TOPS TSA HANDBOOK MD 1100.43-4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working Group Feedback EDR Replacement. Where are we now? Inconsistent deployment and practice. Wide variation in the value placed on the process by managers.
Advertisements

Department of Employee Relations June Unsatisfactory performance and/or behavior of non-instructional staff can be addressed through progressive.
Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation Ministry of Medical Services PERFORMANCE REPORTING 1.
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
To be recognized as the best, we must recognize and reward the best in our employees. Pay for Performance & Performance Management System Veterans Health.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
Performance Appraisal System Update
WHAT TO SAY AND HOW TO SAY IT. Conducting Performance Reviews.
The New Uniform Appraisal Rating Periods Union Brown Bag Lunch Series: Wednesday, October 2, 2002 Noon, Lecture Room D.
Performance Management DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (ED) OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT (OM) Human Capital and Client Services (HCCS) ED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM.
Competency Assessment and Pay Determination N.C. Office of State Personnel Career-Banding Project Team.
Performance Management
EPMS OVERVIEW – Prepare Planning Stages – Provide Ongoing Communication – Performing Evaluation Stage – Address substandard performance. – Use EAP appropriately.
Department of Human Resources. Progressive Process A progressive discipline system gives employees ample warning of misconduct or work-related problems;
Introduction to Business Courses The proposed Introduction to Business Courses consist of three one-credit courses. – BUS 100: Functional Areas of Business.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. Evaluation.
Uintah School District Emergency Preparedness. Utah State law requires each local school board to adopt and maintain an emergency preparedness plan.
Presented by: Cecelia Largo-Nez, Community Involvement Specialist Local Governance Support Center Fort Defiance Agency March 25,2 009 “Essential Tools.
Preparing for and Submitting an Application Jane D N Bates Head of Authorisations and Companies.
DMS Leadership Team Meeting September 23, :00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Conservation Districts Supervisor Accreditation Module 9: Employer/Employee Relations.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Performance Planning & Evaluation Classified & Operational Form.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
LEARNING SUPPORT & GUIDANCE Primary Protocol. Learning Support Protocol. 1 At the beginning of the year, each Learning Support specialist draws up a list.
Procurement Division Procurement Reform Recommendation #19  “DGS shall authorize individual signature authority for contracting and procurement officials.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
Accountability Presented by Mollie Schaffer August 13 th, 2014.
Writing Performance Elements and Standards. What is Performance Management?  It is the systematic process by which an agency involves its employees,
OHSAA Officials Ejection Report Filing an Officials Report Officials shall file a report with the school and the OHSAA office whenever a coach or player.
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Performance Management – Part 3 BCUHB Capability Procedure (WP3A) 69.
MANAGING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE Facilitator: Joan Strohauer, CalHR Guest Presenters: Marva Lee, Personnel Officer, CalSTRS Brenna Neuharth, Workforce Planning.
UCPEA Supervisor Performance Evaluation Training
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
UCPEA Supervisor Performance Evaluation Training
Orientation to Practicum/Internship
TOPS TRAINING.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Field Investigation Drug Officer Workshop Goals and Objectives
TOPS TSA MD
T.O.P.S
Writing Grant Proposals
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation
Performance Management System
Communication Skills Lab 5
Human Resources Management: Module 2
CoC Subrecipient Management
Performance Evaluation
PERFORMANCE AND TALENT MANAGEMENT
Claremont Clinic – The AIS Standard
Employee Performance Management System
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation
Detecting, reporting & investigating data breaches under GDPR
The Delivery System Defines the Components of the Program
TAG and the Law
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Understanding Motivation
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
TRAININGS.
TRAININGS.
Presentation transcript:

TOPS TSA HANDBOOK MD 1100.43-4

B. PERFORMANCE PLANNING: 3. Specific performance standards for each individual performance goal and core competency have been established. These standards provide specific performance details associated with each goal and core competency. Written performance standards for both the Achieved Expectations and the Achieved Excellence levels have been developed. These performance standards will be used to evaluate progress in achieving performance goals. 5. These performance expectations must be communicated in writing to an employee before he/she can be held accountable for them. 6. The performance plan shall consist of pre-established core competencies and pre- established, results-focused individual performance goals including associated performance standards. 7. The Rating Official should explain to the employees the core competencies and the associated performance standards related to each competency. Specific competencies, goals, and standards that are part of the employee’s performance plan must be communicated in writing

E. Summary Rating: 6. A Rating Official must provide written justification to support a summary rating above or below Achieved Expectation. F. Addressing Unsatisfactory Performance: 1. Once a Rating Official determines that an employee’s performance is unacceptable, appropriate action must be taken immediately. The performance improvement process should be according to Article 1 of the CBA. Management is strongly advised to contact their local Employee Relations point-of-contact and their local field counsel; and/or the Employee Relations staff at TSQA HQ Office of Human Capital for guidance.