The Effects of Imagery on Name Recall

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course Fifth Edition Arthur.
Advertisements

Method Participants 36 healthy participants (19 females) aged from 17 to 24 years (mean = 20; SD = 1,67) Material Participants were randomly allocated.
Word Imagery Effects on Explicit and Implicit Memory Nicholas Bube, Drew Finke, Darcy Lemon, and Meaghan Topper.
Cortical Structure and Function. FRONTAL LOBE Anatomy of the Frontal Lobes.
Design of icons for use by Chinese in Mainland China Interacting with computers 9(1998) Yee-Yin Choong, Gavriel Salvendy Report: Yang Kun, Ou.
Distribution of Tau Distances Assessing Episodic and Semantic Contributions in Serial Recall Pernille Hemmer, Brent Miller & Mark Steyvers University of.
Retrieval: How We Recall the Past from Episodic Memory
The Effects of Restriction of Recognition on False Memory Annamarie Elmer, Holly Heindselman, Rachel Robertson Hanover College.
Learning Styles and Comprehension Brought to you by: Jennifer, Annika, and Katharine.
Verbal Rehearsal, Semantic Elaboration, and Imagery.
Research Methods Steps in Psychological Research Experimental Design
Fractionation of Memory in Medial Temporal Lobe Amnesia
Similar Stimuli and Misattribution McNeese, T. Fort Lewis College In this study I investigated the memory error known as misattribution. I examined how.
James B. Brewer, Zuo Zhao, John D Desmond, Gary H. Glover, John D. E. Gabrieli Thomas Pierce.
Working Memory Capacity and Mobile Multimedia Learning Environments: Individual Differences in Learning While Mobile Adviser : Min-Puu Chen Presenter:
Designs. Single-factor designs: Between-subjects.
The Effects of Stress on Memory Final Project Research Design and Analysis Melissa VanToever Lauren McCreight.
Studying Memory Encoding with fMRI Event-related vs. Blocked Designs Aneta Kielar.
Memory Chapter 7. What Is Memory?Memory Use for the Short TermLong-Term Memory: Encoding and RetrievalStructures in Long-Term MemoryBiological Aspects.
© 2013 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner.
Memory: Brain basis (Neurocognition) Evidence for two memory systems?: See Nee et al (2007) article and pp William James (1900): Made Primary-Secondary.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10th Edition
Methods SUBJECTS. SUBJECTS. Ten participants with damage to medial temporal lobe, including the amygdala, consequence to neurosergical temporal lobectomy.
Research Report. Introduction Introduce the research problem Introduce the research problem Why is the study important and to whom Why is the study important.
+ Monday, November 4 th Welcome Back! Grades on projects- soon… Different notes- less confusing! This week: M- Long Term Memory T- Biology of Memory W/TR:
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 12: Single Variable Between- Subjects Research 1.
MEMORY SYSTEMS IN THE BRAIN Some Gross Anatomy. The Human Brain saggital section at midline.
DIFFERENTIAL COMPONENTS OF PROSPECTIVE MEMORY? EVIDENCE FROM FMRI J. Simons, M. Scholvinck, S. Gilbert, C. Frith, P. Burgess By Alex Gustafson.
Jette hannibal Internal assessment Experimental research.
Poster presented at APS 2014 Abstract This study was conducted to determine if explaining criminal behavior influences later identification. Schooler and.
Psychology research methods– Analysis Portfolio Taylor Rodgers B
Oneway ANOVA comparing 3 or more means. Overall Purpose A Oneway ANOVA is used to compare three or more average scores. A Oneway ANOVA is used to compare.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 7 l Hypothesis Tests 7.1 Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses 7.2 Type I & Type.
Comparing Multiple Groups:
Hypothesis Tests l Chapter 7 l 7.1 Developing Null and Alternative
Semantic Priming Effects in a Bilingual Gujarati Speaker
Experimental research
Dependent-Samples t-Test
Difference in Mls poured between the subject and the researcher
Emilie Zamarripa & Joseph Latimer| Faculty Mentor: Jarrod Hines
Mental Rotation of Naturalistic Human Faces
The Relationship Between Emphasis of Cell-phone Use on Performance and Anxiety: Classroom Implications Jordan Booth, Leah Cotton, Jeni Dillman, Kealey.
Performance-Related Sustained and Anticipatory Activity in Human Medial Temporal Lobe during Delayed Match-to-Sample Rosanna K. Olsen,1 Elizabeth A. Nichols,1.
Levels of Processing Memory Model (LoP)
Group Comparisons What is the probability that group mean differences occurred by chance? With Excel (or any statistics program) we computed p values to.
The Components of the Phenomenon of Repetition Suppression
What is the best environment to study in?
Which of these is “a boy”?
Duration of presentat ion
The involvement of visual and verbal representations in a quantitative and a qualitative visual change detection task. Laura Jenkins, and Dr Colin Hamilton.
Comparing Multiple Groups: Analysis of Variance ANOVA (1-way)
Post Hoc or Multiple Comparison Testing
Experimental research
Correct the errors Unfortunately, the data does not support our prediction. The data do not support our prediction.
Catherine Barsics & Serge Brédart
Word Imagery Effects on Explicit and Implicit Memory
Discussion Chapter.
Main Effects and Interaction Effects
Sarah K. Arboleda and Jaclyn E. Reagan
PRACTICE INVESTIGATION
One way ANOVA One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is used to test the significance difference of mean of one dependent variable across more than two.
Human Cortical Neurons in the Anterior Temporal Lobe Reinstate Spiking Activity during Verbal Memory Retrieval  Anthony I. Jang, John H. Wittig, Sara.
Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences
The Wilcoxon signed rank test
Experimental research
Experiments with More Than Two Groups
Cognitive area The cognitive area sees behaviour as being heavily influenced by ones cognitive processes. The area likens human cognitive processes to.
The Effect of Instagram on Text Messaging, Age, and Pinterest
Bruce & Young’s model of face recognition (1986)
Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Individual Differences in Memory
Presentation transcript:

The Effects of Imagery on Name Recall Alden Esguerra Ruben Cabrera  Silva Chilingaryan

Literature Review Past research has examined facial recognition/memory, and the biological bases behind it. Study by Barsics and Bredart investigated the relationship between distinctiveness and semantic information on person recognition.. Conclusion: Identification of people is influenced by distinctive details and linked information. Study by Race, LaRocque, Keane, and Verfaellie investigated the medial temporal lobe’s (MTL) role in memory for human faces.. Conclusion: Participants with damage had lower performance than the ones without the damage. Study by Hanley compared participants on retrieval of names of object pictures and set of names of famous people... Conclusion: More phonological failures for face names. Overall: All of the studies did similar experiments such as our. All past research had similar data with findings coming out that additional stimuli does help with recall.

HYPOTHESIS Task 2 (related pictures) does better than Task 1 (only image) Task 3 (unrelated pictures) does better than Task 1 (only image) Task 2 (related pictures) does better than Task 3 (unrelated pictures)

Methods Materials -laptop -headphones -table & chair -paper & pen Participants -10 participants each (30) -random sampling-friends, family, and anyone willing to participate. -age: 16-62 Measures Task 1(no extra image) Task 2(related image) -Each consists of 15 visual representation with an audio recorded name Task 3(unrelated image) -Presented at a rate of 6 seconds/picture Materials -laptop -headphones -table & chair -paper & pen

-give clear instructions to participants Procedure -give clear instructions to participants -present the Task individually to each participant -30 second rest period -Introduce the Test Task and have them recall the names -write the ones they get correct as they verbally tell you the names

Results IV: the type of accompanying stimuli (no picture vs. related-picture vs. unrelated picture); DV: total amount of names recalled We noted that age was extremely skewed at a value of 2.49, which was something to consider. One-way ANOVA results: A significant difference in recall performance between the three picture type groups, F(2, 27) = 7.42 , p = .003, 2= 0.35. Tukey HSD results: No significant difference in recall performance between the related pictures (M = 7.6, SD = 3.95) and no pictures groups (M = 8.9, SD = 4.09). No pictures group had a greater recall performance than the unrelated pictures (M = 3.2, SD = 1.93). Related pictures group had greater recall than the unrelated pictures group (See Figure 1)

Results (con’t) To further investigate the difference in recall performance between the related picture and unrelated picture groups, we calculated a Cohen’s d value. d = 1.42 Indicated that picture relatedness had a large effect on name recall performance. Figure 1. A comparison of name recall performance between the no picture group, related picture group, and unrelated picture group.

Discussion Results indicated that the no-picture group performed better than both groups with additional stimuli. However, the group with additional-related pictures scored higher than the group with unrelated pictures. Hypothesis 3 was supported. Having a related picture helped participants remember more names than having an unrelated stimulus.

Discussion Participants in groups 2 and 3 did not score as well when compared to group 1 probably because they were distracted by an additional stimulus (interference). Semantic information contributed to overcome interference when group 2 and 3 were compared. Participants from group 1 (no additional stimulus) scored better than groups 2 and 3 probably because they were not distracted with an additional stimulus, and had more time to rehearse people’s names.

Limitations Ages of participants varied significantly. Some participants were tested under noisy conditions, which could have distracted them.