Analysis of DHCAL Events

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Simulation of the RPC Response José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco September.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
First analysis of DHCAL Data José Repond Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider Workshop LCWS 2012 October 22 – 26, 2012 University of Texas at Arlington,
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
José Repond Argonne National Laboratory Review of the Status of the RPC-DHCAL SiD Workshop SLAC, Stanford, California October 14 – 16, 2013.
Simulation of RPC avalanche signal for a Digital Hadron Calorimeter (DHCAL) Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Tracking within hadronic showers in the SDHCAL Imad Laktineh.
Development of Particle Flow Calorimetry José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DPF meeting, Providence, RI August 8 – 13, 2011.
Analysis of DHCAL Data José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting September 17 – 19, 2012 Cambridge, UK.
Summary of Calorimetry/Muon Sessions Burak Bilki University of Iowa Argonne National Laboratory.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory 1 LCWS 2013, Tokyo, Japan November , 2013.
15 Dec 2010 CERN Sept 2010 beam test: Sensor response study Chris Walmsley and Sam Leveridge (presented by Paul Dauncey) 1Paul Dauncey.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.
The CALICE Si-W ECAL - physics prototype 2012/Apr/25 Tamaki Yoshioka (Kyushu University) Roman Poschl (LAL Orsay)
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
José Repond Argonne National Laboratory Status of the DHCAL Project SiD Collaboration Week January 12 – 14, 2015 SLAC.
Digital Hadron Calorimeter (DHCAL) José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CLIC Workshop 2013 January 28 – February 1, 2013 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tests of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting March 10 – 12, 2010 University of Texas at Arlington.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
The DHCAL Data Analysis José Repond CALICE Meeting, Prague, September 10 – 12, 2007.
Analysis of DHCAL Muon Events José Repond Argonne National Laboratory ALCPG 2011 Meeting, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
Calibration of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter with Muons Burak Bilki d, John Butler b, Tim Cundiff a, Gary Drake a, William Haberichter a, Eric Hazen b,
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
Noise and Cosmics in the DHCAL José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco September.
Min-DHCAL: Measurements with Pions Benjamin Freund and José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting Max-Planck-Institute, Munich.
CALICE Tungsten HCAL Prototype status Erika Garutti Wolfgang Klempt Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, October.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Imaging Hadron Calorimeters for Future Lepton Colliders José Repond Argonne National Laboratory 13 th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Vienna University.
1 Analysis of Small RPC DHCAL Prototype Data (noise and cosmic ray) LCWA09, Albuquerque, New Mexico Friday, October 02, 2009 Qingmin Zhang HEP Division,
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Future DHCAL Activities José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Meeting, CERN, May 19 – 21, 2011.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
Analysis of DHCAL Data José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Meeting, September 16 – 18, 2009 Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, France.
Analysis of DHCAL Muon Events José Repond Argonne National Laboratory TIPP 2011 Conference, Chicago, June , 2011.
W-DHCAL Digitization T. Frisson, C. Grefe (CERN) CALICE Collaboration Meeting at Argonne.
1 CALICE Tail-Catcher Muon-Tracker(TCMT) Preliminary Test Beam Results Kurt Francis NICADD/Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration ALCPG.
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
Test Beam Request for the Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter
Vertical Slice Test Data
A Digital Hadron Calorimeter Resistive Plate Chambers
Recent DHCAL Developments
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
The DHCAL – An overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory
CALICE scintillator HCAL
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
(My personal) CALICE Report
Analysis of Muon Events in the DHCAL
The DHCAL: an overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory
State-of-the-art in Hadronic Calorimetry for the Lepton Collider
Development of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter (DHCAL)
   Calorimetry et al.    SUMMARY 12 contributions Tile HCAL
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Argonne National Laboratory
Reports for highly granular hadron calorimeter using software compensation techniques Bing Liu SJTU February 25, 2019.
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
Tests of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Tests of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of DHCAL Events José Repond Argonne National Laboratory Frascati, February 6 - 10, 2012

The DHCAL Project RPC – based imaging calorimeter DHCAL = First large scale calorimeter prototype with Embedded front-end electronics Digital (= 1 – bit) readout Pad readout of RPCs (RPCs usually read out with strips) Extremely fine segmentation with 1 x 1 cm2 pads DHCAL = World record channel count for calorimetry Argonne National Laboratory Boston University Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory IHEP Beijing Illinois Institute of Technology University of Iowa McGill University Northwestern University University of Texas at Arlington DHCAL Collaboration Heads Engineers/Technicians 22 Students/Postdocs 9 Physicists 10 Total 41 …and integral part of

Calorimeters/configurations DHCAL 38 layers, each 1 x 1 m2 1.2 X0 Fe (+ Cu) absorber plates 350,000 readout channels Tail Catcher 14 layers, each 1 x 1 m2 8 1.7 X0 Fe (+Cu) + 6 5.9 X0 Fe (+Cu) absorber plates 129,000 readout channels Silicon – Tungsten Electromagnetic Calorimeter 30 layers, each 18 x 18 cm2 Variable thickness Tungsten absorber 10,000 readout channels Minimal Absorber Structure 50 layers, each 1 x 1 m2 0.27 X0 Fe (+Cu) absorber plates 461,000 readout channels

