MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Crab Waist Studies for SuperB and KEKB Y. Ohnishi/KEK SuperB Workshop V Paris 10/May/2007.
Advertisements

Lattice Status SuperB Project Workshop SLAC, October 6-9, 2009 Yuri Nosochkov for the SuperB Lattice Team Major recent updates by P. Raimondi and S. Sinyatkin.
SuperKEKB Lattice and Dynamic Aperture H. Koiso Apr. 20, 2005 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
1 IR with elliptical compensated solenoids in FCC-ee S. Sinyatkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 13 July 2015, CERN.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Study and Optimization of Dynamic Aperture for the SuperKEKB LER E.Levichev and P.Piminov, BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Muon Collider Physics Workshop FNAL November 10-12, 2009 Muon Collider Lattice Design FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY f Y.
CEPC parameter choice and partial double ring design
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
Dynamic Aperture Studies with Acceleraticum
Review of new High Energy Rings
The Studies of Dynamic Aperture on CEPC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
FCC-ee Lattice with Misalignments
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
BINP Tau-Charm Project
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
The new 7BA design of BAPS
The design of interaction region
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
The project of t-charm factory with crab waist in Novosibirsk
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
Comparison of the final focus design
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
Design of Interaction Region
Update of DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Update of Lattice Design for CEPC Main Ring
CEPC optics and booster optics
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring
Lattice Design of the Collider Ring toward TDR
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories S. Sinyatkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 12 January 2016

IR with compensating and screening solenoids Head-on collision. Main and compensating solenoids are placed between defocusing lenses of FF. Betatron coupling is corrected by compensating solenoids. Vertical emittance is not excited. Compensating solenoids are located outside the area of FF quad lenses. Betatron coupling is corrected by compensating solenoids and additional skew quads. Vertical emittance is created by area with non zero vertical dispersion.

IR with compensating and screening solenoids Collision with crossing angle at IP and crab-waist sextupoles. Main and compensating solenoids are placed between defocusing lenses of FF. Betatron coupling is corrected by compensating solenoids. Vertical emittance is formed by horizontal magnetic field of solenoids. Compensating solenoids are located outside the area of FF quad lenses. Betatron coupling is corrected by compensating solenoids and additional skew quads. Vertical emittance is created by area with non zero vertical dispersion and horizontal magnetic field of solenoids.

Compensating solenoid is located between IP and QD0 Radius of: L_main/2 L_comp Для уменьшения влияние краевых полей необходимо иметь максимальные поперечные размеры антисоленоида. Чтобы уменьшить вывал поля в область экранированного поля необходимо иметь наименьшие размеры экранирующего соленоида. Здесь предполагается, что основное поле соленоида однородное в области других соленоидов. Compensating solenoid is located between IP and QD0 Radius of: - compensating solenoid R = 0.1 m - crossing angle α = 30 mrad - screening solenoid R = 0.2 m

Variation of main and compensating solenoids lengths Geom. length: 1 – L_comp = 0.5 m 2 – L_comp = 0.6 m 3 – L_comp = 0.7 m 4 – L_comp = 0.8 m 5 – L_comp = 0.9 m 6 – L_comp = 1 m Area of residual field ~ 0.5 m B_comp_max ~1/L_comp Conditions: B_main*L_main+2*B_comp*L_comp=0 L_total=L_main+2*L_comp=const=4 m (geometric length)

Variation of main and compensating solenoids lengths Geom. length: 1 – L_comp = 0.5 m 2 – L_comp = 0.6 m 3 – L_comp = 0.7 m 4 – L_comp = 0.8 m 5 – L_comp = 0.9 m 6 – L_comp = 1 m Bx ~ (L_total_h-L_comp)2/L_comp Conditions: B_sol*L_main+2*B_comp*L_comp=0 L_main/2+L_comp=const=2 m (geometric length) Bx~ (L_total_h-L_comp)2/L_comp

Emittance calculation Ring: I2 = 6.07*10-4 m-1 Solenoids: .

