GEOSS Task AR-09-01b Architecture Implementation Pilot AIP Phase 3, (AIP-3) George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task AR-09-01b Task POC GEO WP Symposium May 2010 1.Examples of AIP results 2. Informatics 3.AIP-3 progress

GEO Task AR-09-01b Architecture Implementation Pilot Develop and pilot new process and infrastructure components for the GCI and the broader GEOSS architecture Continuation of existing efforts, e.g., IP3, and new activities solicited through Calls for Participation (CFPs) “fostering interoperability arrangements and common practices for GEOSS” Consistent with that, Task AR 09-01b is defined as: highlighting the development and testing of contributed components in a pilot setting, the leveraging of the GEOSS Common Infrastructure portals and clearinghouses, doing that via interoperability arrangements and serving the SBAs.

AIP-2 Flood Tasking and Product Generation Relief aid released in days, Before on-site assessment. From portal select desired theme(s) and area of interest Wizard picks appropriate workflow for desired result Wizard Mozambique Disaster Management Information System (DMIS) Workflows Estimated rainfall accumulation and flood prediction model Flood Model Selected workflow automatically activates needed assets and models Baseline water level, flood waters and predicted flooding Coordination with GEO Tasks: DI-09-02B: Multi-Risk Management DI-06-09: Use of Satellites for Risk Management 02B through the international Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS). Satellite data coordination for flooding and coastal hazards is managed by the CEOS Strategic Implementation Team (SIT) subgroup for disaster management. The CEOS Working Group on Information Systems and Services (WGISS) supports advanced inter-operability demonstrations in this setting through their Flood Sensor Web activity. The CEOS Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) supports intercomparison campaigns as part of the Quality Assurance for Earth Observations (QA4EO) program. GEO Task

GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements in Disaster Management Response Earthquake in Chile ERDAS Apollo from AIP-2 Earthquake in Haiti Response to AIP-3 CFP University of Heidelberg Crisis response has shifted from "getting any relevant data" to ”selecting and combining data that best aids the response”

comprehensive, harmonized data GEOSS Web-based Services: The Old Way: The Services Way: Jan Find Data Pre-Science Find data Minutes Read Data Retrieve high volume data Days for exploration Feb Extract Parameter Learn formats and develop readers Subset Spatially Use the best data for the final analysis Extract parameters Mar Filter Quality DO SCIENCE Perform spatial and other subsetting Derive conclusions Reformat Write the paper Identify quality and other flags and constraints Apr Reproject Submit the paper Perform filtering/masking Visualize May Develop analysis and visualization Explore Analyze Accept/discard/get more data (sat, model, ground-based) Jun “Link-Rich” Environment: discovery, access,, vis, analysis. Jul DO SCIENCE Exploration Use the best data for the final analysis Write the paper Initial Analysis Derive conclusions Submit the paper Aug Greater access to comprehensive, harmonized data Sep Oct Graphic derived from Greg Leptoukh, NASA

Science Aspects and Informatics Aspects Need geo-science to produce results really useful to end users (as being carried out in SBA tasks) Need geo-informatics to make useful information widely available on the web

GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements - From the GEOSS 10 Year Plan Reference Document - Interoperability through open interfaces Interoperability specifications agreed to among contributing systems Access to data and information through service interfaces Open standards and intellectual property rights GEOSS adopting standards; agreed upon by consensus, preference to formal international standards GEOSS will not require commercial or proprietary standards Multiple software implementations compliant with the open standards should exist Goal is that at least one of the implementations should be available to all implementers "royalty-free"

Reusable Process for Deploying Scenarios Engineering Use Cases support SBA Scenarios Scenarios: end user view of the value of GEOSS Focused on topics of interest to a community Occur in a geographic Area of Interest (AOI) Steps in a scenario are Use Cases Use Cases: reusable service oriented architecture Use cases for discovery, data access, etc Utilize Interoperability Arrangements

Scenarios in AIP-3 Disaster Management: Remote and in-situ sensors Biodiversity: Ecosystem Evolution and Arctic SDI Health: Air Quality and Infectious Diseases Water: Quality and Agricultural Drought Energy: Environmental impacts

GEOSS Actors used in AIP

Services and Components Community Portals & Clients Data Access Services Community Catalogues Processing and Alerts Test and Monitoring Registered Community Resources GEOSS Common Infrastructure Slide 11 11

Interoperability Arrangements for Services

AIP-3 Schedule Call for Participation January 2010 Kickoff Workshop at ESA March 2010 Ministerial Summit, Beijing November 2010 All Deliverables Completed 2010

AIP-3 CFP Responses (34 to date) GIGAS Disaster Mgmt GIS.FCU GMU CSISS GSDI IFGI INCOSE ISPRA and CNR JAXA Mines ParisTech, EnerGEO, GENESIS NOAA DMIT PML Pozzi Team QA4EO Spot Infoterra Univ Heidelberg Univ Tokyo Washington U. St. Louis AIRNOW BKG CEOS CIESIN Compusult CSIRO DRI E-Habitat EO2Heaven ERDAS ESA ESIP Federation ESRI EuroGEOSS and GENESIS GENESI-DR Geoland2 GIGAS Data Interoperability

AIP-3 Working Groups and Leaders Disaster Management Didier Giacobbo Arnaud Cauchy Water Will Pozzi Stefano Nativi Liping Di Brad Lee Health: AQ and Disease Stefan Falke François Marques Biodiversity and Climate Doug Nebert Energy WG     Energy Lionel Menard Isabelle Blanc End-to-End Engineering Nadine Alameh Josh Lieberman Larry McGovern Data Harmonization Herve Caumont Data Sharing Guidelines Steve Browdy (CIESIN) Vocabularies and Semantics Cristiano Fugazza Roberto Lucchi Masahiko Nagai

AIP depends on other GEO Tasks DI-09-02: Multi-Risk Management DI-06-09: Use of Satellites for Risk Management WA-06-02: Droughts, Floods and Water Management WA-06-07: Water Resource Management BI-07-01: BON EN-07-02 - Energy Enviro. Impact HE-09-01: Info Systems for Health HE-09-02: Monitoring and Prediction for Health US-09-01: User Engagement DA-06-01: Data Sharing Principles DA-09-01: Data Management DA-09-02: Data Integration and Analysis DA-09-03: Global Data Sets AR-09-02: Interoperable Systems for GEOSS AR-09-04: Dissemination and Distribution Networks

References GEO earthobservations.org GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot www.ogcnetwork.net/AIpilot GEOSS registries and SIF geossregistries.info George Percivall percivall@myogc.org