Ways of knowing TOK1 LAJM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
Advertisements

A summary of common fallacies
History of Philosophy. What is philosophy?  Philosophy is what everyone does when they’re not busy dealing with their everyday business and get a change.
How Claims of Knowledge Are Justified Foundationalism: knowledge claims are based on indubitable foundations –I can doubt whether there is a world, whether.
What is Knowledge?.
EMOTION - TOK BMIS TOK – TERM 1 – 2012 THIS PRESENTATION IS AN ADAPTATION OF CHAPTER 6 OF RICHARD VAN DE LAGEMAAT’S ˆTHEORY OF KNOWLEDGE FOR THE IB DIPLOMA.
METAPHYSICS ONTOLOGIES OFTEN CENTER ON MIND-BODY & MAY DEAL IN ISSUES OF COMPLEMENTARITY (APPARENT CONTRADCTORY PROPERTIES: eg WAVE, PARTICLE)
© Cambridge University Press 2013 Thomson_alphaem.
© Cambridge University Press 2013 Thomson_Fig
IB Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer INTRODUCTION TO THE WAYS OF KNOWING.
David Hume ( ) “The Wrecking Ball”
The Nature of Knowledge
Tok Reading 10: Imagination
Some channels of shared knowledge TOK. Internet Find two articles from the internet: one that you believe and one that you don’t. Give your reasons. What.
Shared Knowledge TOK.
Deductive and induction reasoning
JOHN DOE PERIOD 8. AT LEAST 80% OF HUMANITY LIVES ON LESS THAN $10 A DAY.
Perception: We perceive with our senses: smell, touch, sight.. What meaning do we make of these perceptions? We use “mental maps” which include our beliefs.
Theories of Human Nature D. Lecture: Introduction zOntological problem: What is human nature? zEpistemological problem: How does one know what.
 What constitutes genuine knowledge as opposed to opinion or belief?  What is the criterion for knowledge?  What are the sources or origins of such.
© Cambridge University Press 2013 Thomson_Fig
How to formulate a Knowledge Question?. 1. About knowledge or knowing 2.Open ended 3.Comparative 4.Expressed in TOK vocabulary.
WAYS OF KNOWING How do you know?. KNOWLEDGE CLAIM  A Knowledge claim (KC) are statement that make assertions to truth.  These claims are about knowledge.
TOK Integration – Counselling LAJM / LOUJ. TASK What was meant by personal knowledge?
Epistemology TIPS 1. What is Truth & Knowledge? 2. How can one determine truth from falsehood? 3. What are the pre- suppositions to knowledge?
Emotion. ● A working definition: a reaction or response related to sense perceptions, internal states, thoughts, or beliefs about things or people, real.
Course Overview THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE. In short, TOK is a course in critical thinking:  How to evaluate evidence using reason and judgment  How to avoid.
Introduction to Philosophy Descartes’ First Meditation
The Origin of Knowledge
Jeopardy Q $100 Q $100 Q $100 Q $100 Q $100 Q $200 Q $200 Q $200
Humanities.
ARGUMENTATION AND LOGIC
KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONS (KQs)
TOK Integration – Counselling
Personal and Shared Knowledge
© Cambridge University Press 2011
Defining our terms - day 3
Shared Knowledge TOK.
The Nature of Knowledge
THE NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE
TOK Fundamentals TOK LAJM.
HISTORY OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY
Epistemology Summary.
Theory of Knowledge: Donald Trump and the “Muslim Ban”
Ways of knowing: language
A Movement Across the Arts
CAS ~ An Introduction.
Empiricism All knowledge of things in the world is a posteriori (that is, based ultimately on experience). Purely mental (i.e., a priori) operations of.
Knowledge Questions Must be open and about knowledge Comparative
Thanks to Richard van de Lagemaat,
Emerson, Thoreau, Ellison
Thomson_eeWWtgc © Cambridge University Press 2013.
Transcendentalism “Trust thyself”
Do Now Pull cell phones in wall pockets
Thomson_atlascmsEventsAlt
THINKING, DECISION MAKING AND THEIR RELIABILITY
Ways of knowing: language
Thomson_CandP © Cambridge University Press 2013.
Knowers and knowing: Nature of knowledge
Thomson_AFBCartoon © Cambridge University Press 2013.
REASON – ARGUMENTATION AND LOGIC
PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE TOK LAJM.
WAYS OF KNOWING TOK LAJM.
AREAS OF KNOWLEDGE TOK LAJM.
SHARED KNOWLEDGE TOK LAJM.
TOK FUNDAMENTALS TOK LAJM.
AN OVERVIEW OF PERSONAL AND SHARED KNOWLEDGE
THE NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE
Knowledge questions have four features: -about knowledge -debatable/argumentative -open ended -expressed in T.o.K. vocabulary.
Presentation transcript:

Ways of knowing TOK1 LAJM

Eight ways of knowing (WOKs) WOKs can be thought as possible sources of knowledge

TASK Try to give at least one everyday example of each WOK in action

WOKs overlap Borders between WOKs are blurred Group work: do the task on WOKs overlapping in seven groups

Best WOK? Can you rank different WOKs? If you can, try to give reasons for this.

Some schools of thought (1) Empiricism All knowledge is ultimately based on perceptual experience

Some schools of thought (2) Rationalism Reason is the most important source of knowledge

Some schools of thought (3) Romanticism Emphasizes the importance of intuitions, emotions and imagination for making sense of the world

Some schools of thought (4) Fideism Knowledge is ultimately based on faith

TASK Which one of these schools of thought is most plausible? Can you give any reasons for and against these schools of thought?

Pros and cons of WOK’s

Other ways of knowing? In the IB TOK curriculum eight WOKs are mentioned Are they all justifiable as genuine ways of knowing? Can we have any other ways to know?

Picture sources WOKs <http://blogs.osc-ib.com/tag/ways-of-knowing/> Accessed 6th of September 2015. Blurry line <http://sankarit.fi/media/2014/06/> Accessed 6th of September 2015. John Locke <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empiricism> Accessed 5th of September. René Descartes <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/René_Descartes> Accessed 5th of September.

Picture sources John Keats <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Keats> Accessed 5th of September. G. K. Chesterton <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton> Accessed 5th of September 2016. David Hume <https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hume> Accessed 5th of September 2016. Double edged WOKs van de Lagemaat, Richard: Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma, Second edition, Cambridge University Press 2015, page 74.