A proposal for multi-model decadal hindcast simulations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Advertisements

Interannual variations in global OH radicals over the period in GEOS-Chem, and preliminary comparisons to other models I. Bey 1, S. Koumoutsaris.
The Atmosphere: Oxidizing Medium In Global Biogeochemical Cycles EARTH SURFACE Emission Reduced gas Oxidized gas/ aerosol Oxidation Uptake Reduction.
Towards a multi-species variational assimilation system for surface emissions of CH 4, CO, H 2 I. Pison, F. Chevallier, and P. Bousquet Laboratoire des.
REFERENCES Maria Val Martin 1 C. L. Heald 1, J.-F. Lamarque 2, S. Tilmes 2 and L. Emmons 2 1 Colorado State University 2 NCAR.
Evolution of methane concentrations for the period : Interannual variability in sinks and sources J. Drevet, I. Bey, J.O. Kaplan, S. Koumoutsaris,
Interactions Among Air Quality and Climate Policies: Lectures 7 and 8 (abridged versions)
Evaluating the Impact of the Atmospheric “ Chemical Pump ” on CO 2 Inverse Analyses P. Suntharalingam GEOS-CHEM Meeting, April 4-6, 2005 Acknowledgements.
This Week—Tropospheric Chemistry READING: Chapter 11 of text Tropospheric Chemistry Data Set Analysis.
Evaluating the Role of the CO 2 Source from CO Oxidation P. Suntharalingam Harvard University TRANSCOM Meeting, Tsukuba June 14-18, 2004 Collaborators.
Hauglustaine et al., IGAC, 19 Sep 2006 Forward and inverse modelling of atmospheric trace gas at LSCE P. Bousquet, I. Pison, P. Peylin, P. Ciais, D. Hauglustaine,
METHANE. TOPICS FOR TODAY 1.Why do we care about methane? 2.What are the sources and concentrations of methane in the atmosphere? 3.Uncertainties in the.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Simple Chemical modeling of ozone sensitivity
1 Global modelling of methane and wetlands: Past, present and future. Nic Gedney (Met Office, Hadley Centre (JCHMR)) (Pete Cox, Hadley Centre and Chris.
Biogenic Contributions to Methane Trends from 1990 to 2004 Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry W. Horowitz 1, Ed Dlugokencky 2, J. Jason West.
Source vs. Sink Contributions to Atmospheric Methane Trends:
HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere GOCE-CT TM4 Year 2004 and sensitivity.
Global trends in CH 4 and N 2 O Matt Rigby, Jin Huang, Ron Prinn, Paul Fraser, Peter Simmonds, Ray Langenfelds, Derek Cunnold, Paul Steele, Paul Krummel,
HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere GOCE-CT WP5 activities Michiel van.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
TEMIS User Workshop, Frascati, Italy October 8-9, 2007 Formaldehyde application Derivation of updated pyrogenic and biogenic hydrocarbon emissions over.
MOZART Development, Evaluation, and Applications at GFDL MOZART Users’ Meeting August 17, 2005 Boulder, CO Arlene M. Fiore Larry W. Horowitz
A modelling study on trends and variability of the tropospheric chemical composition over the last 40 years S.Rast(1), M.G.Schultz(2) (1) Max Planck Institute.
10-11 October 2006HYMN kick-off TM3/4/5 Modeling at KNMI HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the.
HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere GOCE-CT Status of TM model Michiel.
Stratospheric Methane Steve Rieck. Introduction CH 4 is emitted from natural and anthropogenic sources Has a long lifetime (8.6 years) Relatively important.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 14: Methane and CO Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
Overlaps of AQ and climate policy – global modelling perspectives David Stevenson Institute of Atmospheric and Environmental Science School of GeoSciences.
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
Observational Constraints on the Global Methane Budget Ed Dlugokencky NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division Boulder, Colorado.
AN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMIST’S VIEW OF THE WORLD FiresLand biosphere Human activity Lightning Ocean physics chemistry biology.
TF HTAP Multi-model Estimates of Intercontinental Source-Receptor Relationships for Ozone Pollution TF HTAP Workshop, Washington, DC, June 10, 2008 Arlene.
The Double Dividend of Methane Control Arlene M. Fiore IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria January 28, 2003 ANIMALS 90 LANDFILLS 50 GAS 60 COAL 40 RICE 85 TERMITES.
F.J. Dentener, C. Cuvelier, M.G. Schultz, O. Wild, T.J. Keating, A. Zuber, S. Wu, C. Textor, M. Schulz, C. Atherton, D.Bergmann, I. Bey, G. Carmichael,
What have we learned from three decades of atmospheric CH 4 measurements? E. Dlugokencky 1, M. Crotwell 1,2, A. Crotwell 1,2, P.M. Lang 1, K.A. Masarie.
Atmospheric Methane Distribution, Trend, and Linkage with Surface Ozone Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry W. Horowitz 1, Ed Dlugokencky.
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
MOCA møte Oslo/Kjeller Stig B. Dalsøren Reproducing methane distribution over the last decades with Oslo CTM3.
ESF workshop on methane, April 10-12, years of methane : from global to regional P. Bousquet, S. Kirschke, M. Saunois, P. Ciais, P. Peylin, R.
PKU-LSCE winter shool, 14 October 2014 Global methane budget : The period Philippe Bousquet 1, Robin Locatelli 1, Shushi Peng 1, and Marielle.
HYMN: Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere GOCE-CT TM4 model evaluations
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE AS A CLIMATE GAS AND AIR POLLUTANT: THE CASE FOR CONTROLLING METHANE Daniel J. Jacob with Loretta J. Mickley, Arlene M. Fiore, Yaping.
Discussion with NAS ITAP Committee
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Meteorological drivers of surface ozone biases in the Southeast US
GMI Capabilities Sarah Strode, Jose Rodriguez, Steve Steenrod, Junhua Liu, Susan Strahan, Eric Nielsen.
Reducing tropospheric ozone with methane controls:
Atmospheric modelling of the Laki eruption
Distribution and Trends: Impacts on Climate and Ozone Air Quality
SUMMER 2004 FIELD STUDIES Modeling support by Harvard University
Preliminary Ozone Results from the TF HTAP Model Intercomparison
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
FOUR MAJOR RESEARCH CHALLENGES FOR THE SECOND DECADE OF THE USGCRP
Emissions scenarios under a hydrogen economy
Shiliang Wu1 Loretta J. Mickley1, Daniel J
Global atmospheric changes and future impacts on regional air quality
HARVARD GROUP TRACE-P ACTIVITIES (a planned papers)
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
Global Change Welcome Meeting, Edinburgh, October 15th 2010
AIR POLLUTION AND GLOBAL CHANGE: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED POLICY
Questions for consideration
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
Climate feedbacks on tropospheric ozone
Climatic implications of changes in O3
The global cycle of methane CMI methane project
Presentation transcript:

A proposal for multi-model decadal hindcast simulations Constraining uncertainties in observed methane inter-annual variability: A proposal for multi-model decadal hindcast simulations Arlene Fiore/Frank Dentener/ Peter Hess/Isabelle Bey And ??? TF HTAP Workshop, Washington, DC, June 11, 2008

Estimates of current CH4 emissions Total CH4 source ~600 Tg yr-1, ~60% anthropogenic [IPCC AR-4] >25% uncertainty in present-day CH4 sources Plants? Keppler et al., 2006 Ferreti et al., 2006 Houweling et al., 2006 Kirshbaum et al., 2005 anthropogenic c/o Michael Raupach, CSIRO, Australia; studies cited in IPCC TAR, AR-4 Methane sink (OH) also ~30% uncertain [Stevenson et al., 2006]

Why have methane concentrations leveled off Why have methane concentrations leveled off? How well do we understand inter-annual variability? CH4 (ppb) Major driver for 97-98 anomaly? -- Biomass burning (CH4 emission, OH suppression via CO) [e.g.Butler et al., 2005; Duncan et al., 2003; Bousquet et al., 2006;Langenfelds et al., 2002] -- Wetlands [e.g. Dlugokencky et al. 2001; Cunnold et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2004, Mikaloff Fletcher 2004, Chen and Prinn, 2006] CH4 growth rate (ppb yr-1)

