CAP, CSB Study on Spatial and Temporal Variation of LURR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Earthquake recurrence models Are earthquakes random in space and time? We know where the faults are based on the geology and geomorphology Segmentation.
Advertisements

A New Multidimensional Stress Release Statistical Model Based on Co-seismic Stress Transfer Mingming Jiang, Shiyong Zhou, Yongshun John Chen and Yinshuang.
Predictive Modeling of Seismicity Sequences in Southern California Julia Clark David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton.
Active Folding within the L.A. Basin with a focus on: Argus et al. (2005), Interseismic strain accumulation and anthropogenic motion in metropolitan Los.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.
New Multiple Dimension Stress Release Statistic Model based on co-seismic stress triggering Mingming Jiang Shiyong Zhou ITAG, Peking University
Chapter 9 Tectonics, Earthquakes, and Volcanoes
Stress, Strain, Elasticity and Faulting Lecture 11/23/2009 GE694 Earth Systems Seminar.
Earthquake interaction The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
Accelerating Moment Release in Modified Stress Release Models of Regional Seismicity Steven C. Jaume´, Department of Geology, College of Charleston, Charleston,
Chapter 5: Calculating Earthquake Probabilities for the SFBR Mei Xue EQW March 16.
SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/021 Numerical Modeling Using Finite Difference Techniques.
Stress III The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
UseIT Tutorial # 3 Earthquakes in the Southern California Fault System Tom Jordan June 16, 2011.
 ss=  * +(a-b) ln(V/V * ) a-b > 0 stable sliding a-b < 0 slip is potentially unstable Correspond to T~300 °C For Quartzo- Feldspathic rocks Stationary.
Earthquake potential of the San Andreas and North Anatolian Fault Zones: A comparative look M. B. Sørensen Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen,
L Braile, 1/26/2006 (revised, Sept., 2009) What is Moment Magnitude?
If we build an ETAS model based primarily on information from smaller earthquakes, will it work for forecasting the larger (M≥6.5) potentially damaging.
Earthquakes.
Earthquake scaling and statistics
But they are clustered along the Pacific Coast. Why?
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
Comparison of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Presented by: Emel Seyhan, PhD Student University of California, Los Angeles Collaborators: Lisa M.
Thailand Training Program in Seismology and Tsunami Warnings, May 2006 Forecasting Earthquakes.
The Evolution of Regional Seismicity Between Large Earthquakes David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton Geoffrey C. P. King Institut de Physique.
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
Part 8: Fold Types. Tensional Stress Compressive Stress Shear Stress Orientation of stress leads to different folds.
California Earthquakes Through an historical perspective.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA West Newport Beach Association Public Forum, Newport Beach City Hall March 5, 2003 Coping with ‘quakes.
Exploring the underlying mechanism of LURR theory Can Yin Supervisor: Prof. Peter Mora QUAKES, Department of Earth Sciences University of Queensland.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101.
#18 Measuring Earthquakes. How are earthquakes studied? Seismologists use seismometers, or seismographs, an instrument that measure vibrations in the.
Earthquake forecasting using earthquake catalogs.
Response of the San Jacinto fault zone to static stress changes from the 1992 Landers earthquake M. Nic Bhloscaidh and J. McCloskey School of Environmental.
Ergodicity in Natural Fault Systems K.F. Tiampo, University of Colorado J.B. Rundle, University of Colorado W. Klein, Boston University J. Sá Martins,
Earthquake Predictability Test of the Load/Unload Response Ratio Method Yuehua Zeng, USGS Golden Office Zheng-Kang Shen, Dept of Earth & Space Sciences,
Faults and Earthquakes. Some faults become “locked” –Pressure pushes together the irregular walls of the fault; surfaces resist sliding Slip can’t occur.
Schuyler Ozbick. wake-up-call /
Karen Felzer & Emily Brodsky Testing Stress Shadows.
Coulomb Stress Changes and the Triggering of Earthquakes
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.
California Project Seismicity in the oil and gas fields Tayeb A. Tafti University of Southern California July 2, 2013.
Acoustic Emission Study of Micro- and Macro-fracture of Large Rock Specimens Xiang-chu YIN 1,2, Huai-zhong YU 1, Ke-yin PENG 2, Victor Kukshenko 3, Zhaoyong.
Correlating aftershock sequences properties to earthquake physics J. Woessner S.Wiemer, S.Toda.
Can we forecast an Earthquake??? In the next minute there will be an earthquake somewhere in the world! This sentence is correct (we have seen that there.
A Post-Loma Prieta Progress Report on Earthquake Triggering by a Continuum of Deformations Presented By Joan Gomberg.
Evaluation of simulation results: Aftershocks in space Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
A proposed triggering/clustering model for the current WGCEP Karen Felzer USGS, Pasadena Seismogram from Peng et al., in press.
Earthquakes Hazards in North America A. Both plate boundary and within plate earthquakes Most of these are at ancient (former) plate boundaries now buried.
Earthquakes USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquake Basics
Plate tectonics: Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation
SAN ANDREAS FAULT San Francisco Bay Area North American plate
HOW ARE we “BLIND” TO some of our faults?
“It’s an earthquake”.
EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS, PATTERNS, AND RISK
Understanding Earth Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES Grotzinger • Jordan
RECENT SEISMIC MONITORING RESULTS FROM THE CENTRAL
Tectonics V: Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation
Earthquakes.
Southern California Earthquake Center
Geology 15 Fall 2013 Lecture 13 Mid Term I Review Schedule Review
Principal Stress rotates to EW direction
R. Console, M. Murru, F. Catalli
Find the exact value of the expression: {image} Choose the answer from the following:
Seismic Wave Propagation
Earthquakes Vocab.
Kinematics VI: Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation
Scales used to measure earthquakes
Presentation transcript:

