30-Day Outcomes From John Webb, MD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thirty-day Outcomes from the Multi-centre European Pivotal Trial for Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with a Self-expanding Prosthesis.
Advertisements

STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
Three-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of aortic stenosis patients implanted with a self-expending bioprosthesis Sabine Bleiziffer German.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
Lessons from TAVR Randomized Trials and Registries E Murat Tuzcu, MD Professor of Medicine Cleveland Clinic Financial disclosures: None PARTNER Executive.
6-Month Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With a Novel Repositionable Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis Ian T. Meredith, MBBS, PhD,
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Conflicts of interests for Leif Thuesen, M.D.
Aortic Stenosis and TAVR TARUN NAGRANI, MD INTERVENTIONAL AND ENDOVASCULAR CARDIOLOGIST, SOMC.
University Heart Center Hamburg
Dr Martyn Thomas Director of Cardiac Services Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust A Member of Kings Health Partners London.
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
The Impact of Prior Stroke on the Outcome of Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Romain Didier, MD;
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Martin B. Leon, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Investigators TCT 2010; Washington, DC; September 23, 2010 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Inoperable.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Howard C. Herrmann, MD on behalf of The PARTNER II Trial Investigators SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2008 (October 12-17, 2008 · Washington, DC) First-in-Human Report: Initial Experience with a Stentless and Retrievable.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
Patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve replacement for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
The German Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in
Extending the Boundaries of TAVR: Future Directions
Trans- catheter aortic valve replacement vs
On behalf of the FORWARD Study Investigators
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Lotus Valve with Depth Guard First Report from the RESPOND Extension Study Nicolas M Van Mieghem, MD,
Raj R. Makkar, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable, Retrievable, Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California,Davis.
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
Potential conflicts of interest
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
MedStar Washington Hospital Center Cardiac Catheterization Conference
First Report of One-Year Outcomes of the REPRISE I Feasibility Study of the Repositionable Lotus Aortic Valve Replacement System Ian T. Meredith.
30-Day Safety and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expanding Repositionable Evolut PRO System.
ONE-YEAR OUTCOMES OLAF WENDLER, MD PHD FRCS
The Spanish Data Bank PEGASO M. Martínez-Sellés
30 Day Outcomes from the SOURCE XT TAVI Post Approval Study
First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
Early Recovery of Left Ventricular Systolic Function After CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Harold L. Dauerman, MD; Michael J. Reardon,
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable Retrievable Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California, Davis.
TAVI „Catch me if you can!“
The Impact of Live Case Transmission on Patient Outcomes during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from the VERITAS Study Dr. Ron Waksman.
Keith Dawkins MD FRCP FACC FSCAI Global Chief Medical Officer
Two-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus™ Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe.
Transcatheter Heart Valves
Longevity of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients with severe aortic stenosis and lower surgical risk Lars Sondergaard,
Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
10-years after implantation
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
University Heart Center Hamburg
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
A. Procopi, N. Procopi, JP Collet, O. Barthelemy, P. Leprince, R
Presentation transcript:

30-Day Outcomes From John Webb, MD On Behalf of the SAPIEN 3 Investigators University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada

Objective The SAPIEN 3 Trial Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) in high- and intermediate-risk patients who are eligible for surgical aortic valve replacement Primary Endpoint: All-cause mortality of the valve-implant population at 30 days post-index procedure Secondary Endpoints: Technical success, safety and efficacy endpoints, echocardiographic endpoints Organization: Steering Committee, Clinical Events Committee (VARC 2), Echo Core Lab and CT Core Lab Follow-Up: 30 days, 1 year, and annually for 5 years This analysis from The SAPIEN 3 Trial presents the 30-day outcomes of the first 150 patients who received TAVI with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 THV.

Study Administration Principal Investigators: Clinical Events Committee: John Webb, MD St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver Chairman: Norbert Frey, MD University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Thomas Walther, MD Kerckhoff Clinic, Bad Nauheim Data & Safety Monitoring Board: Steering Committee: Chairman: Anno Diegeler, MD Heart and Cardiovascular Center, Bad Neustadt Thierry Lefèvre, MD Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy Echo Core Laboratory: Martyn Thomas, MD St Thomas’ Hospital, London Chairman: Wael Jaber, MD Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research, Cleveland Olaf Wendler, MD King’s College Hospital, London CT Core Laboratory: Gino Gerosa, MD Policlinico Universitario, Padova Chairman: Jonathon Leipsic, MD University of British Columbia, Vancouver Jonathon Leipsic, MD

