FM Journal Club February, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Randomised Clinical Trial: Lactobacillus reuteri DSM vs. Placebo in Children With Acute Diarrohea Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012:36 (4): R. Francavilla.
Advertisements

Critical Appraisal: Epidemiology 101 POS Lecture Series April 28, 2004.
Journal Club General Medicine C- 4/3/14
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2014.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dr. Cristina Ana Stoian Resident Journal Club
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2008.
Clinical trial The Way We Make Progress Against Disease Prof. Ashry Gad Mohamed Prof. of Epidemiology College of Medicine & KKUH.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2015.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2010.
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Evaluating the Medical Literature Clista Clanton, MSLS, AHIP January 2009.
Journal Club by Dr Mohammad Al-Busafi R4.  Compare efficacy of  Ibuprofen 10 mg /kg  Paracetamol and codeine ( cocodamol ! ) 1mg/kg (codeine component.
Budesonide/formoterol as effective as prednisolone plus formoterol in acute exacerbations of COPD A double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority, parallel-group,
Study design P.Olliaro Nov04. Study designs: observational vs. experimental studies What happened?  Case-control study What’s happening?  Cross-sectional.
1 ST JOURNAL CLUB Dr.Raihana AL-Anqoudi. OUTLINE ABOUT THE ARTICLE METHOD AND MATERIALS CRITICAL APPRAISAL LIMITATIONS.
Analyzing Randomized Control Trial: ITT vs. PP vs. AT Proceedings from Journal club….. Vikash.
Probiotics May Lower Risk for Nosocomial Infections in Hospitalized Children A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial reported in the May issue.
How to Analyze Therapy in the Medical Literature (part 2)
How to Analyze Therapy in the Medical Literature: practical session Akbar Soltani.MD. Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) Shariati Hospital
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group.
Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Probiotic in Colic, Regurgitation, & Constipation Indrio F, Di Mauro A, Riezzo G,
DOES UTI CAUSE PROLONGED JAUNDICE IN OTHERWISE WELL INFANTS? Eur J pediatr Feb 2015 Mairi Gillespie.
PTP 661 EVIDENCE ABOUT INTERVENTIONS CRITICALLY APPRAISE THE QUALITY AND APPLICABILITY OF AN INTERVENTION RESEARCH STUDY Min Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
A Simple Method for Evaluating the Clinical Literature “PP-ICONS” approach Based on Robert J. Flaherty - Family Practice Management – 5/2004.
1 EFFICACY OF SHORT COURSE AMOXICILLIN FOR NON-SEVERE PNEUMONIA IN CHILDREN (Hazir T*, Latif E*, Qazi S** AND MASCOT Study Group) *Children’s Hospital,
Journal Club Manjula Velayudhan CF Gastroenterology Sheffield Synbiotic in the management of infantile colic: A randomised controlled trial.
Compliance Original Study Design Randomised Surgical care Medical care.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
/ 161 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine EBM Therapy Articles Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk
Making Randomized Clinical Trials Seem Less Random Andrew P.J. Olson, MD Assistant Professor Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics University of Minnesota.
Silaja Cheruvu, R3.  What’s the BEST way to prevent diabetes in high risk patients?  By doing nothing?  With lifestyle changes?  With medication?
CRITICAL APPARAISAL OF A PAPER ON THERAPY 421 CORSE EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE (EBM)
Critical appraisals: Treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL = a prospective study comparing the effect and value of intervention(s) against a control in human beings.
Lactobacillus reuteri DSM for the management of infantile colic in breastfed infants A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Analytical Interventional Studies
EBM R1張舜凱.
Methods to Handle Noncompliance
Sample Journal Club Your Name Here.
Warm-up A newspaper article about an opinion poll says that “43% of Americans approve of the president’s overall job performance.” Toward the end of the.
Martha A. Wojtowycz, PhD February 26, 2016
Francis KL Chan Department of Medicine & Therapeutics CUHK
How many study subjects are required ? (Estimation of Sample size) By Dr.Shaik Shaffi Ahamed Associate Professor Dept. of Family & Community Medicine.
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
Confidence Intervals and p-values
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
Martha Carvour, MD, PhD March 2, 2017
Probiotics for Infantile Colic: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Investigating Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938  Kim Chau, MSc, Eddy.
Interventional trials
Randomized Trials: A Brief Overview
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
Chapter 13- Experiments and Observational Studies
Randomization and Comparative Designs
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May-June, 2018
Research Rotation Part II
Geir Smedslund, Ph.D.: Diakonhjemmet Hospital (DH)
Sign critical appraisal course: exercise 2
RCT Workshop, Bushehr 2/16/2019.
Appraisal of an RCT using a critical appraisal checklist
Evidence Based Practice
The Research Question Background: Question:
Critical Appraisal of a RCT
EBM – therapy Dr. Tina Dewi J , dr., SpOG
Associate Fellow, Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, Oxford
How to assess an abstract
Principles of Experimental Design
Figure 1. Enrollment and outcomes
Basic statistics.
Presentation transcript:

FM Journal Club February, 2011

Background 3 - 28 % of babies, No standard definition 6 wk peak All babies cry most in the first 3 mo No standard definition Rule of Threes, ≥ 3 hrs, ≥ 3 d/ wk, ≥ 3 wk 6 wk peak  60% by 3 mo, 90% by 4 mo Most treatment works in 1/3 of babies

Background Social phenomenon: “Caretakers perception of what is excessive or prolonged (crying) and caretakers ultimate response to the perception defines it as a problem.” Up to Date

Colic and Probiotics Just in Case Search: Journal of Family Practice Dynamed: No mention under colic tx UpToDate: 2 RCT’s, good synopsis 2010 Double blind, pacebo controlled RCT 2007 Prospective randomized, no placebo, open, simethacone vs probiotic Google Scholar: 1st reference

The Reference Lactobacillus Reuteri DSM in Infantile Colic: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Sevino et at. Pediatrics 2010; 126; e526-e533. Online August 16, 2010.

Methods 50 term breast fed babies, recruited from general practice and outpatient clinics, randomly assigned to receive Lactobacillus reuteri or placebo and evaluated for 21 days, for crying time and gut flora. 5 drops of suspension, once a day before the feed in the morning for 21 days. (108 colony forming units)

Were the patients randomized? Was Allocation Concealed? Page e 527: Study design Randomized, using random digit method, computer generated numbers. Two treatment randomization, with random block of varying size. The pediatrician allocated the next available product entry into the trial, each patient received it directly from the department.

Were patients similar? Table 1 Page e529 Probiotics slightly older by 4 days No sig differences according to P values Page e529 There were no significant differences between the groups regarding type of delivery, gender, age, family history or GI, atopy, or growth or median crying time.

Blinding Method of blinding Patients/Clinicians/Assessors: p. e528: Active study product: suspension of freeze dried L. Reuteri in sunflower oil in dark bottle. Placebo: Identical w/o L. Reuteri. Patients/Clinicians/Assessors: p. e528: The bottles were coded and blinded by the study statistician for both participants and pediatricians, and code was revealed to the investigators once recruitment, data collection, and all … analysis complete

How Complete Was Follow – Up? Intention to Treat? None “lost”, 46 completed the trial Intention to Treat 4 excluded from analysis 1 fever 2 failure to complete daily forms 1 GERD The 4 treated as responders as they were all in the placebo group. (p. 528)

Was the study stopped early? No

Results: Continuous Variable Day 21: Reduction in daily crying time Placebo: 35 min L. Reuteri: 90 min P = 0.022 Days 7, 14 not statistically significant. Noted in discussion and in Table 2. Not in main text. Reporting bias?

Results: Dichotomous: Reduction in crying time by 50%(ITT) p. 529 Day Responders L. Reuteri (%) ITT EER Placebo (%) ITT CER ARR |CER – EER | RRR NNT P value 7 21/25 (84%) 11/25 (44%) 84%-44% 40% 40%/84% 48% 1/.4 2.5 .007 14 24/25 (96%) 16/25 (64%) 96%-64% 32% 32%/96% 33% 1/.32 3.1 0.011 21 18/25 (72%) 96%-72% 24% 24%/96% 25% 1/.25 4 0.049 Results reported in tables and and abstract are the non ITT, and the results in the abstract are the more dramatic P values. Not the the 0.049 seen in the ITT analysis, in fine print.

Error Type II? Power Calculation p. 528 80% power to detect a difference of 50 min of crying with a dropout rate of 20% Type I? Possible with tiny sample size

Other results No differences in Growth parameters, GI symptoms, Adverse events: Not powered for adverse events Rhinitis, ezcema, fever, otalgy, GERD “unrelated”

Application: Similar to my patients? Solely breast fed Italian Full term, otherwise healthy Recruited from general and outpatient practices

Application: All relevant outcomes considered? Real or Surrogate: minutes of crying time?, flora? Adverse outcomes? Long term outcomes?

Application: Will my patient benefit? Risks,harms and costs NNT: 4. You need to treat approximately 4 infants for 3 weeks with L. Reuteri, to have 1 additional infant display a 50% reduction in crying time. 72% responders to placebo at 21 days 96% responders to L. Reuteri at d. Effect is decreasing over time

Application 90% are better at 4 months of age Remember in treatments studied “Most treatments works in 1/3 of babies” 50 minutes less crying time may be very important to families Tiny study, need replication Many studies can’t be replicated