Model studies indicate different drivers for observed decadal trends Study Period Approach Major driver of trends / IAV* Law and Nisbet, 1996 1980-1994 2D CTM 1991 on FSU emis decline Bekki & Law, 1997 1980-1992 wetlands & OH Dlugokencky et al, 2003 1984-2002 Obs. analysis approach to steady state? Karlsdottir and Isaksen, 2000 1980-1996 3D CTM (met fixed) OH (+anthrop SE Asian emis, -strat. o3) Johnson et al, 2002 20 years 3D CTM (emis fixed) OH (water vapor) Warwick et al, 2002 1980-1998 3D CTM (OH fixed) transport Dentener et al, 2003ab 1979-1993 semi-inverse 3D CTM OH (mainly water vapor) Wang et al, 2004 1988-1997 3D CTM anthrop emis & OH (-strat O3) Dalsoren and Isaksen, 2006 1990-2001 3D CTM (only emis. vary) OH (+anthrop. CO, NOx, NMVOC emissions) Fiore et al, 2006 1990-2004 3D CTM (only met. varies) OH (lightning NOx) + T Bousquet et al, 2006 1984-2003 inverse 3D CTM (OH from CH3Cl inversion) anthrop emis; post-1998 +anthrop - wetlands Khalil et al, 2007 23 years constant emis. and lifetime Drevet et al., 2008 1990-2005 Anthrop. emis + OH Bold = “most complete” in terms of considering sources of OH/CH4 emission variability; Add work from Isabelle’s group (also bold)? Italics = studies focused on IAV rather than trends Note that many forward modeling studies suggest that OH may have increased (slightly) whereas CH3Cl inversion suggest constant or slight decrease in recent years. * Many of these studies also identify a large role for wetlands and BB on IAV

Activity #1: CHEMICAL HINDCASTS Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate (AC&C): Effort focused on representation of chemistry-climate interactions in earth system models Activity #1: CHEMICAL HINDCASTS Objective: Use observations of trends and variability in atmospheric composition over recent decades to test models used to project future atmospheric chemistry and climate and to derive and quantify objective measures of uncertainty. Each hindcast experiment defined by: -- a multi-year series (post-1980) of measurements of atmospheric trace species. -- a clear objective grading criteria for evaluating model success. -- a set of required diagnostics to facilitate model comparison and evaluation. -- multi-year external forcings (e.g., emissions) needed to drive the simulations. -- guidelines on the types of chemical models and meteorological fields that can usefully participate.

Chemical Hindcasts Proposed: Simple tracers (CFCs and N2O) Aerosols Ozone Variability (including simulations of OH) Methane Variability.

Drevet, Bey, 2008

Joint AC&C and TRANSCOM Activity to examine methane variability? Can we begin to reconcile conclusions from top-down and bottom-up approaches? Forward model hindcast, including sources of OH variability: 1980-present -- ozone (and aerosol) precursor emissions (anth., biomass burning, biogenic, lightning) -- methane specified to observed values (lower boundary or fixed abundances) -- stratospheric ozone columns -- meteorology (reanalysis and/or GCM driven by observed SSTs) Forward model output available for input to methane inversions: -- Interannually varying monthly mean OH fields (ensemble mean; uncertainty) -- Archived methane loss by tropospheric OH (also to stratosphere / soils) = implied global emissions, may help with a priori error estimates Multi-year inversion modeling for methane: -- Interannually varying monthly mean OH fields (forward model ensemble mean) -- Constant OH (multi-year forward model ensemble mean?) -- Coordinate with HYMN (Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere)

Possible Time Line 2008: define activity as a community, gauge participant interest Initial feedback from Transcom community (last week) - working document available (frank.dentener@jrc.it) 2009: prepare input datasets for forward model hindcast simulations; begin forward model simulations; assemble a priori methane emissions, observations for inversions 2010: forward model simulations complete, prepare archived OH fields + methane loss rates for inversions; begin inversion studies; analysis of forward model results for OH/CH4 2011: complete inverse studies + analysis