi Gezari (Caltech) Chris Martin & GALEX Team Bruno Milliard (GALEX) Stephane Basa (SNLS)
Wednesday, November 19, Years of Chandra: Chandra and the X-ray View of TDEs, Peter Maksym 1 Chandra and the X-ray View of Tidal Disruption Events.
Slews: Fast and Slow. Fast Slew Status  XMMSL1: catalogue of slew sources released May 2006 Revs , 5180 detections, 2692 Revs , 5180 detections,
Early Results from SWIFT's BAT AGN Survey: XMM Follow-up Observations for 22 BAT AGNs Lisa Winter Lisa Winter (Grad Student at UMD) Richard Mushotzky (GSFC),
Matteo Guainazzi Science Operations & Data Systems Division Research & Scientific Support Department “Stellar-mass, intermediate-mass and supermassive.
1 The Fundamental Plane Relationship of Astrophysical Black Holes Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking University Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking.
The variable X-ray spectrum of PDS456 and High-Velocity Outflows Shai Kaspi Technion – Haifa; Tel-Aviv University Israel & Ehud Behar, James Reeves “ The.
Imaging Compact Supermassive Binary Black Holes with VLBI G. B. Taylor (UNM), C. Rodriguez (UNM), R. T. Zavala (USNO) A. B. Peck (CfA), L. K. Pollack (UCSC),
Obscured AGN and XRB models Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Roberto Gilli (INAF-OABologna-Italy) F. Fiore (INAF-OARoma-Italy) G. Hasinger (MPE-Garching-
Accreting flows at (sub) millimeter wavelengths P. Ivanov P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute.
Extreme soft X-ray emission from the broad-line quasar REJ R.L.C. Starling 1*, E.M. Puchnarewicz 1, K.O. Mason 1 & E. Romero- Colmenero 2 1 Mullard.
A new look at AGN X-ray spectra - the imprint of massive and energetic outflows Ken Pounds University of Leicester Prague August 2006.
On the X-ray origin in Quiescent Black Hole X-ray Binaries Hui Zhang ( 张惠 ) Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators:
Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei
XMM monitoring of the state transition of the supersoft source CAL 83 Robert Schwarz Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam Jochen Greiner MPE Garching Gloria.
Origin of the Seemingly Broad Iron- Line Spectral Feature in Seyfert Galaxies Ken EBISAWA (JAXA/ISAS) with H. INOUE, T. MIYAKAWA, N. ISO, H. SAMESHIMA,
Observational Evidence for Quasi-soft X-Ray Sources in Nearby Galaxies and the link to Intermediate-mass Black Holes Albert Kong and Rosanne Di Stefano.
XMM slew survey Richard Saxton 1, Andy Read 2, Pili Esquej 3, Michael Freyberg 3, Bruno Altieri 1 1. ESAC 2. University of Leicester 3. MPE XMM slew survey.
The High Energy Emission of NGC 1365 and 1H Prague: 2010 DOM WALTON IoA, Cambridge In collaboration with Rubens Reis and Andy Fabian.
A deep view of the iron line and spectral variability in NGC 4051 James Reeves Collaborators:- Jane Turner, Lance Miller, Andrew Lobban, Valentina Braito,
Why is the BAT survey for AGN Important? All previous AGN surveys were biased- –Most AGN are ‘obscured’ in the UV/optical –IR properties show wide scatter.
Tidal Disruption Events
Seeking type 2 QSO amongst bright X-ray selected EXOs Agnese Del Moro University of Leicester, UK In collaboration with: M.G. Watson (UoL), S. Mateos (UoL),
Ultra-luminous X-ray sources Roberto Soria (University College London) M. Cropper, C. Motch, R. Mushotzky, M. Pakull, K. Wu.
Average Fe Kα emission from distant AGN
The unusual X-ray spectrum of MCG
Multi-wavelength behaviour of III Zw 2
The Dichotomy of Seyfert Galaxies at Hardest X-rays
Announcements Grades for third exam are now available on WebCT
The X-ray Universe Granada
High energy NLSy 1 galaxies
Multiwavelength spectroscopy of high accretion rate polars
RXTE Spectral Observations of the Galactic Microquasar GRO J1655-40
黎卓 HB Perets, JC Lombardi Jr, SR Milcarek Jr JUNO会议,南京,2016/4/17-18
Yuichi Terashima (Ehime U.)
Evidence for an Intermediate Mass Black Hole in NGC 5408 X-1
Lecture 5 Multi-wavelength cosmic background
Virgo cluster survey with MXT
NuSTAR + XMM Observations of NGC 1365: A Constant Inner Disc
Cosmological constraints from tSZ-X cross-correlation
UV/Optical Detections of Candidate Tidal Disruption Events by GALEX and CFHTLS Gezari et al Looking for detections of stellar material accreting.
MAXI Status and ISS Science
Multi-epoch X-ray observations of Seyfert 1 galaxies
The INTEGRAL NLSy1 FRANCESCA PANESSA The X-ray Universe 2011
XMM-NEWTON reveals a dipping black-hole X-ray binary in NGC 55
Lecture 6: Gamma-Ray Bursts Light extinction: Infrared background.
XMM-Newton slew sources A quick analysis
Risolvere il Background X al suo picco
LINERs: The X-ray Perspective John McNulty
Active Versus Normal Galaxies
Dongyue Li 2018/4/27 Ref: Saxton et al Esquej et al. 2008, 2012
The spectral properties of Galactic X-ray sources at faint fluxes
Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
Suzaku discovery of a transient ultra-luminous X-ray source,
A.Malizia, L. Bassani , M. Molina
The X-ray Morphology and Spectra of Galactic Disks
Mentors: Marco Ajello & Masaaki Hayashida
by S. van Velzen, G. E. Anderson, N. C. Stone, M. Fraser, T. Wevers, B
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Death of a Star and the Birth of a Black Hole
Dongyue Li 15 July 2019.
Presentation transcript:

