Webinar on the Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the PCT Audit Procedure Background: The Act was passed in November The Act will be fully in force by January.
Advertisements

THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada CANADA’S ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING 20 FACTS PREPARERS of FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SHOULD KNOW.
Breach of a Requirement of the Code Marisa Orbea New York 19 June 2012.
Michael Moreland & Kathryn Beseau Partners Moreland & Associates, Inc.
International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants Internal Audit Bob Franchini Paris June
Property/Casualty Actuaries and the New US Qualification Standard Mary Frances Miller (member, AAA Committee on Qualifications) 2007 Casualty Actuarial.
Current CAS Issues and Directions Tom Myers, CAS Chairman of the Board Casualty Actuaries of Europe May 22, 2008.
Current CAS Issues and Directions Joanne Spalla MAF Fall Meeting September 21, 2007.
2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario 2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario Canadian Institute of Actuaries.
Finite Reinsurance - Regulator perspective August Chow Senior Director, OSFI Nov 9, 2005.
Course on Professionalism Actuarial Organizations and Qualification Standards.
Course On Professionalism Actuarial Organizations And Qualification Standards 1.
1 The Impact of SAS 112 on Governmental Financial Statement Audits GAQC Member Conference Call January 4, 2007 Presented by Chuck Landes, CPA.
Course On Professionalism Actuarial Organizations And Qualification Standards.
Current CAS Issues and Directions Joanne Spalla Casualty Actuaries of Greater New York December 2, 2009.
The Actuarial Standards Board and Actuarial Standards of Practice Actuaries’ Club of Boston Annual Meeting September 16, 2010 Kathleen A. Riley, FSA, MAAA,
Mutual Recognition Will Take the CAS Beyond Its Boundaries CAS 2003 Spring Meeting.
IEEE /r3 Submission September 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
2008 Revised Qualification Standards Southwest Actuarial Forum Catherine Taylor, FCAS, MAAA June 2008.
Professionalism Allan Kaufman Casualty Actuaries in Europe November 29,2007.
Course On Professionalism Actuarial Organizations And Qualification Standards 1.
Current CAS Issues and Directions Thomas Myers CAMAR Fall Meeting December 4, 2008.
INTOSAI's Capacity Building Committee Annual Meeting High-level Update on the ‎INTOSAI's Strategic Planning Process By: H.E Mr. Osama Faquih Stockholm.
Page 1 Non-Assurance Services Gary Hannaford IESBA January 2015 London.
Current CAS Issues and Directions Bob Miccolis, FCAS, MAAA Midwestern Actuarial Forum March 7, 2008 Chicago.
Proposed ASB Actuarial Standard of Practice on Statements of Actuarial Opinion Regarding Property/Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves Status.
March 2010 – IAASB to consider issues paper and task force proposals June 2010 – IAASB first read of exposure draft (prior to next IESBA meeting) September.
2002 CLRS - Arlington, VA Reserve/Opinion Issues from a Regulatory Perspective Proposed Revision to the NAIC Annual Statement Instructions Richard Marcks,
Page 1 Part C – Section 320 Jim Gaa, Task Force Chair and IESBA Member IESBA Meeting December 4-6, 2013 New York.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting New York, USA September 15-16, 2015.
IEEE /r5 Submission November 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ACTUARIES Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Actuaries. All Rights Reserved. May not be reproduced without express permission. PAGE.
Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires
Non-Assurance Services
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
2008 General Meeting Assemblée générale 2008 Toronto, Ontario
Review of Part C Phase 2 - Applicability
SAO Changes Then and Now
Structure of the Code – Phases 1 and 2
Structure of the Code – Phase 2 TF Comments and Proposals
Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting
What Does It Mean for an Actuary to Act “Professionally”?
Setting Actuarial Standards
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Review of Part C of the Code – Inducements & Applicability
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Revision 1 to Document CWG-SFP-2/7-E 12 September 2017 Original: English Process and timetable for The elaboration of the ITU STRATEGIC and financial.
Megan Zietsman, Task Force Chair IAASB Meeting, New York, USA
Structure–Feedback on Structure ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
Summary of the 2018 Winter Meetings
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Assigning Courses to Disciplines: Finding the Right Map
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Performance Audit Subcommittee Project for ISSAI Level 4 review 66th INTOSAI Governing Board Meeting Vienna, November 5-7, 2014.
Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA CAG Meeting
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
Jim Gaa, Chair, Part C Task Force IESBA Meeting New York July 8, 2014
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
Towards a Common ITU/ISO/IEC Patent Policy
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
Membership & Professional Standards Committee (MPSC)
Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee Spring 2014
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
Membership & Professional Standards Committee (MPSC)
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Lyn Provost, IAASB Member and Task Force Chair IAASB Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Webinar on the Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy December 4, 2008 10:30 – 11:00 a.m. EST

Speakers Christopher S. Carlson, Chair of the CAS Board of Directors and Consultant, Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc. J. Scott Bradley, Chair of the CAS Continuing Professional Development Task Force, and Consultant, Ascendant Risk Services

Background November 2007 – CAS Board forms Continuing Professional Development Task Force. June 2007 – Task Force presented preliminary report to the Board. September 2008 – Board approved a motion to release an Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy. October 2008 – Executive Council releases Exposure Draft to allow members to comment on the Policy. Let’s start with some background. At the November 2007 Board meeting, the Board formed the Continuing Professional Development Task Force, which is chaired by Scott Bradley. The Task Force was charged with exploring the need for a minimum continuing education requirement for all members. In June, the Task Force presented a preliminary report to the Board and at the September Board meeting, the Board approved a motion to release an Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy. The Executive Council then released the Exposure Draft to allow members to comment on the Policy. The proposed Continuing Education Policy represents a significant milestone in ensuring that our members stay relevant and accountable to their principals. I look forward to hearing your comments on the Exposure Draft. And with that, I’ll turn it over to Scott.

