Outcome of the Review and Response to Recommendations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 UK Project Alan Grant, STFC. Finance How savings are made Update on stepIV position Milestones Critical Path - stepIV Concerns 2.
Advertisements

HL-LHC Corrector Magnet 3D design status Giovanni Volpini on behalf of the LASA team CERN, February 25, 2014.
MICE Superconducting Solenoids: Status and Update RAL: T W Bradshaw M Courthold J Rochford M Hills D Baynham Oxford: J Cobb W Lau S Yang MICE.
Step IV Infrastructure update STFC Tim Hayler Eddie Holtom Norbert Collomb Graham Stokes 14 th December 2011 MICO170 meeting 1Tim Hayler.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 114 September 18, 2008.
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
MICE magnetic measurements Sequence of events and MICE hall movements Alain Blondel – 10-April 2012 revision from 13 December 2012.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Alan Grant OsC 30/4/ UK Project Finance & Schedule.
MICE CM30 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 6 th July
1 UK PM Report Costs & Schedule Alan Grant, STFC.
Magnetic Shielding Issues Roy Preece STFC - RAL. Overview Issues Items in harms way – Step IV Step IV mitigation plan –Racks –Compressors Current / Future.
RSLR mtg 28/3/2014 RLSR mtg Alan Grant. 2 RLSR mtg 28/3/ MICE Finances - Forward Look.
The status of the construction of MICE Step IV K. Long, on behalf of the MICE collaboration.
Schedule and Work We are moving into a very intensive 4 months with a lot of work to be carried out Electrical services to the devices – after the South.
MICE Integration Engineering Jason Tarrant - STFC l Contents »Device Interfaces – General »AFC »Spectrometer Solenoids »RFCC »EMR / KL »South Mezzanine.
1 Layout and Installation MICE Collaboration Meeting, RAL, October 27-29, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Paul Drumm, Matthew Hills, Yury Ivanyushenkov,
Magnetic Mitigation - Contents l Magnetic Mitigation General l West Wall Compressors l Rack Room 2 l Magnetic Shielding Yoke Jason Tarrant – Integration.
MICE magnetic measurements: AFC considerations Alain Blondel see a previous discussion for reference in CM35 (Feb 2013 slides by V. Blackmore, A. Blondel.
MICE VC Alain Blondel 1 MICE NEWS MICE VC Spectrometer solenoid 2. Magnetic shielding 3. Next Collaboration meeting.
Status of the MICE Project & Dashboard MICE Project Board 14 th November 2013 Roy Preece.
PRY Base - Contents l PRY Support/Base/Platform in the MICE Hall l History l Requirements l Environment l Design l Structural Integrity l Preparation l.
Engineering Summary Agenda: Clarification of cooling channel tolerances – Tim Open issues with absorber integration – Andy/Wing.
RLSR 16/4/2015 UK Financial Plan & Risks. Content Finances – Cost to Completion Risks – Top level to completion – R9 working space – Summary 2 RLSR 24/11/2014.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
MICE Cooling Channel Magnets: Spectrometer Solenoid Procurement RF Module Coupling Coil Proposal Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC 07.
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
MICE VC Alain Blondel 1 MICE NEWS MICE VC Next Collaboration meeting CM36 will be Jun at IIT and the 19th at Fermilab right before.
Pre-CM33 schedule planning SuperMICO meeting, June 6th Motivation: For all of us to understand the main drivers behind the top-level MICE schedule So that.
1 Search for Worst-Case Forces MICE Video Conference, September 8, 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department,
OsC mtg 24/4/2014 OsC mtg Alan Grant. 2 OsC mtg 24/4/ MICE Finances - Forward Look.
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
MICE CM20 Alain Blondel 10 February The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment MICE CM20 Spokesmouse remarks.
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
Contents Jason Tarrant STFC Aim of Presentation to show: l Problem of compressors located at south shield wall l Description of compressor layout and services.
Status of the MICE Construction Project Resource Loaded Schedule Review 29 th April 2014 Roy Preece.
MICE CM32 25 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report Vicky Bayliss Victoria Blackmore John Cobb Mike Courthold Roy Preece Mike Zisman 1.
OsC mtg 15/10/2014 MICE Step IV Alan Grant. Content Step IV – Construction Status – Finances – Schedule – Risks – Summary 2.
Spectrometer Solenoid Field Mapping: Thoughts on Mapping Analysis & Results Major caveat: Everything in this talk is highly preliminary Data arrived on.
1 UK Project Roy Preece – STFC Alan Grant, STFC. Finance Staffing Update on stepIV position Milestones Critical Path – stepIV Magnetic field mitigation.
MICE Construction Project Update: SSs, PRY, Cavities, Tracker… 1MAP Friday Meeting – January 30, 2015 Alan Bross.
RLSR 16/4/2015 UK Financial Plan & Risks. Content Finances – FY 2014/15 – Cost to Completion Risks – Top level to completion – R9 working space – Summary.
1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.
MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore 01/19.
1 UK Project Finance & Schedule. Overview Finance  Budget Setting 2013/14  June Finance  Forward look to complete stepVI Schedule  Overview 2.
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
UK Project Plan Roy Preece STFC RAL RLSR 26 th October 2015.
Project Managers Report CM38 – Napa Roy Preece 24th February 2014.
MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore MICE Optics Review 14 th January, /22.
Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment Overview
Resource Loaded Schedule and Budget Profile
Status of the MICE Construction Project
Why do we need to know the fields / map the magnets?
Present status of the flux return yoke design
MICE Partial Return Yoke Mechanical Design
Step IV PRY Preparation - Contents
Forces on MICE magnets in Step IV, commissioning steps J Boehm
UK Financial Plan & Risks
MICE CM31 Schedule summary
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule
Effect of Reduced Focus Coil Current on Step IV and Step VI
Impact of Magnet Performance on the Physics Program of MICE
SHMS Q2 with Beam Line Shield Pipe
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Outcome of the Review and Response to Recommendations

Overview Outcome of review meeting Comments and recommendations Update on PRY

Presented solution: Partial Return Yoke Findings Review Meeting 23rd/24th of September Presented solution: Partial Return Yoke Findings Recognition: intensive programme of FE modelling The team is to be congratulated on the effort that has gone into this work The design of the PRY shielding and the procedure for installation are basically sound The ISIS Group is satisfied with the work being done by the MICE Collaboration to control the level of stray field

Comments The strategy of improving the shielding now to reduce the risk of losing running time later is sound less attention has been paid as to the effect of the presence of the new PRY shielding on the coil Design improvements: Symmetrize support structure Compatibility with Step VI

Recommendations Platform on the north side of the experiment Ensure that PRY does not increase risk of coil failure Forces and coil quenches Modify PRY: independent of mezzanine Compatibility of PRY with Step VI Commissioning plan for Step IV Validate results of Step IV with measurements Steve Plate: UK visit Watch schedule Fit-up / pre-assembly Assembly instructions Steve Plate in UK

Effect of PRY on Solenoids Quenches Forces Variation in material parameters Offsets

Effect of PRY on Quenches Superconducting state: fct (B, J, T) Effect of PRY: changes B Simulation 1: Step IV configuration with PRY Simulation 2: Extrusion coupling: use magnetization of Simulation 1 No coil currents Done for 240 MeV flip and solenoid mode (MICE: NbTi, Cu:Sc = 4)

Effect of PRY on Quenches 240 MeV Flip Mode 28.5 mT Spectrometer+End coil 2

Effect of PRY on Quenches 240 MeV Solenoid Mode 23 mT End coil 2

Tc End Coil 2 240 MeV Flip L. Bottura, “A practical fit for the critical surface of Nb–Ti”. DOI: 10.1109/77.828413

ΔTc End Coil 2 ΔTc < 0.02 K Assume ΔB of 30 mT everywhere

Spectrometer Solenoid, B 240 MeV Flip

Spectrometer Solenoid Note: steps due to Bisection method ΔTc < 0.02 K

240 MeV Solenoid, End Coil 2 Tc ΔTc ΔTc < 0.02 K

Variation of Material Properties Half PRY Simulation Iron Air

Magnetization 240 MeV Flip

Half PRY Simulation Forces in Newton Fx FC M1 M2 E1 SS E2 240 MeV Sol -587 494 39 -254 -6253 -3048 240 MeV Flip -4273 -2835 -2673 -2315 -10344 -3414 PRY1 (Sol/Flip): Fx=19776 N / 52317 N Fy FC M1 M2 E1 SS E2 240 MeV Sol -596 87 140 53 -159 -155 240 MeV Flip -1935 174 576 50 -243 -167 Acceptable force: 1/3 of longitudinal force Tracker: 50 tons FC: 20-30 tons

Forces – Simple Study

Result

Solenoid Mode - Forces

Flip Mode - Forces

Update on PRY - Stray field Discrepancy: MICE hall model predicts larger stray fields Increased stray field Differences in coil geometries/currents Differences in PRY geometry Position of Virostek disc

Coil Geometry Difference in coil cross-section: M1 (TRD) M1 M2 (TRD) M2 R1 (mm) 255 258 R2 (mm) 355 302.7 312 287.8 Z1 (mm) 3752 3711.6 4193 4150.8 Z2 (mm) 3550 3510.4 3991 3951.3 J (A/mm2) 71.31 71.6 65.6 66 Difference in coil cross-section: M1: 20200/8993.64 = 2.25 M2: 11514/5945.1 = 1.94

New Solenoid Currents Old New

PRY Geometry – Backing Plates Updated model, including centre section

Residual Field

Residual Field

PRY Geometry – Lap Joint Stray field looks ok, but…

Lap Joint Design - Forces 190 kN 94 kN 94 kN Analogy: N S N S N S

Solenoid Mode

Flip Mode

Review: very positive feedback MICE solenoids: not affected by PRY Summary Review: very positive feedback MICE solenoids: not affected by PRY Engineering suggestions: underway Compatibility with Step VI Lap joint design Not considered anymore

Additional Slides

Process for Releasing Steel Preliminary survey in controlled area No dose rate above background: move steel to low background area Survey on 8” grid pattern using hand held meter Examination with High Purity Germanium (HPGe) gamma spectroscopy unit only Naturally Occurring Radioactivity Material: release for free use

EVA Magnet Steel

EVA Magnet Steel Unknown pedigree Controlled area Engineering C 0.3%? Measurements: 1 month Controlled area Release process: 2 months? Risk: only naturally occurring radiation allowed Engineering Additional weight Space

Magnetization – 240 MeV Flip Mode Solenoid Mode

Stray Field JFE-EFE Steel