Edwards SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve Large top-row cells facilitate coronary access Frame design for ultra-low profile Outer skirt minimizes paravalvular leak EDWEU10435_S3_Cent_Msg_Lv16

Edwards Commander & Certitude Delivery Systems 14F eSheath compatible Accurate positioning 18F Sheath compatible Ergonomic design SAPIEN 3 Valve Size 23 mm 26 mm 29 mm Edwards eSheath 14F 16F Minimum Vessel Diameter 5.5 mm 6.0 mm SAPIEN 3 Valve Size 23 mm 26 mm 29 mm Certitude Sheath 18F 21F

Methods The SAPIEN 3 Trial Study Design Prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study Number of Patients 150 (TF [transfemoral] = 96, TAA [transapical / transaortic] = 54) Patient Selection 50 high-risk patients & 100 high-risk or intermediate-risk patients High-risk: STS score ≥ 8 or Logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 15 Intermediate-risk: STS score ≥ 4 to < 8 or Logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 10 to < 15 Enrollment Period January 2013 to November 2013 Study Centers 16 sites in Europe and Canada Access Approach Transfemoral, transapical, or transaortic access, as determined by the Heart Team

150 patients from 16 centers in 6 countries Enrollment Centers SITE # of Pts Bad Nauheim, Germany – Kerckhoff Clinic 22 Hamburg, Germany – University Hospital 21 London, UK – King's College Hospital 17 Vancouver, Canada – St Paul's Hospital 14 Essen, Germany – West German Heart Center London, UK – St Thomas’ Hospital 11 Massy, France – Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier 9 Belfast, UK – Royal Victoria Hospital Karlsruhe, Germany – Municipal Hospital 8 London, UK – The Heart Hospital 7 Cologne, Germany – University Hospital 6 Padova, Italy – University Polyclinico 5 Paris, France – CHU Bichat – Claude-Bernard 2 Rouen, France – CHU Charles Nicolle Toulouse, France – CHU Rangueil Plymouth, UK – Plymouth Hospital 1 Total Enrolled (N) 150 150 patients from 16 centers in 6 countries Canada France Germany Italy Spain UK

Baseline Characteristics (1) Operability Risk Assessment AT* PATIENTS (N = 150) Age (Years) 83.6 ± 5.0 Female 81 (54.0%) NYHA III/IV 130 (86.7%) Severe Pulmonary Hypertension 10 (6.7%) Severely Impaired Pulmonary Function Contradicting Surgery 8 (5.3%) Hostile Chest 3 (2.0%) Severe Liver Disease / Cirrhosis 2 (1.3%) Frailty Index VARC-2 (continuous) 1.3 ± 0.9 Patients with 1 or More Risk Factors 147 (98.0%) Non-Cardiac Conditions AT* PATIENTS (N = 150) Renal Insufficiency 60 (40.0%) Diabetes 48 (32.0%) Anemia 46 (30.7%) Pulmonary Disease – COPD 40 (26.7%) Cancer 32 (21.3%) Echo Parameters AT* PATIENTS (N = 150) Effective Orifice Area (cm2) 0.6 ± 0.2 Mean Gradient (mm Hg) 45.3 ± 14.3 LV Ejection Fraction (LVEF) (%) 56.3 ± 9.2 Mitral Regurgitation (Moderate to Severe) 26 (22.4%) Annular Diameter (TEE - mean) (mm) 23.2 ± 2.3 * AT, as-treated.

Baseline Characteristics (2) TF PATIENTS (N = 96) TAA PATIENTS (N = 54) P-VALUE STS PROM Score 7.5 ± 4.26 7.3 ± 4.94 0.813 Logistic EuroSCORE (%) 19.8 ± 10.9 24.9 ± 14.0 0.022 Peripheral Vascular Disease 16.7 38.9 0.003 Previous Myocardial Infarction 11.5 27.8 0.014 Previous CABG 14.6 0.056 Atrial Fibrillation 22.9 35.8 0.125 Previous Aortic Valvuloplasty 10.4 3.7 0.213 Previous Pacemaker Implantation 13.5 0.635 Carotid Disease 25.0 25.9 1.000 Porcelain Aorta 1.0 1.9 Prior Stroke 7.3 7.4

Procedural Characteristics (1) ACCESS APPROACH (%) VALVE SIZE (%) Note: Limited14F eSheath availability during initial patient enrollment period. The 29 mm valve was introduced later in the trial. Due to the low rate of paravalvular leaks a strategy of reduced oversizing evolved

Procedural Characteristics (2) Variable TF PATIENTS (N = 96) Femoral Access/Anesthesia  General 63.5% Conscious Sedation 36.5% Femoral Access/Closure Percutaneous/Closure Device 95.8% Surgical 4.2% Variable ALL PATIENTS (N = 150) Procedural Outcomes Correct Placement at Intended Site 149 (99.3%) Post-dilatation 5 (3.3%) Technical Success* 94.0% Procedural Events Conversion to Conventional Surgery 1 (0.7%) Patient Required ECMO Coronary Obstruction 0 (0.0%) Valve-in-Valve * No procedural mortality, correct positioning, and only one valve implanted.