Vertical emittance vs. compensating solenoid length. Conditions: B_sol*L_main+2*B_comp*L_comp=0 L_main/2+L_comp=const=2 m (geometric length) I5,y ~ hy5 ~ Bx5

Variation of compensating solenoids length Geom. length: 1 – L_comp = 0.5 m 2 – L_comp = 0.6 m 3 – L_comp = 0.7 m 4 – L_comp = 0.8 m 5 – L_comp = 0.9 m 6 – L_comp = 1 m B_comp_max ~1/L_comp Conditions: B_sol*L_main+2*B_comp*L_comp=0 L_main+L_comp is variable L_main=2 m (geometric length)

Variation of compensating solenoids length Geom. length: 1 – L_comp = 0.5 m 2 – L_comp = 0.6 m 3 – L_comp = 0.7 m 4 – L_comp = 0.8 m 5 – L_comp = 0.9 m 6 – L_comp = 1 m Conditions: B_sol*L_main+2*B_comp*L_comp=0 L_main+L_comp=var. L_main=2 m (geometric length)

Variation of compensating solenoids length Conditions: B_sol*L_main+2*B_comp*L_comp=0 L_main/2+L_comp=const=2 m I5,y ~ hy5 ~ Bx5

Optimisation of edge field area Final quads Main detector solenoid 2 1 Quad screening solenoid 4 3 Compensating solenoid 1 – Half of main solenoid length ( 1 m) 2 – Length of compensating solenoid (0.7 m) 3 – Overlap of compensating and screening solenoids (5 cm) 4 – Length of screening solenoid ( 3.95 m) Transverse half size: - compensating solenoid - R = 0.1 – 0.15 m - screening solenoid - R = 0.15 m

Optic model of solenoids Piecewise elements have been inserted into 2 m (distance from IP to QD0) Solenoids are presented by thick elements. Skew components are thin elements. Radial and vertical fields are presented by thin elements with nonzero length to carry out emittance calculation by EMIT module (Lrad = 2/N, N – slices number).

Beam Orbit at IR Critical photon energy (E=175 GeV): εc up to 4.9 MeV Main detector solenoid Compensating solenoid Final quads Critical photon energy (E=175 GeV): εc up to 4.9 MeV Radiation angle ~ ± 0.2 mrad Bx_max = 0.24 T

Check of emittance calculation Formula I2 = 6.07*10-4 m-1 MAD calculation (EMIT module) Ey = 0.259 pm*rad .

Tilt of eigen oscillation modes degree

Summary Vertical emittance is not excited (or is small) for head-on collision scheme. Vertical emittance is excited by radial magnetic field of edges between main solenoid, compensating solenoid and screening solenoid for crab-waist scheme. There is a possibility to optimize magnetic field of edges. Vertical emittance is strongly excited by radial field of solenoids at low energy (Bmain sol = const). Slicing of solenoids and fringe field areas allows to take into account fringe fields of the solenoids more precisely.

Head-on collision lattice

IR design Transverse size of tunnel is small in comparison with crab-waist scheme. Single aperture of final focus elements. Simple elements are used. There is limitation of critical energy of synchrotron radiation photons in experimental section. (100 keV at beam energy 120 GeV) The Crab section can be excluded. Local chromaticity correction to provide maximal energy acceptance (± 2% at 120 GeV). Maximal number of bunches is limited by area of beam separation.

