STFC-Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC-ILC collaborations on detectors F. Richard LAL/Orsay PAC Valencia May
Advertisements

31 May 2007LCWS R&D Review - Overview1 WWS Calorimetry R&D Review: Overview of CALICE Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
 k0k0 ++ -- -- p ILC Technical Design Report Physics and Detectors – Detailed Baseline Design Juan A. Fuster Verdú, IFIC-Valencia PAC Meeting, KEK.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
SiD’ and CLIC CDR preparations Outline: Introduction Description of SiD’ detector R&D in software/hardware for SiD’ Preparations for the CLIC CDR Conclusions.
Time development of showers in a Tungsten-HCAL Calice Collaboration Meeting – Casablanca 2010 Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
Development of Particle Flow Calorimetry José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DPF meeting, Providence, RI August 8 – 13, 2011.
Summary of Calorimetry/Muon Sessions Burak Bilki University of Iowa Argonne National Laboratory.
Mark Thomson Timing, Tungsten and High Energy Jets.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
F. Richard LAL/Orsay CLIC-ILC connections on Detectors PAC Paris meeting October 20, 2008.
The CALICE Si-W ECAL - physics prototype 2012/Apr/25 Tamaki Yoshioka (Kyushu University) Roman Poschl (LAL Orsay)
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Lucie Linssen, CLICdp, (bi-)monthly meeting, July 21st CLICdp news CLICdp (bi-)monthly meeting July 21 st 2014.
SiD R&D on PFA and Calorimetry -> IDAG guidance. -> Present PFA situation. -> Developing a timeline for PFA development. -> Calorimetry aspects.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
Sim/Recon DBD Editors Report Norman Graf (SLAC) Jan Strube (CERN) SiD Workshop SLAC, August 22, 2012.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
ILC DBD Common simulation and software tools Akiya Miyamoto KEK ILC PAC 14 December 2012 at KEK.
Tungsten as HCal-material for a LC at multi-TeV energies CALICE AHCAL Meeting, DESY 17 July 2009 Christian Grefe for the Linear Collider Detector Group.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
Pandora calorimetry and leakage correction Peter Speckmayer 2010/09/011Peter Speckmayer, WG2 meeting.
CLIC CDR in relation to SiD Lucie Linssen SiD discussion at IWLC CERN October 18 th LL, SiD meeting at IWLC, 18/10/2010.
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
Update on CLIC_ILD detector studies necessarily incomplete, but attempting to give you a “glimpse” presented by K. Elsener (CERN), for the CLIC detector.
February, INP PAN FCAL Workshop in Cracow W. Lohmann, DESY The BCD (Baseline Configuration Document) The next calendar dates Where we are with FCAL.
1 News from the CERN Linear Collider Detector Project Konrad Elsener CERN.
1http:// Lucie Linssen LCWS /3/2010 SiD and CLIC Outline: Adaptation of SiD detector for CLIC Use of SiD software for CLIC Tracking.
Individual Particle Reconstruction The PFA Approach to Detector Development for the ILC Steve Magill (ANL) Norman Graf, Ron Cassell (SLAC)
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
16 February 2009CLIC Physics & Detectors Konrad Elsener 1... some issues regarding the forward region... (“picking up” from Lucie Linssen, 29 Sept 2008)
Mark Thomson University of Cambridge High Granularity Particle Flow Calorimetry.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
Imaging Hadron Calorimeters for Future Lepton Colliders José Repond Argonne National Laboratory 13 th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Vienna University.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
I nstrumentation of the F orward R egion Collaboration High precision design ECFA - Durham2004 University of Colorado AGH University, Cracow I nstitute.
Initial proposal for the design of the luminosity calorimeter at a 3TeV CLIC Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University March 6th 2009
16/10/2010ECFA CERN1 Manqi RUAN Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) Ecole Polytechnique 91128, Palaiseau SDHCAL PFA Study: Single Particle Event.
SiD R&D Plan and Opportunities for New Collaborators
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
CEPC 数字强子量能器读出电子学预研进展
Linear Collider Detector (LCD) project overview
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
slicPandora: slic + pandoraPFANew
News item and introduction of working groups
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
CLIC detector at SiD meeting 28/3/2010
Starting up the CLIC detector design study CLIC Workshop, 15. Okt 2008
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
Studies with PandoraPFA
Calorimetry for a CLIC experiment
State-of-the-art in Hadronic Calorimetry for the Lepton Collider
CLIC Detector CERN Status + plans
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Argonne National Laboratory
CLIC Detector Synergies with SiD R&D
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
Presentation transcript:

