Catheter-based Renal Denervation with the Symplicity System Provides Safe and Durable Blood Pressure Reduction out to Three Years Horst Sievert1, Henry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RENAL SYMPATHETIC DENERVATION Anxiolytic for nervous kidneys???
Advertisements

For OMA distribution only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners © 2015 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved DOC_1A.
Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. Today’s discussion may regard information or indications not evaluated by.
EnligHTN™ I, First-in-Human Multicenter Study of a Multi-Electrode Renal Denervation Catheter in Patients with Drug-Resistant Hypertension Vasilios Papademetriou,
The INSIGHT study - Reliable blood pressure control and additional benefits for hypertensive patients Anthony M Heagerty Department of Medicine Manchester.
Renal artery denervation for treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hypertension: Results from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry.
Steffen Desch Thomas Okon, Diana Heinemann, Konrad Kulle, Karoline Röhnert, Melanie Sonnabend, Martin Petzold, Ulrike Müller, Gerhard Schuler, Ingo Eitel,
The safety and long-term effect of renal artery denervation on blood pressure and renal function in real world patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
Management of Hypertension according to JNC 7 BY SANDAR KYI, MD.
Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. A reminder that this is a discussion of SYMPLICITY trial results and their.
1 Chronic Treatment of Resistant Hypertension with an Implantable Medical Device: Interim 3 Year Results of Two Studies of the Rheos ® Hypertension System.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Hypertension Family Medicine Specialist CME October 15-17, 2012 Pakse.
A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
Radial Frequency Ablation for Hypertension Treatment: Help or Hype? J. Dawn Abbott, M.D., F.A.C.C., F.S.C.A.I. Director, Interventional Cardiology Fellowship.
HYPERTENSION: WHEN TO TREAT & WHEN TO REFER Dr Charles Knight, Consultant Cardiologist BMI The London Independent Hospital Barts and the London NHS Trust.
Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. A reminder that this is a discussion of SYMPLICITY trial results and their.
Powered by Infomedica Infomedica Conference Coverage* of 26 th European Meeting on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection Paris (France), June 10-13,
Horst Sievert, MD DISCLOSURES Consulting Fees
Renal Sympathetic Denervation View From the EU
Renal Denervation for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Management of Hypertension according to JNC 7
Global Experience with Peripheral DCBs/Stent Studies: C.R. Bard
Meeting of the Balkan Excellent Centers
Prairie Cardiovascular, Springfield, IL US
Prof. Joachim Schofer, MD
- Higher SBP visit-to-visit variability (SBV) has been associated
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
PFO Closure: Review of the Trials for Migraine CRT 2013
Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Treatment of Resistant Hypertension: One-Year Results from the Symplicity HTN-2 Randomized Controlled Trial  Prof Murray.
Eberhard Grube MD, FACC, FSCAI
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors / angiotensin receptor blockers and contrast induced nephropathy in patients receiving cardiac catheterization:
The SPRINT Research Group
Angio Landmarks for Transseptal
Paul A. Sobotka, MD Professor of Medicine/Cardiology
The Vessix Global Clinical Program REDUCE-HTN: REINFORCE
Renal Nerve Ablation: Will It Become the treatment
Hypertension in the Post SPRINT era
Catheter-Based Denervation for Resistant Hypertension
CRT 2014 Washington DC, Feb 22-25, 2014 Renal Denervation with a Percutaneous Bipolar Radiofrequency Balloon Catheter in Patients with Resistant Hypertension:
FDA Pathway to Approval: Clinical Requirements for Renal Denervation
John C. Somberg, MD I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
From ESH 2016 | POS 7D: Jan Rosa, MD
Proximal Embolic Protection Devices CRT 2013
Health and Human Services National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Renal Denervation Next Steps
First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.
Vanguard Phase Results for the Blood Pressure Component
Jan B. Pietzsch1, Benjamin P. Geisler1, Murray D. Esler 2
Sympathetic Nerve Denervation for Treatment of Hypertension
A randomized controlled trial of distal renal denervation vs conventional mode of the intervention for treatment of resistant hypertension Stanislav Pekarskiy.
Cardiovascular Research Technology (CRT) 2011
Access and Closure Devices: How to Minimize the Complications
SYMPLICITY HTN-3: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Refractory Hypertension: Post Hoc.
CCSVI: Can We Justify this Procedure at this Time? - Pro -
Are the Data Supportive? Academic View
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
The Ardian Catheter Based Approach to Renal Denervation to Treat Refractory HTN: Results of the EU Randomized Clinical Trial Krishna Rocha-Singh, M.D.,
Renal Sympathetic Denervation: The Academic View
CVRx Baroreflex Activation Therapy:
Managing Carotid Disease After Crest - Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA):
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
Diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing percutaneous drug-eluting stent implantation: short and long-term results Claudio Moretti, M.D. Division of Cardiology,
Renal Denervation Industry Perspective
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Table of Contents Why Do We Treat Hypertension? Recommendation 5
Clinician Referral Training
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
Presentation transcript:

Catheter-based Renal Denervation with the Symplicity System Provides Safe and Durable Blood Pressure Reduction out to Three Years Horst Sievert1, Henry Krum2 on behalf of the Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators 1CardioVascular Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GERMANY, 2Monash University/Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Horst Sievert, MD Consulting: AccessClosure, Inc., AGA Medical Corporation, Ardian, Inc., Arstasis, Inc., Atritech Atrium Medical Corporation, Avinger, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation, Bridgepoint, CardioKinetix Inc., CardioMEMS, Inc., Coherex, Inc., Contego, CSI, EndoCross, Endotex Interventional Systems, Epitek, Evalve, Inc. and ev3, Inc.

Horst Sievert, MD Consulting: FlowCardia, Inc., Gore, Guidant, Lumen Biomedical, Inc., HLT, Kensey Nash Corporation, Kyoto Medical, Lifetech, Lutonix, Inc., Medinol, Medtronic, Inc., NDCNMT Medical, Inc., OAS, Occlutech Osprey Medical, Inc., Ovalis, Inc., Pathway Medical Technologies, Inc., PendraCare International B.V., Pfm Medical, Inc., Rox Medical, Recor, Sadra Medical, Sorin Biomedica Cardio S.R.L.,and Spectranetics Corporation, Trireme, Trivascular and Viacor, Inc.

Horst Sievert, MD Honoraria: Veryan, Ardian, Inc., Atritech, Atrium Medical Corporation, Boston Scientific Corporation, CardioKinetix Inc., CardioMEMS, Inc., Coherex, Inc., Contego, Epitek, Evalve, Inc., Guidant,Gore,Kyoto Medical, Lutonix, Inc., Medinol, Medtronic, Inc., Pfm Medical, Inc., and Spectranetics Corporation.

Horst Sievert, MD Honoraria: Viacor, Inc., HLT, Lifetech, Recor, Trivascular, Veryan, CVRx, GDS and InSeal Medical.

Symplicity HTN-1 Initial Cohort – Reported in the Lancet, 2009: Catheter-based Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Resistant Hypertension Durability of Blood Pressure Reduction Out to 24 Months Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators* Lancet. 2009;373:1275-1281 Hypertension. 2011;57:911-917. Initial Cohort – Reported in the Lancet, 2009: First-in-man, non-randomized study conducted in Europe and Australia Cohort of 45 patients with resistant HTN (SBP ≥160 mmHg on ≥3 anti-HTN drugs, including a diuretic; eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min) All patients received bilateral renal denervation with the Symplicity™ renal denervation system Primary endpoint: change in office BP; 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-procedure Expanded Cohort – Symplicity HTN-1: Expanded cohort of patients (n=153) from 19 sites (US, Europe, and Australia) 24 and 36-month follow-up of safety and effectiveness 6

Baseline Patient Characteristics (n=153) Demographics Age (years) 57 ± 11 Gender (% female) 39% Race (% non-Caucasian) 5% Co-morbidities Diabetes Mellitus II (%) 31% CAD (%) 22% Hyperlipidemia (%) 68% eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) 83 ± 20 Blood Pressure Baseline BP (mmHg) (n=150) 175/98 ± 17/15 Number of anti-HTN meds (mean) 5.1 ± 1.4 Diuretic (%) 95% Aldosterone blocker(%) ACE/ARB (%) 91% Direct Renin Inhibitor 14% Beta-blocker (%) 82% Calcium channel blocker (%) 75% Centrally acting sympatholytic (%) 33% Vasodilator (%) 19% Alpha-1 blocker Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators. Hypertension. 2011;57:911-917. 7

Change in Office Blood Pressure Through 36 Months* P<0.01 for ∆ from BL for all time points Reported as mean with 95% confidence intervals *Data is reported only on the patients available at each timepoint. It does not reflect the full cohort

Distribution of SBP Change at BL, 1, 12, 24, and 36 Months % Patients placeholder (N=150) (N=143) (N=132) (N=105) (N=34)

Percentage Responders Over Time Responder was defined as an office SBP reduction ≥10 mmHg (n=143) (n=148) (n=144) (n=132) (n=108) (n=105) (n=44) (n=34)

Change in Office BP by Age 12 Months 24 Months 36 Months (mmHg) Actual values to be added P<0.01 compared with BL, †p=0.19 N=98 N=34 N=78 N=27 N=29 N=5

Change in Office BP in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients 12 Months 24 Months 36 Months (mmHg) Actual values to be added P<.01 Compared with BL, †p=0.03 DM (N=45) Non-DM (N=87) DM (N=31) Non-DM (N=74) DM (N=11) Non-DM (N=23)

Change in Office BP According to Baseline Renal function 12 Months 24 Months 36 Months (mmHg) ‡ Actual values to be added eGFR 45-60 (N=10) eGFR>60 (N=116) † eGFR 45-60 (N=9) eGFR>60 (N=92) eGFR 45-60 (N=2) eGFR>60 (N=30)

Vascular Complications Out to 36 months Stenosis (previously reported to 18 months) One progression of a pre-existing stenosis unrelated to RF treatment (stented without further sequelae) One new moderate stenosis which was not hemodynamically relevant , requiring no treatment No new reports of vascular complications* *Analysis includes data on all patients available through 36 months Ask Bryan – can this be included Schlaich M, TCT 2012 Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators. Hypertension. 2011;57:911-917. 14

Other Adverse Events Out to 36 months* Hypotension and Renal Failure (18 m) n=1 Due to sepsis, resolved Hypotension and Renal Failure (24 m) n = 1 Post-operative acute renal failure resolved Hypotension Episode (n = 1) No treatment, resolved 3 deaths, unrelated to procedure Myocardial Infarction - After 3-day visit Sudden death (cardiac) - After 6 months Cardio-respiratory arrest - After 18 months Ask Bryan – can this be included *Analysis includes data on all patients available through 36 months Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators. Hypertension. 2011;57:911-917. Schlaich M – TCT 2012 15

Conclusions The magnitude of clinical response is significant and sustained through 36 months Increasing responder rates indicate: Some subjects respond late to RDN No loss of treatment effect out to 36 months The treatment effect was consistent across subgroups (age, diabetes status, and baseline renal function) No late adverse events related to RDN through 36 months Analysis iincludes data on patients available through 36 months