Updates on vertex detector

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Radiation Damage to Silicon Sensors DCC 11/14/02 DRAFT.
Random Telegraph Signal (RTS) in CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS) for charged particle tracking. Outline Reminder: The operation principle of.
Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.
Impact of LHCf on BRAN and beam monitoring Y.Itow, H.Menjo (Nagoya University) The 1 st TAN integration workshop Mar10, 2006.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
The Physics Potential of the PHENIX VTX and FVTX Detectors Eric J. Mannel WWND 13-Apr-2012.
Status of the Micro Vertex Detector M. Deveaux, Goethe University Frankfurt for the CBM-MVD collaboration.
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
1 J.M. Heuser et al. CBM Silicon Tracker Requirements for the Silicon Tracking System of CBM Johann M. Heuser, M. Deveaux (GSI) C. Müntz, J. Stroth (University.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Simulations with event pile up in MVD 1. Improvement of the MVD-digitiser 2. General simulations with pile up 3. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa.
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
David Emschermann CBM Collaboration Meeting - GSI – 12/04/2010 TRD geometry in CBMroot and conclusions for detector module design David Emschermann Institut.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
1 An introduction to radiation hard Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors Or: A tool to measure Secondary Vertices Dennis Doering*, Goethe University Frankfurt.
Feasibility studies of open charm reconstruction with pile up 1. General simulations with pile up 2. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa Outline:
M. Deveaux, CBM collaboration meeting, Oct. 2008, Dubna, Russia A revision of the concept of the CBM – MVD Or: Do we need an intermediate pixel.
IPHC-LBNL meeting 3-5 April 2008 Radiation damage in the STAR environment and performance of MAPS sensors Compilation of different test results mostly.
Recent developments on Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS) for charged particle tracking. Outline The MAPS sensor (reminder) MIMOSA-22, a fast MAPS-sensor.
Summary STS working group Design optimization STS (Strip) layout R&D (MAPS) Working packages.
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
1 Radiation Hardness of Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors Dennis Doering, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main on behalf of the CBM-MVD-Collaboration Outline.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
Dmitri Ossetski Obninsk State University Department of Applied Mathematics
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group 28 July 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Radiation hardness of Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS)
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
STS Radiation Environment 11 th CBM Collaboration Meeting GSI, February 2008 Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
M. Deveaux, CBM-Collaboration-Meeting, 25 – 28. Feb 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Considerations on the material budget of the CBM Micro Vertex Detector. Outline:
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 Design of the Micro Vertex Detector of the CBM experiment: Development of a detector response model and feasibility studies.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Ideas for Super LHC tracking upgrades 3/11/04 Marc Weber We have been thinking and meeting to discuss SLHC tracking R&D for a while… Agenda  Introduction:
Radiation Damage Studies for Si Diode Sensors Subject to MRaD Doses Bruce Schum UC Santa Cruz July
Radiation Damage Studies for Si Diode Sensors Subject to MRaD Doses Bruce Schum UC Santa Cruz June
Measurements of low mass e + e - pairs in p+p and Au+Au collisions with the HBD upgrade of the PHENIX detector Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
Updates on Vertex Detector NA61/SHINE Collaboration meeting, Wrocław Oct. 8, 2013.
Feasibility of the detection of D 0 mesons in the NA61/SHINE experiment: Vertex detector for NA61/SHINE P. Staszel and Yasir Ali Jagiellonian University.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
K+e+γ using OKA detector
Tracking detectors/2 F.Riggi.
 Silicon Vertex Detector Upgrade for the Belle II Experiment
The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Feasibility of the detection of D0 mesons in the NA61/SHINE experiment
Future prospects for NA61 heavy ions: rare observables
Non-Prompt Tracks with SiD BeamCal Radiation Damage Studies (Proposal)
A heavy-ion experiment at the future facility at GSI
ADvanced MOnolithic Sensors for
CBM beam pipe current status
Radiation tolerance of MAPS
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
  at Super tau-charm
Vertex Detector project for the NA61/SHINE collaboration
Prototype Vertex Detector
NA61/SHINE: status and energy scans with Pb+Pb collisions
Rita De Masi IPHC-Strasbourg on behalf of the IPHC-IRFU collaboration
The LHC collider in Geneva
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
Status of CCD Vertex Detector R&D for GLC
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information
Presentation transcript:

Updates on vertex detector P. Staszel and Yasir Ali Jagiellonian University

Outline 1. Outer dimensions 2. New layout based on MIMOSA -26 VTPC2 1. Outer dimensions 2. New layout based on MIMOSA -26 3. Micropatern Gaseous Detectors (MicroMegas) 4. Fluence study 5. MIMOSA-26 test (?)

NA61/SHINE detector – top view VTPC2 Vertex Detector (VD)

Outer VDS's dimensions VTPC2 We generated 100 k events containing only signal: 1 D0 meson decaying in to π+K pair. The rapidity and mT distributions of D0s are the same as these predicted by AMPT for Pb+Pb at 158AGeV. The calculations were performed with relatively large stations. This allowed us to set fiducial cut on each station. The idea for the cut was to keep the most occupied area within the cut and remove (outer) areas with low occupancy, so finally we obtain high signal acceptance using relatively small stations.

Signal track distribution at 158 AGeV in VDS1 VTPC2 2x4 cm2 VTPC1 The figure shows hits (x,y) distribution generated by signal tracks is Vds1. The dashed boxes represent the cuts. We found that ~99.5% of signal tracks is localized within the box 2x4cm2. As you can see, to cover the remaining 0.5% we would need to extend the cut in the x direction for almost factor of 2.

Signal track distribution at 158 AGeV in VDS2 VTPC2 4x8 cm2 VTPC1 For stations Vds2-Vds4 we just extend size of the boxes in proportion to their distance from the target. So we got dimensions: 4x8 cm2, 6x12 cm2 and 8x16 cm2 for Vds2, Vds3 and Vds4, respectively. The signal lost is kept below 1 % for each station. For Pb+Pb at 40 AGeV the signal lost is on the level of 4% for the same cuts.

Signal track distribution at 158 AGeV in VDS3 and VDS4 VTPC2 6x12 cm2 VTPC1 8x16 cm2

Charged particles produced in Pb+Pb 0-10% central interactions VTPC2 We can expect very high hit occupancy on the level of 5 hit/mm2/event in the most inner part of the vertex detector. → it suggests that silicon pixel sensors would provide a good solution for us. VTPC1 1.

MIMOSA-26 The following conceptual drawings are based on MIMOSA-26 chip hosting sensitive area of about 1.06 x 2.12 cm2 with the pixel pitch equal 18.4 μm (~663.5k pixels/chip): VTPC2 These pads are for testing purpose and can be removed VTPC1 The readout speed of the whole fame in ~100 μs (10 kHz), zero suppression circuit. The chips are available. We can just buy them from IPHC, Strasbourg (we know also the estimated price per chip)

Preliminary drawing of the 1-st station VTPC2 VTPC1 Drawn blue boxes have dimensions of the sensitive area of MOMOSA-26 sensor (~1x2cm2) Size of the dashed box is ~ 2x4 cm2. We have to cover this area to loose less than 0.5% / 3% of signal particles for 158 / 40 GeV

Preliminary drawing of the 2-nd station VTPC2 Vds2 VTPC1 MOMOSA-26 sensors (~1x2cm2) Size of the dashed box is ~ 4x8 cm2 – same meaning as for Vds1 Full coverage with MOMOSA-26 requires 20 sensors

Preliminary drawing of the 3-rd station VTPC2 MM_A VTPC1 MM_B Inner ring – same layout as Vds1 based on MIMOSA-26 Outer region covered with thin MicroMegas: MM_A with dimension 2.3x4.7 cm2 MM_B with dimension 4.7x6.3 cm2 Size of the outer dashed box is 6x12 cm2

