MITO (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer) - CERV2 trial: a randomized phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel +/- cetuximab, in advanced.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mary McCormack & Jonathan Ledermann NCRI Gynae Clinical Studies Group.
Advertisements

Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
CB-1 Background of Pancreatic Cancer & NCIC CTG PA.3 Study Design Malcolm Moore, MD Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology Princess Margaret Hospital Chair,
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel- Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab- Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel (CP) compared to Carboplatin-Paclitaxel- Bevacizumab (CP-B) in advanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Elderly Women Ovarian Cancer Multicenter, randomized trial of carboplatin +/- paclitaxel in vulnerable elderly patients with stage III-IV advanced ovarian.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
Esophageal Cancer: A Critical Evaluation of Systemic Second-Line Therapy Christiane Maria Rosina Thallinger, Markus Raderer, and Michael Hejna J Clin Oncol.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
EFFECT: A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
MITO 27 Randomized Phase II study on Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (a MITO.
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
CHEMO-IMMUNO-TARGET THERAPIES
LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
ASPEN: Prolonged PFS With Sunitinib vs Everolimus in Nonclear-Cell RCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Rosell R et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 7503.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Fig 1A. Patient enrollment flow chart
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
A phase II study of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer  Sandro Pignata, Enrico.
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
ASCO Recap Palak Desai, MD.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Abraxane-Pembro nei carcinomi uroteliali avanzati
Ruolo di carboplatino + nab-paclitaxel nel trattamento di I linea nel carcinoma polmonare non a piccole cellule         P.Bidoli S.C. Oncologia Medica.
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Fabio Puglisi
Ovarian Cancer: A new look at an old veteran
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
Avastin and weekly pacLItaxel use in sEx cord-stromal ovariaN tumORs
Participating groups:
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
Randomized phase III trial on Trabectedin (ET 743) vs clinician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancers.
MITO CERV …3…(?) Phase II study on Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Pembrolizumab in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Lunedì 04 giugno Highlight a cura di Filippo de Marinis
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
MITO CERV …3…(?) Phase II study on Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Pembrolizumab in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
MITO 27 Randomized Phase II study on Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (a MITO.
La nanomedicina in oncologia: presente e futuro
Presentation transcript:

MITO (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer) - CERV2 trial: a randomized phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel +/- cetuximab, in advanced and/or recurrent cervical cancer Sandro Pignata1, Giovanni Scambia2, Domenica Lorusso3, Ugo De Giorgi4, Maria Ornella Nicoletto5, Rossella Lauria6, Annamaria Mosconi7, Cosimo Sacco8, Claudia Omarini9, Pierosandro Tagliaferri10, Gabriella Ferrandina2, Saverio Cinieri11, Carmela Pisano1, Sabrina Chiara Cecere1, Marilena Di Napoli1, Vanda Salutari2, Maria Carmela Piccirillo1, Gennaro Daniele1, Ciro Gallo12, Francesco Perrone1. 1 Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Fondazione Pascale, IRCCS, Napoli; 2 Catholic University of The Sacred Heart of Rome, Roma; 3 Fondazione IRCSS National Cancer Institute, Milano ; 4 IRST-IRCSS National Cancer Institute, Meldola-Cesena; 5 Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova; 6 Federico II University, Napoli; 7 Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia; 8 University Hospital "S. Maria della Misericordia", Udine; 9 Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena; 10 Medical Oncology - Magna Grecia University, Germaneto (CZ); 11Medical Oncology & Breast Unit, “Senatore Antonio Perrino” Hospital, Brindisi; 12 Medical Statistics, Department of Medicine and Public Health, Second University of Naples, Napoli; Italy.

Background Carboplatin plus paclitaxel is a standard option for treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer patients Long-term results of systemic treatment are poor in this setting

Study rationale Cervical cancer cells often express Epidermal Growth Factor receptor (EGFR) Cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, can be safely combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel

Study aim To assess the activity of a combination of cetuximab (weekly) with carboplatin + paclitaxel (every three weeks) compared to chemotherapy alone in terms of event-free survival (EFS)

Study endpoints Primary endpoint Secondary endpoints Event-free survival time from randomization to progression, death, definitive discontinuation of the whole treatment or loss to follow-up, whichever occurred first Secondary endpoints Overall survival Progression-free survival Response rate (RECIST 1.0) Toxicity (CTCAE 3.0)

Study design RANDOM Carbo AUC 5 + Paclitaxel 175 mg/mq, d1 Q21 Carbo AUC 5 + Paclitaxel 175 mg/mq, d1 Q21 + Cetuximab 400 mg/m² one week before starting chemo, then 250 mg/m² day 1, weekly Strata: Previous Chemo Distant mets Centre Chemotherapy was given for 3-6 cycles depending on clinical response Cetuximab was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Study population Advanced and/or metastatic cervical cancer patients untreated or having failed only one previous chemotherapy (with at least 6 months of progression-free interval, with or without concomitant or sequential radiotherapy) PS 0-1 according to ECOG Age >18 Written informed consent

