Identifying and prioritising mitigation options

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXERCISE IN MITIGATION DECISIONS MODULE 2 THE MULTI-HAZARD ENVIRONMENT.
Advertisements

Vegetative Risk Management Plan Template Details for Development by Section.
The tradeoffs between water savings and GHG emissions in irrigated agriculture Shahbaz Mushtaq, Tek Maraseni, and Kate Reardon Smith Australian Centre.
Setting the context. Introduction Welcome & Acknowledgement Background Workshops  action plan General Manager’s support Housekeeping Facilities, OH&S,
YJB TOOLKITS: Disproportionality YJB owner: Sue Walker Dept: Performance May (2011) Version 1.0.
A risk based approach to sustainable procurement
Assessing climate change risk. Introduction Welcome & Acknowledgement Background Workshops  action plan General Manager’s support Housekeeping Facilities,
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course
Hartley, Project Management: Integrating Strategy, Operations and Change, 3e Tilde Publishing Chapter 10 Risk Management Proactively managing the positive.
Observations on Sustainable Energy Action Planning Dominic Sims 16 th July 2013.
Identifying and prioritising adaptation actions. Introduction Welcome & Acknowledgement Background Workshops  action plan General Manager’s support Housekeeping.
Background very brief summing up of the NSS conclusions Background very brief summing up of the NSS conclusions Dr. Elewa.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Action Planning Workshop January 2007.
January 2013 Action Plan Skills Building: Module 4 Implementing and Evaluating the Action Plan.
Workshop 2 Core Skills Development Welcome to. Review of action planning Discuss engagement in learning process Describe what they learned between workshops.
The Climate Action Task Force’s Transportation Workgroup October 16, 2008 FacOps Conference Room B.
Green House Gases (GHGs) mitigation measures taken in Mexico Elizabeth Mosqueda, SESAM, University of Flensburg Abstract: Mexico’s aspirational target.
Climate Change Action in the Northern Territory Climate Change Adaptation Workshop for Practitioners Paul Purdon Manager Environment and Greenhouse Policy.
Analysis Manager Training Module
Welcome to Scottish Improvement Skills
MODULE 12 – STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Facilitation Tool: Team Agreement
Climate Change Assessment Tool Workshop
The Low Emission Capacity Building (LECB) Programme
Creative Solutions Through Brainstorming
Exercise Module 3b Cost-Benefit-Analysis (CBA)
Presentation by Dilyanka Zhelezarova & Viire Viss
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FINAL QUARTERLY COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP
It can be as easy as turning down a thermostat.
Introduction to CREAT Braden Rosenberg, The Cadmus Group, Inc.
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
Child Protection Case Management Supervision & Coaching Training Date Location  20 minutes Distribute: 0.0 Supervision and Coaching Pre-test and allow.
SWOT to TOWS Product strategy
Project Plan Template (Help text appears in cursive on slides and in the notes field)
Microsoft Cloud Adoption Workshop
EXECUTIVE – LEGISLATIVE AGENDA FORMULATION
Presentation Module 3c Cost-Benefit-Analysis (CBA)
Exercise Module 3b Cost-Benefit-Analysis (CBA)
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Funding for Energy Efficiency Projects
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Regions for Sustainable Change Project
7. EAFM process overview Version 1.
SWOT to TOWS Product strategy
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Agenda item 5(b) the Committee’s activities related to the overview of progress in implementing the strategic plan for 2015–2020, including the evaluation.
Pierce County Performance Audit Committee
Grantee Guide to Project Performance Measurement
Funded by the European Union
Role of CBIT in the transparency framework of the Paris Agreement
2019 Meeting 1 Northern Ontario Safety Group.
Training of trainers, part 1
Sustainable Energy Europe
Energy performance and Carbon emissions Assessment and Monitoring tool
Energy performance and Carbon emissions Assessment and Monitoring tool
Bulloch Information Session
Chapter 5: Water management and adaptation
Energy performance and Carbon emissions Assessment and Monitoring tool
Training of trainers, part 1
Working Group Review 14/12/11
7. EAFM cycle overview Essential EAFM Date • Place 1.
Climate Change Planning Process
Stakeholder Mapping.
Effective Off-Site Air Quality Mitigation
Learning Modules Introduction Lead Authors: Shannon M. Haworth, MA
Slide Deck: 01.
Presentation transcript:

Identifying and prioritising mitigation options

Introduction Welcome & Acknowledgement Background Housekeeping Workshops  action plan General Manager’s support Housekeeping Facilities, OH&S, Turn off mobiles [Insert Council logo] [Introduce the Mayor, a Councillor or the GM to officially open the workshop] [Acknowledge the traditional owners] [Provide the background to the project noting the support of the General Manager] [Housekeeping]

Introduction Purpose Program Introductions Evaluation forms Developing a Climate Change Action Plan Program Keeping to time Respectful discussion Introductions Evaluation forms [Note the purpose of the workshop/s] [Outline the program, noting the importance of keeping to time and keeping discussion respectful, invite any deniers to make a statement now so as to refrain from disrupting proceedings later] [Invite introductions from around the room if necessary] [Ask that pre-workshop evaluation forms be completed] Right: Brainstorming mitigation options at Clarence Valley Council

