SMARTEE Howard Brown Health, Chicago

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FY14 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee February 3, 2014.
Advertisements

The Hotspotters Retention and VL Supression Monitoring Project Ivy Clinic, Arnot Ogden Medical Center DRAFT Quality Improvement Team  Clinical Coordinator.
Quality Management Chart Review Pamela Casey, MS, RD June 24, 2014.
PROJECT IN-CARE Chicago’s Positive Charge Project Roman Buenrostro, AIDS Foundation of Chicago Sunday July 22, 2012.
New York State DOH Health Home Care Management Reporting Tool (HH-CMART) Support Calls – Session #3 March 6,
From Aggregate Indicators to Impacting Patients - Data Use to Inform Treatment and Improve Care Ian Wanyeki Track 1.0 Implementers Meeting Dar Es Salaam.
POSITIVELY CONNECTED FOR HEALTH (PC4H) Helen Koenig, MD Juliet Fink Yates, Ed.M Nadia Dowshen, MD Susan Lee, MPH Philadelphia, PA.
Managing the Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 27, 2016.
Health Research Inc., New York, NY Cheryl Smith Beatrice Aladin Mark Thompson.
USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA TO IMPROVE ENGAGEMENT AND RETENTION IN CARE FOR GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN AND OTHER MSM AND TRANSGENDER WOMEN WITH HIV Wake Forest School.
County Hospital in Cleveland, OH PI: Ann K. Avery, MD | Project Manager: Jen McMillen Smith, LISW-S Evaluator: Mary M. Step, PhD | Designer: Julia Briggs,
Digital HIV Care Navigation San Francisco Department of Public Health Erin Wilson, Sean Arayasirikul and Dillon Trujillo June 16-17, 2016.
WELLNESS WEB 2.0 Coastal Bend Wellness Foundation Alison Johnson & Hillary Vallejo.
HIV-positive Young Transgender Women Text Me, Girl!
2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016
A FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRESCRIPTION PROGRAM
Wellness Web 2.0 Coastal Bend Wellness Foundation, Corpus Christi, TX
3.a.iii Medication Adherence Program (MAP)
Project ARK- Washington University School of Medicine
What’s at stake for California under proposals to unwind federal health reform March 10, 2017 Shannon McConville.
Tracking Students Throughout the Scholarship Season
HIV Program and Data Integration
Child Care Assistance Program Waitlist
MetroHealth Cleveland, OH
Penn State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Positively Connected for Health (PC4H)
Strategies for Linkage to and Engagement in Care
Melanie L. Fritza Ronald J. Lubelchek, MD a, b, c*
ERCOT CRR Update to CMWG
YGetIt? Project New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute/ New York, NY. Presenters: Mark Thompson and Jason Rogers.
San Francisco Department of Public Health SPNS Grantee Meeting
Wellness Web 2.0 Coastal Bend Wellness Foundation, Corpus Christi, TX
Wellness Champion meeting: March 16th
NYSDOH AIDS Institute Quality of Care Program eHIVQUAL
Module 4: Role Playing and Case Discussions
Opt-In for life Hershey Medical Center, Alder Health Services, Pinnacle Health, Hamilton Health Center Greater Harrisburg, PA Presenters: John Zurlo,
Technical Frontiers, Inc.
Emily Patry, BS The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI
CUTTING KEEPING THE PROMISE PENSION SYSTEM CRISIS
Howard Brown Health, Chicago
About the Client Challenges
MTN-025 (HOPE Study) Community Education Presentation
PMP Advisory Committee
Bending the Cost Curve A Case for Integration.
HIV Prevention Data Amanda Dennison, MPH Ohio Department of Health
Using the SafeMed model for transitions of care approach
Testing and linking different key population groups in Ukraine
Introduction to the Texas Credentialing Verification Organization
HIV Counseling.
Using the SafeMed model for transitions of care approach
MoH leading the design and scale up of PrEP in eswatini
School Board Finance Committee Presentation 6/20/16
Police Services Analysis – Community Meeting 2
2017 HIV Care Cascade Submission
Participant Retention
From toward HIV Elimination with Boosted-Integrated Active HIV Case Management (B-IACM) in Cambodia Dr. Penh Sun LY, Director, NCHADS Presented.
Update on community-based harm reduction services in Durban
School Consortium Challenge:
Introduction to Successful Quarterly Reporting
Shawano County DHS NIATx Project 2017
More Than a Meal Campaign
How the Boston Public Health Commission created a client level data system that providers actually use HIV/AIDS Services Division Infectious Disease Bureau.
Needs Assessment Slides for Module 4
January 19, – 11:30 CHN Headquarters
SNAP into WIC; Using Program Coordination, Data, and Technology for Targeted Recruitment and Retention National WIC Association 2019 Annual Education.
IMPACT QIC Action Period Call
Baltimore Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA) Planning Council Meeting
Illustrative Cluster Detection and Response Strategy
Provider Survey Peer-led sessions Initial remarks on local sites
Leveraging Bed/Chair Alarm Removal for Falls Prevention
Presentation transcript:

SMARTEE Howard Brown Health, Chicago James Zuniga, Kristin Keglovitz Baker, George J. Greene, Reynaldo Cordova, Sarah Shulbank-Smith June 15, 2017

Implementation IRB Approval on Jan. 16th with start date of Feb. 7, 2017 Number of participants enrolled to date: 57 Monthly enrollment target:11-14 participants Participants create an account after survey administration. Engaging through the app: Participants receive 3 standard messages once a month. Each participant is contacted every 30 days to check in. Refining segments of the app with the developer Identifying if clients read messages. Identifying charts with missing results. Deciding which results are auto-populated and when. A participant receives 3 messages, one inspiring, general support, medication adherence, HIV facts and sexual health 3 weeks out of the month. HBH SOP calls for clients receiving case management have contact with clients at least once every 30 days. Advocates contact clients through the app and ask how the client is doing, if they need anything or have any questions. We have worked with HV to decipher if clients are reading messages we have sent, and we now have a client read stamp. HV has made it significantly easier to identify accounts with missing results, allowing us to enter results before the client needs to contact us. One concern is HIV confirmatory results are automatically pushed through, however this may impact the LTC process. For ex. while we don’t post a new reactive rapid results we still enter their gc/ct orders, but their HIV confirmatory results were being pushed through anyway. We are working closely together to see if this is steady trend or something we should monitor in the future.

Tools and Estimates HAB Measures Internal referrals Gap in HIV Medical Visits Numerator HIV Viral Load Suppression VL Noncompliance Report (Den – Num = VL NC Report) Internal referrals Table 1 Month VL NC Total Elig. Gap Total Feb 312 227 464 177 March 233 459 189 April 305 215 458 188 May 289 209 185 VL Suppression report includes all clients living with HIV who have had a medical appointment within the measurement year as the denominator, the numerator is the number of those clients who have a VL less than 200. The noncompliance report subtracts the numerator from the denominator of the VL suppression report. Gap in care reports are released on the 1st of the month for the previous month, (We will not have May’s report until June 1st). VL NC reports are released on the 15th. Elig numbers are the initial number after filtering before chart auditing. Factors like new dx, clients on both lists, clients lost to care, clients that only receive gender affirming services but not HIV care, and clients already virally suppressed are not yet taken into account.

Data at a Glance Criteria Total Newly Dx. 5 Gap in Care 43 Viral Load Table 2 Table 3 Criteria Total Newly Dx. 5 Gap in Care 43 Viral Load 18 Multiple 9 Population Total MSM 53 TWOC 4 Mean Age 28 Demographics % Black/African American 44 Hispanic/Latino 22 White/Caucasian 28 Asian 3 American Indian/Alaska Native 2 Recruitment did not begin until Feb with IRB approval, but clients in need of a medical appt were contacted. All clients on the gap in HIV medical visits report are contacted regardless of study eligibility. We call these efforts and processes Retention in Care. Different orders are used for tracking clients who do not fit study criteria. Table 4

Implementation Successes Working processes Protocols Schedules Team Communication Assisting the LTC team Over 1609 contact attempts made to re-engage clients into care. Over 215 HIV medical appointments were scheduled. Most clients contacted: Not in need/want of case management Not eligible for LTC services Have lower needs Very receptive Table 5 Outreach Attempts (12/01/16 to 06/09/2017) Unique Pts Attempts Retention 540 980 SPNS 287 629 Total 1609 Table 6 HIV Medical Appts. Scheduled (12/01/16 to 06/09/2017) Unique Pts Sched. Appts. Retention 134 146 SPNS 63 69 Total 197 215 While the LTC program does retention work, they do not have the capacity to work with both new clients, and follow up with clients who are no longer in need of LTC services. The SPNS teams assists with contacting clients before they are lost to follow up and considered in need of LTC. Its important to note we make a distinction between those who qualify for the study, SPNS, and those who do not, Retention. Most clients who were contacted were at greater risk of being lost to follow up because they were not in case management, have lower medical needs, and were no longer eligible for LTC services. However, these clients still struggled with make or keeping an HIV medical appointment every 6 months. By contacting these clients, we are able to prevent many from being lost to follow up and experiencing breaks in their ART. While some clients are not interested in the program, over 92% accept assistance with scheduling an appointment.

Challenges Next Steps Old contact information Other departments conducting research with similar client pool Youth Advisory Board Check In Process Improved protocols to avoid client confusion Updating EHR information Reforming the Youth Advisory Board Examining our system integrations Monitoring our marketing. A more structured protocol for contacting clients will be helpful when navigating clients who are working with other staff. While we want avoid confusing clients by having many different staff contact them, its also difficult to monitor if clients are given information about the program or following up with appointments. Activing updating client contact information within the EHR will reduce repeat contact attempts. Reforming the YAB to an focus group to provide direct feedback from actual users. A greater systems integration would allow for easier use for clients and staff. While the check in process for clients has improved since first launching, we are still working to remind clients to check in every time, and working with Healthvana to fine tune which tests are automatically pushed through and which are not.

Recruitment Successes and Challenges As of now, we have reach 1/3rd of our recruitment goal. Direct outreach and staff referrals have worked the best. What are the challenges in recruiting? Clients not attending appointments. Clients confusing the role of the Advocate. Little meeting space. Next steps for overcoming challenges? Being proactive – more appointment reminders Clearer boundaries with clients and existing case mangers. Using alternative work times more often. Our marketing is being edited and will be available to clients. As of now, nearly ½ of the clients who agree to participate do not complete enrollment. We anticipated this struggle given we are working with clients who struggle to remain in care. One challenge is clients who have existing case managers confusing the Advocate with an additional cm. This has led to some clients believing their needs will get met faster and confusion between case managers and clients. Not having space to conduct the survey means fewer options for the client to come in when its convenient for them, especially if space cannot be found on the same day of their medical appt.

Additional Updates: Focus Groups Challenges in assembling a focus group required revision Revised age, number of participants, attendance and HIV status. The invite was sent in Healthvana to 180 clients, 50 replied, the first 5 were selected and 3 attended. Feedback on marketing Participant messages App Features Next meeting will be in September We hope to recruit from enrolled participants to get direct feedback. Focus on marketing, messages, and the app features. Increase incentives offered. The age of participants was increased to 34, the number of participants decreased to 5, participants no longer had to be living with HIV, and each meeting can have different members. The first focus group met on April 12th and lasted roughly 90 minutes.

Additional Updates: Recruitment materials Feedback from the focus group is being incorporated into the design. A comparison of the original flyers on top, and the edited version on the bottom.

The Howard Brownies!!

Contact James Zuniga Jamesz@Howardbrown.org Kristin Keglovitz Baker Kristink@Howardbrown.org George Greene George-greene@northwestern.edu