CAP, CSB Study on Spatial and Temporal Variation of LURR in Southern California and Its Implication to Earthquake Tendency in This Region Yongxian Zhang, Xiangchu Yin & Keyin Peng Center for Analysis and Prediction(CAP), China Seismological Bureau(CSB), Beijing 100036, China (e-mail: zhang.yongxian@263.net; phone 86-10-88015551; fax: 86-10-68218604). CAP, CSB

Outline About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) CAP, CSB About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) Field Stress in SC Calculation of Y/Yc Variation of Y/Yc before Some Strong Earthquakes in SC Earthquake Tendency in SC Discussion

LURR—Load/Unload Response Ratio Put forward by Prof. Xiangchu Yin in 1987 - Yin X.C.(1987), A new approach to earthquake prediction, Earthquake Research in China, 3,1-7(in Chinese with English abstract) Basis: The seismogenic process is nonlinear and irreversible so that the response to loading is different from that to unloading. Y=X+/X- X+-- response rate under loading condition X--- response rate under unloading condition Y--LURR

How to calculate LURR? 1. Find a easy way to calculate LURR Where E denotes AE energy; “+” means loading “–” means unloading. m=1, Em is exactly the energy itself; m=1/2, Em denotes the Benioff strain; m=0, ∑Em denotes the number of events. --Xiang-Chu Yin, et al.(2000), Pure and applied Geophysics,157(2000), 2365-2383

How to calculate LURR? 2. Criteria to Judge loading and unloading Loading--the rate of Coulomb failure stress is positive. Unloading-- the rate of Coulomb failure stress is negative. --Xiang-Chu Yin, et al.(2000), Pure and applied Geophysics,157(2000), 2365-2383 -normal stress -shear stress -coefficient of internal friction

Obtaining high confident LURR? Y(LURR) is sensitive to the number of earthquakes, when Y is greater than the critical value(Yc), the confidence of Y Anomaly is higher. N Yc(90%) Yc(95%) Yc(99%) 20 3.18 4.17 7.69 21 3.09 4 7.21 22 2.98 3.83 6.59 …… 36 2.26 2.68 3.89 --Zhuang and Yin(1999), Earthquake research in China, 15(128-138). So we express the LURR by Y/Yc. When Y/Yc is greater than 1, the anomaly of LURR is confident.

Outline About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) CAP, CSB About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) Field Stress in SC Calculation of Y/Yc Variation of Y/Yc before Some Strong Earthquakes in SC Earthquake Tendency in SC Discussion

understanding of California's fault system understanding of California's fault system. The 1994 Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas by Charles W. Jennings (available from the California ... www.scecdc.scec.org/faultmap.html

CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN REGION dominated primarily by northwest-trending , generally of a right-lateral strike-slip nature

CALIFORNIA NORTHWEST REGION, every kind of fault type can be found here.

MOJAVE REGION, dominated by northwest-trending, right-lateral strike-slip faults

BASIN AND RANGE REGION characterized by roughly north-south trending valleys and mountain ranges, bounded typically by normal faults

NORTHWEST REGION dominantly a region of reverse faulting, but faults of every sort can be found on this map

Outline About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) CAP, CSB About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) Field Stress in SC Calculation of Y/Yc Variation of Y/Yc before Some Strong Earthquakes in SC Earthquake Tendency in SC Discussion

Tectonic Stress of America

Outline About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) CAP, CSB About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) Field Stress in SC Calculation of Y/Yc Variation of Y/Yc before Strong Earthquakes in SC Earthquake Tendency in SC Discussion

1. Division of Southern California X Z A2 NC02 NC04 NC01 NC03 T W Q A1 R Y1 SC08 NC07 S SC11 P O SC09 SC05 M N SC06 K L SC04 SC03 C E I D SC10 J SC01 H B SC02 A F1 G F

Determine the limit magnitude of earthquakes Earthquake Catalogue: from CNSS

SC01 ML: 2-3.5 Gutenberg-Richter relation

Scaning parameters: Temporal window: 12 months Time moving step: 3 month Spatial window: R=100km Space moving window: Nmin=20 R

Outline About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) CAP, CSB About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) Field Stress in SC Calculation of Y/Yc Variation of Y/Yc before Some Strong Earthquakes in SC Earthquake Tendency in SC Discussion

1980-2001 M>=6.5 in California Loma Prieta Coalinga Hecter Mine Northridge Landers Superstition Hills

For 1983-05-02 Coalinga 6.7 earthquake

1982-03

1982-06

1982-09

1982-12

1983-03

For 1987-11-24 Superstition Hills 6.6 earthquake

1986-09

1986-12

1987-03

1987-06

1987-09

For 1989-10-18 Loma Prieta 7.0 earthquake California: An Interpretive History , by James Rawls and Walton Bean, 7th edition (McGraw-Hill, 1998). The Elusive Eden: A New History of California , by Rice, Bullough, and Richard Orsi, 2nd edition (McGraw-Hill, 1996). Geosystems: An Introduction to Physical Geography , by Robert Christopherson, 3rd edition, (Prentice-Hall, 1997).

1988-09

1988-12

1989-03

1989-06

1989-09

For 1992-6-28 Landers 7.3 earthquake

1991-09

1991-12

1992-03

For 1994-1-17 Northridge 6.6 earthquake On January 17,1994 the most expensive earthquake in the United States, a 6.7, hit Southern California. It was caused by a deeply buried thrust fault 11 miles underground, beneath the San Fernando Valley.

1992-12

1993-03

1993-12

For 1999-10-16 Hector Mine 7.1 earthquake

1999-03

1999-06

1999-09

Remarks Future earthquake located near region of anomalous Y/Yc. Date Epicenter Magnitude/ (km) Max Y/Yc Lasting Time of anomalous Y/Yc 1983.5.2 Coalinga 6.7/? ? 1987.11.24 Superstition Hills 6.6/0 1.4 21m 1989.10.18 Loma Prieta 7.0/100 1.2 24m 1992.6.28 Landers 7.3/100 1.0 18m 1994.1.17 Northridge 6.6/80 25m 1999.10.16 Hector Mine 7.1/100 15m Remarks Future earthquake located near region of anomalous Y/Yc. Anomalous Y/Yc lasts about 1-2 years before upcoming earthquake.

Outline About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) CAP, CSB About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) Field Stress in SC Calculation of Y/Yc Variation of Y/Yc before Some Strong Earthquakes in SC Earthquake Tendency in SC Discussion

Earthquake Tendency in Southern California There might be moderate earthquake about 5 around (36N, 119W) and (36N, 121.6W) within about 1 year. The results also show that there are no LURR anomalies in other regions, which implicates that there is less strong earthquake hazard in Southern California in the near future.

Outline About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) CAP, CSB About LURR Fault System in Southern California(SC) Field Stress in SC Calculation of Y/Yc Variation of Y/Yc before Some Strong Earthquakes in SC Earthquake Tendency in SC Discussion

Discussion LURR is a promising approach to mid-term earthquake prediction. However, calculation of LURR depends on high quality earthquake catalogue and other data. Up to now, we can not give an exact earthquake prediction by LURR, but an approximate one. For earthquakes greater than 6.5 in Southern California, the size of anomalous LURR are among 100-300km, which might imply the seismogenic region size. In addition, evolution of anomalous LURR is complex.

Acknowledgements QUAKES NSFC(Grant 19732060, 40004002) CNSS, SCEC

SC02 ML: 2-4.0

SC03 ML: 2-4.0

SC04 ML: 2-3.5

SC05 ML: 2-3.5

SC06 ML: 2-4.0

SC07 ML: 2-4.0

SC08 ML: 2-4.0

SC09 ML: 2-3.5

SC10 ML: 2-3.5

SC11 ML: 2-3.5

1995.10.6 Tangshan 4.9

1997.5.25 zhangjiakou Ml:4.7

1997.9-1998.8 1999.3.11 zhangbei 5.6

1997.10-1998.9 1999.3.11 zhangbei 5.6

1998.5-1998.10 1999.3.11 zhangbei 5.6

1997.6-1998.11 1999.3.11 zhangbei 5.6

1998.7-1998.12 1999.3.11 zhangbei 5.6

1998.8-1999.1 1999.3.11 zhangbei 5.6

1998.9-1999.2 1999.3.11 zhangbei 5.6

1998.10-1999.3 1999.5.15 hunyuan Ml:4.6

1998.11-1999.4 1999.5.15 hunyuan Ml:4.6

1998.12-1999.5 1999.5.15 hunyuan Ml:4.6

considering the influence of random factors on LURR.