Experimental section layout Head-on collision CCSX CCSY Distance between reference orbits is 1.8 m Сritical energy of synchrotron radiation photons : Region: 0 – 500 m, Eγ = 100 keV Region: 500 – 730 m, Eγ = 200 keV

Final focus Quad Q0: K1 = -91 T/m L = 3.6 m Quad Q1: K1 = 84 T/m

Experimental section layout Head-on collision Single aperture lenses: QD0 – QD1 Double aperture lenses: Quad: Q3-Q8 Sext: MSY1, MSY2 Electrostatic dipoles ( 0 – 100 m): MB0,MB1, L=30m, E= 15 kV/cm, Angle= 0.25 mrad Magnetic dipole (100 – 230 m) ? MB2, L=30 m, Angle= 0.25 mrad MB3, L=22 m, Angle= 0.19 mrad

Beam size at IR Horizontal size – ±27*σx Distance between electron and positron bunches is more than 108 m. Maximal possible number of bunches is ~ 450 (Circumference ~ 50km)

Interaction Region optical functions CCSY CCSX Compres. section Arc cells Ratio of dispersions between CW and head-on lattices is ~ 5. Maximal dispersion is limited by dipole radius and dipole length in CCSY and CCSX. It is difficult to optimize DA and energy acceptance.

Interaction Region Montague functions horizontal vertical CCSY CCSX Vertical Montague function is reduced by main sextupoles of CCSY section. Radial Montague function is reduced by main sextupoles of CCSY and CCSX section. Montague functions at entry to arcs are: Wx < 0.6, Wy < 50. Best compensation is possible. Compres. section Arc cells

Interaction Region optical functions horizontal vertical CCSXY Radial and vertical Montague functions are reduced by main sextupoles of CCSXY section. IR is short. Nonlinearities of tunes are difficult for correcting.

Interaction Region Montague functions CCSXY horizontal vertical μx,y Radial and vertical Montague functions are reduced by main sextupoles of CCSY section. Montague functions at the end of chromatic section are small. μx ≈ 0.5, μy ≈ 0.75.

Optical functions Beta function: QD0 - βy = 10 km. CCSY – βy = 7 km. CCSX - βx = 150 m.

Montague functions horizontal vertical Montague functions in arcs: Wx < 5, Wy < 30, |DDx| < 0.3. Montague functions at IP: Wx = 0.5, Wy = 58, DDx = 0.02.

Montague functions horizontal vertical Montague functions in arcs: Wx < 5, Wy < 30, |DDx| < 0.3. Montague functions at IP: Wx = 0.5, Wy = 58, DDx = 0.02.

Energy acceptance Eacc≈ ± 1 % RF is switched off Damping is switched off Chromaticity is corrected by 2 sextupole families of arc and main chromatic sextupoles of CCSY and CCSX sections.

Energy acceptance 1 – chromaticity is corrected by 2 sextupoles famalies of arc and main sextupoles of CCSY and CCSX sections. 2 – Optimization of vertical nonlinearity of tune by additional sextupoles in CCSX, CCSY sections . 3 – Optimization of energy acceptance (± 1.4 %) by additional sextupoles in CCSX, CCSY sections and sextupoles of matching sections.

Parameters of lattice Energy E, GeV 175 Damping time Circumference, m   Circumference, m 99915 tx, sec 1.47E-02 Revolution period, sec 3.33E-04 ty, sec Betatron tunes te, sec 7.33E-03 qx 391.100 Sigma_s, mm 2.7 qy 297.240 RF voltage, MV 9.00E+03 Natural chromaticity RF harmonic number 133312 Cx -422.39 RF frequency, MHz 400 Cy -1561.09 RF acceptance 3.67E-02 Emittance, nm*rad 1.29 Synchrotron tune 5.89E-02 Betatron coupling 0.20% Radiation integral Energy spread 1.47E-03 I1, m 6.81E-01 Momentum compaction 6.81E-06 I2, m^-1 6.03E-04 Energy loss, MeV 7.96E+03 I3, m^-2 5.80E-08 Damping partition number I4, m^-1 6.19E-09 Jx 1.00 I5, m^-1 1.73E-11 Jy 1 Beta_x_IP, m 0.500 Je 2.00 Beta_y_IP, mm 1.000 Dx_IP, m 0.000

Summary Maximal number of bunches is limited by separation sections. Final focus lenses are simple. Dispersion of IR is small because there is limitation of magnetic field and length of experimental section. Main chromatic sextupoles are very strong. Energy acceptance is ± 1.4 %.