Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 104-112 (February 2011) Varying protein source and quantity do not significantly improve weight loss, fat loss, or satiety in reduced energy diets among midlife adults  Noel D. Aldrich, Marla M. Reicks, Shalamar D. Sibley, J. Bruce Redmon, William Thomas, Susan K. Raatz  Nutrition Research  Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 104-112 (February 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.01.004 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Flow diagram for the study design and subjects. Nutrition Research 2011 31, 104-112DOI: (10.1016/j.nutres.2011.01.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Fat loss by region and by diet at 5 months. Values measured by DXA and reported as mean (±SEM). Different lower case letters indicate significance between groups as determined by GLM. Nutrition Research 2011 31, 104-112DOI: (10.1016/j.nutres.2011.01.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Lean tissue change by region and by diet at 5 months. Values measured by DXA and reported as mean (±SEM). Different lower case letters indicate significance between groups as determined by GLM. Nutrition Research 2011 31, 104-112DOI: (10.1016/j.nutres.2011.01.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 The weekly average satiety score during the 8-week feeding phase. The Labeled Affective Magnitude scale consisted of labeled terms on a 100-mm scale, with 0 mm being “Extremely Hungry,” 50 mm being “Neither Hungry nor Full,” and 100 mm being “Extremely Full.” Data shown are means (±SEM). Week 8 difference between groups, P = .08. Nutrition Research 2011 31, 104-112DOI: (10.1016/j.nutres.2011.01.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions