Feedback on PIN Meeting 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What you might do and see at each place. Why you would enjoy it.
Advertisements

A teachers’ project: “Towards learner autonomy”. A teachers’ project: towards learner autonomy §Rationale §What we wanted to achieve §The process §Problems.
Dr. Brad Harrington, ©2009 MB 110: Human Resource Management Course Evaluations Prof. Brad Harrington Boston College.
Discussion examples Andrea Zhok.
CEBP Learning Institute Fall 2009 Evaluation Report A collaborative Partnership between Indiana Department of Corrections & Indiana University November.
Science Andrea’s Student Led Conference. Cover Letter This year in science I have learned about many things. We learned a ton of important information.
SINC LS1 Evaluation Results. Learn Session 1 Learning Session 1 5. What worked best for our team during this Learning Session # 1 was : being able.
The short but incredibly happy life of Riley
ESDGC Conference 2013 Evaluation. Setting the scene! Welcome Phil Williams.
Click on a question to see the answer. HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE COMBINATION OF YOUR MAIN PRODUCT AND ANCILLARY TEXTS? My main product and the ancillary product.
Arden Medical Centre Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire 2015.
P is For… Current Word: Passion Your Word: Passion Why? I would not change passion, no matter what unless you are passionate about something there is no.
Introduction to CSCI 1311 Dr. Mark C. Lewis
109 Wardens Survey – 16/17 Season End of Season Get Together –
Introverts CAN BE LEADERS TOO
Training & Communicating with Your Staff
Why Peer Review? Rationale #4
Four day shadowing programme
Formal Feedback about the ‘Bridge’ (Internally collated)
Hello and welcome to today’s training.
Evaluate the Evaluator Responses
Information Session for Parents and Carers
Agenda Welcome and apologies for absence
Consultation: Your Say ….
General Meeting cern, 10-12/10/2017 CREATIONS Demonstrators
Structured Dialogue in ESN
BRINGING THE OUTSIDE IN
Project Management Institute Heartland (NE) Chapter
Why Peer Review? Rationale #4
Damned if you do and Damned if you don’t
Power, Status, Leadership
English Proficiency Workshop
INtopFORM Faculty Learning Community Survey
Developing a Learning Organisation
CRPUSD Instructional Update
We asked……….. You said………………
Ground Rules.
DISCUSSION ONLINE A Survey CMS102J, SUMMER, 2008
English for Civil Engineers
Fiona Malkin (Nailsea School) Robert Vilain (University of Bristol)
Alumni Relations 3 April 2014 Kendall
Parent Questionnaire 2016 We issued 113 questionnaires during
Hi everyone, for those that don’t know me, I’m Nicole and my colleague Ian and I are responsible for promoting teaching to physicists and engineers. I’m.
Words and Actions Can Hurt
HIS RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM
August 1-2 All Staff PD Survey results
Manageable amount of work from EES to fit around other commitments
Using the Six Traits of Writing
Re-envisioning Process Discussion
Using the Six Traits of Writing
Go to =>
National Charter & Expansion Committee National Convention 2013
The Benefits of Saving Money.
A shift in the market is taking place.
Continuing Professional Development Assessor Briefing
Handout 5: Feedback and support
A Short Introduction to Intergenerational Working
Developed by HC3, USAID’s Flagship Health Communication Project
How to Market Yourself in 15 Seconds
DISCUSSION ONLINE A Survey CMS102J, SUMMER, 2008
Public Engagement with Research
Leadership Group 9th November 2013 Feedback Summary.
Comments written by Pupils about particular strategies used in English which helped their writing As you will read, some of our pupils commented about.
The Nature of Science.
Using the Six Traits of Writing
January 2018 PPG Workshop Evaluation
You’ve Got Friends, Followers & Fans Now What?
Preparing for a Job Interview
The London Environmental Network Volunteer Recruitment Workshop
Year 11 & 12 Maths from a students’ viewpoint
Presentation transcript:

Feedback on PIN Meeting 2014 Help us to improve! Evaluation of the Questionnaire

What % of your working time do you spend in PR: 0 - 20% 20 - 80% 80 – 100%

How experienced in PR do you consider to be? little medium highly

What was your motivation to come to the PIN Meeting? Meeting the PIN’ies Learning something Seeing CERN Getting updated Seeing TCV others

Do you consider the overall meeting as being useful? Why?

What did you like the best?

What will you take back?

What would you change?

Is there anything you missed?

The Host Organization: Very good, thank you ABSOLUTELY fantastic! Perfect Thanks and compliments Excellent! EPFL campus is a very nice location, and the organization was perfect

Breakout session template presentation: Big work done, useful interaction with PINies GREAT location and motivating group A bit to short +: preparatory presentation, time to familiarize ourselves with it, -: time too short In our group the starting point was too far from final and we didn’t have time to re-think the structure together. Useful idea anyway Unfortunately not enough time to discuss all! Good sharing of views; serious discussion! Exchange of air in Rolex centre Seemed a little bit lost – needs more focus & a clear message

Status report EFDA/PIN: Institutional communication Clear structured as always complete Very clear

Status report Fusion for Energy: Sorry, I am a bit confused Not sure, what it means for us Institutional communication Hard to understand the role of F4E Too general Too F4E marketing oriented

Creating a MOOC: Would be nice to try Interesting idea Very preliminary Very interesting

Reporting form Ecsite: Crowdfunding and co-creation have sparkled a couple of ideas Very good idea Seems to be interesting to look in other areas New ideas! Useful info, just a bit too long Good Already too tired, sorry

Science on the street: Very insiring *** Very creative! Really interesting Great input, lots of enthusiasm! Very interesting and refreshing! Enthusiast Good communicator, much enthusiasm, interesting experience

Communication in EPFL: The difference between ‘amateur’ (me) and Communication Representative Very good Very professional Quite good Too long Interesting sight into how communications work at EPFL Low voice, low enthusiasm

Inertial fusion research: Very enthusiastic. Maybe a bit technical Too much physics?! Very interesting, new things learned Comparison to magnetic fusion in relation to facilities development and (? Couldn’t read) perfect Entusiasm great, but too much for a non scientist. Very enthusiastic and lively

Comments, suggestions PIN meeting and PI network: Fusion Presentation Kit is a great tool. We should share more information with each other. The meeting proved how important the host is for the overall success of the meeting The number of participants is decreasing, why? I am happy with the network and meeting as they are now. People who don’t normally (or never) show up for the monthly videoconferences should be encouraged to participate, otherwise their participation is very limited.