STFC-Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Detector studies for CLIC Marcel Stanitzki STFC-Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Outline The CLIC CDR The CLIC experimental conditions Detectors for CLIC Recent Highlights

The CLIC CDR

CLIC Conceptual Design Report Three volumes (due August 2011) Vol. 1 Executive Summary Vol. 2 Accelerator Vol. 3 Physics & Detectors Will focus on Vol. 3 It will carried by entire Linear Collider Community, the Editors represent all regions Input from ILC detector concepts, R&D collaborations, theorists CDR to focus on 3 TeV case Goals of Vol. 3 Describe the CLIC physics potential Show that CLIC physics can be measured with adequate precision

CDR Main Editors Four Main Editors were appointed Lucie Linssen (CERN) Akiya Miyamoto (KEK, Asia) Marcel Stanitzki (RAL, Europe) Harry Weerts (ANL, Americas) Responsible for the overall CDR Individual Chapters handled by Chapter Editors First point of contact for questions/contributions

CLIC CDR Editors

Performance requirements CLIC Detector concepts CDR Editorial team Main Editors Physics Potential G. Giudice (CERN) J. Wells (CERN) Performance requirements M. Battaglia(UCSC,CERN) M. Thomson(Cambridge) CLIC Detector concepts J. Brau (Oregon) D. Schlatter (CERN) F. Simon (MPI) G. Wilson (Kansas) Vertex Detectors S. Worm (RAL) Tracking M. Demarteau (FNAL) C. Lacasta (Valencia) T. Matsuda (KEK) T. Nelson (SLAC) J. Timmermans(NIKHEF) Calorimetry F. Sefkow (DESY) T. Takeshita (Shinshu U) A. White (UTA) Solenoids A. Gaddi (CERN) Y. Makida (KEK) Muon system B.Schmidt (CERN) Forward H. Abramowicz (Tel Aviv) W. Lohmann (DESY) Detector Integration H, Gerwig (CERN) M. Oriunno (SLAC) Benchmarking J.J. Blaising (Annecy) J. Strube (RAL) F. Teubert (CERN) Costing M. Breidenbach (SLAC) C. Clerc (LLR) M. Nordberg (CERN)

CLIC Experimental conditions

Conditions at CLIC CLIC Bunch structure 312 bunches, 0.5 ns bunch spacing 50 Hz repetition rate Luminosity profile 30 % of the Events are inside 1% nominal Energy interval Beam Background more challenging Higher rates

Beam Backgrounds Incoherent e+e- Pairs Photons interacting with other electron/photon Peak at lowest Energies few 105 particles/BX Coherent e+e- pairs Direct photons conversion in strong fields Cutoff at several GeV 108 particles/BX

γγ→ Hadrons 3.3 events/BX 30 particles hit detector Deposit ~ 50 GeV Forward-peaked 15 TeV dumped in the detector per 156 ns bunch train ! Reconstruction Challenge Mini-jets Overlap with physics events

This means for the detectors Due to beam-induced background and short time between bunches: High occupancy in the inner regions (incoherent pairs) Jets scale and resolution are affected (γγ→ hadrons) Time-stamping is a must for almost all sub-detectors Narrow jets at high energy Calorimeter has to measure high-energy particles (leakage) Track separation in dense jets

