A Match Likelihood Ratio for DNA Comparison

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNA Identification: Mixture Weight & Inference
Advertisements

DNA Identification: TrueAllele ® Testimony Cybergenetics © Continuing Legal Education Duquesne University October, 2010 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD,
Overcoming DNA Stochastic Effects 2010 NEAFS & NEDIAI Meeting November, 2010 Manchester, VT Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics.
Sherlock Holmes and the DNA Likelihood Ratio American Academy of Forensic Sciences February, 2011 Chicago, IL Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
Forensic DNA Inference ICFIS 2008 Lausanne, Switzerland Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Joseph B Kadane, PhD Robin W Cotton, PhD Cybergenetics ©
DNA Identification as an Information Science
DNA Mixture Interpretations and Statistics – To Include or Exclude Cybergenetics © Prescription for Criminal Justice Forensics ABA Criminal Justice.
New York State Police TrueAllele ® Casework Developmental Validation Cybergenetics © New York State DNA Subcommittee March, 2010.
Finding Truth in DNA Mixture Evidence Innocence Network Conference April, 2013 Charlotte, NC Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA.
How Inclusion Interpretation of DNA Mixture Evidence Reduces Identification Information American Academy of Forensic Sciences February, 2013 Washington,
Creating informative DNA libraries using computer reinterpretation of existing data Northeastern Association of Forensic Scientists November, 2011 Newport,
Preventing rape in the military through effective DNA computing Forensics Europe Expo Forensics Seminar Theatre April, 2014 London, UK Mark W Perlin, PhD,
TrueAllele ® Interpretation of DNA Mixture Evidence 9 th International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics August, 2014 Leiden University,
TrueAllele ® Casework Validation on PowerPlex ® 21 Mixture Data Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society September, 2014 Adelaide, South Australia.
Using TrueAllele ® Casework to Separate DNA Mixtures of Relatives California Association of Criminalists October, 2014 San Francisco, CA Jennifer Hornyak,
Revolutionising DNA analysis in major crime investigations The Investigator Conferences Green Park Conference Centre May, 2014 Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.
DNA Mixture Statistics Cybergenetics © Spring Institute Commonwealth's Attorney's Services Council Richmond, Virginia March, 2013 Mark W.
More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics ©
Scientific Validation of Mixture Interpretation Methods 17th International Symposium on Human Identification Sponsored by the Promega Corporation October,
DNA Identification Science: The Search for Truth Cybergenetics © Summer Research Symposium Duquesne University July, 2010 Mark W Perlin, PhD,
Computer Interpretation of Uncertain DNA Evidence National Institute of Justice Computer v. Human June, 2011 Arlington, VA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD.
Automated STR Data Analysis: Validation Studies Automated Analysis Databasing Validation Casework Studies Mark W. Perlin (Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA)
How TrueAllele ® Works (Part 2) Degraded DNA and Allele Dropout Cybergenetics Webinar November, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh,
Blairsville, PA Dentist Dr. John Yelenic
TrueAllele ® Genetic Calculator: Implementation in the NYSP Crime Laboratory NYS DNA Subcommittee May 19, 2010 Barry Duceman, Ph.D New York State Police.
Separating Familial Mixtures, One Genotype at a Time Northeastern Association of Forensic Scientists November, 2014 Hershey, PA Ria David, PhD, Martin.
Cybergenetics Webinar January, 2015 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © How TrueAllele ® Works (Part 4)
Unleashing Forensic DNA through Computer Intelligence Forensics Europe Expo Forensic Innovation Conference April, 2013 London, UK Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD,
Getting Past First Bayes with DNA Mixtures American Academy of Forensic Sciences February, 2014 Seattle, WA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
Compute first, ask questions later: an efficient TrueAllele ® workflow Midwestern Association of Forensic Scientists October, 2014 St. Paul, MN Martin.
Virginia TrueAllele ® Validation Study: Casework Comparison Presented at AAFS, February, 2013 Published in PLOS ONE, March, 2014 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD,
Murder in McKeesport October 25, 2008 Tamir Thomas.
Open Access DNA Database Duquesne University March, 2013 Pittsburgh, PA Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics ©
Exploring Forensic Scenarios with TrueAllele ® Mixture Automation 59th Annual Meeting American Academy of Forensic Sciences February, 2007 Mark W Perlin,
Objective DNA Mixture Information in the Courtroom: Relevance, Reliability & Acceptance NIST International Symposium on Forensic Science Error Management:
Death Needs Answers: The DNA Evidence Cybergenetics © Andrea Niapas Book Launch Pittsburgh, PA May, 2013 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics,
DNA Identification: Quantitative Data Modeling Cybergenetics © Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA TrueAllele ® Lectures.
Data summary – “alleles” Threshold Over threshold, peaks are labeled as allele events All-or-none allele peaks, each given equal status Allele Pair 8,
Separating DNA Mixtures by Computer to Identify and Convict a Serial Rapist Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Garett Sugimoto,
Overcoming Bias in DNA Mixture Interpretation
Validating TrueAllele® genotyping on ten contributor DNA mixtures
Error in the likelihood ratio: false match probability
Explaining the Likelihood Ratio in DNA Mixture Interpretation
Distorting DNA evidence: methods of math distraction
On the threshold of injustice: manipulating DNA evidence
Virginia TrueAllele® Validation Study: Casework Comparison
Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Suffolk County TrueAllele® Validation
American Academy of Forensic Sciences Criminalistics Section
Solving Crimes using MCMC to Analyze Previously Unusable DNA Evidence
Investigative DNA Databases that Preserve Identification Information
DNA Identification: Inclusion Genotype and LR
Forensic Thinking, Fast and Slow
DNA Identification: Stochastic Effects
Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
DNA Identification: Biology and Information
DNA Identification: Biology and Information
Forensic match information: exact calculation and applications
severed carotid artery
The Triumph and Tragedy of DNA Evidence
Probabilistic Genotyping to the Rescue for Pinkins and Glenn
Forensic validation, error and reporting: a unified approach
DNA Identification: Biology and Information
DNA Identification: Mixture Interpretation
Exonerating the Innocent with Probabilistic Genotyping
Testifying about probabilistic genotyping results
David W. Bauer1, PhD Nasir Butt2, PhD Jeffrey Oblock2
Using probabilistic genotyping to distinguish family members
Reporting match error: casework, validation & language
Presentation transcript:

