Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

Long-Term Soil P and K Trends in Relation to Nutrient Removal in Corn-Soybean Rotations Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University Joint Meeting NEC-17, NCERA-13,
PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE BY SILAGE CORN IN SOUTHERN IDAHO Amber Moore, Steve Hines, Brad Brown, Mario de Haro Marti, Christi Falen, Mireille Chahine, Tianna Fife,
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.
Experiences with PSNT in North Carolina David H. Hardy Soil Testing Section Agronomic Division- NCDA&CS.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
Use of Active Optical Sensor in North Dakota Dave Franzen and Lakesh Sharma, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
What is the purpose of this presentation? n Provide a better understanding of site specific yield information and the value that it can bring to your.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
Real-Time Corn Assessment for Variable Rate Nitrogen Management Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Peter Scharf, Harlan Palm,
Sensor research and algorithm development for corn in ND L.K. Sharma, D.W. Franzen, H. Bu, R. Ashley, G. Endres and J. Teboh North Dakota State University,
May 15,  Rates – current industry recommendations  Soil and Foliar Applied ◦ Boron, Chlorine, Copper, Zinc ◦ Calcium – Foliar only  NDVI, Soil,
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
1 CANOPY REFLECTANCE (HRWW AND HRSW) IN SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC OPTIMUM NITROGEN RATE FOR HRSW IN SOUTH DAKOTA Nitrogen Use Efficiency Meeting Cheryl Reese*,
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
NUE Workshop: Improving NUE using Crop Sensing, Waseca, MN
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo,
Use of aerial imagery to detect N response in corn following alfalfa FR 5262 Matt Yost Stephen Palka.
Potential for Sensor Based Systems in Corn-Sugar Beet Rotations John A. Lamb Department of Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota – St. Paul.
Corn Plot Overview Jared Shippey Ben Logan. General Information  Planted 5/30/08  Hybrid – Pioneer 38B87 – 94 days  Planted population 35,000  Manure.
Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines John Sawyer Department of Agronomy Iowa State University.
Tracy Blackmer Peter Kyveryga Advancing Agricultural Performance ® 1 Iowa Soybean Association On-Farm Network®
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
Current N Fertilization
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Revised Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn Carrie Laboski, Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski UW-Madison, Soil Science.
Within Field Variation in Corn Response to N Fred Below Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
On-farm Evaluation of Optical Sensor Technology for Variable Rate N Application to Corn in Ontario and Quebec Bao-Luo Ma, and Nicolas Tremblay Eastern.
Nitrogen efficiency in our N systems study fields Peter Scharf, Newell Kitchen, and Ken Sudduth University of Missouri and USDA-ARS.
Principles of Soil and Plant Testing December 2009 Eugenia Pena-Yewtukhiw and Jeff Skousen West Virginia University.
Categorizing Nitrogen Availability for Corn Fields Using Field History and Cornstalk Nitrate Test Haiying Tao 1, Thomas Morris 1, Suzy Friedman 2, Richard.
Figure 1. Rodale Farming Systems Trial with rotations. Note the presence of cover crops and amendment in organic systems. Synthetic fertilizer herbicide.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Precision Agriculture Technologies: An Opportunity for new Approaches to N management John Schmidt Department of Agronomy Kansas State University.
Exploratory Research in Corn
Fertility Strategies for Lean Times
Variable Rate Nitrogen
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
In-season Nitrogen Applications: How Late is Too Late?
Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
John Kovar & Doug Karlen USDA-ARS
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Cotton Sensor Research Update
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
In-season Nitrogen Applications: How Late is Too Late?
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
REVIEW.
Current KSU N recommendations for corn & wheat
Intro to Precision Agriculture
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota
Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.222
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
Reflectance and Sensor Basics
Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Biomass Yield and Nutrient Accumulation by Four Small Grain Species
Presentation transcript:

Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA using a Crop Circle ACS-210 John Schmidt Adam Dellinger Doug Beegle ARS and Penn State

Background Improving N recommendations for corn Sidedressing N is common in PA Many fields with a manure history Spatial variability in relief, aspect, soil water content

Field selection – 2005 State College area, four fields Previous crop Corn, Soybean, Soybean with manure history, Alfalfa Soil pH: 5.5 – 6.2 Soil P (M3): 17 – 101 mg kg-1 Soil K (M3): 93 – 160 mg kg-1

Treatment design Whole plot, 30 x 105 ft Control 50 lb acre-1 N as NH4NO3 Manure, 115 – 165 lb acre-1 total N Split-plot, 30 x 15 ft 250 lb acre-1 N as NH4NO3 at planting 20, 40, 80, 120, and 160 lb acre-1 N as NH4NO3 at sidedress Four Blocks

Sensor Sensor Crop Circle ACS-210 Plant Canopy Reflectance Emission Bands: 590 and 880 nm Two detectors: 400 – 680 nm, 800 – 1100 nm Sensor Crop Circle ACS-210 Plant Canopy Reflectance Emission Bands: 590 and 880 nm Two detectors: 400 – 680 nm, 800 – 1100 nm

Data collection 8 samples per second Simultaneously georeferenced Trimble Pro XRS GPS and TSCe Field Device 24 – 32 inch sensor height Weekly, June 8 – July 12 Data collection

Data collection Grain yield PSNT from the control SPAD readings at sidedress Leaf tissue at silking Stalk nitrate test, selected trts Data collection

Grain yield response – Corn after corn EONR = 94 EONR = 73 EONR = 124 $0.30 / lb N $2 / bu corn

Grain yield response – Corn after soybean EONR = 43 EONR = 0 EONR = 54

Grain yield response – Corn after alfalfa

Grain yield response – Corn after soybean (manure history)

EONR (Economic Optimum N Rate) Previous crop Whole plot trt EONR (lb N / acre) Corn Control 94 50 lb N / acre 73 Manure 124 Soybean 43 54 Alfalfa Soybean (manure history)

NDVI, Corn after corn, Control (whole plot) June 24 N applied

NDVI, Corn after corn, Control (whole plot)

NDVI, NDVIratio and SPADratio

EONR as a function of NDVI ratio

NDVIratio compared to SPAD ratio, June 21

EONR as a function of NDVIratio or SPAD ratio June 21

Summary First year of results in PA Sensor was effective at those sites requiring N fertilizer NDVI ratio was correlated to SPAD ratio NDVI ratio was better correlated to EONR than SPAD ratio