Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric M. Jones, Thomas C. Squier, Colette A. Sacksteder 
Advertisements

Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
The Phot LOV2 Domain and Its Interaction with LOV1
Yinghao Wu, Barry Honig, Avinoam Ben-Shaul  Biophysical Journal 
Masahiro Ueda, Tatsuo Shibata  Biophysical Journal 
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
A Link between Hinge-Bending Domain Motions and the Temperature Dependence of Catalysis in 3-Isopropylmalate Dehydrogenase  István Hajdú, András Szilágyi,
Crystallization and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Characterization of the Complex of Photosystem I with its Natural Electron Acceptor Ferredoxin  Petra.
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Sebastian McClendon, Nick Zhadin, Robert Callender  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Time-Resolved FTIR Difference Spectroscopy in Combination with Specific Isotope Labeling for the Study of A1, the Secondary Electron Acceptor in Photosystem.
Santosh K. Dasika, Kalyan C. Vinnakota, Daniel A. Beard 
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
A.M. Stadler, I. Digel, G.M. Artmann, J.P. Embs, G. Zaccai, G. Büldt 
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Unitary Conductance Variation in Kir2
Volume 91, Issue 10, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
DNA Hairpins: Fuel for Autonomous DNA Devices
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Enthalpy Changes during Photosynthetic Water Oxidation Tracked by Time-Resolved Calorimetry Using a Photothermal Beam Deflection Technique  Roland Krivanek,
Experimental and Computational Studies Investigating Trehalose Protection of HepG2 Cells from Palmitate-Induced Toxicity  Sukit Leekumjorn, Yifei Wu,
Kelly E. Caputo, Dooyoung Lee, Michael R. King, Daniel A. Hammer 
Gustav Persson, Per Thyberg, Jerker Widengren  Biophysical Journal 
H.M. Seeger, G. Marino, A. Alessandrini, P. Facci  Biophysical Journal 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Ivan V. Polozov, Klaus Gawrisch  Biophysical Journal 
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Low-Resolution Structures of Proteins in Solution Retrieved from X-Ray Scattering with a Genetic Algorithm  P. Chacón, F. Morán, J.F. Díaz, E. Pantos,
Crystallization and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Characterization of the Complex of Photosystem I with its Natural Electron Acceptor Ferredoxin  Petra.
Modeling Ca2+ Feedback on a Single Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor and Its Modulation by Ca2+ Buffers  Jianwei Shuai, John E. Pearson, Ian Parker 
Volume 93, Issue 11, Pages (December 2007)
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Use of Helper Enzymes for ADP Removal in Infrared Spectroscopic Experiments: Application to Ca2+-ATPase  Man Liu, Eeva-Liisa Karjalainen, Andreas Barth 
Low-Temperature Electron Transfer from Cytochrome to the Special Pair in Rhodopseudomonas viridis: Role of the L162 Residue  José M. Ortega, Barbara Dohse,
Ivan Coluzza, Daan Frenkel  Biophysical Journal 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Carlos Mattea, Johan Qvist, Bertil Halle  Biophysical Journal 
Dmitrii V. Vavilin, Esa Tyystjärvi, Eva-Mari Aro  Biophysical Journal 
Characterization of the Photoconversion on Reaction of the Fluorescent Protein Kaede on the Single-Molecule Level  P.S. Dittrich, S.P. Schäfer, P. Schwille 
Congju Chen, Irina M. Russu  Biophysical Journal 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
K.J. Tielrooij, D. Paparo, L. Piatkowski, H.J. Bakker, M. Bonn 
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Kinetic Analysis of the Thermal Stability of the Photosynthetic Reaction Center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides  Arwel V. Hughes, Paul Rees, Peter Heathcote,
Protein Self-Association Induced by Macromolecular Crowding: A Quantitative Analysis by Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion  Karim Snoussi, Bertil Halle  Biophysical.
Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy of mCherry in Living Cells
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
The Selectivity of K+ Ion Channels: Testing the Hypotheses
Rinat Nahum-Levy, Dafna Lipinski, Sara Shavit, Morris Benveniste 
Kinetic and Thermodynamic Analysis of the Light-induced Processes in Plant and Cyanobacterial Phytochromes  Igor Chizhov, Björn Zorn, Dietmar J. Manstein,
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Andreas Fibich, Karl Janko, Hans-Jürgen Apell  Biophysical Journal 
Scott M. Blackman, Eric J. Hustedt, Charles E. Cobb, Albert H. Beth 
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Vesna Serrano, Wenge Liu, Stefan Franzen  Biophysical Journal 
Kiyoshi Kawai, Toru Suzuki, Masaharu Oguni  Biophysical Journal 
Phase-Separation and Domain-Formation in Cholesterol-Sphingomyelin Mixture: Pulse- EPR Oxygen Probing  Laxman Mainali, Marija Raguz, Witold K. Subczynski 
Influence of the Long-Chain/Short-Chain Amphiphile Ratio on Lateral Diffusion of PEG- Lipid in Magnetically Aligned Lipid Bilayers as Measured via Pulsed-Field-Gradient.
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Volume 93, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
Barrier Compression and Its Contribution to Both Classical and Quantum Mechanical Aspects of Enzyme Catalysis  Sam Hay, Linus O. Johannissen, Michael.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages 5890-5900 (December 2008) Reaction of the CoII-Substrate Radical Pair Catalytic Intermediate in Coenzyme B12- Dependent Ethanolamine Ammonia-Lyase in Frozen Aqueous Solution from 190 to 217K  Chen Zhu, Kurt Warncke  Biophysical Journal  Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages 5890-5900 (December 2008) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.138081 Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Minimal mechanism of catalysis for coenzyme B12-dependent EAL (29,30). The forward direction of reaction is indicated by arrows. The steps are: (1) radical pair separation, (2) first hydrogen atom transfer (HT1), (3) radical rearrangement, (4) second hydrogen atom transfer (HT2), (5) radical pair recombination, and (6) product release/substrate binding. Substrate-derived species are designated S-H (bound substrate), S· (substrate radical), P· (product radical), and PH (diamagnetic products). The 5′-deoxyadenosyl β-axial ligand is represented as Ad-CH2 in the intact coenzyme, and as Ad−CH2⋅ (5′-deoxyadenosyl radical) or Ad-CH3 (5′-deoxyadenosine) after cobalt-carbon bond cleavage. The cobalt ion and its formal oxidation states are depicted, but the corrin ring and the dimethylbenzimidazole α-axial ligand of the coenzyme (68,69) are not shown for clarity. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Dependence of the EPR spectrum of the CoII-substrate radical pair state in EAL on time after temperature step to T=207K. The free electron resonance position at g=2.0 is shown by the arrow. Experimental conditions: microwave frequency, 9.3434GHz; temperature, 207K; microwave power, 20.25 mW; magnetic field modulation, 1.0 mT; modulation frequency, 100kHz; scan rate, 6.52 mT/s; and time constant, 2.56ms. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of the EPR spectra of the CoII-substrate radical pair state before annealing and at different levels of decay, for decay performed at T=197K. (A) CoII-substrate radical pair state generated by using 1,1,2,2-2H4-aminoethanol as substrate. (a) Preannealling spectrum, obtained at 160K. (b) Average of spectra corresponding to amplitudes of 99–90% of initial amplitude. (c) Average of spectra corresponding to amplitudes of 79–70% of initial amplitude. (d) Average of spectra corresponding to amplitudes of 59–50% of initial amplitude. (B) CoII-substrate radical pair state generated by using 1-13C-aminoethanol as substrate. (a) Preannealling spectrum, obtained at 160K. (b) Average of spectra corresponding to amplitudes of 99–90% of initial amplitude. (c) Average of spectra corresponding to amplitudes of 79–70% of initial amplitude. (d) Average of spectra corresponding to amplitudes of 59–50% of initial amplitude. Experimental conditions: (A) Microwave frequency, 9.3390GHz; microwave power, 20.25 mW; magnetic field modulation, 1.0 mT; modulation frequency, 100kHz; scan rate, 6.52 mT/s; and time constant, 2.56ms. (B) Microwave frequency, 9.3390GHz; microwave power, 20.25 mW; magnetic field modulation, 1.0 mT; modulation frequency, 100kHz; scan rate, 6.52 mT/s; and time constant, 2.56ms. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Decay of the substrate radical as a function of time at different temperatures from 197 to 214K, and overlaid best-fit biexponential functions. The EPR experimental conditions are as described in the legend to Fig. 3. The overlaid solid curves correspond to simulations of the decay with a biexponential function (197–210K) or monoexponential function (214K). The simulation parameters are presented in Table 1. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Decay of the substrate radical EPR amplitude at 207K after partial decay at T=193K. The sample was held at 193K for 13h, and the substrate radical amplitude decayed to 38% of the initial amplitude. The subsequent decay at T=207K is shown, with overlaid monoexponential fit to the data (solid line). The EPR experimental conditions are as described in the legend to Fig. 3. Simulation parameters: first-order rate constant, 2.3×10−4 s−1; R2=0.9967. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Arrhenius plots of the observed first-order rate constants for the decay of the CoII-substrate radical pair, kobs,m, kobs,f, and kobs,s. The combined kobs,m and kobs,f values (solid circles) are fitted by the upper line. The kobs,s values corresponding to 190≤T≤207K (solid squares) are fitted by the lower line. The kobs,s value for 210K (open square) is not included in the fit. The data are from Table 1. The fitting parameters are presented in Table 2. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Amplitudes of the fast and slow decay phases of the biexponential decay of the CoII-substrate radical pair, Aobs,f and Aobs,s, respectively, as a function of temperature. The amplitudes for 214 and 217K correspond to the fit to the monoexponential decay function. The curves are drawn to guide the eye. The data are from Table 1. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Simulation of the CoII-substrate radical decay at 207K by using the homogeneous linear two-step model (Scheme 2). The experimental decay data are shown as dots. The simulated normalized population of the A1 ([A1]t/[A1]0, dotted line) state, and the calculated time dependence of the A2 ([A2]t/[A1]0solid line) and A3 ([A3]t/[A1]0.dashed line) states, are shown. Simulation parameters: initial normalized populations A1,0=1.0, A2,0=A3,0=0; k12=9.73×10−4 s−1, k21=3.87×10−4 s−1, k23=3.09×10−4 s−1, k32=0s−1 (fixed); and R2=0.9994. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Scheme 1 Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Scheme 2 Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 5890-5900DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.138081) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions