Prof.Halimu Shauri (hshauri@yahoo.com), Social Impact Assessment of Livelihood- Developing an Inclusive Impact Assessment Instrument Prof.Halimu Shauri (hshauri@yahoo.com), Sellah Lusweti (s.lusweti@pu.ac.ke), Yvonne Kuhnke, Prof. Elisabeth Wacker 1st -5th May 2015 Technische Universität München, Pwani University Kenya 1 Introduction In Kenya, very little is known about the situation of youths and young adults with disabilities with regard to their transition into the world of work and its related challenges how youths and young adults earn their living how or if they benefit from livelihood promotion programmes and the impact that support programmes and networks have on their lives, and that of the broader community. This does not only apply to youths and young adults with disabilities, but also to other vulnerable and marginalised groups. Against this background, this study critically analyses both intended and unintended effects of projects and programmes operating in the field of livelihood promotion. 3 Specific Objectives This study specifically aims to 1. Develop a Social Impact Assessment (SIA) instrument to assess the social outcomes of livelihood programmes for persons with disabilities and other disadvantaged groups. 2. Develop a tool based on Social Return On Investment (SROI) for an “input-outcome analysis” to measure impact of on the individual, family, community and society levels in monetary terms.  3. Determine how less tangible factors, such as the impact of policy and legislation can be adequately captured in impact assessment. 5 Methodology Phase I: Development of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) tool Phase II: Monetising the SIA tool into a Social Return On Investment (SROI) tool Each tool will: Assess the value of a project in form of returns as appreciated by the stakeholders themselves Incorporate participatory methodologies, pre-resting and Field-testing in the Coastal Region of Kenya in conjunction with practitioners in the field of livelihood development. 7 Outputs and Outcomes Outputs The main expected outputs are the two tools: Social Impact Assessment & Social Return on Investment tools Expected outcomes The tools developed will facilitate comprehensive monitoring and evaluation of project/program impact since the SROI approach provides for including people with disabilities can reflect on the impact in all spheres of their lives. Further, stakeholders will have deeper insights into the life circumstances experienced by young persons with disabilities. Transitions into work for young adults with disabilities will also be better understood and can then be planned for strategically. 2 Significance and purpose Significance Many organisation do not have complete and up to date information of the impact that their interventions have on the situations of youth and young adults living with disabilities. Consequently there is a gap in planning and programming whose immediate result is continued exclusion. Purpose This study aims to investigate how the framework of Social Return on Investment (a cost-benefit-analysis technique) can be applied to the field of livelihood development for young adults with disabilities and other vulnerabilities. 4 Measuring impact As projects/programs affect the entire personal and social circles of individuals and communities, Quality of Life (QoL) will serve as a comprehensive framework in this study for assessing social outcomes in 8 domains: Personal development Self-Determination Interpersonal Relations Social Inclusion Rights Emotional well-being Physical well-being Material well-being (Schalock 2010). 6 Milestones achieved The draft Social Impact Assessment tool has been completed. Feedback from experts and partners on the SIA tool obtained during a round-table meeting has been incorporated. Research assistants have been trained to use the SIA tool. Pre-tests of the SIA tool have been conducted analysis is currently ongoing. Data will be collected (next step). The assessed Impacts on Quality of Life will be monetised in a Social Return on Investment Process (next step). 9 Project Partners Funding institutions CBM Germany CBM International Researching institutions Pwani University Technische Universität München Cooperation partners in the field of livelihood Plan International (Kenya) Association for the Physically Disabled of Kenya Reynodls Whyte, Susan & Ingstad, Benedicte (1995): Disability and Culture. An Overview. In: Ingstad, Benedicte & Reynolds Whyte, Susan (eds.): Disability and Culture. Berkeley & Los Angeles: California University Press. UN – United Nations (2006): Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Online: http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?navid=15&pid=150 (28.04.2015) Schalock, R. (2010): The Measurement and Use of Quality of Life-Related Outcomes. In: Kober, R. (edt.): Enhancing the Quality of Life of People with Intellectual Disabilities. From Theory to Practice. Dordrecht, 3-16. Vanclay, F. (2003): Social Impact Assessment. International Principles. Online: https://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/SP2.pdf?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 (28.04.2015) Schalock, R., Keith, K., Verdugo, M. & Gómez, L. (2010): Quality of Live Model Development and Use in the Field of Intellectual Disability. In: Kober, R. (edt.): Enhancing the Quality of Life of People with Intellectual Disabilities. From Theory to Practice. Dordrecht, 17-32. WHO – World Health Organization (2011): World Report on Disability. Online: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en/ (28.04.2015) WHO – World Health Organization (2010): Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines. Livelihood component. Online: http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/guidelines/en/ (28.04.2015) Schlyter, Charlotta (2002): International Labour Standards and the Informal Sector: Developments and Dilemmas. Online: http://www.ilo.org/employment/Whatwedo/Publications/WCMS_122056/lang--en/index.htm (11.05.2015)