ERS Procurement Methodology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T&D Losses Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012.
Advertisements

Demand Side Working Group April 27 th, © CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. THE OFFERING DESCRIBED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS SOLD AND CONTRACTED.
NPRR 532 Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin David Kee CPS Energy Energy Supply & Market.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
February 25, 2011 Demand Side Working Group EILS Update Mark Patterson ERCOT, Manager Demand Integration.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Energy supply forecast Presentation to Connecticut’s Energy Future Conference by Bridgett Neely, London Economics International LLC December 2, 2004 Hartford,
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
Proposal to Modify ERS Time Periods 2014 DSWG Goal #10 Presented to: Demand Side Working Group.
FAST Procurement and Pricing May 28, 2015 TAC Meeting 1.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
ERCOT Tool to manage unexpected incremental load November 16, 2006.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
ERS Procurement Methodology 09/04/2013 ERS Workshop Presented By: ERCOT Staff.
Presented By: Mark Patterson ERCOT Manager, Demand Integration November 29, Minute ERS Pilot update to TAC 1.
1 WMS Report TO TAC March In Brief Three Working Group Reports Three Working Group Reports Three Task Force Reports Three Task Force Reports EILS.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR Part A/S Bidding Proposed Methodology.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
ERS Update Plus Revisions to Proposed Changes for ERS Time Periods Presented to: Demand Side Working Group November 5, 2014.
Demand Side Working Group Chairman Slides June 27, 2008 Mary Anne Brelinsky Vice President 1.
PRR 547 – Trading Hubs CMWG Presentation to WMS October 21, 2004.
ERCOT Emergency Interruptible Load Program Paul Wattles Steve Krein WMS Oct. 13, 2006.
Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
NPRR 571 ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Carl Raish, ERCOT QSE Managers Working Group November 5, 2013.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS June 12, 2013.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
Capacity Forecast Model Mark Ruane Credit Work Group ERCOT Public October 15, 2014.
EILS Cost Comparison WMS Jan. 28, Background ERCOT procures Emergency Interruptible Load Service three times annually by Contract Period –February-May.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
MCWG Update to WMS 11/13/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update - October 30 th Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review September 25 Meeting Minutes - Approved.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
EILS Discussion February WMS. Charge to WMS from PRS The benefit. The cost based on the EILS PRRs. Changes in Market since April 17, 2006.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
Project Funding Review February 7, Background ERCOT has a $15M project budget in 2013 (same as 2012) –To allow for new additions to the.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
Long-term Solution Task Force Ellis Rankin & Bob Wittmeyer Co-Chairs.
DSWG Update to WMS March 22, Demand Side Working Group Goals.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 05, 2008.
Market Trials Congestion Revenue Rights
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
penetration of wind power
Electricity Procurement Options
31st USAEE/IAEE North American Conference
30 Minute Reserves EPFSTF January 4,
Reserve Products Interaction
TSC Modifications Panel Meeting
TSC Modifications Panel Meeting
Planning Reserve Margin
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

ERS Procurement Methodology Mark Patterson, ERCOT Wholesale Market Subcommittee October 9, 2013

ERS Time Period Capacity Demand Curve MW $/MW/Hr Offer Cap Expenditure Limit Capacity Demand Curve Inflection Point ERS Time Period Capacity Demand Curve October 9, 2013 ERCOT Public

Benefits of Proposed Procurement Methodology Primary goal of the methodology is to provide transparency into how offers are procured or rejected Procurement Parameters will be published as part of the RFP for a Contract Term Capacity demand curve creates liquidity in the ERS Market and encourages offers based perceived cost of providing the service Meets the recommendation of the PUCT to move to a clearing price as opposed to pay-as-offered October 9, 2013 ERCOT Public