Sample size This is a randomized phase II trial, with relaxed statistical criteria* : one-tailed test, significance level 20% power 80% Assuming an expected median EFS 4.5 months and an auspicated median EFS 6.4 months (corresponding to a Hazard Ratio of 0.70) 89 events are required and 108 patients (54 per arm) were planned *Rubinstein, J Clin Oncol 2005

Study conduction The study was sponsored and supported by NCI Naples that has the property of data Merck Serono provided cetuximab and partial funding 14 Italian centers actively recruited the patients First patient enrolled: Feb 3, 2010 Last patient enrolled: May 8, 2013 Final analysis: May 5, 2015 Median Follow-up: 23 months

Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Carboplatin/Paclitaxel plus Cetuximab Patients’ flow Randomized 108 pts Carboplatin/Paclitaxel 53 pts Carboplatin/Paclitaxel plus Cetuximab 55 pts 1 patient: consent withdrawn immediately after random EFS analysis 52 pts EFS analysis 55 pts

Baseline characteristics Carboplatin/Paclitaxel (n =52) Carboplatin/Paclitaxel + Cetuximab (n=55) Median age (interquartile range - IQR) 52 (44-62) 47 (41-60) Previous chemotherapy No 22 (42%) 24 (44%) Yes 30 (58%) 31 (56%) Distant metastasis 9 (17%) 10 (18%) 43 (83%) 45 (81%) ECOG performance status 33 (64%) 40 (73%) 1 19 (36%) 15 (27%) Histotype Adenocarcinoma 11 (21%) 12 (22%) Squamous 41 (79%) (78%)

Compliance to chemotherapy Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Carboplatin/Paclitaxel + Cetuximab (n =52) (n=55) Number of cycles median (IQR) 6 (4-6) At least one delay 17 (33%) 21 (38%) At least one dose reduction 12 (23%) 8 (14%) Cause of treatment interruption Completion 35 (67%) 34 (62%) Progression or death 14 (27%) 14 (25%) Toxicity or refusal 2 (4%) 7 (13%) Other 1 (2%) 0 (0%) A median number of 6 (IQR 4-6) CP cycles was given in both arms.

Compliance to cetuximab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Carboplatin/Paclitaxel + Cetuximab (n =52) (n=55) Weeks on treatment median (IQR) - 26 (14-35) At least one delay 27 (49%) At least one dose reduction 4 (7%) Cause of treatment interruption Progression or death 41 (74%) Toxicity or refusal 13 (24%) On treatment 1 (2%) Reason for discontinuation of cetuximab was progression/death in 41 (74%) cases and toxicity/refusal in 13 (24%) . A patient was on treatment at the time of the analysis.

Events After a median follow-up of 23 months (95% CI:20-26) 102 patients had an event 97 progressed 61 died

Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Carboplatin/Paclitaxel + Cetuximab Event-free survival Patients Events Median EFS months (95% CI) Carboplatin/Paclitaxel 52 48 4.7 (4.1 – 6.5) Carboplatin/Paclitaxel + Cetuximab 55 54 6.0 (4.4 – 7.6) Unadjusted HR=0.97 (95% CI 0.66-1.43) Log-rank p=0.43 Patients at risk Carboplatin/Paclitaxel 52 21 7 5 3 2 Carboplatin/Paclitaxel + Cetuximab 55 28 8 -

Progression-free survival Patients Events Median PFS months (95% CI) CP 52 45 5.2 (4.5 – 7.8) CP + CET 55 7.6 (5.6 – 9.0) Unadjusted HR=0.84 (95% CI 0.56-1.26) Log-rank p=0.20 Patients at risk CP 52 22 8 6 3 2 CP + CET 55 34 14 -

Overall survival Patients Events Median OS months (95% CI) CP 52 30 17.7 (11.0 – 31.6) CP + CET 55 31 17.0 (12.5 – NA) Unadjusted HR=0.85 (95% CI 0.52-1.42) Log-rank p=0.27 Patients at risk CP 52 39 29 16 10 4 2 CP + CET 55 48 30 19 11 -

Response Rate (RECIST 1.0) Carboplatin/Paclitaxel (n=44) Carboplatin/Paclitaxel + Cetuximab (n=42) P* Responders (CR+PR) 19 (43%) 95%CI: 30%-58% 16 (38%) 95%CI: 25%-53% 0.79 CR 4 (9%) 2 (5%) PR 15 (34%) 14 (33%) *Chi-square test Out of 86 patients eligible for RECIST

Safety One patient died for a stroke during standard treatment There was no difference in the occurrence of severe side-effects, except for diarrhoea and skin toxicity

Adverse events CP (n=52) CP + CET (n=55) Dry skin 2% 0% 9% 4% 0.03 Grade 1 2 3 4 5 p* Dry skin 2% 0% 9% 4% 0.03 Flushing 11% 5% 0.003 Nail changes 7% 0.006 Rash/ desquamation 18% 0.05 Rash/acneiform 24% 25% <0.001 Diarrhoea 6% 16% 0.02

Conclusions The addition of cetuximab to carboplatin/paclitaxel is feasible but not worthy of further investigation in unselected advanced cervical cancer patients Efforts are ongoing to retrospectively collect tumor samples for an exploratory biomarker analysis