New Orientations in Evaluation and Reporting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accounting: Graded Unit 2 (Project) Graded Unit 3 (Examination)
Advertisements

1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
TRAINING FOR CCE MENTORS
Revised August 2011 Growing Success: Use of “I” and “R”
Page 1 Marie Curie Schemes Science is not the whole story! (How to write a successful Marie Curie RTN Proposal) Siobhan Harkin.
NEW MEXICO Three-Tiered Teacher Licensure EDUCATOR QUALITY DIVISION New Mexico Public Education Department September, 2005.
Secondary Cycle I Report Card School Team Workshop Questions and Answers from June 21, 2006.
Assessment, Evaluation and Reporting in Ontario schools
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
INTRODUCTION.- PROGRAM EVALUATION
Revised August 2011 Growing Success: Late & Missed Assignments.
Key Stage 4 Accountability Measures from 2016 Heads’ Huddle Bishop Fox 19 November 2013.
What are the SATs tests? The SATs tests are statutory tests taken by pupils at the end of a key stage. The tests are designed to test pupils’ knowledge.
Principles of Assessment
Science and technology in elementary school Evaluation in the cycles 2 and 3 Spring
Serbian Beginning Teachers’ Views on Induction as Their Professional Development Stage Vera Rajović, Lidija Radulović, Teacher Education Center, Faculty.
The Educational Systems in PolandPoland. The School System in Poland.
EFFECTIVE JULY 1 st, 2011 Winter INTEGRATIVE PROJECT.
ROMANIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ROMANIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM.
NSS Learning and Teaching Strategies for the Chemistry Curriculum Series: (2) Active Reading and Writing Tasks Sing Yin Secondary School Mr. Hui Chi Kuen.
Ryve Prekorogja 13 June VET Vocational Education and Training.
St. George’s Curriculum and Evaluation practices November 15 th, 2011.
THE SPANISH EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM COMENIUSNE.M.O. OUTLINE 1.General Framework a. Recruitment of teachers 2.Department of maths (C.S.E.)
Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 147 Aviation Advisory Committee Working Group Training Updates Presented to: World Aviation Training Symposium.
Direction de l’évaluation April Agenda - New frameworks (20-30 min.) - Grade 6 data collection (10 min.) - Summer marking centres (10 min.) - June.
 Familiarization with the general education programs and competencies in the Work-Oriented Training Path Main orientations Broad areas of learning and.
Kombizweig at the DSJ Information for parents 7. September 2015 Svea Fürstenberg Oberstufenkoordinatorin.
Training and Certification - Mentoring Marija Matek Training Coordinator for Internal Auditors Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Croatia Central Harmonisation.
1. 2 Applying Knowing Committing Proposed process for adapting to this change Understanding.
No tests are dropped No tests are given over No extra time is given Calculators can be used Partial Credit is given Non – calculator No partial credit/multiple.
Educational Services Department November, The Sir Wilfrid Laurier School Board computerized Report Card is used in all cycles at the elementary.
Key Stage 3 Assessment and Reporting November 2014 Specialist School in Mathematics and Business St Mary's High School, Newry.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
Bulgarian School System. Introduction The Bulgarian educational system covers: The Bulgarian educational system covers: Pre-school education – not compulsory.
ELL Program Advisory Group November 10, TWO PHASES of WORK ELL Program Advisory Group PHASE ONE 1/1/2016As Specified in HB Criteria Determine.
The Czech education system Mgr. Petra Velebova November 2009.
03/03/2016MELS Working Document Progression of Learning at the Secondary Level EESL Programs RREALS October 2011 Information Session.
EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM in POLAND. EDUCATION The present educational system in Poland was introduced in 1998/1999. Many changes have been implemented over.
To improve your knowledge and understanding of RCN UWC practices Attendance, Feedback, Grades What? When? How? Who?
Adapting the Biggs 3P model (1993) for Learning in Pharmacy Practice Boys,R; Kendrew,P; Miller, E. Reflection Advanced and Consultant Level Framework Appraisals.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Examination Administration Dr. Richard Cuthbertson MBA Chair of Examiners.
WELCOME TO ORIENTATION
NEW ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE CBSE
Assessment and Report Cards
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
process and procedures for assessments
Update on the Latest Developments in Government Auditing Standards
GRADE 9 AT WYNBERG GIRLS’ HIGH SCHOOL
From the Diocese of Allentown Mission Statement
Assessing Young Learners
Autumn term 1 (Sept/Oct) Summer term 2 (June/ July)
Five-Level Performance Management System
Mariya International School
WELCOME TO ORIENTATION
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Final Grade Averages Weighted Averages.
ARMY PUBLIC SCHOOL,MHOW
WELCOME TO ORIENTATION
New York State Report Cards
HERAKLION, JANUARY 2014.
Technology and Living Third Consultation
Ongoing Reporting Guiding Principle 4
12/11/2015.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Using the 4.0 Gradebook.
Tasks & Grades for MET1.
Penncrest High School Course Selection –
College and Career Readiness
Sec 3 Subject Combinations and Streaming Exercise
Presentation transcript:

New Orientations in Evaluation and Reporting INTEGRATIVE PROJECT New Orientations in Evaluation and Reporting EFFECTIVE JULY 1st, 2011 Winter 2010-2011

What are the major changes? Uniform provincial report card 3 formal reporting periods with weightings for each term Evaluation of knowledge and competencies Reduction in number of evaluation criteria (based on the Framework for the Evaluation of Learning)

Provincial report card for elementary and secondary school 1st report card Results for Term 1 (count for 20% of the student’s final mark) 2nd report card Results for Term 2 (count for 20% of the final mark) Last report card of the year Includes: for Term 3, a competency report covering learning as a whole for the year (results count for 60% of the final mark) AND a final mark Un ()  Un (  Un,

WHEN TO REPORT Written communication No later than October 15th Term 1 report card No later than November 20th Term 2 report card No later than March 15th Last report card of the year (Term 3 report card + Final result) No later than July 10th

Weighting and wording on report card Integrative Project Secondary V Weighting Wording in report card Carries out an integrative project Makes connections between elements of his/her learning 100% Integrative Project Mathématique

Results for Terms 1 and 2 Entrepreneurship (100%) Term 1 (20%) Term 2 Term 3 (60%) Final Mark Integrative Project (100%) Personal Orientation Project (100%) Exploration of Vocational Training (100%) Subject mark Group average For Terms 1 and 2, the teacher communicates a mark expressed as a percentage that reflects the knowledge and subject-specific competencies a student has acquired, based on the evaluations carried out during the term (tests, assignments, etc.).

Results for Term 3 (competency report) Entrepreneurship (100%) Term 1 (20%) Term 2 Term 3 (60%) Final Mark Integrative Project (100%) Personal Orientation Project (100%) Exploration of Vocational Training (100%) Subject mark Group average For the last term, the teacher prepares a competency report that covers the student’s learning as a whole for the year (knowledge and subject-specific competencies) and communicates a mark expressed as a percentage.

Final mark Entrepreneurship (100%) Term 1 (20%) Term 2 Term 3 (60%) Final Mark Integrative Project (100%) Personal Orientation Project (100%) Exploration of Vocational Training (100%) Subject mark Group average The report card for the last term also includes a final mark, which is calculated automatically using the results of all three terms, in accordance with the respective weighting of each term (20%– 20%–60%), as well as the results on the compulsory examinations set by the Minister for elementary school and for Secondary Cycle One.

Results shown on the report card A detailed result for each competency (or component) in: language of instruction second language mathematics science Only a subject mark for all other subjects

The Uniform Report Card will also include….. Comments on subject learning Comments on at least 2 of the 4 following competencies (in Terms 1 and 3): Exercises critical judgment Organizes his/her work Communicates effectively Works in a team

MELS Exams MELS Compulsory Exams 20% of Final Mark (calculated on final report card of the year) MELS Uniform Exams (Secondary ) 50% of Final Mark - Sanction rules still apply (calculated on final report card of the year)

COMPULSORY USE OF Frameworks for the Evaluation of Learning MELS has developed new frameworks for each subject area, effective July 1st, 2011. Frameworks include: - Weighting of competencies, where applicable - Evaluation criteria, with explanations - Verification of acquired knowledge, and evaluation of applied knowledge

Evaluation criteria Revised and simplified Accompanied by an explanation Sometimes followed by an asterisk (*), indicating: that the student must be provided with feedback on this criterion but that the criterion is not considered when determining the student’s mark

Standards & Procedures At the start of the school year, the school provides parents with a summary of the Standards and Procedures for the evaluation of student learning, specifying: the main types of evaluation to be carried out and when they will take place

Summary of Compulsory Elements Uniform provincial report card Number of report cards, deadlines, and weightings of each term (20%, 20%, 60%) Summary of Standards and Procedures for the evaluation of student learning provided to parents at the beginning of school year Student knowledge officially taken into account Use of new Frameworks for the Evaluation of Learning

Reduction in number of marks entered

MELS Resources Progression of Learning: http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/progression/secondaire/index_en.asp Secondary Evaluation Frameworks for each subject (2011-2012): http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/sections/publications/index.asp?page=fiche&id=1616 QEP: Cycle 1 http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca./sections/programmeFormation/secondaire1/index_en.asp Cycle 2 http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca./sections/programmeFormation/secondaire2/index_en.asp