Transport in the South Peninsula

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Advertisements

THE YELLOW SCHOOL BUS HELPING THE ENVIRONMENT GATEWAY TO EDUCATION KEEPING KIDS SAFE.
Smarter Travel Programmes– Financial impacts for Transport for London COLIN BUCHANAN
Summary information of vehicles fitted & registered with PF2 units 2 Reports home page show ALL PF2 reports available : access restricted by PF2 service.
1 HOV Attitudinal Research Among Hampton Roads Commuters Sponsored by Conducted by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC August 2002.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Presentation to IPH HIA Forum 4 th November 2010.
 Travel patterns in Scotland Frank Dixon and Stephen Hinchliffe, Transport Statistics branch, Scottish Executive.
Auckland’s Travel Demand Initiatives Sustainable Mobility & Healthy Communities Summit 2014.
Mobile Ghent Mobile positioning data and transport: a theoretical, methodological and empirical discussion 24 October 2013 Bert van Wee Delft University.
The Civic Recommendations: some informations Out of 42 draft recommendations, 18 showed an average value exceeding 50% of high priority. These Civic Recommendations.
Feasibility Study Jonathan CalderwoodJune 14, 2013 West Shore Communities Feasibility of Sustainable Transportation with Passenger Ferry Service.
Marco Ponti Urban density, the environment, and mobility, Venezia SIET September 20th, 2013 Marco Ponti – Politecnico of Milan Urban density, the environment,
 Scotland’s National Transport Strategy A Consultation.
TAG 2012 Survey Data. Survey sent to 16, responded.
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
Travelling to Destinations. Model -Advantages and Disadvantages of train travel Direct travel to cities No driver error/tiredness Low environmental impact.
Evaluating the Impacts of Real Time Passenger Information and Bus Signal Priority in Trondheim Morten Welde, Norwegian Public Roads Administration Trond.
Pulsar Advertising Southeastern Institute of Research 1 I-66 Corridor: Westbound Traffic Issues Within the I-495 Beltway Community Involvement Survey December.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift.
National Household Travel Survey 2010 Introduction NHTS provides very valuable information for Transport Malta and other entities involved in transport.
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS Key Transport Facts: Trend 1: Growth in passenger transport and freight compared with.
Calgary, Cochrane, CRAZ. Why?Why?  Estimated 16 million cars on the road in Canada  Of these 80 percent occupied only by their driver  Estimated 30,000,000.
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
Carbon Footprint of the U.S. Population: Causes and Spatial-Temporal Pattern Class Project ME/ENV 449, 2007 Grace D. W. Johnson Instructor: R. Husar VMT.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
What is Elasticity of Demand? Elasticity of demand is a measure of how consumers react to a change in price.
Portland 2040 Analysis. Portland residents drive less… While per capita vehicle miles traveled is increasing nationally at an average of 2.3% per year,
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement.
DOES WEATHER IMPACT ON COMMUTERS’ TRAVEL DEMAND - EMPIRICAL CASE STUDY OF BELGRADE Dragana Petrovic, Ivan Ivanovic, Vladimir Djoric Faculty of Traffic.
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee September 9,
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
University of Virginia 2009 NHTS Survey Results
Mr. Hazael Brown Dr. Margaret O’Mahony
Patient Participation meeting Monday 11 February 2013
Changing the Commuter Equation
National Consumer Agency Economiser – Transport Section
Consultation Outcomes Report
Elmwood Church of Christ Congregational Assessment
Canyons School District Bell Efficiency Study 2016
FLEXIBLE TIME.
The Business of Transportation
Modeling A More Efficient Transportation System Zachary Buzaid | Samuel Irwin WIT Department of Applied Mathematics Results After processing all the data,
National CAPITOL REGION STATE OF THE COMMUTE
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
A strategy to encourage cycling as a public transport feeder mode
Land Use Planning - Goals
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE IMPACTS ON ACCESSIBILITY FOR SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN BLOEMFONTEIN NDAKHONA BASHINGI Southern African.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Transportation Engineering Trip Distribution January 19, 2011
Teen Health Perspective Results
WP D Integrating Mobility Management and Land Use Planning
SGV Active Transportation Survey 2016
The Business of Transportation
Jetton Road Safety Survey
Teen Health Perspective Results
BMC/ BUMC 2018 MA DEP Commuter Survey
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS
REGIONAL TRIP RATES VARIATION IN TRICS OWEN EDWARDS TRICS CONSORTIUM.
Mass Transit Usage According to IBISWorld, the public transportation industry increased 14.3%, from $63 billion during 2013 to $72 billion for 2017,
Workforce Engagement Survey
ABC Ramps Transportation Options Implementation Plan
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
UK Alumni Association Club Programming Survey
Analysis and Mapping of Transportation Needs in Haliburton County
DISRUPTIVE TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES: IS SOUTH AND SOUTHERN AFRICA READY?
NHS DUDLEY CCG Latest survey results August 2018 publication.
Future Visions: overview of GCP plans and proposals
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Transport in the South Peninsula Thursday, April 06, 2017