Detectors for CLIC

The validated ILC detectors Both ILD & SiD build on particle flow paradigm ILD & SiD have complementary approaches Field, radius, tracking … CLIC detector concepts are based on SiD and ILD. Modified to meet CLIC requirements ILD SiD

Modifications for CLIC Crossing angle Changed to 20 mrad Vertex detector Moves outwards to r~ 2.5-3.0 cm due to beam background HCAL Barrel: 7.5 Λi , 1 cm W plates Endcaps:7.5 Λi , 2 cm steel plates Changes in Coil radius and length Modified MDI/Forward region CLIC_SiD

CLIC_SiD and CLIC_ILD More details : https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CLIC/ClicCDRNumbers

Rationale for 7.5 Λi Study done using PandoraPFA Tail-Catcher (points) brings little improvements 7.5 Λi gives good jet energy resolution up to 1.5 TeV

Vertex detector modifications PRELIMINARY

Zoom In

Recent Highlights

W-HCAL studies Tungsten as absorber Larger slow neutron component Slower shower development Timing cuts important Drive Resolution Sets scale for time stamping Build prototype Verify Simulation

W-HCAL testbeam Prototype tests together with CALICE W -Absorbers 30-40 layers Thickness1 cm 80 cm Ø Different active materials Start Nov 2010 with PS beam 30 W plates AHCAL Scintillator planes 3x3 cm Tungsten stack 22

Low energy Muons in W-HCAL

PFA at CLIC CLIC uses PFA-based detectors Algorithms needs tuning for high energies Current Status is very promising 500 GeV Z 1 TeV Z Decent W/Z separation Some W/Z separation

Two detectors, one PFA CLIC_SiD CLIC_ILD SLIC Org.lcsim SLICPandora Mokka Marlin MarlinPandora CLIC_SiD Simulation Reco PandoraPFA PFA Analysis Analysis CLIC_ILD

Green and purple are two reconstructed PFOs. Muon ID in dense jets First yoke hit Pandora clusters the hits outwards In dense environments it occasionally has wrong hit assignment for muon hits in the HCAL. To prevent this: Match Inner Detector tracks to tracks in the yoke. Assign HCAL hits along the new defined muon track HCAL muon hits Track to which muon really belongs Green and purple are two reconstructed PFOs.

80k jobs in a month, 40k in 4 days ILCDIRAC DIRAC developed by LHCb Aim: provide easy access to GRID resources User-friendliness & more stability Built-in production system ILCDIRAC implements ILC specific features Software Whizard, Mokka, Marlin, SLIC, LCSIM 6 month to develop ILCDIRAC Active users are not only at CERN: RAL and LAL 80k jobs in a month, 40k in 4 days

Underground Caverns

MDI Integration of QD0 magnets and IP Feedback systems in IR Kicker BPM Spent beam Beamcal Lumical Integration of QD0 magnets and IP Feedback systems in IR

CDR Benchmarks 5+1 benchmark channels for the CDR At 3 TeV e+e-→Hνeνe H→bb, µµ (mH=120 GeV) e+e-→H+H- →tbtb e+e-→HA→bbbb (mH,H+,A=900 GeV) e+e-→qRqR mqR= 1.1 TeV e+e-→l+ l- ml=423,696 GV e+e-→ χ+χ-, χ0χ0 m1/2 = 800 GeV, A0 = 0, m0 = 966 GeV, tan β = 51, μ > 0 At 500 GeV e+e-→tt (same as ILC Benchmark)

A First look Example : Smuon analysis Currently using K' point χ1= 554.3 GeV μR=1108.8 GeV Full simulation Measured χ1= 569.1± 1.5 GeV μR=1118.4± 3.0 GeV

Summary CLIC CDR is a collaborative effort of the LC community Editors represent all the regions CDR is due in August 2011 Oral presentation to the Scientific Policy Committee in June 2011 More details 25 scheduled presentations on Detectors for CLIC in the parallel sessions LCD notes http://lcd.web.cern.ch/LCD/Documents/Documents.html Acknowledgments Everybody in the CLIC detector study group