TDAQ Phase-II kick-off CERN background information

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals and status of the ATLAS VME Replacement Working Group Markus Joos, CERN Based on slides prepared by Guy Perrot, LAPP 19/09/2012.
Advertisements

André Augustinus ALICE Detector Control System  ALICE DCS is responsible for safe, stable and efficient operation of the experiment  Central monitoring.
LHCb Upgrade Overview ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb joint workshop on DAQ Château de Bossey 13 March 2013 Beat Jost / Cern.
Information Systems and Data Acquisition for ATLAS What was achievedWhat is proposedTasks Database Access DCS TDAQ Athena ConditionsDB Time varying data.
23/04/2008VLVnT08, Toulon, FR, April 2008, M. Stavrianakou, NESTOR-NOA 1 First thoughts for KM3Net on-shore data storage and distribution Facilities VLV.
Trigger and online software Simon George & Reiner Hauser T/DAQ Phase 1 IDR.
1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.
MSS, ALICE week, 21/9/041 A part of ALICE-DAQ for the Forward Detectors University of Athens Physics Department Annie BELOGIANNI, Paraskevi GANOTI, Filimon.
Impact on Project Planning and Cost. Agenda CERN Project Budget Planning Summary E. Gschwendtner, 9 April
1 Alice DAQ Configuration DB
ALICE Upgrade for Run3: Computing HL-LHC Trigger, Online and Offline Computing Working Group Topical Workshop Sep 5 th 2014.
Wesley SmithAug. 18, 2010 Trigger Budget Review: Labor & M&S - 1 US CMS FY 2011 Budget Review Trigger Labor & M&S Wesley Smith Aug. 18, 2010 Outline Overview.
Control in ATLAS TDAQ Dietrich Liko on behalf of the ATLAS TDAQ Group.
CERN, Main challenges for the ATLAS upgrade project in the coming year.
R. Fantechi. TDAQ commissioning Status report on Infrastructure at the experiment PC farm Run control Network …
Silicon Module Tests The modules are tested in the production labs. HIP is is participating in the rod quality tests at CERN. The plan of HIP CMS is to.
Online Software 8-July-98 Commissioning Working Group DØ Workshop S. Fuess Objective: Define for you, the customers of the Online system, the products.
TDAQ Upgrade Software Plans John Baines, Tomasz Bold Contents: Future Framework Exploitation of future Technologies Work for Phase-II IDR.
Overview of DAQ at CERN experiments E.Radicioni, INFN MICE Daq and Controls Workshop.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Committee August 3, 2005 U.S. ATLAS TDAQ FY06 M&O Planning A.J. Lankford UC Irvine.
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
Deliverables, Cost, Manpower, Schedule & Maintenance Su Dong CSC Readout Replacement CDR Oct/8/
1 LHCC RRB SG 16 Sep P. Vande Vyvre CERN-PH On-line Computing M&O LHCC RRB SG 16 Sep 2004 P. Vande Vyvre CERN/PH for 4 LHC DAQ project leaders.
Computing Facilities CERN IT Department CH-1211 Geneva 23 Switzerland t CF CERN Computer Centre Consolidation Project Vincent Doré IT Technical.
R. Boyd 1 February  Dr. M. Saleem  D. Jana  M. R. Meera Labbai  R. Boyd.
The Past... DDL in ALICE DAQ The DDL project ( )  Collaboration of CERN, Wigner RCP, and Cerntech Ltd.  The major Hungarian engineering contribution.
Status of ATLAS Resources Presentation to RRB Markus Nordberg ATLAS Resources Coordination CERN-RRB
The ATLAS DAQ System Online Configurations Database Service Challenge J. Almeida, M. Dobson, A. Kazarov, G. Lehmann-Miotto, J.E. Sloper, I. Soloviev and.
Computing Division FY03 Budget and budget outlook for FY04 + CDF International Finance Committee April 4, 2003 Vicky White Head, Computing Division.
14 November 08ELACCO meeting1 Alice Detector Control System EST Fellow : Lionel Wallet, CERN Supervisor : Andre Augustinus, CERN Marie Curie Early Stage.
AFP Trigger DAQ and DCS Krzysztof Korcyl Institute of Nuclear Physics - Cracow on behalf of TDAQ and DCS subsystems.
Pierre VANDE VYVRE ALICE Online upgrade October 03, 2012 Offline Meeting, CERN.
Ian Bird Overview Board; CERN, 8 th March 2013 March 6, 2013
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
PCIe40 — a Tell40 implementation on PCIexpress Beat Jost DAQ Mini Workshop 27 May 2013.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
ALICE Trigger Upgrade CTP and LTU Design Review ALICE CTP and LTU Upgrade Design Review CERN 27 th January 2016 Budget, time schedule, resources David.
Introduction to L1Calo Upgrade L1Calo Collaboration Meeting Cambridge 23-Mar-2011 Norman Gee.
Summary of IAPP scientific activities into 4 years P. Giannetti INFN of Pisa.
Detector Safety System overview DSS is a PLC based system designed to protect ATLAS detector from damages. Front end (hardware) 2 redundant PLC ~700 input.
CO 2 Cooling Plants for the LHCb upgrade LHCb infrastructure workshop February Burkhard Schmidt With input from Bart Verlaat, Paolo Petagna and Lukasz.
20/07/ Marzio Nessi Agenda For NIKHEF plans for the ATLAS Upgrade. NIKHEF ATLAS upgrade plans and organization DL/NH Potential.
Gu Minhao, DAQ group Experimental Center of IHEP February 2011
Gene Oleynik, Head of Data Storage and Caching,
Workshop Concluding Remarks
U.S. ATLAS TDAQ FY06 M&O Planning
LKr status R. Fantechi.
TC activities.
Completion and Pre-Exploitation Costs for the Initial ATLAS Detector
CMS High Level Trigger Configuration Management
ATLAS M&O General Comments
Off-detector electronics: what could be a generic module?
Online Control Program: a summary of recent discussions
Enrico Gamberini, Giovanna Lehmann Miotto, Roland Sipos
DAQ for ATLAS SCT macro-assembly
Controlling a large CPU farm using industrial tools
HERD Prototype Beam Test
Japan Participation in Phase-II TDAQ Upgrade
The Software Framework available at the ATLAS ROD Crate
Electrical and electronic systems projects
Status of ATLAS Resources
New strategies of the LHC experiments to meet
ATLAS Canada Alberta Carleton McGill Montréal Simon Fraser Toronto
DAQ Architecture Design of Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment
Trigger M&O Progress -- Florida, Rice, UCLA, Wisconsin
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
TDAQ commissioning and status Stephen Hillier, on behalf of TDAQ
Design Principles of the CMS Level-1 Trigger Control and Hardware Monitoring System Ildefons Magrans de Abril Institute for High Energy Physics, Vienna.
MORE ON ARCHITECTURES The main reasons for using an architecture are maintainability and performance. We want to structure the software into reasonably.
Implementation of DHLT Monitoring Tool for ALICE
Presentation transcript:

TDAQ Phase-II kick-off CERN background information CERN plays a major role in the TDAQ Project and the associated Trigger Activity in many areas including many coordination responsibilities (past,present, and incoming) (TDMT, Trigger Coordinator, DAQ/HLT and Trigger Run Coordinators, hardware installation coordination, etc), as well as direct contributions to the work CERN is strongly involved in TDAQ and Trigger operations and support, and in the trigger menus implementation CERN is responsible for all aspects of the hardware, firmware and associated software for the LVL1 central trigger: CTP, MUCTPI and TTC Associated with the central trigger system are responsibilities for global experiment timing, luminosity measurement and monitoring, integration of special triggers, etc. CERN is strongly involved in HLT, including core software maintenance/ devel. CERN plays a leading role in many areas of the DAQ system including: ROS/RCD configuration and operation; eventbuilder, storage, event-format and control-and-configuration software; and TDAQ networks. CERN maintains the TDAQ test and development labs for the Collaboration, as well as taking care of the infrastructure of SDX1 (cooling, ventilation and electrical). CERN is already involved in various aspects of the upgrade including improvements that were installed during LS1, work on phase-I upgrades, and system architecture design for phase-II.

TDAQ Phase-II kick-off CERN Phase-II upgrade plans CERN intends to play a strong role in the upgrade of the TDAQ System and associated work in the Trigger Activity, building on its experience built up since the formation of ATLAS, while continuing to participate in the operation and maintenance of the current system. we intend to follow the strategy that we have followed up to now for LVL1, focusing exclusively on the central trigger and TTC that interfaces with many other systems We intend to maintain our current strong involvement in the HLT, including core software maintenance and development and trigger menu implementation We intend to build on our current expertise in the DAQ system to play a central role in the upgrade of the system In particular we are interested in: L0 Central Trigger L0CTP MuCTPI L1 Central Trigger L1CTP TTC system (incl. LTI) Event selection software Core software Trigger menus DAQ/Event Filter Detector Readout Dataflow Event Filter (Processing Farm) Infrastructure (racks and cooling)

TDAQ Phase-II kick-off CERN Phase-II upgrade plans cont. Note we would likely not be involved with a ROIE seems more closely coupled to the L0TOPO Note we already completed the Phase-I CTP upgrade and work we are doing for the Phase-I MUCTPI aims to be forwards compatible (or at least forwards ready, implying largely replacing the firmware) for Phase-II In collaboration with NBI and NIKHEF in particular on interface modules This makes the topics listed above very natural choices for our Phase-II involvement

TDAQ Phase-II kick-off CERN available effort for Phase-II Note that addition to the CERN staff/fellow manpower, we often host associates and students from other institutes who work closely with us They are accounted with their home institutes if they are in ATLAS The available effort is estimated as: Note we are still working on the manpower planning, so the numbers shown above are very preliminary and indicative However consistent with realistic projections and take into account the effort needed for operations and Phase-I activities, and the fact that some of the people are working in parallel on other activities including physics studies. Head count FTE-years to 2017 FTE-years to 2025 L0/L1/TTC Engineer 5 0.7 33 Scientist 10 20 HLT - 0.2 DAQ/EF 1 2 12 0.5 49 Scientist= Scientist/student, Engineer=Engineer/Technician in this table