The Swedish Protection System in a European Context

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Europeanization of International Refugee Law Catherine Dauvergne UBC Faculty of Law photos courtesy of Efrat Arbel, UNHCR, CBSA,
Advertisements

Migration Caused by Environmental Changes Ivan Ivandić.
Thanks go to the Jesuit Refugee Service. This quiz has have been developed in response to earlier work by them. This project on CST and Migration is developed.
Right to Non-Refoulement – Protection Against Expulsion By Kris Spartanska.
11-12 June 2009 Survey of the data sources and compilation practices of EU Member States Item 4.1 International Technical Meeting on Measuring Remittances.
Republic of Serbia Commissariat for Refugees and Migration ENARO Closing Conference Ragusa, 28 th -30 th November 2012.
THE EU REGULATION ON COMMUNITY STATISTICS ON MIGRATION AND INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION Ann Singleton, Audrey Lenoël Centre for the Study of Poverty and Social.
Immigration of foreign students to the European Union – the case of Sweden EMN Conference 2012 Immigration of International Students to the EU 6 December.
TARGET 2016 How Turkey gets to Visa liberalization.
Circular migration Statistics and policies from a Swedish perspective
Migration in Europe – , Prague, Czech Republic EU Migration and Asylum Policy.
Cross-border cooperation is our way to take responsibility for refugees Reception Conditions for Asylum Seekers in Europe materials for a better practice.
Immigration and immigration policy in Finland
Presentation by Boldizsar Nagy CEU 2015CEU 2015 MIGRATION POLICY IN A EUROPEAN CONTEXT Hungary in a nutshell Presented by Boldizsár Nagy, SPP 2015.
Data Collection at the EU level Conference ‘Sharing Best Practices in Harmonised Data Collection on Trafficking in Human Beings’ 26 March 2013, Bratislava,
State child protection and adoption service under the ministry of social security and labour Director Odeta Tarvydienė Transfers within Europe.
The Common European Asylum System and the Receptions Directive Patrick Lefevre European Commission DG Justice, Freedom and Security The Common European.
Guatemala City February 15-16, 2007 Best Practices on Refugee Protection Incorporated into the Legislation of RCM Member Countries.
Asylum MINISTRY OF INTERIOR POLICE DIRECTORATE BORDER POLICE DIRECTORATE
Refugees – fundamentals September 17 Presentation at the CEU 17 September 2015.
FEDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNIONS 1 EUROPEAN WORK COUNCILS (EWC) Dip. Ing. Panos Katsampanis OBES trainer 02/0207.
FEDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNIONS 1 EUROPEAN WORK COUNCILS (EWC) Dip. Ing. Panos Katsampanis OBES trainer Round table Sofia 8/12/06.
Recent Developments in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in the EU University of Oslo Asylum Course 10 March 2006.
Policy Plan on Asylum An integrated approach to the protection of refugees across the European Union June 2008.
Situation of Asylum in the EU and update on relocation activities Jean-Pierre Schembri EASO Spokesperson.
Territorial and urban aspects of migration and refugee inflow Sandra Di Biaggio ESPON Seminar A world without borders.
. Risk Migration – The Swedish Context. Goals of the Swedish Migration Policy To protect the right to apply for asylum in Sweden and different countries.
7-8-March 2011 Task Force "Organic farming statistics"-Luxembourg, 7-8 March Item 4 Harmonised questionnaire for data collection: State of the art.
Migration Crisis. From West Asia to Europe, etc. More than a million migrants and refugees crossed into Europe in 2015 – by land and sea.
Recognition of a right to Immigration?. There is no Right to Immigration Right of entry into the national territory– only for National Citizens Art. 13,
Krešimir Perović, mag. iur. Head of the Independent Sector for Schengen coordination and Projects of the European Union
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 18 – Statistics Bilateral screening: Chapter.
EU acquis in the field of asylum ( plus an overview of the EU financial assistance to Turkey) JFS Team of the EU Delegation to Turkey.
Political Issues and Social Policy in the E.U. Professor John Wilton Position Paper Immigration policy Identify and briefly outline the political issues.
Levels of International Protection Terminology and Phases.
MOSCOW, NOVEMBER 2007 ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION LAW AND POLICY OF THE EU PROF DR JAAP W. DE ZWAAN DIRECTOR ‘CLINGENDAEL’ AND PROFESSOR OF EU LAW THE NETHERLANDS.
Strömsund Program for immigrants and integration We all have an equal responsibility to work with immigrants and integration. Politicians,
Ministry of Justice Sweden Government Offices of Sweden Ministry of Justice Sweden Government Offices of Sweden CEAS, a judicial reality or actual practice?
Recast Directives in CEAS
Moderators: Char Gray-Sorensen, Pennsylvania Campus Compact
International migration: practices of 2000 Round and issues for 2010
New Travel Executive Order Effective March 16, 2017
Common European Asylum System
Policy paper and data evidence on migration flows
Globalization and Europeanization
EMN Conference, The Hague, 24 April 2013
Asylum seekers’ human rights: do they exist in Finland?
State of play: Refugee situation in and beyond Europe Senior Specialist Tuomas Koljonen Finnish Immigration Service
Migration to Europe and Austria
Managing the migration crisis How statistics can help
Working Party on Regional Statistics 1-2 October 2012
LAMAS Working Group January 2016
News on Migrant Integration Indicators and AMM statistics
Global Refugee Crisis Review
Global Refugee Crisis Review
LAMAS Working Group 5-6 October 2016
Working Group "European Statistical Data Support" April 2016
Refugees, Asylum Seekers, Migrants What’s the difference ?
Teaching young refugees in Germany 2018
MIGRATION POLICY OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC AND THE NEW SECURITY STRATEGY
Asylum procedures - 7/6/2013 – 30/9/2017
Outline of the EU greenhouse gas emission trend report
People.
Trends for ECDC measles and rubella monitoring,
Item 10 : Rail Statistics at the International Transport Forum Working Group on Rail- Eurostat Luxembourg 1-2 October 2015 Mario BARRETO.
DURABLE SOLUTIONS.
Transposition and implementation of WFD
Germany’s Refugee Crisis
Introduction to the Discussion Paper on Draft Elements of a Guide to Effective Practices Prof. Walter Kaelin, Envoy of the Chairmanship of the Nansen Initiative.
International Technical Meeting on Measuring Remittances
Presentation transcript:

The Swedish Protection System in a European Context International EMN Conference CEAS, a judicial reality or actual practice? The Hague, 24 April 2013 Bernd Parusel Swedish Migration Board National EMN contact point

Harmonised and non-harmonised protection statuses in Sweden (1) The granting of protection in Sweden is fully harmonised in accordance with the EU “Qualification Directive”, but there are also complementary national bases for protection The granting of refugee status in accordance with the Geneva Convention and the granting of subsidiary protection are harmonised forms of protection in Sweden As a complement to the granting of subsidiary protection in accordance with the “Qualification Directive”, there are also national forms of subsidiary/humanitarian protection covering grounds of other severe conflicts and environmental disasters In 2012, 95.5 % of all residence permits granted for subsidiary protection were granted on grounds covered by the Qualification Directive. 4.5 % were granted on the basis of complementary national provisions

Harmonised and non-harmonised protection statuses in Sweden (2) In exceptional cases, a residence permit can also be granted on grounds of exceptionally distressing circumstances (non-harmonised) Resettlement, which can be seen as a complement to the asylum system, is undertaken on the basis of national practice, in cooperation with the UNHCR

Harmonised and non-harmonised protection statuses in Sweden (3) European National (Harmonised) (Non-harmonised) Refugee protection (Geneva Convention) Subsidiary protection Exceptionally distressing circumstances Resettlement

Overview: Positive decisions in Sweden Table 1: Positive decisions on asylum applications and resettlement, % for different grounds for protection Geneva Con-vention Subsidiary protection Exceptionally distressing circumstances Resettle-ment and other grounds Total % positive decisions of all decisions Main countries of origin 2006 3.8 % 14.9 % 14.6 % 66.7 % 100 % 42.1 % Iraq, Serbia Montenegro, Russia 2009 16.2 % 54.7 % 8.9 % 20.2 % 27.3 % Somalia, Iraq, Kosovo 2011 22.6 % 48.3 % 10.6 % 18.5 % 29.9 % Afghanistan, Somalia, Serbia 2012 26.5 % 52.2 % 7.6 % 13.6 % 34.4 % Somalia, Syria, Afghanistan Source: Swedish Migration Board Note: In 2006, many positive decisions were granted on the basis of a temporary law which equaled to a regularization. Numbers for 2006 are therefore not fully comparable.

Towards an approximation of asylum decision-making in the EU? (1) Table 2: % of Geneva convention status among all positive decisions taken in EU Member States (all countries of origin) Min. EU Max. EU 2008 0.0 % 98.3 % 2011 4.3 % 93.3 % 2012 2.4 % 87.5 % Sweden 21.6 % 26.5% 30.2% Source: Eurostat - First instance decisions, annual aggregated data (rounded), update 2013-03-15 Note: Only EU Member States with more than 100 decisions were considered for this Table. (Shares for Sweden according to Eurostat are higher than according to national statistics of the Swedish Migration Board since, among other reasons, resettlement is not included in the total number of positive decisions at Eurostat.) Only looked at EU MS with higher numbers of decisions than 100.

Towards an approximation of asylum decision-making in the EU? (2) Table 3: % of Geneva Convention status among all positive decisions taken in EU Member States in relation to applicants from Afghanistan Min. EU Max. EU 2008 3.0 % 92.3 % 2011 3.7 % 54.1 % 2012 11.8 % 58.6 % Sweden 12.5 % 14.7 % 30.6 % Only looked at EU MS with higher numbers of decisions than 100. Source: Eurostat - First instance decisions, annual aggregated data (rounded), update 2013-03-15 Note: Only EU Member States with more than 100 decisions were considered for this Table

On the other hand: Differing trends in EU Member States 2011 - 2012 New asylum applications in 2012, compared to 2011 Increase in 10 Member States, including Sweden Stable levels (+/- 5% or less) in 3 Member States Decrease in 6 Member States Virtually no new asylum applicants or very small numbers (less or much less than 1 000 per year) in 7 Member States More than 10 000 new asylum applicants per year in at least 5 Member States (Germany: 64 540, France: 54 280, Sweden: 43 930 in 2012) Source: Eurostat, New asylum applicants, annual data (rounded), update 2013-03-15 Please note that there were no or incomplete Eurostat data for 6 Member States (IT, LT, HU, NL, AT, PT) at the time of making this analysis

Current situation New asylum applications in Sweden and selected EU Member States January 2012 - February 2013, monthly data Source: Eurostat, New asylum applicants, Monthly data (rounded), update 2013-03-15, complementary national statistics for Germany and Finland.

Thank you for your attention! Bernd Parusel Swedish Migration Board National EMN contact point emn@migrationsverket.se www.emnsweden.se