Progress Gain internal support Steering Committee Meeting 1 -Develop a planning program Workshop 1 -Introduction Steering Committee Meeting 2 -Research adaptation options Steering Committee Meeting 4 -Action plan Meeting 5 -Review Steering Committee Meeting 3 -Mitigation Workshop 4 -Mitigation actions Identify Planning Team Workshop 2 -Risk assessment Workshop 3 -Adaptation actions [Provide an overview of the climate change action planning process thus far and the overall objectives and goals]. 4

Expected outcomes Participants will: Brainstorm greenhouse gas mitigation actions Prioritise mitigation actions using an evaluation process By working as a group & in small groups The expected outcomes of this workshop are that we will brainstorm greenhouse gas mitigation actions and prioritise the actions using an evaluation process. We will work as one group and also in small groups to complete 3 or 4 exercises. Depending on the time available, the Steering Committee may complete the fourth exercise at some point after the workshop [insert any variations to this process]. Photo by yewenyi www.flickr.com

Emissions inventory [Outline what the Steering Committee, facilitator or other individuals have achieved by completing module 5 – note the process and outputs] [Outline what the Steering Committee, facilitator or other individuals have achieved by completing module 5 – note the process and outputs]

Emissions profile [Insert a visual representation of Council’s greenhouse gas inventory completed in module 5] [Discuss the greenhouse gas inventory and the major sources of emissions].

(1) Brainstorming actions Groups of 3- 5 Emission Reduction Action Template for each major source of emissions (A) Some actions already identified by the Steering Committee (C) Brainstorm additional actions & list (D) For the first exercise we will brainstorm mitigation actions. We will break into groups of 3-5 people. Each group will receive Emissions Reduction Action Templates which will note a source of emissions and have space to list actions to reduce those emissions. On the template there will be an action already identified by the Steering Committee which will provide an example. Photo by nicolas.boullosa www.flickr.com

(2) Rating mitigation potential of actions Work through each action & agree on its mitigation potential Mitigation potential (F) = estimate of % of emissions reduction the action will achieve (E) x the quantity of the emissions source (B) The second exercise can be fairly challenging and we will do it as one group, all together. We are going to look at each mitigation action and estimate its mitigation potential. The mitigation potential is the impact each action would have on reducing Council’s greenhouse gas emissions. We will estimate this by first estimating the percentage of emissions we think the action would reduce and then working out what that reduction would be. Photo by Nomad Tales www.flickr.com

Example For example: Emissions from electricity use 12,000 T CO2-e Installing insulation in council buildings would reduce electricity use by 5% The mitigation potential for an insulation action = 600 T CO2-e For example: Say emissions from electricity use were 12,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent And installing insulation in council buildings would reduce electricity use by 5% Then the mitigation potential for the action of installing insulation would therefore be 5% of 12,000 tonnes which is 600 tonnes of CO2 equivalent Photo by AIA web team www.flickr.com

Break Break while the mitigation actions & mitigation potential are entered into an electronic spreadsheet [The facilitator or an assistant should type the mitigation actions and their mitigation potential into the MCA tool while participants break for refreshments].

(3) Evaluating actions Actions will be evaluated for their quadruple bottom line potential Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) tool Agree criteria & weightings Score each mitigation action for all criteria using drop down menus The third activity involves evaluating the mitigation actions you have come up with for their potential impact on Council’s quadruple bottom line. That is social, economic, environmental and governance considerations. We will do this as a group by using a multi-criteria analysis tool in Microsoft Excel. [Display the MCA tool and ask whether everyone agrees on the criteria and weightings of the criteria or amend as agreed. Score each mitigation action for all criteria using the drop down menus in the tool].

(4) Prioritising mitigation actions Each action will be plotted on a matrix based on the potential savings (CO2e) & MCA score This will classify actions as high, medium or low priority [Note whether the fourth step in identifying and prioritising mitigation actions will be undertaken after the workshop or during the workshop]. To develop a priority list of mitigation actions, the potential savings and the MCA score for each action will be plotted on a matrix. The matrix will help to classify actions as high, medium or low priority. The matrix shows that high priority actions will be highly effective and perform well against quadruple bottom line criteria. Medium Priority – High MCA score but low potential savings (tCO2-e). These actions may become higher priority if modified to improve the mitigation potential High Priority – High MCA score and high potential savings. These actions should be considered as a priority for implementation Low Priority – Low MCA score and low potential savings (tCO2-e). These actions are lowest priority Medium Priority – High potential savings (tCO2-e) but low MCA score. These actions may become higher priority through modifications to the action to improve MCA score High score Low score Potential savings MCA score

Questions Any questions? Any questions?

Achievements from the workshop During the workshop we have: Identified possible mitigation actions Estimated the mitigation potential of the actions Prioritised the actions based on mitigation potential and multi-criteria analysis [Summarise the achievements and check that everyone is happy that the expected outcomes and objectives of the workshop have been achieved. Note whether the fourth step in identifying and prioritising mitigation actions will be undertaken after the workshop or was completed during the workshop].

Conclusion Thank you Evaluation forms Thank you for your participation. Please complete the workshop evaluation form.