Status and Plans for InCA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BE/CO Changes in LS1 to the Software Development Infrastructure and Widely Used Libraries Chris Roderick, Greg Kruk, Katarina Sigerud, Luigi Gallerani,
Advertisements

FESA 3 Implementation Status Stephane Deghaye BE/CO On behalf of the FESA team and many users.
GreenWor ds This Old Application Front-End Quality Management and Your Mission-Critical Fixer-Uppers.
BE-CO work for the TS Nov 8 Nov 11P.Charrue - BE/CO - LBOC1.
Industrial Control Engineering Industrial Controls in the Injectors: "You (will) know that they are here" Hervé Milcent On behalf of EN/ICE IEFC workshop.
Accelerator Complex Controls Renovation, LHC Excluded Purpose and Scope M.Vanden Eynden on behalf of the AB/CO Group.
Overview of Data Management solutions for the Control and Operation of the CERN Accelerators Database Futures Workshop, CERN June 2011 Zory Zaharieva,
Copyright © 2004 Sherif Kamel Information Systems Planning Sherif Kamel The American University in Cairo.
Consolidation of access systems for the injector Complex ATOP days 4-6 March 2009 P. Ninin & R, Nunes in behalf of the PS and SPS access project teams…
Roles Committees Meetings
Stephane Deghaye (AB/CO) ATC/ABOC days.
© 2001 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 LEIR Application Project LEIR Applications is a separate project.
Status Report – Injection Working Group Working group to find strategy for more efficient start-up of injectors and associated facilities after long stops.
T HE BE/CO T ESTBED AND ITS USE FOR TIMING AND SOFTWARE VALIDATION 22 June BE-CO-HT Jean-Claude BAU.
ST/MAforLHC April 2003Sixth ST workshop1 Summary of ST/MA deliverables for LHC Luigi Scibile for the ST/MA group.
Wojciech Sliwinski BE/CO for the RBAC team 25/04/2013.
Debriefing of controls re-commissioning for injectors after LS1 TC 09 October 2014.
Nov, F. Di Maio, M.Vanden Eynden1 CO Proposal concerning AB Front-End Software Responsibilities First detailed proposal based on the global Front-end.
25/01/2001 PS days - Evian Application software Status and trends Marine Pace Marine Pace.
European Organization For Nuclear Research Future Database Requirements in the Accelerator Sector Ronny Billen Database Futures Workshop – 6-7 June 2011.
K.Hanke – PS/SPS Days – 19/01/06 K.Hanke - PS/SPS Days 19/01/06 Recommissioning Linac2/PSB/ISOLDE from CCC  remote operation from CCC  upgrades & changes.
Architectural issues M.Jonker. Things to do MD was a success. Basic architecture is satisfactory. This is not the end: Understanding of actual technical.
26 Jan 06Marine Pace - AB/CO1 LEIR Controls : Gain of Experience for the Running-in of LHC Marine Pace on behalf of AB/CO and LSA.
Overview of new high level software applications developed for the HIE- ISOLDE superconducting linac D.Lanaia*, M.A. Fraser, D. Voulot *The research project.
LS1 Review P.Charrue. Audio/Video infrastructure LS1 saw the replacement of BI and RF analog to digital video transport Was organised in close collaboration.
CERN IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t Migration from ELFMs to Agile Infrastructure CERN, IT Department.
POST-ACCOR renovations until LS2 – DEBRIEFING – Marine Pace, CO3 – 17 September 2015 Input from Chris, Marc, Stephen, Stephane, Wojtek.