CAS Code of Professional Conduct PRECEPT 2. An Actuary shall perform Actuarial Services only when the Actuary is qualified to do so on the basis of basic and continuing education and experience and only when the Actuary satisfies applicable qualification standards. ANNOTATION 2-1. It is the professional responsibility of an Actuary to observe applicable qualification standards that have been promulgated by a Recognized Actuarial Organization for the jurisdictions in which the Actuary renders Actuarial Services and to keep current regarding changes in these standards. Let’s start with Precept 2 of the Code of Professional Conduct: An Actuary shall perform Actuarial Services only when the Actuary is qualified to do so on the basis of basic and continuing education. The CAS operates as an international body, relying on the national associations with jurisdiction where its members practice to establish qualification and practice standards. The Code explicitly requires that CAS members meet the requirements set by a recognized actuarial organization having jurisdiction where the member practices. The annotations to the Code specifically recognize the jurisdiction of the CIA and the AAA in this regard in Canada and the United States. It would seem appropriate, then, that the CAS simply continue to rely on the national associations to set qualification standards, including CE requirements. However, there are a number of jurisdictions where there is no national body or where there are few or no national CE requirements. This is the primary reason why the Task Force concluded and the Board agreed that the CAS should set minimum CE requirements for its members.

How are CAS Members Affected? CAS members who issue Statements of Actuarial Opinion: Would be required to follow local qualification standards or, in cases where no local standards have been established, with the CAS standards. The local qualification standards in the U.S. are the AAA standards. Local standards in Canada are the CIA standards. So, how are CAS members affected? The Code of Conduct requires that members be qualified in order to practice. It poses no requirement on members who do not practice. Therefore, it is appropriate that a CAS CE requirement be limited to those members who practice as actuaries. In other words, the CE requirement is a practice requirement, not a membership requirement. This is consistent with the AAA qualification standard effective January 1, 2008. About 87% of CAS members reside and presumably practice in the United States and another 7% reside and presumably practice in Canada. The US CE requirements in the AAA qualification standards are robust, and the CIA requirements are also rigorous. So CAS members who issue Statements of Actuarial Opinion and who are practicing in the U.S. or Canada would be required to comply with the AAA or CIA qualification standards. CAS members who issue Statements of Actuarial Opinion who are practicing outside the US or Canada would be required to follow local standards or, in cases where no local standard has been established, with the proposed CAS standards.

What are Statements of Actuarial Opinion? An opinion expressed by an actuary in the course of performing Actuarial Services and intended by that actuary to be relied upon by the person or organization to which the opinion is addressed. For further guidance, please refer to the AAA Qualification Standards and supporting documentation. Before we get back to how members are affected, it would be helpful to define a key term. What are Statements of Actuarial Opinion? A “Statement of Actuarial Opinion” (SAO) is an opinion expressed by an actuary in the course of performing Actuarial Services and intended by that actuary to be relied upon by the person or organization to which the opinion is addressed. This is the same definition used by the AAA Qualification Standards. For further guidance as to what constitutes a Statement of Actuarial Opinion, please refer to the Qualification Standards and supporting documentation of the American Academy of Actuaries.

How are CAS Members Affected? A CAS member who is a member of another IAA full member organization may meet the continuing education requirements of that organization, provided that the requirements are of parallel rigor with the CAS requirement. The CAS recognizes the requirements of: American Academy of Actuaries Canadian Institute of Actuaries Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries (UK) Institute of Actuaries of Australia Now, I’ll go into a little more detail on how CAS Members are affected. A CAS member who is a member of another IAA full member organization may meet the requirements of that organization, but there’s a caveat - the requirements must be of the same rigor as the CAS requirement. In addition to the AAA, the CAS has already agreed to recognize the requirements of: Canadian Institute of Actuaries Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries (UK) Institute of Actuaries of Australia If you are not currently meeting the requirements of one of these organizations, then you need to familiarize yourself with the CAS Continuing Education requirements as stated in the Exposure Draft.

Documentation CAS members must keep appropriate documentation of their continuing education. Beginning with submission of their dues for 2010, members must report whether they expect to perform Actuarial Services in 2010, and if so, whether they have met the CE requirements. Beginning in 2010 (for statements issued in 2011), CAS members must maintain records of their continuing education. These records must be available for audit by the CAS. So it’s important that you meet the CE requirements, but it is equally important that you document your activities. As you can see on this slide, and again, this comes directly from the Policy, beginning with submission of their dues for 2010, members must report whether they expect to perform Actuarial Services in 2010, and if so, whether they have met the CE requirements. Also, beginning in 2010, CAS members must maintain records of their continuing education and these records must be available for audit by the CAS.

Timeline December 19, 2008 – Deadline for comments on the Exposure Draft. March 2009 – Board to formally adopt Policy. December 31, 2009 – The requirement would be applicable for all Statements of Actuarial Opinion issued after this date. I touched on a few implementation dates on that last slide, but there are a few milestones to get past first. Members and other interested parties are invited to comment on the Exposure Draft by December 19. You can find the Exposure Draft on the CAS Web Site, along with instructions for submitting comments. There is a link right on the home page. All comment letters will be considered and revisions may be made to the proposed policy based on the comments. Barring substantial comments from the membership, the Board is expected to adopt the proposed policy at its March 2009 meeting. And on December 31, 2009, the requirement would be applicable for all Statements of Actuarial Opinion issued after this date.

Questions and Discussion