Tests in the Fermilab Test Beam Fermilab Test Beam Facility 120 GeV primary proton beam 1 – 60 GeV/c secondary beam (pions, positrons, muons…) Broadband muon beam 3.5 second long spills every minute Muon data taking +32 GeV/c secondary and 3 m Fe absorber DAQ rates 500 – 2000/spill DAQ triggered by a pair of 1 x 1 m2 Scintillator paddles Secondary beam data taking DAQ rates 50 – 500/spill DAQ triggered by a pair of 19 x 19 cm2 Scintillator paddles 1 x 1 m2 Scintillator Paddle A 1 x 1 m2 Scintillator Paddle B DHCAL Tail Catcher Trigger DHCAL Tail Catcher Trigger Cerenkov 19 x 19 cm2 Scintillator A 19 x 19 cm2 Scintillator B

World record in calorimetry The DHCAL in the Fermilab Test Beam Date DHCAL layers Tail catcher layers Total RPC layers Configuration Readout channels Number of Muon events Secondary events October 2010 38 DHCAL 350,208 1.4M 2.9M January 2011 13 51 DHCAL + TAIL CATCHER 470,016 1.6M 5.2M April 2011 14 52 + CALICE Si-W ECAL 488,952 2.5M 7.3M June 479,232 3.3M 6.0M November 50 Minimal Absorber 460,800 0.6M 4.5M TOTAL 9.4M 25.8M 488,952 readout channels World record in calorimetry

Energy reconstruction in the DHCAL Data Consists of hit patterns of pads with signal above 1 threshold and their time-stamps with 100 ns resolution Incident particle energy reconstruction To first order E ∝ N N = ∑layer Ni … total number of hits Correction for contribution from noise E ∝ N - Nnoise Nnoise … accidental hits Correction for variation in chamber inefficiency E ∝ ∑layer Ni ·(ε0 /εi) – Nnoise ε0 … average DHCAL efficiency εi … efficiency of layer i Correction for variation in pad multiplicity E ∝ ∑layer Ni ·(ε0 /εi) ·(μ0 /μi) – Nnoise μ0 … average pad multiplicity ` μi … average pad multiplicity of layer i Second order corrections Compensate for e/h ≠ 1 Saturation (more than 1 particle/pad) …

General DHCAL Analysis Strategy Noise measurement - Determine noise rate (correlated and not-correlated) - Identify (and possibly mask) noisy channels - Provide random trigger events for overlay with MC events (if necessary) Measurements with muons - Geometrically align layers in x and y - Determine efficiency and multiplicity in ‘clean’ areas - Simulate response with GEANT4 + RPCSIM (requires tuning 3-6 parameters) - Determine efficiency and multiplicity over the whole 1 x 1 m2 - Compare to simulation of tuned MC - Perform additional measurements, such as scan over pads, etc… Measurement with positrons - Determine response - Compare to MC and tune 4th (dcut) parameter of RPCSIM - Perform additional studies, e.g. software compensation… Measurement with pions - Compare to MC (no more tuning) with different hadronic shower models - Perform additional studies, e.g. software compensation, leakage correction… This talk This talk + Poster

Some cute muon events Note: Consecutive events (not selected) Look for random noise hits

DHCAL rotated by 100 Increased MIP detection efficiency Average pad multiplicity → As seen with cosmic rays

Estimation of contributions from noise Data collection (in general) Trigger-less (all hits) mode for noise, cosmics Triggered (record hits in 7 time bins of 100 ns each) for noise, cosmics, testbeam → Only hits in 2 time bins used for physics analysis Noise measurement These results from trigger-less mode In quantitative agreement with measurements with random trigger Results Noise rate measured to be 0.1 – 1.0 Hz/cm2 Rate strongly dependent on the temperature of the stack (FE-electronics embedded into stack and generates heat) Tail catcher in 4/2011 run DHCAL in 4/2011 run DHCAL in 10/2010 run Noise rate [Hz/cm2] 0.1 0.5 1.0 Nnoise/event in DHCAL + Tail Catcher (2 time bins) 0.009 0.05 0.09 Nnoise/event in DHCAL + Tail Catcher (7 time bins) 0.033 0.165 0.33 1 hit corresponds to ~ 60 MeV! Contribution from noise negligible for most analysis

Tracking Clustering of hits Loop over layers 1 cluster 2 clusters Performed in each layer individually Use closest neighbor clustering (one common side) Determine unweighted average of all hits in a given cluster (xcluster ,ycluster) Loop over layers for layer i request that all other layers have Njcluster ≤ 1 request that number of hits in tracking clusters Njhit ≤ 4 request at least 10/38(52) layers with tracking clusters fit straight line to (xcluster,z) and (ycluster,z) of all tracking clusters j calculate χ2 of track request that χ2/Ntrack < 1.0 inter/extrapolate track to layer i search for matching clusters in layer i within record number of hits in matching cluster

Geometrical alignment For each readout board i plot residual in x/y Rix = xi cluster- xitrack Riy = yicluster - yitrack Average residuals per front-end board in x in y

After SW alignment of each readout board Note expanded y-scale RMS 1104 → 62 μm RMS 265 → 21 μm 1 entry/readout board

Simulation Strategy Comparison Parameters GEANT4 Experimental set-up Beam (E,particle,x,y,x’,y’) Measured signal Q distribution Points (E depositions in gas gap: x,y,z) GEANT4 RPC response simulation Hits Parameters Distance cut dcut (within which only 1 avalanche) Charge adjustment Q0 (if needed) Exponential slopes a1, a2 (of signal spread in pad plane) Ratio R (between 2 exponentials) Threshold T (of discriminator) Hits Comparison DATA With muons – tune a1, a2, R, T, (dcut), and Q0 With positrons – tune dcut Pions – no additional tuning

x = Mod(xtrack + 0.5,1.) for 0.25 < y < 0.75 y = Mod(ytrack – 0.03,1.) for 0.25 < x < 0.75 Scan across one 1 x 1 cm2 pad Note These features not implemented explicitly into simulation Simulation distributes charge onto plane of pads…

Efficiencies, multiplicities Select ‘clean’ regions away from - Dead ASICs (cut out 8 x 8 cm2 + a rim of 1 cm) - Edges in x (2 rims of 0.5 cm) - Edges in y (6 rims of 0.5 cm) - Fishing lines (12 rectangles of ±1 cm) - Layer 27 (with exceptionally high multiplicity) Measured average response Note: Simulation of RPC response tuned to this data Tail towards higher multiplicity reproduced with 2nd exponential

Response over the entire plane Implemented dead areas of data in MC (= corresponding hits deleted) Note x/y-axis in [cm] not [pad number] x-distribution Well reproduced y-distribution Inter-RPC gaps well reproduced Fishing lines well reproduced Edges well reproduced

Calibration constants, etc… Calibration factors = mean of multiplicity distribution/(average over detector) = ε·μ/ ε0·μ0

Analysis of Primary and Secondary Beam Data 50 GeV pion showers Muon traversing stack No isolated hits photons, neutrons Isolated hits from

Unidentified μ's, punch through Results - October 2010 Data CALICE Preliminary Gaussian fits over the full response curve Unidentified μ's, punch through

Pion Response N=aE As expected, linear up to > 25 GeV CALICE Preliminary (response not calibrated) N=aE Standard pion selection + No hits in last two layers (longitudinal containment 16 (off), 32 GeV/c (calibration off) data points are not included in the fit. As expected, linear up to > 25 GeV

Energy Resolution for Pions (response not yet calibrated) CALICE Preliminary (response not yet calibrated) B. Bilki et.al. JINST 4 P10008, 2009 MC predictions for a large-size DHCAL based on results from small scale prototype. 32 GeV data point is not included in the fit. Standard pion selection + No hits in last two layers (longitudinal containment) Measurements confirm prediction

(response not yet calibrated) B. Bilki et.al. JINST 4 P04006, 2009 Positron Response CALICE Preliminary (response not yet calibrated) N=a+bEm Non-linearity Due to saturation (more than 1 hit/pad) Can be improved with software compensation Not detrimental: this is a hadron calorimeter! Data (points) and MC (red line) from small prototype test and the MC predictions for a large-size DHCAL (green, dashed line). Measurements confirm prediction

Compensation? Due to saturation (=more than one hit/pad) for em showers → Can be overcome with software compensation, fractal analyses… As usual in calorimeters with Iron absorbers Careful choice of segmentation (1 x 1 cm2 pads) → Compensation

Events taken with Minimal Absorber Stack 50 layers Cassette contain 2 mm Cu and 2 mm Fe 0.27 X0/layer → 13.4 X0 total 0.038 λI/layer → 1.9 λI total Beam 1,2,3,4,6,8,10 GeV/c secondaries 8 GeV e+ 16 GeV/c π+ 8 GeV/c π+

Concept of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter (almost) validated Conclusions The DHCAL provides new insight into showers Preliminary results have been presented using muons Geometrical alignment Response across pad Performance parameters in ‘clean’ regions Performance parameters over the entire plane Performance as function of time Comparison with track segment method Results compared to GEANT4 + RPCSIM simulation RPCSIM tuned to reproduce performance in ‘clean’ regions Overall reasonable agreement with data observed Preliminary results have been presented using the secondary beam Response to pions and positrons consistent with expectations Concept of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter (almost) validated

Backup Slides

RPCSIM Parameters Distance dcut Charge Q0 Slope a1 Slope a2 Ratio R Distance under which there can be only one avalanche (one point of a pair of points randomly discarded if closer than dcut) Charge Q0 Shift applied to charge distribution to accommodate possible differences in the operating point of RPCs Slope a1 Slope of exponential decrease of charge induced in the readout plane Slope a2 Slope of 2nd exponential, needed to describe tail towards larger number of hits Ratio R Relative contribution of the 2 exponentials Threshold T Threshold applied to the charge on a given pad to register a hit Only used in 2 exponential parameterization