Neutrino v2.1 structural assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to check close-to-the-line arrows F E D E R A T I O N I T N E R N A T I O N A L E D E T I R A L ' A R C a b TOP VIEW FRONT VIEW a b c d e c d e.
Advertisements

Suspension Bridge Wizard
Roofs and Ceilings Revit® Architecture C H A P T E R OBJECTIVES Learn how to place a Roof by Footprint. Learn how to make a wall meet a roof. Learn.
Electric field calculation for the neutron EDM SNS experiment. Septimiu Balascuta Ricardo Alarcon ASU, 02/07/2008.
USE A SHEET OF LINED PAPER AND FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS PLEASE NOTE: We are using lined paper to make the drawings easier for you. 1.DRAW A HORIZONTAL.
V. Carassiti - Princeton (USA) 9-13/01/ BABAR IFR UPGRADE DETECTOR ASSEMBLING AND MOUNTING.
Basis & Structure Surface – 6 of them, 6 colors Center Cube – 6 of them (fixed) Edge Cube –12 of them Corner Cube –8 of them Center Edge Corner.
3D views of the singular behavior of the first 6 Maxwell eigenfunctions on the Fichera corner Martin Costabel Université de Rennes 1 May 2003.
The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.
Agricultural Faculty Bd. of AGU - Concept Drawings Handong graduate school.
Simulations and measurements of the pre-isolator test set-up WG5 Meeting F. Ramos, A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, N. Siegrist November 9, 2010.
Lines Identifying Different Types of Lines. LINES There are many different types of lines. Can you think of any? vertical horizontal diagonal perpendicular.
1 Detector position August 2005, supplement May’06 sub- detectormean Zdelta ZZ_startZ_end TT First pillar =1 st shelf at sides
Step 2: Solve the 1st side/layer
Preparation of wall position Alignment of A and C side in closed position Creation of reference system Translation of reference system to open position.
Current Floor Plan N. Marking C1 indicates that a load bearing steal beam is present at each end of the existing exterior wall which both need to stay.
Supervisor: Dr. Mahmoud Dweikat.. Outline: 1. Introduction. 2. Static design 3. dynamic design 4. Conclusion.
St4 Prop Tube Mapping 05/15/2011 Ming Liu This is a mapping diagram for St-4 prop tubes Facing a module/FEM: – ECL Channels counted from right (1) – to.
CRYOSTATS DESIGN. WA105 – Cryostat Cut-out WA105 – external walls penetrations & GTT All the information needed has been sent this morning to GTT, and.
Warm-Up What 3-d geometric shape will the following nets fold to create? 1) 2) 3)
Drawing Unit Orthographic Projection P. Hennessy
ENGINEERING GRAPHICS By R.Nathan Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering C.R.ENGINEERING COLLEGE Alagarkovil, Madurai I - SEMESTER.
Draw the oblique view 20 H 40 R20  15  H1 L1.
UCLA - S.Sharafat: ITER TBM Dec. ’04 DCLL ITER-TBM: Design for Accident Relevant Loading Jaafar A. El-Awady, P. Rainsberry, S. Sharafat, and N. Ghoniem,
Beamline Readiness Review - Hutch Beamline Microdiffraction March 28, 2006.
Freehand Sketching. Draw a horizontal line about 70 mm long, and then another six lines underneath, each separated by about 10 mm.
Warmup Find the GCF for #1. Factor #s
Lecture 2: Ship structural components
Software testing techniques Software testing techniques Sandwich strategy Presentation on the seminar Kaunas University of Technology.
August 201 st Period  Supply check while you write  Hand in papers  Distribute Divergent, Read Ch 1-4 for Tuesday/post-its.
Jean-Christophe Gayde CERN-EST/SUEDMS Id: Juin 2003 ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER PRE-ASSEMBLY SURVEY DATA ANALYSIS CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM DEFINITION 11.
Calculations D. Smargianaki 29/04/2015 LBNF. Outline D. Smargianaki(CERN) 2 29/04/2015 Comparison between Single Beam & Beam with Spliced connections.
Mathematics 2 Ms. Meek Symmetry. A figure is said to be symmetric if you can draw a line down the middle, and split the figure into two pieces that are.
House Construction.
Status of report on chapter 6: Warm cryostat mechanical calculation PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN Page 1 CERN, May 20th 2015.
EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED D. ALVAREZ FEITO J.C. BATISTA LOPES C. BAULT O. BELTRAMELLO A.CATINACCIO.
Neutrino 1 Assembly Process. Neutrino 2 Assembly Process Step 1: Basement I beams positionned and fixed on the ground. Flatness checked.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Deformations and stresses in the flux return yoke A.Efremov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov Darmstadt,
The LBNF cryostats Marzio Nessi, CERN 16 March 2017.
Ferrara MECHANICAL SUPPORT for forward tracking detectors Federico Evangelisti INFN - Ferrara GSI – 2-6 march 2009.
Using One Point Perspective to Combine Shapes
LBNF CAD models, Drawings and Component list
Notes by Shibili Prasanth Science Grinds
Present status of the flux return yoke design
Graphing Rational Functions
Marius Skudžinskas IFM-02
Endcap shielding senarios:
STRAW TOWER SUMMARY/EVALUATION NOTES LESSON
Creating 2-Point Perspective
DOOR & WINDOW.
CENTROIDS AND CENTRES OF GRAVITY
Collapse Patterns.
Drawing Walls for a Room
Using One Point Perspective to Combine Shapes
Beam dump for J-Parc neutrino facility
Finding Distance by using the Pythagorean Theorem
One and Two Point Perspective.
Civil engineering drawing
John Blair DJ Geoff Morgan Michael Rossol
Structural Loading.
Back of tub 794 mm (31.25”) 654 mm (25.75”) 06-Jan-06 F.E.Taylor.
1st solution. Cut internal to the plate with startup hole
T. Trimpe Lesson 1: Length T. Trimpe
Neutron guide Shielding Concept
Bunker Wall Design Wall
Identifying Different Types of Lines
Bunker Wall Design Wall ESS
A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA)
BaBar LST Upgrade Richard F Boyce
Op Art Directions.
Presentation transcript:

Neutrino v2.1 structural assessment JCBL 10.11.2015

1st iteration HL1100M Modified geometry (edms: 1557602) of iteration 6 as follows: Corner beams (IPE500) were replaced by HL1100M Purpose: to verify effect of stiffening the corner pieces.

Small wall – Unit check for all NL combinations

Small wall – Displacements for all NL combinations

Side wall – Unit check for all NL combinations

Side wall – Displacements for all NL combinations

Bottom layer – Unit check for all NL combinations

Bottom layer – loads for all NL combinations Msd.y Nsd Vsd.z Vsd.z Nsd

Top layer – Unit check for all NL combinations

Top layer – loads for all NL combinations Nsd Vsd.z Msd.y

2nd iteration HL1100M Modified geometry of iteration 1 as follows: Longitudinal beams (IPE500) were replaced by HL1100M Access holes (800mm) were placed on the HL1100 beams Vertical & horizontal access holes

Small wall – Unit check for all NL combinations

Small wall – Displacements for all NL combinations

Side wall – Unit check for all NL combinations Longitudinal beams Vertical beams

Side wall – Displacements for all NL combinations

Bottom layer – Unit check for all NL combinations

Bottom layer – loads for all NL combinations Msd.y Nsd Vsd.z

Top layer – Unit check for all NL combinations

Top layer – loads for all NL combinations Nsd Vsd.z Msd.y

3rd iteration To remove Modified geometry of iteration 2 as follows: Two lines of longitudinal beams (IPE500) on the tope layer were removed

Small wall – Unit check for all NL combinations

Small wall – Displacements for all NL combinations

Side wall – Unit check for all NL combinations Vertical beams Longitudinal beams

Side wall – Displacements for all NL combinations

Bottom layer – Unit check for all NL combinations

Bottom layer – loads for all NL combinations Msd.y Nsd Vsd.z

Bottom layer – loads for all NL combinations Msd.y Vsd.z Nsd

Top layer – Unit check for all NL combinations May be increased.

Top layer – loads for all NL combinations Nsd Vsd.z Msd.y

Top layer – loads for all NL combinations Nsd Vsd.z Msd.y

Following v 2.1 iterations Geometry Following v 2.1 iterations

IPE 500 HL1100M

Neutrino v2.2 structural assessment JCBL 16.11.2015

Purpose of v2.2 To optimize the roof top To replace bottom beams by HL1100M beams with holes (to allow access to ventilation, checks, etc…) 1 2

1st iteration Bottom Top Modified geometry of 3rd iteration V2.1 as follows: Bottom and top beams replaced by HL1100M beams with holes for access; Top

Small wall – Unit check for all NL combinations

Small wall – Displacements for all NL combinations

Side wall – Unit check for all NL combinations Longitudinal beams Vertical beams

Side wall – Displacements for all NL combinations

Bottom layer – Unit check for all NL combinations

Bottom layer – loads for all NL combinations Vsd.z Msd.y Nsd

Bottom layer – loads for all NL combinations Msd.y Vsd.z Nsd

Top layer – Unit check for all NL combinations

Top layer – loads for all NL combinations Msd.y Nsd Vsd.z

Top layer – loads for all NL combinations Vsd.z Msd.y Nsd

Version 2.1 – total weight (gravity )

2nd iteration Modified geometry of 1st iteration V2.2 as follows: top middle beam HL1100M removed;

Small wall – Unit check for all NL combinations

Small wall – Displacements for all NL combinations

Side wall – Unit check for all NL combinations Longitudinal beams Vertical beams

Bottom layer – Unit check for all NL combinations

Top layer – Unit check for all NL combinations

Following v 2.2 iterations Geometry Following v 2.2 iterations

Top

Bottom

Side

Front