TDE in the XMM-Newton slew survey Richard Saxton S. Komossa, A. Read, P. Lira, K. Alexander, P. Esquej, P. Rodriguez, M. Wieringa, I. Steele

Contents Characteristics of soft-X-ray selected TDE focussing on the ones found in the XMM slew Where do X-rays in TDE come from? Galaxy types Latest results

ROSAT – the first TDE detector Theory had it that disrupted material would circularise and be accreted causing an EUV / soft X-ray flare (Rees 88 etc.) in galactic nuclei. Debris would fall back at a rate of t-5/3 and luminosity would follow the mass. Launched in 1990 Sky survey found 100,000 objects

ROSAT high variability galaxies – Tidal Disruptions (TD) RXJ 1242.6-1119 Komossa & Greiner 1999 RXJ 1420.4+5534 Greiner+ 2000 Komossa 2012 RXJ 1624.9+7554 Grupe, Thomas & Leighly 1999 Rosat discovered several quiescent galaxies with soft X-ray flux variations > 100. Light curve decay roughly compatible with t-5/3 . Dropping by factors of 1000s in some cases. NGC 5905 Bade, Komossa & Dahlem 1996; Gezari+ 2003

Summary of ROSAT results Decays with t-5/3 Decays by factors of 1000s X-ray spectrum is soft as expected Shown to be TDE (candidates) rather than AGN, SNR, ULX, Blazars etc. Number counts low because nothing deep to compare against. Four new ones were found by comparing RASS with XMM pointed obs – 2% of sky hence will be hundreds found when compared with eRosita final cat. (Maksym 2014, Khabibullin & Sazonov 2014)

XMM-Newton slew survey Has covered ~85% of sky in the 0.2-2, 2-12 and 0.2-12 keV bands as of Jan 2015 and found >30,000 sources Compare with ROSAT >10x limit of 3x10-13 ergs/s/cm2 - Nearby X-ray TDE.

List of TDE in XMM slew SRC Z Lbol (Log) Soft Hard Radio NGC 3599 0.002 42 Y N ? SDSS 1323 0.07 44 SDSS 1201 0.15 45 2MAS 0619 2MAS 0740 0.02 1 mJy XMM 0630-60 New One 0.029 43 Mainetti, Campana and Colpi 2016

Slew – temporal characteristics Overall index -5/3 SDSS 1201+30 SDSS J1323+43 XMM 0630-60 Not biased because of 20 yr baseline 2MASS 0740-85 NGC 3599 2MASS 0619-65

Slew – UV temporal characteristics 2MASS 0619-65 2MASS 0740-85

Slew – temporal characteristics Soft X-ray Supernova hump making the UV / optical bump ? t-1.2 t-5/3 0740-85 uvw2 (2246Å) – GALEX NUV

Slew – dips Strong dips, due to what ? SDSS 1201+30 0740-85 Swift 1644 Curtis Saxton et al. 2012

Slew – dips : 0740-85 Dips are not caused by neutral absorption. Could be ionised absorption or intrinsic emission drop

Slew – slow rise Slow rise sometimes ? 0619-65 NGC 3599 18 months 5 months 0619-65 NGC 3599 Tidal stripping of red giant: MacLeod, Guillochon & Ramirez-Ruiz 2012 Delayed TDE : Guillochon & Ramirez-Ruiz 2015

Slew – spectral characteristics Brem=0.3 keV Bbod = 66 eV Disk_bbod = 59 eV SDSS 1201+30 SDSS J1323+43 0630-60 Γ=2, Bbod=86 eV Bbod = 95 eV Γ=2, Bbod=114 eV 0740-85 NGC 3599 2MASS 0619-65

Slew – spectral characteristics 0740-85 Modelling X-ray spec with multi-coloured disk black-body underpredicts the UV. Power-law + Disk black-body

Slew – spectral characteristics Fit UV, soft and hard X-rays Optxagn – Done et al. 2011 Thermal for UV Comptonised thermal – soft Power-law for hard With strongly-ionised absorber cf ASSASN 14li (Miller et al. 2016)

Where do X-rays in TDE come from ? Kara et al. 2016 – Swift 1644 reflection from accreting matter - M_BH a few x 10^6 - 400s doubling = <70 Rg 0740-85 soft X-ray light curve 0740 – variability , hence from within 70 Rg

Galaxy Types Arcavi et al. 2014; French et al. 2016 - E+A galaxies disproportionately represented in optical TDE samples 0740-85 starburst ~2 Gyr ago H_delta (ew) ~3 Ang, H_alpha (ew) < 1 Ang 0740-85 – also resides in a post-starburst host galaxy

New source z=0.029 15x brighter than ROSAT upper limit

Summary Soft X-ray TDE rate about 10-4 /gal/year. 7 events found in slew survey, 3 are well monitored Mix of soft and soft+hard – don’t know how many just hard Index=5/3 over long-term curve but highly variable in detail. Unsure if variability intrinsic or ionised absorption or both. At least one found in E+A galaxy Hard emission most likely from Compton rather than a jet Open question why hard component sometimes not present. Radio usually not present but weak emission in 0740-85.