Definitions Time Period Risk Weighting Factor – A value from 0-10 that represents the relative risk of entering into an EEA during each ERS time period. These factors are assigned by ERCOT ahead of each ERS procurement using the most current information available (i.e.; load forecast, available operating reserves, outage information, etc.) Time Period Expenditure Limit – An allocation of the $50 Million ERS budget that sets the maximum dollars that can be spent on all ERS products in each ERS time period Capacity Inflection Point – The point on the capacity demand curve at which capacity = spend limit / (offer cap × hours) Capacity less than inflection will result in procurement < spend limit Capacity greater than inflection will result in clearing price < offer cap October 9, 2013 ERCOT Public

Expenditure Limit and Capacity Inflection Point Calculations   Risk Weighting Factor (a) Time Period Hours (b) Offer Cap (c) (a)*(b)*(c) Expenditure Limit Allocation Factor ERS Time Period Expenditure Limit Capacity Inflection Point FebMay bh1 1 430 $ 80 34,400 3.05% $ 1,527,423 44.4 bh2 258 20,640 1.83% $ 916,454 bh3 344 27,520 2.44% $ 1,221,938 nbh 1,871 149,680 13.29% $ 6,646,064 JunSep 420 33,600 2.98% $ 1,491,901 10 252 201,600 17.90% $ 8,951,407 444.0 336 268,800 23.87% $ 11,935,209 1,920 153,600 13.64% $ 6,820,119 OctJan 20,160 1.79% $ 895,141 26,880 2.39% $ 1,193,521 1,945 155,600 13.82% $ 6,908,923 October 9, 2013 ERCOT Public

Estimated Clearing Prices per Capacity Procured Risk Weighting Factor (a) Max Clearing Price Allowed to Procure a MW Level 100 MW 250 MW 500 MW 750 MW 1000 MW FebMay bh1 1 $ 35.52 $ 14.21 $ 7.10 $ 4.74 $ 3.55   bh2 bh3 nbh JunSep 10 $ 80.00 $ 71.04 $ 47.36 OctJan October 9, 2013 ERCOT Public

Assigning Risk Factors Need to Redefine ERS Standard Contract Terms and Time Periods % hrs in # Hrs % Tot Hrs SCT Feb-May13 BH1 425 0.05 0.15 BH2 255 0.03 0.09 BH3 340 0.04 0.12 NBH 1859   0.21 0.65 Jun-Sep13 420 0.14 252 336 0.11 1920 0.22 0.66 Oct13-Jan14 1945 Issue: Typical winter peak hours ~ 5-8 a.m. in late Dec through Feb ERCOT’s approach is to assign conservative risk weighting factors for the winter peak until SCT and TP issues are resolved. October 9, 2013 ERCOT Public

ERS Time Period Offer Cap The ERS time period offer cap is a constraint on the demand curve to identify unreasonable offers. The offer cap will apply to all ERS types in each time period during the ERS budget year and will be established at $80/MW/Hr. This cap is consistent with the prices historically paid to loads participating under the TDSP Energy Efficiency Rule pertaining to the Standard Offer Load Management Programs. Any offers above the offer cap will be rejected and not considered for procurement. Based on the historical levels of participation, the proposed methodology makes it highly unlikely that ERS will clear at the offer cap in any time period and most likely will clear significantly below the cap October 9, 2013 ERCOT Public

ERS Capacity provided through ERS Self Provision Other Clearing Price The highest offer accepted for a time-period from will set the clearing price for all ERS Resources cleared in that time-period. Each ERS type as different characteristics ERS-10 has shorter ramp but deployed in EEA L2 ERS-30 deployed in EEA L1and potentially more often ERCOT believes 10-Minute and 30-Minute ERS are deployed for the same purposes Help recover operating reserves Reduce or prevent firm load shed ERS Capacity provided through ERS Self Provision For any ERS self-provision, ERCOT will reduce the Time Period expenditure limit for any offers to self-provide part or all of a QSE’s ERS Obligation by the clearing price for ERS. October 9, 2013 ERCOT Public