FESA S. Deghaye for the FESA team BE/CO. What happened since April? followed by “Our plans”
1 September 2007 – Tango Meeting – A.Buteau ICALEPS 2005 Status report SOLEIL September 2007.
Final Report – Injector Re- Commissioning Working Group (IRWG) Working group to find strategy for more efficient start-up of injectors and associated facilities.
Stephane Deghaye (AB/CO) The InCA project - S. Deghaye Accelerator Complex Controls Renovation Workshop Motivations & Objectives.
– Machine Controls Coordinators (MCC): team and role – Overview of renovations during LS1 – Proposal for after-LS1 Commissioning organization ACCOR PROJECT.
Linac2 and Linac3 D. Küchler for the linac team. Planning first preparative meeting for the start-up of Linac2 in June 2013 –this early kick-off useful.
The OP Viewpoint on the Accelerator Complex Controls Renovation R. Steerenberg on behalf of the OP group Accelerator Complex Controls Renovation Workshop.
Archives/References for SPS Faraday Cage Timing Vito Baggiolini AB/CO after discussions with M. Arruat, J.-C. Bau, R. Billen, A. Butterworth, F. Follin,
Marine Pace Technical Committee -12 Dec DRY RUNS COMMISSIONING & EARLY BEAM OPERATION STABLE OPERATION.
LHC RT feedback(s) CO Viewpoint Kris Kostro, AB/CO/FC.
Contents  Samplers and OASIS  New Controls Platform & Strategy  CTF3 Mini Pilot Project  Concluding Remarks IEFC Workshop, March 2011 Rende.
LS1 Review BE-CO-SRC Section Contributions from: A.Radeva, J.C Bau, J.Betz, S.Deghaye, A.Dworak, F.Hoguin, S.Jensen, I.Koszar, J.Lauener, F.Locci, W.Sliwinski,
LS1 Day: The Injectors S. Baird EN/MEF Thanks to R Brown, N Gilbert, D McFarlane & V Chohan, IEFC workshop…. LS1 Day: The Injectors 1.
PS Complex Controls Renovation S Baird AB/ABP ATC/ABOC Days: Session Jan 2008.
TK2023 Object-Oriented Software Engineering
V4.
All-Hands Meeting Outcome and Discussion
Accelerator Controls Renovation Project “ACCOR”
ICE SECTION The coolest place to be! Elias Métral
Update on the Critical Path of the PS Booster Schedule for the EYETS
(on behalf of the POOL team)
Database Readiness Workshop Intro & Goals
Database involvement in Timing
Post-mortem of Experience with LEIR Controls
Introduction This seminar is intended to give people an overall view of the capabilities of the Scientific Programme Management System (SPMS), to explain.
Quality Assurance applied to Accelerator Safety
High Radiation to Materials 16th Project Team Meeting – May 20, 2010
PS wire scanner failures
Linac4 RF System Operation for the Reliability Run in 2017
Dirk Düllmann CERN Openlab storage workshop 17th March 2003
GIS PORTAL RACKS Integration of Equipment Racks in the Geographic Information Service (SMB/SE) Olivier Barrière.
HEPiX Fall 2017 CERN project Follow-up
Client Management Managing Client Expectations
Offline Analysis Framework STATUS
Performance Load Testing Case Study – Agilent Technologies
Software System Integration
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, 2004.
Software engineering -1
Project Management How to access the power of projects!
LHC BLM Software audit June 2008.
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE
7/28/ :33 PM © 2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or.
LHC An LHC OP guide… under construction J. Wenninger
Presentation transcript:

Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye IEFC Workshop 2010 Introduction to the renovation project of the high level control system of the CERN PS complex

Agenda What is InCA? What happened in 2009? What will happen in 2010? MDs’ results Deployment in LEIR What will happen in 2010? PS deployment Setup & planning Preparation (MD, OP applications) Support Organisation Advantages (e.g. increase number of contexts) Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Agenda What is InCA? What happened in 2009? What will happen in 2010? MDs’ results Deployment in LEIR What will happen in 2010? PS deployment Setup & planning Preparation (MD, OP applications) Support Organisation Advantages (e.g. increase number of contexts) Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

What is InCA? InCA: Injector Controls Architecture Presented in details at the ATC/ABOC Days’08 Renovation of the high-level controls aiming at: Reduce effort duplication Reduce maintenance cost (XMotif) Improve control system performance * Reduce effort duplication: Homogenise the solutions deployed across the accelerator complex. Reduce the number of specific applications needed by providing high-level services. * Reduce maintenance cost: Suppress remaining 30+ X-Motif applications. Renovate & redefine some (obscure) PS specific parts. * Improve Controls system performance: Tackle the performance, scalability and reliability problems experienced in the PS complex. Provide sound technical solutions to common problems badly handle due to architecture limitations. Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

What is InCA? Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Agenda What is InCA? What happened in 2009? What will happen in 2010? MDs’ results Deployment in LEIR What will happen in 2010? PS deployment Setup & planning Preparation (MD, OP applications) Support Organisation Advantages (e.g. increase number of contexts) Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

MDs’ results Original planning approach with regular MD sessions 2009 InCA MD Program: 2-day MD after Easter, Many parasitic MDs for the beam steering (YASP), Few smaller MDs during parallel MD sessions (6 hours). Very fruitful  We want more!! Feedback on performance & scalability  bottlenecks found & removed User feedback on new tools (FunctionEditor) Main corrections on the PS validated  YASP@PS ready! Need for an InCA test stand identified (2000 devices avail.) Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Deployment in LEIR – Why? OP/ABP point of view: LEIR control system was hybrid  more difficult to operate (e.g. Archive incomplete & not coherent) InCA could bring a homogenous view of the machine Favourite operational tools would remain unchanged Old XMotif generic tools would be replaced CO point of view: Opportunity to have a first partial deployment Proof of concept on a longer period Gather experience Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Deployment in LEIR – What? Database Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Deployment in LEIR – Results? Preparation from May Ready to operate in July Good feedback from OP/ABP Know where to improve Quote from OP representative during the InCA day’09: “LEIR Controls in good shape. Thank you to the INCA team for its availability and its reactivity” Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Agenda What is InCA? What happened in 2009? What will happen in 2010? MDs’ results Deployment in LEIR What will happen in 2010? PS deployment Setup & planning Preparation (MD, OP applications) Support Organisation Advantages (e.g. increase number of contexts) Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

PS deployment: Setup & Planning Same setup as in LEIR + YASP for beam steering Acquisitions done in 2-tier Old status algorithm used on the workstation Direct DB access Three tentative dates (LHC technical stop): Week 26 (28-06-2010) Week 30 (26-07-2010) Week 35 (30-08-2010) 2-day MD (week 17) to assess the readiness and decide on the release date Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

PS deployment - Preparation Before the MD in April: DB preparation (cycles, parameters) - 90% to be done Solution for XMotif applications in place InCAification of the Java applications - 80% to be done Before the release date: OP Training to the new concepts (YASP, resident cycles, Settings DB...) Support team operational Expert/OP training in InCA troubleshooting InCAified environment i.e. InCA applications in CCM... Monitoring infrastructure (DIAMON) Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

PS deployment - Support Very important topic. 3-step response: Troubleshooting guide for OP Expert support team reachable 24/7 on a fix phone no Fall-back solution ready in case of big troubles Presence in the CCC during working hours for the 1st weeks Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

PS deployment - Advantages Immediately: Quite transparent as seen in LEIR Settings history Much faster archiving YASP for beam steering + optics for other applications New FunctionEditor More contexts than users Later: Less load on the FECs, the CCC workstations and the DB Quicker start-up for popular working sets Virtual parameters in control & acquisition ... Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Limitation of the number of users Limited number of users – 24 in the PS Complex More is needed as more beams are produced on a regular basis At a given moment, there are never 24 users programmed in the central timing sequences Two solutions: Increase the number of users in the FECs Not realistic in the short term. InCA solution  Available in the PS in 2010, in the PSB in 2011 Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Solution at low-level – Why not? Some pieces of hardware have the 24 in hard Need to renovate the installations  need a long shutdown + money. GM classes: Difficult to asses how tight to 24 they are Effort with little future as GM is replaced by FESA Memory problem in some FECs XMotif applications: how many times 24 has been hard-coded? Effort with little future as XMotif is replaced by Java For both cases, tricky to find all the occurrences  High risk of failure (always at the wrong time) (no 25% free RAM) Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

InCA Solution Introduction of Context – Cycle for the PS. The Context: are always in the DB can be made resident i.e. linked to a timing user can be made non-resident in no time Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Conclusions 2009 = Very good year for InCA: Fruitful MDs Successful deployment in LEIR 2010 = Challenging year for InCA: Decisive MD in April First PS deployment in June (or July/August) Status and Plans for InCA S. Deghaye – IEFC Workshop 2010

Thank you for your attention! Questions ?!? Thank you for your attention! CO Experience in LEIR S. Deghaye – InCA day’09