Mark L. Brusseau University of Arizona

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROTECTING AND PRESERVING GROUND WATER with MONITORING SYSTEMS and VULNERABILITY MAPS PAPATHEODOROU Konstantinos, Assoc. Professor 1 EVANGELIDIS Konstantinos,
Advertisements

GEO-ELECTRIC INVESTIGATION OF UNDERGROUND LEACHATE DISTRIBUTION AT A CLOSED LANDFILL IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO, CANADA Joshi, Siddharth 1, Yang, Jianwen.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
1 Brave New World Emerging Tools for NAPL Remediation Jim Cummings Technology Innovation Office/USEPA Chicago, Illinois Dec 2002.
LNAPL Transmissivity (Tn) Remediation Design, Progress and Endpoints
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
PROTECT: Puerto Rico Testsite for Exploring Contamination Threats Why modeling? The prediction of water resources and the assessment.
1 Kent S. Sorenson, Jr. Ryan A. Wymore Enhanced Bioremediation for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent Residual Source Areas – Case Study and Implications.
Green Remediation An Overview of the State of the Practice
Introduction to GW contamination and
1 Geosciences Research Initiative All technologies envisioned to meet future energy and environmental demands require advances in fundamental.
Interdisciplinary Modeling of Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop July 18, 2005 Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Greg Pohll Division.
Environmental Legislation and Agencies Review. Sets a time table for phasing out ozone- depleting substances.
Gas Phase Transport Principal Sources: VLEACH, A One-Dimensional Finite Difference Vadose Zone Leaching Model, Version 2.2 – United States Environmental.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Southern Illinois University Carbondale Instructor: Dr. L.R. Chevalier Lecture Series.
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
Site Activities Update Park – Euclid RP Group Community Advisory Board Meeting January 16, 2013.
Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.
Introduction to NAPLs Review of general concepts
BIOCHLOR A Screening Level Natural Attenuation Model and Database for Solvents C.E. Aziz C. J. Newell A.P. Smith Groundwater Services, Inc. J.R. Gonzales.
Name that Legislatio n! Review. Sets a time table for phasing out ozone- depleting substances.
Upscaling of two-phase flow processes in CO 2 geological storage Orlando Silva (1), Insa Neuweiler 2), Marco Dentz (3,4), Jesús Carrera (3,4) and Maarten.
The Perchlorate Contamination Challenge: EPA’s Part in Pro-Active Partnership William H. Farland, Ph.D. Director National Center for Environmental Assessment.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Cosolvent Flushing and Enhanced Bioremediation at a Dry Cleaner Site By Michael D. Annable Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences 1.
1 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPALS OF In Situ THERMAL TREATMENT Professor Kent S. Udell Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental.
1 Section 6- ISCO DESIGN  Initial Site Evaluation  ISCO Compatibility  ISCO Modeling and Dosage Considerations  Bench Testing  Pilot Testing/Delivery.
Effects of salinity on open soil evaporation processes M.Gran( 1 ), J.Massana( 1 ), J.Carrera( 1 ), M.W.Saaltink( 1 ), S.Olivella( 1 ), C.Ayora( 2 ), A.Lloret(
SERDP- ESTCP- ITRC A PARTNERSHIP Dr. Jeffrey Marqusee ESTCP, Director SERDP, Technical Director.
Multiphase Field-scale Modeling: Brine Transport Ann Cook Per Per Hatlevik Jonathan Levine Brice Loose Keegan Roberts Amber Sallerson Katy Schulte Martina.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
Waste Program Monitoring Technology Needs and the 21M 2 Effort ETC Brownbag Thursday, May 19, 2005 Daniel Powell, U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation.
19 Basics of Mass Transport
Recommendations for Developing Effective Risk Management Policies for Contaminated Site Cleanup An Overview of Risk Management Concepts and How Risk Management.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
1 EPA’s Ground Water Task Force: Presentation of Two Option Papers Available for Public Input : EPA’s Ground Water Task Force: Presentation of Two Option.
Argonne National Laboratory Experience and Perspectives on Environmental Remediation Karen P. Smith Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم تلوث المياه الجوفية الناتج عن التسربات من خزانات الوقود المدفونة الخيار بين الوقاية والعلاج.
Fractured Rock Sites –Challenges and Significance for the Superfund Program EPA Fractured Rock Workshop John Prince EPA Region 2 Remedy Selection/Design.
Goal Oriented Hydrogeological Site Characterization: A Framework and Case Study in Contaminant Arrival Time Bradley Harken 1,2 Uwe Schneidewind 3 Thomas.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
A comparison of numerical and field modeling techniques in tracking contaminant plumes: 1. Analysis of subsurface contaminant migration and remediation.
(Z&B) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow & transport model) Adjust parameter values Design conceptual model Assess uncertainty.
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
Groundwater Pollution
Groundwater related research Dr Shafick Adams 21 July 2010.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
1 Source Removal- Policy and Practice in the FDEP Robert C. Cowdery, P.E. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section Division of Waste Management Florida Department.
Benefits of Laboratory Treatability Studies in Support of Full-Scale Design for In Situ Remedies Michaye McMaster Geosyntec Consultants Sandra Dworatzek.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services William A. Suk, Ph.D., M.P.H. Director, Superfund Research Program Chief, Hazardous.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
Hasan Nourdeen Martin Blunt 10 Jan 2017
Controlled assessment
Sean Anderson, P.Eng., QPESA Steve Russell, B.Sc., QPRA
ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION PILOT USING iSOC® TECHNOLOGY AT A FORMER MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT CASE STUDY PREPARED BY: MR. DAVID WORK, PE RETEC GROUP.
Introduction of Pilot Study
SERDP SYMPOSIUM 2008 POSTER NO. 138
Mathematical modeling techniques in the engineering of landfill sites.
UNC Superfund Research Program
Presented by: Brad Cross, ERM October, 2018
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS
Objectives Provide an overview of the triad approach and its application Describe the elements of the triad approach for practical application Describe.
The Fuel Cycle Analysis Toolbox
Brownfield Corrective Action with Revised RRS
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Novica S. Rados - graduate student -
Modeling Water Treatment Using the Contaminant Transport Module
Presentation transcript:

Mark L. Brusseau University of Arizona DNAPL Source Zones Mark L. Brusseau University of Arizona

Superfund Basic Research Program University of Arizona Funded and administered by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), an institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Hazardous wastes investigated include: arsenic, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and mine tailings contamination

Recent Studies Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council. 2002. DNAPL Source Reduction: Facing the Challenge. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. The DNAPL Remediation Challenge: Is There a Case for Source Depletion? National Research Council. 2004. Contaminants in the Subsurface: Source Zone Assessment and Remediation. Strategic Environmental Research & Development Program. 2006. Reducing the Uncertainty of DNAPL Source Zone Remediation.

The DNAPL Problem Long-term Source of Contamination Accurate risk assessment and effective remediation of DNAPL sites requires understanding of source-zone architecture, mass-transfer dynamics, and mass-flux response Current Understanding is Insufficient

UA DNAPL Research Three Major Aspects: Fundamentals of Source-zone Architectures and Mass-transfer Dynamics Source-zone Characterization Technologies Source-zone Remediation Methods

Source-zone Architecture & Mass-transfer Dynamics

Source-zone Mass Flux Input for dissolved-phase groundwater plume (Which is usually primary risk driver for site) (Figure adapted from EPA)

Field-scale Research: TIAA Study Site Characterization Source-Zone TCE Mass Flux TCE Spatial Distribution (areal, vertical) DNAPL presence Advective, Diffusive, Dispersive Transport Laboratory Experiments--- Mass Transfer Processes Mathematical Modeling--- Plume Behavior Pilot Source-zone Remediation Projects

TIAA Site Site Remediation under Superfund and DOD-IR Multiple source zones and PRPs 14 years of research at portions of the complex 9

Contaminant Elution

Intermediate-scale Research Conducted with Flow Cells Well-defined conditions Develop DNAPL Source Zone Characterize Architecture (Imaging; Tracer Tests) Water Flush (Monitor Q, C) Simulate w/ Model

Contaminant Elution: Data

Contaminant Elution: Modeling

NAPL Distribution In-situ Measurement of NAPL Saturation [dual-energy gamma]

Column-scale Experiments Ideal mass transfer = maintain max C Efficient mass removal Most prior research = well-sorted sands

Pore Scale Research: Synchrotron X-ray microtomography 5 mm DOE APS facility NAPL = white Water = Black Solid = Gray

NAPL Blob Morphology

NAPL Dissolution Dynamics Initial Time Step 1 Time Step 2

Summary: Part 1 NAPL configuration and flow-field dynamics are key Hydraulic Accessibility of NAPL Constraints to full characterization at the field scale Need methods for profiling general behavior Up-scaled Modeling MFR-MR Assessment

Source-Zone Remediation To Remediate or Not To Remediate---that is the question…

Source-zone Remediation Complete Mass Removal Not Possible Is Partial Removal [Mass Reduction] Beneficial? Need To Define Objectives Cost/Benefit Analysis Need Metrics

Mass Flux Reduction vs Mass Removal A key metric for assessing remediation-system effectiveness

MFR-MR Relationship

Mass Removal Behavior

Key Questions Expected Degree of Mass Removal? Impact of Specified MR on Mass Flux? Impact of Mass Flux Reduction on Risk?

Column Data

Flow-cell Data

? Field Data: End-Point Analysis of MFR-MR More Common Data Type Missing early stages Not continuous Many uncertainties 28 28

Field Data: Time-Continuous Analysis of MFR-MR TIAA Borden Very different mass-flux reductions for similar % mass removed Impact of source-zone architecture Rare data type 29 29

Answer Need to Understand the Impact of Source-zone Architecture and Mass-transfer Dynamics on Mass Flux Behavior

Predicting MFR-MR Relationships Simplified Mathematical Modeling Systems Indicator Parameters (e.g., Ganglia:Pool Ratio) Mass-removal Functions MFR = MRn

Example: Flow-cell Data

Example: Field Data

Example: TIAA Data n=0.1 n=2

Summary: Part 2 MFR-MR Relationship Useful for Evaluating Behavior How to Predict– need more data What Site Information can Support Application

Acknowledgements NIEHS SBRP, US Air Force, EPA Erica DiFilippo, Justin Marble, Ann Russo, Greg Schnaar, Nicole Nelson, Mart Oostrom

Links to Additional Resources Thank You After viewing the links to additional resources, please complete our online feedback form. Thank You Links to Additional Resources Feedback Form 37 37