Preliminary drawing of the 4-th station VTPC2 MM_B MM_B VTPC1 8cm 16cm Inner ring – same layout as Vds1 based on MIMOSA-26 Outer region covered with thin MicroMegas 6 MM_B stations (4.7x6.3 cm2) → only 2 types of MicroMegas detectors have to be developed → eventually MM_A in Vds3 can be replaced with MM_B → only one type of MM

Preliminary drawing of the complete VD VTPC2

VTPC2 VTPC1

VTPC2 VTPC1

Overview of talk in conference in Utrecht → In 50M events (1 month run of NA61 Experiment) Yield for the open charm at the 158 AGeV 40K Yield for the open charm at the 40 AGeV 1800 People appreciated the idea of using MIMOSA chips as solution for dedicated vertex detector Conclusion of the discussion with the people from GSI was that our solution is feasible and very much optimistic specially at the SPS intensities where radiation hardness is not a problem.

Performance of MIMOSA-26 → Beam Tests Temperature: + 300 C Readout Time: 125 µs Pitch size : 20.7 µm Irradiated with to fluence = 3 X 10 12 neq/cm2 For disc. Threshold= 5 mV: detection efficiency ~ 99.8%, fake hits < 10-4 resolution ~ 3.5 µm (M.Winter, CBM Progress Report 2010)

Displacement Damage Function Bulk damage exclusively depends upon non ionizing energy lose (NIEL). This is described by the displacement damage functions D(E) Hadronic interactions: flux = (105 * 0.005) event/s * 1.6 particles/mm2/event = 800 Hz/mm2 Electromagnetic interactions (δ-electrons): flux = 105 event/s * 0.04 particles/mm2/event = 4000 Hz/mm2 0.62 0.62/5 (A. Vasilescu, ROSE Internal Note ROSE/TN/97-2 (1997))

Fluence in NA61/SHINE Factor of 40 below the tested range Φeq 1MeV = ϰΦ ϰ - radiation hardness parameter ϰ = 0.62/5 for electrons ϰ = 0.62 for particles from hadronic interactions Fluence for electrons in 1 month (upper limit): Φeq 1MeV = 4 x 105 /cm2/sec X 0.62/5 X 2592000 sec = 1.28 X 1011 neq/ cm2 For Spill of the beam (20%) = 2.6 X 1010 neq/cm2 Fluence for charged particles for 1 month (upper limit): = 8 x 104 /cm2/sec X 0.62 X 2592000 sec = 1.28 X 1011 neq/ cm2 For Spill of the beam (20%) = 2.6 X 1010 neq/cm2 Factor of 40 below the tested range

Data rates assuming full pixel coverage Input: max 1140 bytes/frame, fake hit probability = 10-4 max ~500 hits/frame (info from Michael Deveaux) Vds1 consists of 6 M-26 chips: max: 6 frames x 1140 bytes/frame x 10kHz = 7 Mbytes/s exp: 1035 hits/station x 2.25 bytes/hit x 10 kHz = 2.3 Mbytes/s Vds2 consists of 20 M-26 chips: max: 20 frames x 1140 bytes/frame x 10kHz = 23 Mbytes/s exp: 2205 hits/station x 2.25 bytes/hit x 10 kHz = 5 Mbytes/s Vds3 consists of 36 M-26 chips: max: 36 frames x 1140 bytes/frame x 10kHz = 41 Mbytes/s exp: 3452 hits/station x 2.25 bytes/hit x 10 kHz = 7.8 Mbytes/s Vds4 consists of 64 M-26 chips: max: 64 frames x 1140 bytes/frame x 10kHz = 73 Mbytes/s exp: 5364 hits/station x 2.25 bytes/hit x 10 kHz = 12 Mbytes/s

Backup Slides

D0→ K+ π- , 200k 0-10% cent. Pb+Pb at 158 AGeV VTPC2 S/B=13 For 50M events: SNR = 193 40k D0+D0bar S/B=15 For 50M events: SNR = 178 34k D0+D0bar VTPC1 S/B=6.6 For 50M events: SNR = 163 31k D0+D0bar S/B=9.6 For 50M events: SNR = 155 26k D0+D0bar