Disturbed Things Come in small packages

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Star formation histories and environment Bianca M. Poggianti INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova WE ARE ALL AFTER THE BIG PICTURE: 1)To what extent,
Advertisements

Introduction to Astrophysics Lecture 14: Galaxies NGC1232.
Observations of the evolution of HI in galaxies across different environments. D.J. Pisano (West Virginia University)
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Mass determination Kauffmann et al. determined masses using SDSS spectra (Hdelta & D4000) Comparison with our determination: Relative.
Star-Formation in Close Pairs Selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Overview The effect of galaxy interactions on star formation has been investigated.
Evolution of Luminous Galaxy Pairs out to z=1.2 in the HST/ACS COSMOS Field Jeyhan Kartaltepe, IfA, Hawaii Dave Sanders, IfA, Hawaii Nick Scoville, Caltech.
Exploring the Stellar Populations of Early-Type Galaxies in the 6dF Galaxy Survey Philip Lah Honours Student h Supervisors: Matthew Colless Heath Jones.
SFR and COSMOS Bahram Mobasher + the COSMOS Team.
Rand (2000) NGC 5775 Hα map. D = 24.8 Mpc It is an interacting galaxy.
M ORPHOLOGY OF G ALACTIC O PEN C LUSTERS Thirty six open clusters were selected from the 2MASS database on the basis of the latest open cluster catalogue.
On the inconsistency between the SMBH Mass Function from velocity dispersion and luminosity E. Tundo 1,2, M. Bernardi 2, R. K. Sheth 2 J. B. Hyde 2, A.
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
Evolution of Luminous Galaxy Pairs out to z=1.2 in the HST/ACS COSMOS Field Jeyhan Kartaltepe, IfA, Hawaii Dave Sanders, IfA, Hawaii Nick Scoville, Caltech.
Star Formation Enhancement in Close Pairs Each galaxy pair consists of a primary galaxy and a companion - we examine the specific star- formation rate.
Kinematics of Globular Clusters in Giant Elliptical Galaxies Hong Soo Park 1, Myung Gyoon Lee 1, Ho Seong Hwang 2, Nobuo Arimoto 3, Naoyuki Tamura 4, Masato.
Dynamical state and star formation properties of the merging galaxy cluster Abell 3921 C. Ferrari 1,2, C. Benoist 1, S. Maurogordato 1, A. Cappi 3, E.
Galactic Metamorphoses: Role of Structure Christopher J. Conselice.
Environmental Properties of a Sample of Starburst Galaxies Selected from the 2dFGRS Matt Owers (UNSW) Warrick Couch (UNSW) Chris Blake (UBC) Michael Pracy.
The assembly of stellar mass during the last 10 Gyr: VVDS results B.Garilli on behalf of the VVDS consortium 1 topic, 4 approaches, concordant results.
Properties of Barred Galaxies in SDSS DR7 - OPEN KIAS SUMMER INSTITUTE - Gwang-Ho Lee, Changbom Park, Myung Gyoon Lee & Yun-Young Choi 0. Abstract We investigate.
The shapes of the THINGS HI profiles Presented by : Ianjamasimanana Roger Supervisor : Erwin de Blok UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN.
Study Mg II quasar absorption line systems in order to understand the kinematics of halos probing distances out to 70 kpcs from the galaxies. Therefore.
Scaling Relations in HI Selected Star-Forming Galaxies Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
Redshift Evolution Of The Morphology Density Relation Peter Capak B. Mobasher, R. Abraham, R. Ellis, K. Sheth, N. Scoville Postdoctoral Fellow California.
MNRAS, submitted. Galaxy evolution Evolution in global properties reasonably well established What drives this evolution? How does it depend on environment?
Dynamic and Spatial Properties of Satellites in Isolated Galactic Systems Abel B. Diaz.
Field O Stars: A Mode of Sparse Star Formation Joel Lamb Sally Oey University of Michigan.
Competitive Science with the WHT for Nearby Unresolved Galaxies Reynier Peletier Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Groningen.
ZCOSMOS 10k: The role of group environment on the morphological transformation of galaxies Katarina Kovač 1 and the zCOSMOS team* *The zCOSMOS team comprises.
Discovering galaxy individuality with SAMI The Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral field spectrograph Scott Croom, Julia Bryant and the SAMI team Sydney Institute.
BULGE FRACTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF STAR FORMATION IN SAMI GALAXIES Greg Goldstein PhD student, Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University Supervisors:
Julia Bryant HECTOR project scientist Australian Astronomical Observatory University of Sydney CAASTRO With Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Jon Lawrence, Scott Croom.
David V. Stark In collaboration with: Sheila Kannappan, Kathleen Eckert, Jonathan Florez, Kirsten Hall, Linda Watson, Erik Hoversten, Joseph Burchett,
The Active to Passive Transition Alvio Renzini, Ringberg Schloss, May 21, 2010 ● Star Formation ceases in many galaxies, first in the most massive ones,
Towards Realistic Modeling of Massive Star Clusters Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan) graduate student Hui Li.
On the Origin of Galaxy Morphology in a Hierarchical Universe
Spectral classification of galaxies of LAMOST DR3
Radio Loud and Radio Quiet AGN
Genevieve J. Graves University of California, Santa Cruz
M. LIMOUSIN & THE SL2S COLLABORATION
The morphology and angular momentum of simulated galaxy populations
A Survey of Starburst Galaxies An effort to help understand the starburst phenomenon and its importance to galaxy evolution Megan Sosey & Duilia deMello.
Dynamical Models for Galaxies Observed with SAURON Michele Cappellari
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
The formation and dynamical state of the brightest cluster galaxies
Sugata Kaviraj Hertfordshire Based on: Kaviraj 2014, MN, 440, 2944
Extragalactic Archaeology
Aday Robaina Rapisarda (Yes, two surnames)
DYNAMO Survey: An up-close view of turbulent, clumpy galaxies
Galaxy Formation and Evolution: Where we are and where we are going.
Signposts of massive star formation
GALAXIES, GALAXIES, GALAXIES!
GALEX: Galaxy Evolution Explorer
‘3D’ Data Sets are ABSOLUTELY Crucial to Answer the Important Questions of Galaxy Formation and Evolution Galaxy dynamical masses, gas masses Spatially.
The Stellar Population of Metal−Poor Galaxies at z~1
Kinemetry of High-Redshift Galaxies
Probing the IMF Star Formation in Massive Clusters.
Yongmin Yoon, Myungshin Im, Gwang-ho Lee, Gu Lim, and Seong-kook Lee
Quenching of the star formation activity in cluster galaxies
Ages, Metallicities and Abundances of Dwarf Early-Type Galaxies in the Coma Cluster by Ana Matković (STScI) Rafael Guzmán (U. of Florida) Patricia Sánchez-Blázquez (U.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs
Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The sSFR-M∗ relation part I σsSFR -M∗ as a function of sample, SFR indicator and environment L. J. M. Davies et al. Liu.
SDSS-IV MaNGA: The Spatial Distribution of Star Formation and its Dependence on Mass, Structure and Environment (arXiv: v1) 胡 宁
Authod: Ryan L. Sanders et al.(2018)
Galaxies.
Galaxies.
Author: Ting-Wen Lan and Houjun Mo.(2018)
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Compact Star-Forming Galaxies as Old Starbursts Becoming Quiescent
Presentation transcript:

Disturbed Things Come in small packages Jessica V. Bloom Disturbed Things Come in small packages Thanks to: Scott Croom Julia Bryant Joss Bland-Hawthorn

Kinematics can uncover processes shaping galaxy evolution Kinematic classification of SAMI galaxies Physical basis for scatter off the Tully-Fisher relation What determines asymmetry? Bloom et al., 2016 (submitted) Events which perturb kinematics (e.g. major/minor mergers, secular processes) play key role in galaxy evolution Morphology valuable, but kinematics allows different view, without Hubble type or bursts of SFR Low mass galaxies are known to be highly irregular – work on TFR etc Test case for different kinds/causes of asymmetry Shapiro et al., 2008

Data SAMI Galaxy Survey data cubes Hα emission line kinematic maps fit by LZIFU (Ho et al., 2014) – subsample of 816 galaxies MY SAMPLE: 532 galaxies after Hα S/N cuts Gas kinematics, range of morphological types, thanks to I-Ting Ho, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii Explain colours/velocity fields

HIGHER MODES INDICATES KINEMATIC ASYMMETRY Krajnovic et al., 2007 KINEMETRY Asymmetry (n>1) POWER IN HIGHER MODES INDICATES KINEMATIC ASYMMETRY Regular rotation Fourier decomposition of velocity fields, such that they are separated into modes, with asymmetry signatures carried in higher order modes Fits first and higher order models to velocity and dispersion fields Take the median over ellipses

Classification using kinemetry Visually classified normal galaxies Bloom et al., 2016 (submitted) Bin counts (normalised) Visually classified perturbed galaxies

Scatter off the Tully-Fisher Relation (can be physically explained) Asymmetry Causes: TFR remains at all stellar masses PA offset SCATTER OFF TFR INVERSELY CORRELATES WITH STELLAR MASS Increases with scatter, decreases with mass Low Vrot - explain TFR Previous work, e.g. Kannapan et al., in Nearby Field Galaxy Survey Thanks to Luca Poorly constrained PA (due to mergers making the galaxy irregular) Large offset between photometric and kinematic PA (yay for spatially resolved kinematics!) – correlation between PA offset and scatter off TFR, as well as - inverse correlation between PA offset and stellar mass What this tells us: PA offset is a major cause of scatter below TFR, particularly at low stellar mass Scatter increases at low mass log(Stellar Mass) Vrot measurements by L. Cortese

Asymmetry is related to stellar mass Asymmetry-mass correlation: Slope=-0.27, p-value=5.8x10-8 GAS ASYMMETRY IS INVERSELY CORRELATED WITH MASS No trend with Halpha S/N and mass No trend with coverage and asymmetry Gas fraction linked to formation of massive instabilities – low mass galaxies have high gas fractions High gas fraction also linked to turbulent support, relative to rotational support Also maybe environmental – satellites? log(Stellar Mass)

Why are asymmetry and mass anticorrelated? Interactions? Are low mass galaxies satellites of large galaxies? Are low mass galaxies qualitatively different? High gas fraction  turbulence, star formation… More likely to be kinematically disturbed Less likely

What about distance to nearest neighbour? GAMA: Liske et al., 2015 Brough et al., 2013 DN = distance to first nearest neighbour AT ALL DN, LOW MASS GALAXIES HAVE HIGHER GAS ASYMMETRY log(M*)<9.0 log(M*)>10.0: Slope =-0.18, p-value=0.009 Stellar mass - Thanks to Sarah STRESS MEDIANS NOT TREND LINES High and not high are separate distributions (something is going to that is different for both of them) May tell us that interaction causes asymmetry in high mass galaxies, but something else is going on for low mass galaxies log(M*)>10.0 log(M*)<9.0: Slope=-0.063, p-value=0.49 DN measurements by S. Brough

Disturbed things trend small Stellar mass is more strongly related to asymmetry than distance to nearest neighbour Asymmetry can be caused by turbulence, bursty star formation Interaction is not the primary cause of asymmetry Scatter off the Tully-Fisher relation can be explained Scatter is often caused by offset between photometric and kinematic PA

Differences in PA  rotation velocity Kinematic PA Photometric PA