Wellesley Speech & Debate Workshops

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LANCASTER UNIVERSITY DEBATING SOCIETY luds Advanced debating.
Advertisements

IPM Exam PreparationIPM Exam Preparation November 12 th pm – 5.15pm 2 hours & 15 minutes reading time.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
Summary Speeches clarity, destruction and magic. Recap: Role of a Whip Speaker Identify the “clash points” aka the voting issues. Destroy the opposition’s.
1. 2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible for young people to.
DIEFENBAKER XXXI A briefing for debaters and judges Directors: Garrett Richards and Angela Jansen.
Social Choice Session 20 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
ADJUDICATORS’ FUNCTIONS Decide which team has won. Decide the best speaker. State the reasons for the decision (oral adjudication). Provide constructive.
We couldn’t do it without you! This Brief Presentation Will Cover Five Talking Points That Will Train You To Be Great Judges Style of Debate Role Of.
An Overview By: Christina Weber
Role Fulfilment. “Rules” of Britisth Parliamentary Formally all speakers in a debate are meant to do certain things In real terms these are guides to.
SUMMARY AND FINAL FOCUS. Summary Basics  2 minute speech, after the rebuttals.  It’s a time to clear up for the judge what she should really be paying.
Debate Basics (In other words... how to present arguments like a professional!)
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Revision Workshop on Research Papers Sentence Variety, Transitions, and Paragraph Order.
Speech Unit III: Intro to Debate!
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are making an investment You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible.
Opposition Strategy NCFA Rookie Debate Camp. Agenda ❖ A Brief Word on Trichotomy ❖ Basic Path to Winning ❖ Opposition Strategies by Position* ❖ Quick.
AN INTRODUCTION COMPETITION DEBATES. DEBATE Debate is essentially the art of arguing a point, policy or proposition of value. When participating in a.
Role Fulfillment TRAINING SESSION 21 OCT Plan  Announcements  Quick review of last time’s stuff  Positions and their roles  How to prepare for.
Public Forum Debate Basic Forensics. What is public forum debate? Style of debate compared to a nationally- televised debate, like Crossfire. Debaters.
JUDGING PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE Find the PuFo in You!.
Debate 101. What is Debate? A debate is the practice of comparing & contrasting ideas that centers on the discussion of a RESOLUTION. The RESOLUTION IS....?
Presentation by Jessica Prince March 13, 2010 The Pre-competition for the 14 th FLTRP Cup National English Debating Competition 1.
Welcome to Debating  Introduction  2008 changes  Speaker roles  Types of debates  Coaching tips  Draw announcement for the Senior Competition.
Basic Structure of a Round. a) Before the Round Pre-flowed arguments.
Wellesley Speech & Debate Workshops Parli Basics Forming a Case Guide to Speeches and Responsibilities Leader of Opposition Prime Minister Members of.
Wellesley Speech & Debate Workshops Parli Basics Forming a Case Guide to Speeches and Responsibilities Leader of Opposition Prime Minister Members of.
Unit 2.1 An introduction to the role of the early years practitioner
Chapter 25 Cross-Examination Techniques. Purposes of Cross-Examination Clarify arguments Clarify arguments Point out misinterpretations Point out misinterpretations.
Affirmative vs. negative
Parliamentary Debate:
By Jessica Cuddy & Josh Malig, December 2007
Crystallization.
Quiz: How Are Your Meetings
Argument Writing Grade 8 Copyright © 2015 by Write Score LLC.
Debating Tips and Strategies
Public Forum Debate A quick guide.
Debate Chapter 13 Pages
Debating Tips and Strategies
A BRIEF GUIDE TO ESSAY WRITING
World schools debate championships 3 vs 3 format
Thanks to Ionut Stefan and Eliot Pallot
Workshop for Debate Teachers
Debating Tips and Strategies
Argument Writing Grade 8 Copyright © 2015 by Write Score LLC.
Activity 2.11: Understanding argumentative elements
Parliamentary Debate Orientation
Expanding your position paper: Counter-Argument
Argument Writing Grade 8 ©Copyright by Write Score LLC.
Sixth Debate of the Semester
Roles In Debating Week 2.
NUDC KOPERTIS BOBY-ANGGI-OMAR
E145/STS173 Case Study Tips Professors Tom Byers and Randy Komisar
The Debate.
Debating Tips and Strategies
Parliamentary Debate Orientation
Chapter 16 Persuasive Speaking.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Do Now May 19 Sit in your new groups for the week and get out your binder and a textbook book: Brenden/ Angelica Kyara/Kaitlyn Abijah/Emani Sabryna/Elizabeth.
Solving Workplace Problems
BRIEFING A CASE.
Motion: Social Networking is a good advancement in modern technology
Debating Who What How long? Prop Presentation Proposition
Presentation Logistics
Public Speaking Contest
Debating Tips and Strategies
Debate.
Presentation transcript:

