Practical Implications Laura Lovato, Biostatistician

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
RESEARCH COMPLIANCE Agenda 1. No Destruction of local research documents after scanning 2. Training for shipping biological samples/specimens 3. Regulatory.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
SDPI Competitive Grant Program Planning Meeting 1 IHS Diabetes Competitive Grant Program: Overview and Update Kelly Acton, MD, MPH, FACP Director, IHS.
Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
Coordinating Center Overview November 16, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Diabetes Prevention Program Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
Discussion Gitanjali Batmanabane MD PhD. Do you look like this?
Intervention Studies Principles of Epidemiology Lecture 10 Dona Schneider, PhD, MPH, FACE.
Preparing for and Disseminating Study Results. Overview This session will cover how to: Develop and implement a dissemination plan Correctly time the.
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM Office Location: 1350 N. Vine Ave. (one block west of Cherry Ave. & three blocks north of Speedway) PO Box Phone:
Communications During a Clinical Trial. Overview This session will cover how to: Announce your trial Maintain good communications Communicate with key.
Dr. Susan Lockwood SSA Executive Director June 18, 2010.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Third Annual Medical Research Summit Washington, D.C. March 2003.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Intermittent vs Continuous Pulse Oximetry McCulloh R, Koster M, Ralston S, et al.
1 Dissemination and Implementation Paul K. Whelton MD, MSc for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group ALLHAT U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
3CTN “Ask Me” Campaign Training Slides. Introduction 3CTN Ask Me Campaign Training Slides March CTN Objectives 1. To improve patient access to.
Ethics in Research Each research study involves a careful risk/benefit analysis prior to beginning data collection. The question each researcher must ask.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Data Management and Coordinating Center (RDCRN DMCC) Rosalie Holland LDN Investigator Meeting at WORLDSymposium.
The Southampton Mobility Volunteer programme to increase physical activity levels of older inpatients: a feasibility study (SoMoVe) Dr Stephen Lim Specialist.
Summary of “A randomized trial of standard versus intensive blood-pressure control” The SPRINT Research Group, NEJM, DOI: /NEJMoa Downloaded.
Workforce Development Domain Task Force
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Background Post-transplant outcomes in adult Fontan patients remain poorly defined. Available studies limited to sub-groups within published registry data.
Overview of Plain Language Summary
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Study Feasibility and Start-up
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one?
Enrolling in Clinical Trials
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
ClinicalTrials.gov: An introduction
Dining with Diabetes IRB Training 2017.
Whistleblower Program
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
NHLBI Perspective Yves Rosenberg, M.D, M.P.H.
Discussant: Theodore Karrison, PhD
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Snapshot of the Clinical Trials Enterprise as revealed by ClinicalTrials.gov Content downloaded: September 2012.
implementing NEW NIH Human subjects guidance
How we use Your Health Records
WCHRI Summer Studentship Competition 2017
Elements of a Successful Informed Consent
eResearch at Emory Phase I: eIRB
Crisis Communications Plan
Participant Retention
Steering Group Meeting
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Optum’s Role in Mycare Ohio
TRTO (Translational Research Trials Office)
Human Participants Research
VOLUNTARY BLOOD DONATION TERUMO PENPOL Limited
3CTN Ask Me Campaign Training Slides.
Understanding the Process of Documenting Informed Consent
Office of the Human Research Protection Program Update
Protocol Approval Criteria
Presentation transcript:

Practical Implications Laura Lovato, Biostatistician Statistical and Practical Considerations When Terminating a Trial Early: Contrasting early stopping due to harm (ACCORD) versus for benefit (SPRINT) Practical Implications Laura Lovato, Biostatistician Liverpool, UK, May 8th, 2017 Invited Session 2.1 - Statistical Design and Trial Conduct

Coordinating center knowledge of the potential for early termination Strict Confidentiality Maintained Small group working on analyses, planning for early termination scenarios and developing materials for rapid cessation Biostatisticians Project Management Programmers

Planning for potential early termination 2-3 most likely scenarios Rapid plan for notifying Steering Committee, Clinical Sites, IRBs, and Participants Development of Operational Materials Data freeze and publication of results (data the DSMB used for decision, or updated data through stopping point, beyond?) Earlier transfer of participant care Training for closeout visits

Planning for potential early termination Website and data management systems modified in the background Documents (for sites, public, media) Data entry systems to capture transfer of treatment/care Closeout visit data entry and management Made ‘live’ once public announcement occurs ACCORD: continuation of Lipid and Blood Pressure trials SPRINT: follow up for cognition and kidney outcomes

Study Leadership Involvement ACCORD MASKED: Site staff and principal investigators UNMASKED: Some coordinating center staff, Some project office (NIH) personnel, and the Steering Committee Chair All actively participated in the discussions. SPRINT None of the project office personnel were unmasked except for the NHLBI representative; he was not otherwise involved in the study. The steering committee chair was masked. Site principal investigators were masked. This meant that the coordinating center had much less advice.

Materials Developed for Early Termination: Publication Documents: obvious! Press Release Journal Article Media talking points Letter to major medical societies

Materials Developed for Early Termination: Memo to Site PIs and Staff: explanation of result, reasons for stopping standard arm, overview of transition process, timeline for remainder of trial. Memo to CCN/Site IRBs: explanation of result, reasons for stopping standard arm, overview of transition process, timeline for remainder of trial. Q&A for Study Staff: anticipated questions and answers to address clinic operations during transition. Treatment plan for transition of standard arm participants to intensive goal (SPRINT) or backing off therapy from intensive arm participants (ACCORD) including written algorithm for implementing intensive arm BP target among standard arm participants.

Materials Developed for Early Termination: Modified Study Forms to be used during transition and remaining follow-up. Meet me slides: slides for presentation to clinic staff that explanation of result, reasons for stopping standard arm, overview of transition process, timeline for remainder of trial. Letter to drug companies currently donating medications: includes explanation of results and plans for transition and timeline for remainder of trial Participant information document for website: explanation of result, reasons for stopping standard arm, overview of transition process, timeline for remainder of trial. Model Consent Addendum

Materials Developed for Early Termination: Materials for dissemination of results to participants, including resources for group sessions. Letter to All participants explaining the result, clearly explaining what they should do next, and encouraging their continued follow-up (NEXT SLIDE) Letter to non-study care provider regarding trial results and recommendations. Talking Points for Participants: anticipated questions and answers for participants designed to be used in 1-1 discussion during transition visits. FAQ for General Distribution: anticipated questions and answers for site PIs and others to aid in explanation of results to general (lay) audience.

Elements of a Participant Notification Letter Introduction What is the news? What do these results mean for me? What should I do now? Thank you! Signatures of Project Office and local Principal Investigator (letter to hand to personal health care provider)

Participant Notification Letters ACCORD Template letters developed centrally, different for each study arm Overnight mail from clinical sites SPRINT Generic letter, same for both arms Printed, Labeled and Mailed from coordinating center to all participants, one day prior to clinical site notification

SPRINT Coordinating Center Staff – Labor Day weekend

Which events to include? Continued collection of events following early termination: implications for analysis Which events to include? Event Detected: prior to DSMB decision after DSMB decision Event Occurred: A BN BF F

Continued collection of events following early termination: WHAT DID SPRINT DO? DSMB Data Freeze July 5, 2015 NHLBI Director accepts DSMB Recommendation to Terminate Early August 20, 2015 NEJM Paper Data Freeze October 2015 NEJM Paper Published November 9, 2015 SPRINT Follow-up Competed June 30, 2016

Clinical Site Staff Concerns - stress ACCORD Devastated by news of possible harm Counseling services offered for staff at many clinical sites Emphasis on quickly and safely transferring participants to appropriate treatment (backing off intensive glycemia arm) SPRINT Emphasis on transferring participants to appropriate treatment, slower timeline Continue follow-up for other outcomes

Clinical Site Staff Concerns – job security ACCORD Glycemia trial stopped 17 months early, but follow-up continued to full duration for the Blood Pressure and Lipid trials SPRINT Intervention stopped 11 months early, and follow-up stopped 4 months early

Practical Considerations When Terminating a Trial Early: Contrasting ACCORD And SPRINT trials Early Termination due to harm (ACCORD) Early termination due to benefit (SPRINT) More sensitivity for study staff (counseling recommended) Follow other outcomes to complete the picture Rapid transition away from experimental treatment Slower transition; focus on explanation of study results and letter to primary care provider Publication based on data frozen for DSMB important to understand decision Publication contained events known at the time of publication that occurred prior to termination announcement

Special thank you to… Bob Byington (ACCORD) Sharon Wilmoth (ACCORD) Letitia Perdue (SPRINT) David Reboussin (SPRINT)