Settlement Timeline Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AMS DATA WORKSHOP III TDSP UPDATE September 19,
Advertisements

ERCOT Billing, Settlement Disputes & Data Extracts
October 28, 2014 Update to RMS 1. * Reviewed and Discussed: * ERCOT Protocols and Retail Market Guide Requirements * TDSPs’ Data Processes for IDR vs.
SMART METER TEXAS Status Update July 29, AGENDA Release 1 Smart Meter Texas Online Portal Update – SMT Solution Update – Registration Statistics.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott April 24,
1 AMS Data Workshop ERCOT Overview of AMS Data Processes June 27, 2014 ERCOT June 27, 2014.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
Retail Market Subcommittee (RMS) Update Kathy Scott January 3, 2013Technical Advisory Committee 1.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT June 10, Supporting Reports Section.
MARS Taskforce COPS Update May 12, Execution MilestonesBaseline DateStatus Technical Architecture Complete 05/15/2009On Schedule Development Complete07/24/2009On.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott July 16,
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Distributed Generation Task Force November 29, 2007 TAC Report.
June 22 and 23,  The information and/or flow processes contained in this Power Point presentation: ◦ Were created to allow interested parties to.
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Mandy Bauld ERCOT October 9, 2012 RTM SETTLEMENT TIMELINE.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
ESI IDs Retired in Error! RMS – August 10, 2005 Discussion.
1 ESI ID SERVICE HISTORY AND USAGE DATA EXTRACT SYSTEM CHANGE REQUEST (SCR 727) February 24, 2003.
SPP Presentation Stakeholder Meeting April 16, 2008 Austin, Texas UPDATE: Retail Open Access for ETI within SPP.
October 9, 2012 Commercial Operations Subcommittee RMS Update Kathy Scott RMS Vice Chair.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Retail Transaction Processing.
MARS 867_03F ROR vs. Settlement vs. 810 Scenarios ERCOT September 2008.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
Profiling Working Group October 16, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting October 16, 2003.
MARS Advanced Metering – ERCOT Market Facing Changes Jackie Ashbaugh Manager Data Integrity and Administration 3/9/2009.
AMS Indicator ERCOT Recommendations
MARS Taskforce RMS Update November 10, Conference Call concerning Settlement Estimates TDSPs held a conference call on October 28, 2010, where we:
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Smart Meter Technology.
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 (following RMS) COPS-RMS-WORKSHOPShttp://
1 Update on the 867_03 Contingency Plan Nancy Hetrick February 25, 2003.
1 Next Steps to Reduce the RTM Settlement Timeline COPS Workshop August 29, 2013 Mandy Bauld ERCOT Director, Settlement & Retail Operations (512)
1 CenterPoint Energy Response RMS Update January 14, 2008 CenterPoint Energy’s Update on Usage & Invoices Backlog.
TX SET Update to RMS Wednesday, November 7, 2007.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Advanced Meter Technology.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
Retail Market Update August 6, Load Profile Guides In accordance with section § (e) (3) and PUCT Project 25516, Load Profiling and Load Research.
MARS Taskforce COPS Update August 10, Definitions AMC – AMS (IDR) meter type settled using the 15-Minute LSE data received from TDSP AMDG – 15 Minute.
1DRAFT for DISCUSSION Transition From Non-IDR to IDR Load Profile and LSE 15-minute Data for AMS Market Advanced Readings and Settlements Taskforce 10/9/09.
1 New MO Projects June COMS Extract, Report & Web Services Monitoring & Usage Statistics Jackie Ashbaugh.
AEP ONCOR TNMP TDSP AMS Data Practices Summary TDSP_AMS Data Practices Summary.ppt CenterPoint.
February 2, 2016 RMS Meeting 1. * Reasons: * Per the ERCOT Board Report dated 8/5/14 there were 6.6M Advanced Metering System (AMS) Electric Service Identifiers.
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 (following RMS) COPS-RMS-WORKSHOPShttp://
COPS DECEMBER 2013 UPDATE TO RMS 12/18/2013 Harika Basaran, Chair Jim Lee, Vice Chair.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
Proposed Timeline for Extract, Variances, True-Ups Extracts 10/1/03 Clear all “old” extracts from Portal 9/26/03 Post last “old” daily extract 10/6/03.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
Module 1 From Bundled Utilities to Current Market Design.
3 rd Party Registration & Account Management SMT Update To AMWG MAY, 2015.
1 RMS Update to RMWG June 6, Market Process for Solar & Wind Devices Retail customers are purchasing and installing wind and solar equipment on.
1 TX SET Update to RMS March 14, Drop to AREP Changes PUCT Project oOne of TX SET 2007 goal is to evaluate approved Rulemakings and determine.
Nodal RTM Settlement Timeline Snapshot Timing for Load and Gen Data (Follow-Up) Mandy Bauld COPS November 10, 2009.
MARS Taskforce RMS Update October 13, 2010.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
SMT Update To AMWG NOV 2016.
Distributed Generation Task Force
Nodal COMS Additional Items Update
AEP ONCOR TNMP CenterPoint
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC
June 7, 2016 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS
MARS Taskforce RMS Update December 9, 2009.
Usage Billing Issues.
TEAMS – Texas Electric Advanced Market Solution
Presentation transcript:

Settlement Timeline Workshop November 6, 2012

Agenda TDSP’s AMS Data Flow Overview AMS LSE Data Process Monthly 867_03 Process for AMS Meters TDSP’s Conventional IDR Data Flow Overview Conventional IDR Meter Process TDSP’s Non-AMS/Non-IDR Meter Reading Overview Non-AMS/Non-IDR Meter Process TDSP’s Unmetered Usage Overview Unmetered Usage Process Settlement Reduction Timeline TDSP’s Concerns and Potential Impacts TDSP’s Questions? Q&A

TDSP’s AMS Data Flow Overview Daily Register Read Interval Usage Data Data Collection Meter Data Management System (MDMS) “Daily 15-Minute Interval Data LSE Files” COLLECTOR Customer Information System (CIS) “867 Usage Processing” Daily 15-Minute Interval Data LSE Files SMT Transaction Management Systems and NASEB Server REPS Customers ERCOT “867 Usage Transactions” Retailers

AMS LSE Data Process Usage and reads are collected from AMS meters through an automated communications process by the TDSPs. Readings are processed in TDSP’s Meter Data Management Systems (MDMS) where intervals are identified as either Actual (A) or Estimated (E) usage data and are labeled as such in the daily LSE files. Estimates are mainly the result of communication failures while trying to retrieve data from the AMS meter, so in order to fill those missing intervals, also known as gaps, intervals are estimated to produce a LSE file with all 96 intervals filled with 15-minute interval usage. 96 intervals are the norm, but 92 Intervals or 100 Intervals are necessary for Spring and Fall changes in the Central Prevailing Time (CPT). Estimates may be replaced by actuals if actuals are available when the AMS meter is interrogated in subsequent request for usage data. High percentage of market’s LSE Interval Data is produced daily LSE Files containing 15-minute interval data are sent by the TDSPs to both ERCOT for Real Time Settlements (RTM) and Smart Meter Texas (SMT) for Customer’s and REP of Record’s use.

Monthly 867_03 Process for AMS Meters TDSPs provide both: LSE files that provide daily 15-minute interval data and Monthly summarized usage are based upon the TDSP’s cycle read schedules . The LSE file register readings from the prior and current month’s cycle readings are used to calculate consumption (usage) for the current month. Monthly cycle readings will indicate in the 867_03 TX SET transaction as Actual (A) or Estimated (E) and if readings are estimated a reason for estimate will be provided in the 867_03 transaction by the TDSP. Estimates in this case are mainly the result of communication failures while trying to retrieve data from the AMS meter, so in order to fill those missing intervals, also known as gaps an 867_03 Monthly Cycle Reading may be the result of an estimate. TDSPs will communicate these readings and usage to ERCOT and REPs of Record via the TX SET 867_03 Monthly Usage transaction where ERCOT will ONLY forward this transaction to the REPs of Record for their Customer’s invoicing since ERCOT uses the LSE data for settlements.

TDSP’s Conventional IDR Meter Data Flow Overview MV90 Systems Meter Called or Polled On Cycle Read Schedules Conventional IDR Meters or Telephone Lines or Field Polled at Meter IDR Usage and Billing System “867 Usage and Processing” 867_03 Monthly Cycle Interval Data Billing and Invoicing by REP 867_03 Monthly Cycle Interval Data Transaction Management Systems and NASEB Server Customers REPS ERCOT

Conventional IDR Meter Process TDSPs collect readings and usage from IDR meters through: Telephone/Dial-up Communications Meter Crews polling IDR meter at Premise Automated System Processes Readings are processed by TDSP’s MV90 Systems where intervals are either Actual (A) or Estimated (E) usage and are labeled as such once the monthly 867_03 TX SET transaction is created by IDR Usage and Billing systems. Again, estimates are mainly the result of communication failures while trying to retrieve data from the IDR meter, so in order to fill those missing intervals, also known as gaps, intervals are estimated to produce the 867_03 TX SET Monthly Usage transaction that contains all 2880 intervals filled with 15-minute interval data. All Conventional IDR readings and data are processed according to TDSP’s monthly cycle meter reading schedules. TDSPs will communicate these readings and data to ERCOT and REP of Records via the TX SET 867_03 Monthly Usage transaction for ERCOT’s Real Time Settlements and to REPs of Record for their Customer’s invoicing.

TDSP’s Non-AMS/Non-IDR Meter Reading Overview Customer Information System (CIS) Non-AMS or Non-IDR Meter types “867 Usage Processing” Field Read Meters according to TDSP’s On Cycle Meter Read Schedules 867_03 Monthly Cycle Readings & Usage 867_03 Monthly Cycle Readings & Usage Billing and Invoicing by REP Transaction Management Systems and NASEB Server “867 Usage Transactions” Customers REPS ERCOT

Non-AMS/Non-IDR Meter Process These meter types require meter readings to be preformed by field personnel at the premise. TDSPs use their Customer Information Systems (CIS) and/or Billing Systems to create TX SET 867_03 Monthly Usage transactions. Cycle readings are indicated in the 867_03 transaction as Actual (A) or Estimated (E) usage, if estimated a reason for estimate will be provided in the 867_03 transaction by the TDSP. In this case, estimates are mainly the result of meter access or inaccessible to field personnel. All NON-AMS or NON-IDR meter readings are processed according to TDSP’s monthly cycle meter reading schedules. TDSPs will communicate these readings and usage to ERCOT and REPs of Record via the TX SET 867_03 Monthly Usage transaction for ERCOT’s Real Time Settlements and to REPs of Record for their Customer’s invoicing.

TDSP’s Unmetered Usage Overview Database “ESI IDs Unmetered Services and Usage ” CIS and Billing System “867 Usage Processing” 867_03 Monthly Cycle Readings 867_03 Monthly Cycle Readings Billing and Invoicing by REP Transaction Management Systems and NASEB Server “867 Usage Transactions” Customers REPS ERCOT

Unmetered Usage Process Unmetered usage is based upon the type of unmetered services that is assigned to an ESI ID. TDSPs use their Customer Information Systems (CIS) and/or Billing Systems to create TX SET 867_03 Monthly Usage transactions. Unmetered ESI IDs are processed according to TDSP’s monthly cycle meter reading schedules. TDSPs will communicate this usage to ERCOT and REPs of Record via the TX SET 867_03 Monthly Usage transaction for ERCOT’s Real Time Settlements and to REPs of Record for their Customer’s invoicing

Settlement Time Reduction TDSP’s Concerns and Potential Impacts: Depending upon the reduction in settlement timelines may result in: A review of TDSP’s staffing and systems needs to support: LSE file exceptions where daily LSE 15-minute interval data failed to load and/or were rejected at ERCOT. AMS or Conventional IDR Data Collection failures. Maybe the result of a significant or catastrophe event. EPS meters that failed to communicate when ERCOT attempted to retrieve data. Maybe the result of telephone communication problems and out of TDSP’s control (i.e. telephone line failed).

TDSP’s Concerns and Potential Impacts: Depending upon the reduction in settlement timelines may result in: An increased risk to the market that less actual data may be available, and/or any corrections or updates where necessary to prior data, for AMS and Non-AMS, Conventional IDR, Unmetered and EPS premises.

TDSP’s Concerns and Potential Impacts: Conventional IDR meters continue to be processed by the TDSPs according to a monthly cycle read schedule through a different system than AMS meters and IDR meters were not included in TDSP’s PUCT approved AMS deployment plans. TDSPs’ AMS deployment plans for meters and systems did not include those meters already required by ERCOT to have IDR meters, this is consistent with PURA 39.107(h).

TDSP’s Questions? Is the goal of making changes to the settlement timeline only applies to Initial Settlements? Are there any ERCOT or Market plans to make changes to Final and True-up timelines and/or the current protocols requirements that apply to Final and True-up Settlements? In order to reduce market cost and impacts, could ERCOT evaluate what it would take to make changes to reducing their Settlement timelines that do not impact the TDSP’s current business processes and systems?

TDSP’s Questions(cont.)? Regardless of final decisions approved by the market concerning Settlement timeline changes, will ERCOT continue to support and apply Protocol’s Section 11.4. “Load Data Aggregation” when usage data is missing or unavailable as a Settlement’s fallback process? 11.4.1 Estimation of Missing Data The Data Aggregation System (DAS) will perform estimation of missing interval and non-interval retail Load meter consumption data for use in Settlement when actual meter consumption data is unavailable.

Questions and Answers?