723 Total Responses Date Created: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 Date analysed: Thursday, April 6, 2017 Complete Responses: 468

Q1: Do you mainly use a car most weekday mornings and/or afternoons? Answered: 722 Skipped: 1 630 The survey was aimed at the 87%

Q2: Do you use your car to: Answered: 577 Skipped: 146 - the attrition must be non-commuters While the majority who use their car just travel to work (60%), 40% include school trips. Separating out scholar transport needs creates options for work travel

Q5: Most weekday mornings and/ or afternoons do you mainly use (1=most; 3=least): Answered: 52 Skipped: 671 Once those who use private and public transport were filtered out, those who use alternative transport remained. Their mode choice is prioritised: Choice

This relates to those who don’t use public transport Q6: Is the impact of your carbon footprint one of your considerations when making travel choices? Answered: 92 Skipped: 631 This relates to those who don’t use public transport 39

Q8: Do you use mainly (choose one): Answered: 15 Skipped: 708 Those who said they regularly use public transport in the mornings indicated the type: 4 2 11

Q9: Rank your reasons for using public transport from most (1) to least (8) important: Answered: 14 Skipped: 709

Q10: Would you be prepared to introduce someone to public transport who has never used it in this area before, by inviting them to join you, or travelling with them? Answered: 15 Skipped: 708 It is known that a “helping hand” can initiate an attempt to move to a more “risky” travel choice

Approximate modal split of respondents This reflects the target group of the survey, rather than a representation of residents’ choices. The sample size is best for the private transport users

Q11: If you use your own car to travel, what is your suburb of origin? Answered: 487 Skipped: 236 Most of the respondents are car users come from Noordhoek and Fish Hoek (227, ie 46,6%), followed by Kommetjie, Sunnydale and Capri The major destination area is the Sothern Suburbs (45%), followed by within the study area (22%), and the CBD and surrounds (20%). 13% of respondents travel to multiple destinations outside the study area daily (making it difficult to car share / use public transport)

Q13: Approximately how much do you spend? Answered: 516 Skipped: 207 Monthly fuel Annual maintenance Car travel is expensive. A Metroplus monthly ticket from Simonstown to the CBD is R394

Q15: How much time do you spend in traffic to your destination … Answered: 511 Skipped: 212 during peak times? In the event of an accident? 243 165 An accident affects those travelling the furthest, the most

Q17: If you use Chapmans Peak Drive, do you make use of their “frequent user” and Wildcard discounts? Answered: 510 Skipped: 213 Assuming that the “yes” and “no” respondents use Chapmans Peak Drive, only 40% of them use the frequent user benefits. Is this to do with awareness (which this survey would have addressed), or the nature of the frequent user benefit?

Q18: Are you part of a lift club / carpooling arrangement? Answered: 516 Skipped: 207 88 83% of respondents are not part of a lift club / carpool

Q19: If yes, How many people (including the driver) on average in the carpool? Answered: 87 Skipped: 636

Q20: Does this include taking children to school? Answered: 87 Skipped: 636 48 Separating out school transport would create greater flexibility for 55% of car poolers / lift club participants

Q21: If no: What would induce you to start a lift club / join a carpooling arrangement? (1= most important factor, 5=lease important factor) Answered: 367 Skipped: 356

However, overall, the factors ranked fairly evenly. Q21: If no: What would induce you to start a lift club / join a carpooling arrangement? (1= most important factor, 5=lease important factor) Answered: 367 Skipped: 356 In terms of inducements, increase in travel costs was the most significant factor. But flexitime is also a high priority. However, overall, the factors ranked fairly evenly. Significantly, “not applicable” was the priority response for 41%, and ranked equally to the other responses overall, as well as having the greatest number of respondents. Does this mean that they would not even consider it as a travel option? Or was an important factor excluded from the choices? It was not referred to in the open comments section

Q22: Did you use public transport before, at any stage, as your main mode of commuter (incl education) travel since you have lived in this area? Answered: 404 Skipped: 319 131

Q23: Would you consider trying out a public transport service? Answered: 272 Skipped: 451 132 As many as used to use public transport, would consider using it in future

The highest response is to avoid congestion Q24: What factors would induce you to revert back / shift to public transport?  Which of the following are the main reasons for not using your car (1= most important, to 5= least important): Answered: 220 Skipped: 503 The highest response is to avoid congestion

Reliability / availability, and feeling secure are important. Q25: Which of the factors below do you think are most important for improving public transport?   (1= most important, 5= least important): Answered: 352 Skipped: 371 While avoiding congestion would get people out of cars, greater time saving is seen as the least significant improvement needed in public transport. Reliability / availability, and feeling secure are important.

Q26: What circumstances would induce you to use a bicycle or walk (1= most important , 6= least important)? Answered: 285 Skipped: 438 The highest response was for shorter travel distances, which is a land use matter

Q27: Is the impact of your carbon footprint one of your considerations when making travel choices? Answered: 461 Skipped: 262 251 People do have an environmental awareness wrt their travel choices, but cannot always act on this