Architectures in Support of Capability Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achievement of CIS Interoperability – NATO Policy and Processes
Advertisements

NATO NNEC Core Enterprise Services
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
NATO Network Enabled Capabilities
OHIO OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Even the agents are suffering…
IACT 901 Module 10 1 Plan Delivery. IACT 901 Module 10 2 Elements of IS & IT Plans Delivered Comprise Overall IS/IT vision Applications development plan.
Preparing the Way for NATO Network Enabled Capability J. Troy Turner C4 Interoperability Standardization ACT C4I Division.
Enterprise Architecture
Resiliency Rules: 7 Steps for Critical Infrastructure Protection.
A Methodology that is PROVEN PRACTICAL EFFECTIVELY INTEGRATED SCALABLE CUSTOMIZABLE.
1 NATO HQ C 3 Staff The NATO HQ need for the Web: How policy requirements are affected by the need to take web development into account Georges D’hollander.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
JNTC Joint Management Office
ARCH-04 Before You Begin Your Transformation Project… Phillip Magnay Architect – Applied Technology.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e As of: 3/1/2016 Air Force Weather Agency CEISC Committee Focus Shift - Proposed Modification to.
Enterprise Architectures Course Code : CPIS-352 King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
Benefits Map Using this Template
Michael J. Novak ASQ Section 0511 Meeting, February 8, 2017
What is Enterprise Architecture?
6th May 2013 CDR Volodymyr Khilkevych, UKR N
Enterprise Architecture
Patrick Gorman Assistant Head Architecture Framework
An example of how to develop a dynamic business model
Crisis management related research at
Transforming business
FY17 End of Year Goals Summary FY17: Top 40 Goals Assessment
Overarching Architecture v2.5 Architecture Workshop 1 June 2006
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
DATA VERTICAL Technical Exchange
NCDF Organization and Processes Concept
National e-Agriculture Strategy Implementation From Vision to Action
Webinar Optimize Your Business Applications Strategy
RA-II/Doc Implementation of the WMO DRR Roadmap in RA II including major activities on DRR Services Alasdair Hainsworth, Chief Disaster Risk Reduction.
CV-1: Vision The overall vision for transformational endeavors, which provides a strategic context for the capabilities described and a high-level scope.
WMO Integrated Global Observing System (WIGOS) 16-RA VI Side Event Helsinki, Finland, 11 September 2013 Dr Miroslav Ondráš, Dr Wenjian Zhang (WMO) Dr.
Standards for success in city IT and construction projects
Introducing Statistical Standards -GAMSO
Information Brief (Deep Dive)
Asset Governance – Integrated Strategic Asset Management
Future Concepts Turning Water into Wine
Establish Process Governance
WaterHUB People Worksteam Update 10 July 2018.
Get Ready for GDPR Compliance
Information Technology (IT)
By Jeff Burklo, Director
ESS Vision 2020 Recent developments
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Defense Health Agency Industry Exchange J-6 I&O’s Enterprise Approach by COL Beverly Beavers November 08, 2018 Authorized Use Only Authorized Use Only.
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
CQI Defence Special Interest Group (DSIG) 3 Year Strategy ( )
Enterprise Architecture at Penn State
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Define Your IT Strategy
Joint Vision 2020.
Australia Local Mission Delivery and the National Strategy
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
1 Envision 3 Outline 4 Design
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
CQI Defence Special Interest Group (DSIG) 3 Year Strategy ( )
Kei aku rangatira Kua hui mai nei Hei whakawhanake
Smart Campus Project Update
Presentation transcript:

Architectures in Support of Capability Development NATO UNCLASSIFIED Architectures in Support of Capability Development Wg Cdr Mark Voss ACT/SC-6111 SMPI NATO UNCLASSIFIED

NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED Introduction Scope: Outline the Capability Development Process Outline the ‘tools’ for achieving coherence Outline the emerging NNEC ‘focus areas’ Consider the relationship with Architectures Aim: to inform you of emerging thinking NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

Capability Development Process Concept Definition Realization Usage Analysis of Strategic Environment Identify Capability Needs Derive Requirements Conduct Gap Analysis & Fulfillment Identify & Select Possible Solutions Conduct Implementation Capability Area Improvement Programmes Capability Area Plans NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

Capability Management Capability Development Achieving Coherence Capability Planning CAPs CAIP Capability Management & Coordination FPs R&D CPs Pol & Stds Exp Capability Development & Implementation CAP – Capability Area Plan CAIP – Capability Area Improvement Program NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED Capability Area Plan NNEC CAP will provide common overall perspective Operational needs (required sub-capabilities) Short, mid and long term goals and objectives Major milestones and resource requirements Management of risks NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