Clinical Outcomes at 30 Days (1) EVENT RATE IN THE AT POPULATION # PATIENTS (KM %) Clinical Outcome TF (N = 96) TAA (N = 54) Overall (N = 150) All-Cause Mortality 2 (2.1%) 6 (11.1%) 8 (5.3%) Cardiac Mortality 5 (9.3%) 7 (4.7%) All-Stroke* 1 (1.0%) 3 (5.6%) 4 (2.7%) Disabling Stroke 0 (0.0%) Major Vascular Complication 5 (5.2%) 4 (7.4%) 9 (6.0%) Major Bleeding 19 (19.8%) 11 (20.4%) 30 (20.0%) Life-Threatening Bleeding 5 (3.3%) Rehospitalization† EVENT RATE IN THE VI POPULATION # PATIENTS (KM %) Primary Endpoint TF (N = 95) TAA (N = 54) Overall (N = 149) All-Cause Mortality 1 (1.1%) 6 (11.1%) 7 (4.7%) VI, valve implant = all enrolled patients who received a SAPIEN 3 implant, and retain the valve upon leaving the cath lab * Severity of the one TF stroke unknown. † Rehospitalization for for valve-related symptom or worsening of congestive heart failure.

Clinical Outcomes at 30 Days (2) EVENT RATE IN THE AT POPULATION # PATIENTS (KM %) Clinical Outcome TF (N = 96) TAA (N = 54) Overall (N = 150) Acute Kidney Injury (Stage II/III) 1 (1.0%) 3 (5.6%) 4 (2.7%) Myocardial Infarction 2 (2.1%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (1.3%) Reintervention* 1 (0.7%) Endocarditis Valve Thrombosis New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation 7 (7.3%) 11 (20.4%) 18 (12.0%) New Permanent Pacemaker Implanted 12 (12.5%) 8 (14.8%) 20 (13.3%) * Valve Malposition requiring a second valve on Day 0

Clinical Improvement at 30 Days NYHA CLASS ANGINA CCS CLASS p < 0.0001 p = 0.0027 N = 150 N = 135 N = 150 N = 134

Improvement in Quality of Life at 30 Days VAS EQ-5D 6-MINUTE WALK TEST p < 0.0001 p = 0.0031 * * VAS Score Meters N = 146 N = 127 N = 76 N = 76 VAS, Visual Analogue Scale. * p-values from paired t-test baseline vs follow-up.

Echocardiographic Data MEAN GRADIENT & EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA (EOA)* p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 Gradient, mm Hg EOA, cm2 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 No. of Patients EOA 110 99 100 Mean Gradient 125 116 122 * mVI population (Overall, N = 149; TF, N=95). The modified valve implant (mVI) population consists of all VI patients who retained the study valve at the time of assessment.

Echocardiographic Data at 30 Days TOTAL AR (N=149) PARAVALVULAR AR (N=149) N = 78 N = 39 N = 117 N = 77 N = 39 N = 116

Conclusions - The SAPIEN 3 Trial Outcomes at 30 days were excellent. TF SAPIEN 3 implantation was associated with a very low mortality of 2.1%, stroke of 1.0%, and very few access-site complications. TF implantation was associated with a very low mortality of 1.1% in the valve-implant population – the primary endpoint. 99.3% of valves were implanted at the intended location - due to precise SAPIEN 3 positioning. 96.6% of patients had ≤ mild PVL. There was no severe PVL. Post-implant maneuvers were rarely needed despite reduced oversizing – Procedural post-dilatation (3.3%), or valve-in-valve implants (0%). The SAPIEN 3 THV may enable treatment of intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis.

Potential conflicts of interest Speaker's name: I do not have any potential conflict of interest I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Honorarium: Institutional grant/research support: Consultant: Employment in industry: Owner of a healthcare company: Stockholder of a healthcare company: Other(s):