A Match Likelihood Ratio for DNA Comparison American Academy of Forensic Sciences February, 2009 Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Corp Pittsburgh, PA USA Cybergenetics © 2003-2009

Uncertain Genotype probability distribution q(x) s(x) r(x) Q R S

Match Likelihood Ratio Pr(Q=S) S Q Pr(Q=R) Pr(Q=S) LR= R Pr(Q=R)

Interpreting DNA Evidence A. Obtain DNA data B. Infer genotype Data Model Compare Probability C. Likelihood ratio

sum of all genotype likelihoods* Genotype Inference Data • evidence • victim Model • genotype candidate • generate pattern Compare • likelihood function (bell curve) • product rule for data Probability • genotype probability distribution • genotype probability =    genotype likelihood*   sum of all genotype likelihoods*

Different Methods: Data Used inclusion subtraction addition victim profile NO YES original data

Statistical Inference View inclusion method vs. likelihood ratio approach "often robs the items of any probative value" - B. Weir "usually discards a lot of information compared to the correct likelihood ratio approach" - C. Brenner "does not use as much of the information included in the data as the LR approach but, conceptually, they are equivalent" - M. Krawczak "Recommendation 1: The likelihood ratio is the preferred approach to mixture interpretation." - DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics

Mixture Case • DNA from under victim's fingernails • two contributors to DNA mixture • 93.3% victim & 6.7% unknown • 2 ng DNA in 50 ul • ProfilerPlus + Cofiler STR analysis • three different mixture interpretations 1. inclusion 2. subtraction 3. addition

D16S539

Inclusion Method 12 13 14 • discard peak heights • create uniform peaks • included allele pairs • uniform probability cutoff 12 13 1 number included

'Inclusion' LR at D16S539

Addition Method victim genotype second genotype 12, 14 ? data 13 + = victim genotype second genotype 12, 14 ? data genotype pattern • similar pattern, high likelihood • dissimilar pattern, low likelihood

'Addition' LR at D16S539

Information 10 thousand (4) 10 million (7) 100 billion (11) 10 quadrillion (16)

Validation

Calibration

Bibliography • Quantitative STR Peak Information • Genotype Probability Distributions • Computer Interpretation of STR Data • Statistical Modeling and Computation • Likelihood Ratio Literature • Mixture Interpretation Admissibility • Computer Systems for Quantitative DNA Mixture Deconvolution • TrueAllele Casework Publications

Conclusions: MLR • a useful tool for determining identification information with uncertain genotypes • works well on forensic mixture cases • enables quantitative validation, calibration, and comparison of genotype inference methods • based on generally accepted scientific principles