Wellesley Speech & Debate Workshops Parli Basics Forming a Case Guide to Speeches and Responsibilities Leader of Opposition Prime Minister Members of Gov & Opp Style Tips

Leader of the Opposition A Wednesday Workshop brought to you by the Speech&Debate Society

The Speeches: PMC LOC MGC MOC LOR PMR Intro intro Present case statement Independent points of analysis Respond to opposition’s main points deconstruct crystallize reconstruct case point 1 Case point 2 Case point 3

The Constructive: LOC intro Independent points of analysis deconstruct At the very beginning, state and explain any important objections to the case or case statement, for example, claims of tightness or specific knowledge. Then move on—it’s up to the judge to decide on your arguments and you must attempt to debate the case! If relevant, introduce a counter-case. Construct an opposition based on independent arguments (these are points that deal with subjects that were not brought up by the government, but are relevant to the case) Deconstruct each case point that the PM brought up (some credit to apdaweb.org)

The Rebuttal: LOR intro crystallize Crystallize the round into clear Opposition voting issues. The speech serves to frame the debate from the Opposition's point of view. The LO should explain each of the reasons why the Opposition has won the round and why these reasons outweigh the arguments the government has made. The last opportunity to remind the judge briefly of any objections the LO raised about the case or the case statement (spec knowledge, tight, tautology, etc.) Point out ‘holes in the flow’- arguments that the MG failed to address (ask the judge to count these dropped arguments against the Government) No new arguments, only new examples (some credit to apdaweb.org)

Basic Opposition Strategies: When in doubt…. use the “Harvard Cheat Sheet” Too expensive Right place, right idea…Wrong time Right time, right idea….Wong place Infrastructure does not exist No need

Damn, he is hot!

Those Funky Countercases… Sometimes, you will be presented with a case statement describing a problem or issue that you care about (rare, but it does happen). You will then probably feel that the Government's case sucks, so you can use a Countercase to present your own solution to the problem as an alternative to the case (must present during the LOC). You will be arguing against the Government’s case and for your case, describing how your countercase has an advantage that the government’s case lacks. A countercase must be different from the status quo (current situation) and mutually exclusive to the proposed government’s case, i.e.. one could not do both cases (sometimes it is permissable to have a countercase that is not mutually exclusive, but that is argued to be superior...this is very tricky though) Example: case is that a taco bell should be in the new student center, countercase is that a kfc should be in the new student center; the countercase will only work if it is the situation that only one greasy fast-food place will be allowed in the new student center; if both could be placed in the new student center, they are not mutually exclusive cases

Opp-Choice? Wtf? In an Opp-Choice round, the Government will present a case and then allow the Opposition to choose which side they will argue Example: Wellesley should or should not have an Alcohol Policy that ruins everyone’s social life– the Opposition will choose if they wish to argue should or should not Why would anyone do this? It makes everyone look good– wow, so smart, she can debate both sides of this case! You may not really care about which side you want to argue, presenting your case as Opp-Choice is a way to get someone else to make the decision for you It’s fun!

Tips and Helpful Hints: Make sure you ask for points of information to clarify the case statement/background Have an overall ‘theme’ or strategy that you can use to characterize your opposition throughout the round End with “We beg/are proud to oppose”

That’s all folks! For more details, check out the Parli Guide at www.apdaweb.org Stay tuned for next week’s presentation….an overview of the Prime Minister position! (10/17/01, 5pm, Schneider) “I killed the President of Paraguay with a fork…how have you been?”