Capability Area Improvement ‘Programs’ NNEC CAIPs intended to be 5-6 year ‘roadmaps’ for coordinating capability development and implementation (“mid-term plans”) Groups all related activities (across DOTMLPFI) into logical solution paths to achieve desired needs Provides visibility of interdependencies and milestones across key programs, projects and activities A management & coherency tool intended to encompass: Changes to existing projects Introduction of new projects NATO and national contributions NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

IS-NNEC in Transformation TOAs CAFJO Enhanced CIMIC Expedition Ops Joint Logistics Joint Man Effective Engage Operational Concepts Enabling Concepts IS NNEC Capability Master Plan Sit Awareness Collaboration JISR/Intel Information - Interoperability IS : exploitation of info to meet operational C3 needs Info Assurance Functional Svcs Info & Int Svcs Comms Svcs NNEC : re-useable CIS components & stds Multinational Networked Information Infrastructure (NII) NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

Emerging Service Areas (1) Sub-Services (Focus Areas) Functional Joint/Adaptive C2 & Consultation Shared Situational Awareness Collaboration ISR Information Operations Functional Application Services Reasoning for Focus Areas; This is very much work in progress. Focus areas are intended to be the subject for the initial set of CAIPs Confident that these are a reasonable set of focus areas that reflects the outcome of the FS and our understanding of some of the work ongoing in the nations in the NEC area It’s about establishing shared ground for the nations and help us focus and prioritize our efforts These may need to be refined as operational concepts are developed and doctrine matures – however, don’t see any major revisions unless we get this completely wrong NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

Emerging Service Areas (2) Sub-Services (Focus Areas) Information Integration Information Interoperability Core Enterprise Services Secure & Dynamic Information Sharing Service Management Communications Improved & Converged Strategic Networks Improved Strategic-Tactical Communications Improved & Converged Tactical Networks Secure & Flexible Transport Services Network Management Information Assurance NII Security Management Cyber Defence Reasoning for Focus Areas; This is very much work in progress. Focus areas are intended to be the subject for the initial set of CAIPs Confident that these are a reasonable set of focus areas that reflects the outcome of the FS and our understanding of some of the work ongoing in the nations in the NEC area It’s about establishing shared ground for the nations and help us focus and prioritize our efforts These may need to be refined as operational concepts are developed and doctrine matures – however, don’t see any major revisions unless we get this completely wrong NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

Use of CAIPs to Achieve Coherence 2007 2011 2010 2009 2008 Strategic Networks Activities Approach 1 Approach 2 Path 1 Doctrine Path 2 Exp R&T CP XXX Strategic & Tactical Communications Tactical Networks IP Gateways Waveforms Freq Man Static Deployable Pol FPs Exp CP xxxx Visibility of interdependencies and critical paths across activities Services largely provided through existing programs/projects Existing CPs will map into more than one CAIP Will necessitate ‘steering’ of existing programs/projects Existing program/project management structures retained Architecture development is critical to deliver coherent set of services NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

Use of CAIPs to Determine Priorities 2007 2011 2010 2009 2008 JISR Activities Approach 1 Approach 2 Path 1 Doctrine Path 2 Exp R&T CP XXX Collaborative Environment Shared Situational Awareness Year by year view across ALL CAIPs should enable more effective prioritization across SPOW, EPOW, NSIP, FPs and other activities NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

Building the NNEC Architecture User Services System (FAS) Components Implementation Categories of User Service: Generic Common to TOAs Specific to TOA CAIPs show implementation ‘roadmap’ across programs/projects and other activities Info & Int Services Components Standards & Implementation Comms mnNII Core Enterprise Services NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

Architecture, CAIPs and CMM Capability Maturity Levels needed to define LOA – this in turn drives objectives & priorities – these have impact on Archs & Planning ‘HOW’ & ‘WHEN’ ‘CAIPs Plan coherent delivery of components & standards Support Help develop and define Long Term Vision Mid Term Planning RAs built to underpin mid term planning and implementation – they specify the service components & interfaces required in the mid-term FAS I&IS COMMS 5-6 yrs TAs describe interim solutions within CPs/Projects. Likely in mid-term to be a combination of ‘system’ & ‘service’ approaches? Near Term Activities ‘WHAT’ NATO / EAPC UNCLASSIFIED

NATO UNCLASSIFIED Discussion NATO UNCLASSIFIED