Partnering For Our Future

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Early Lessons Learned from DOE-EPRI Framework Experience Melissa Chan MA DPU.
Advertisements

Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
0 © 2011 Silver Spring Networks. All rights reserved. Building the Smart Grid.
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
Storage Heaters : Dead or Alive? Kenny Cameron Director of Strategic Development Energy Assets.
Emerging Lighting Technologies Roundup
Keystone Energy Efficiency Conference 2011 September 20, 2011.
Home Area Networks …Expect More Mohan Wanchoo Jasmine Systems, Inc.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
WAL-MART STORES, INC. DEMAND RESPONSE. Wal-Mart in New York Supercenters45 Discount Stores45 Neighborhood Markets 0 Sam’s Clubs17 Distribution Centers4.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
Over 60,000 Honda MCHP Units at work in Japan
Advanced Metering Infrastructure
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
1 SmartMeter™ Delivering Customer Benefits Jana Corey Director, Policy Planning Integrated Demand-side Management Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Getting ready for Advanced Metering Infrastructure Paper by : Rajesh Nimare Presented by : Prashant Sharma.
The information contained in this presentation is for the exclusive and confidential use of the recipient. Any other distribution, use, reproduction or.
Overview of OpenADR May 4, 2011 Integrating Demand Response, Efficiency, Renewables and Smart Grid Sila Kiliccote Deputy, Demand Response Research Center.
Energate: Leaders in Consumer Demand Response ENERGATE: AN ONTARIO CASE STUDY A fully integrated 2.0 Smart Grid… with Ontario Consumers.
FirstEnergy / Jersey Central Power & Light Integrated Distributed Energy Resources (IDER) Joseph Waligorski FirstEnergy Grid-InterOp 2009 Denver, CO November.
UGI Utilities – Electric Division Energy Efficiency & Conservation Collaborative Meeting June 9, 2010.
Demand Response Robert Balzar Conservation Resources Director.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.
Smart Grid Workforce Education Presentation Smart Grid – A Framework for Change Brad Gaskill, CEO - Poudre Valley REA May 29, 2009.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
BPA’s DR Experience Karen Meadows Bonneville Power Administration May 2, 2007.
1 Confidential The information contained in this presentation is for the exclusive and confidential use of the recipient. Any other distribution, use,
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project  Largest Smart Grid Demonstration.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
Leverage Smart Grid Technology into Tangible Results
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
Metering Americas April 24, 2006 Advanced Metering.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
Author : Peng Han, Jinkuan Wang, Yinghua Han, and Qiang Zhao Source : 2012 IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology Wuhan, Hubei,
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
Interest Free Energy Efficiency Loan Program Proposal for Improvements August 15, 2016.
Pay-As-You-Go Final 2012 Report. Agenda PAYG Refresher Pilot Goals & Overview Voice of the Customer Front Office Impacts Back Office Impacts Financial.
A smart grid delivers electricity from suppliers to consumers using two-way digital technology to control appliances at consumers' homes to save energy,
1 Proposed Performance Tracker for PSC Working Group 1 of 3 CategoryMetricResults Project Costs Cost to Deploy: Capital vs total Capital deployment cost.
Community Solar Dan McIlroy Clean Energy Collective.
SMECO Demand Response filing
MEPAV 2010 CONFERENCE. AMI MANASSAS Gregg S. Paulson, P. E
Erin Buchanan Iowa League of Cities Annual Conference
Wade Shimoda, Hawaii Electric Company,
NW Demand Response Symposium
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Mass Market Demand Solutions in PJM
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer

Engaging Members Improved DR experiences through technology
How can metros and municipalities operate to ensure that revenue generated from electricity sales is sustainable? by Dr Minnesh Bipath and Dr Willie de.
Grid Modernization in Massachusetts
Electricity Demand Response and Advanced Metering for Integrated Utilities Arkansas Public Service Commission Lonni Dieck AEP May 24, 2007.
Load Response Products from Constellation NewEnergy
2500 R Midtown Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Reducing Electrical Energy Consumption
Impact of Dynamic Pricing on AMR
Mike Mumper & Brian Kick Good afternoon
Southern California Edison Sacramento, California 95821
Transformation of the Energy Grid
Reference Design for Residential Energy Gateway
SMART ENERGY GB.
Presentation transcript:

Flathead Electric Cooperative Demand Response Project Successes and Lessons September 28, 2016

Partnering For Our Future In 2010 Flathead Electric Cooperative (FEC) joined with Bonneville Power Administration in five year long Smart Grid Demonstration Project to investigate the cost effectiveness of smart grid technology. Main reasons for FEC involvement: 50% federal match of FEC Smart Grid Investment Reduce future power supply costs to FEC Better inform our members on how to reduce their future energy costs Three technologies were tested

Option #1 Option #2 Option #3 Provide members with an In-Home Display (IHD) IHD is configured to respond to over-power line communications broadcast from the integrated AMI system for human-in-the loop demand response. Option #2 Water Heater Demand Response Unit (DRU) Traditional DR technology over power line allows members to have their hot water heater operated by the co-op in response to peak demands. Option #3 Implement Home Energy Network with Smart Appliances for advanced control with GE Nucleus / Profile Brillion enabled Home Energy Network and load control-enabled dishwasher load control-enabled clothes washer load control-enabled clothes dryer one Zigbee Water Heater Switch one Energy Display

Successes Strong member engagement approach Water heater program caused little member inconvenience. Demand reduction was measurable in hourly data. Deployed smart appliances in Libby, Montana, one of the few actual deployments in the entire country. Smart Appliance group did produce the most demand reduction under some events, but also cost the most.

What we learned Of the technologies tested the Electric Water Heater Load Control units had the least amount of intrusion and were the most reliable technology Benefits: One time installation cost. Little to no maintenance or failure rates - no failures during the course of the three year study. Once installed the water heater unit can be used for multiple members/renters/owners with minimal updating in Flatheads customer information system. Can be made available to residential and small business locations. No member action required. No complaints to date about a lack of hot water.

How does the program work? Plan to install 5000 water heater units over the next five years. Currently 1200+ for installations Flathead Electric will install an Electric Water Heater Load Control Unit for the water heater in the member’s residential or small business location. Using over power technology and software to predict and dispatch the water heaters based on historical data, weather, etc., the Water Heater Load Control Unit will curtail power to the water heater during Peak Time Periods to reduce demands on the system for up to three hours. The participating member receives a $4 monthly participation credit for each month of active participation.

How are members eligible? Members can be eligible to participate if: They are a Flathead residential or small business member. They have an electric water heater The location is the participating members’ primary residence or business location. Renters can participate but must have written consent of the landlord or location owner.

Lessons Learned Avoid lightning rod terms like RF and Smart Grid. Beta products require careful procurement. Critical peak rebate too high for actual ability to hit peak and prevent gaming, further refinement needed on critical peak pricing metrics. BPA’s system needs didn’t coincide with local utility needs. No “out of the box” options for software for deployment available

Financial Overview On the cost-benefit of each test groups: The Smart Appliance group at times produced the most benefit of 0.0 to 2.34 kW/per unit peak reduction, but was also the most costly, with additive home energy network aspects costing $2500+ over regular appliances. The In Home Display, human in the loop, group did not demonstrate appreciable load response, but could have been the least costly, $125, to implement had the technology matured. The over power line water heater solution produced reliable savings across most events producing from an average of 0.58 in the summer and .91 kW/per unit peak reduction in the winter with an average of .75 kW.  Simple payback as quickly as 3 to 5 years with an average install cost of $413, but highly dependent upon hitting the monthly peak.

Teri Rayome-Kelly, Demand Response Coordinator Office (406)751-1834 t Teri Rayome-Kelly, Demand Response Coordinator Office (406)751-1834 t.rayome-kelly@flathead.coop