Data visualisation for reproducibility

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Data Publishing: Challenges for HEIs and Libraries Dr Liz.
Advertisements

Rate myData! OR Is peer review broken? If so what needs to be done to fix it?
Biomarkism: taming the revolution? May 12 th 2014 PSI Conference David Lovell St George’s Medical School University of London.
BPK 304W Inquiry & Measurement in Kinesiology Dr. Richard Ward Summer 2014.
An Open Access publisher’s perspective on data publishing Matthew Cockerill Managing Director, BioMed Central Dryad-UK meeting HEFCE, London, 28 April.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
The Mind Map of a Data Scientist Rebecca Perry and Carlota Valdivieso, Work Experience Students July 2013 What qualifies Data Science? Many things qualify.
Sara Bowman Center for Open Science Open Science Framework: Facilitating Transparency and Reproducibility.
Reading Science Critically Debi A. LaPlante, PhD Associate Director, Division on Addictions.
Towards an Integrated Transparent Journal Publishing Workflow
SoundSoftware.ac.uk: Software sustainability for the audio and music researcher Chris Cannam, Mark Plumbley, Luís Figueira Centre for Digital Music Queen.
TODAY’S SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE – HOW REPRODUCIBLE IS IT? MICHAEL MARKIE Associate Publisher,
Academic Viva POWER and ERROR T R Wilson. Impact Factor Measure reflecting the average number of citations to recent articles published in that journal.
Mapping the Impact Pathways: How Management Research Can Be Relevant? Hazhir Rahmandad Post-doctoral Associate MIT.
SCIENCE, RESEARCH DATA, AND PUBLISHING Stewart Wills Editorial Director, Web & New Media, Science 26 February 2013.
Introduction to Faculty of 1000 Services Find out how F1000 services can help you search the literature and publish your work By [Your name] F1000 Specialist.
How to use Bibliometrics in your Career The MyRI Project Team.
The ISI Web of Knowledge nce/training/wok/#tab3.
DA-RT What publishing houses can and can’t do Patrick McCartan Publishing Director, Social Science and Humanities Journals Cambridge University Press.
Electronic labnotes Mari Wigham COMMIT/. Information WUR  Organising, sharing, finding and reusing data  Expertise in: ● Modelling data.
LAWRENCE P. KANE, PH.D. DEPT OF IMMUNOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE PUBLISHING IN THE 21 ST CENTURY.
F1000: HELPING YOU WRITE, DISCOVER AND SHARE SCIENCE [Your name] [date and location of talk]
Open access and subscription journals: implications for low- and middle-income countries Moderated by Subhasree Raghavan Presented by Emma Veitch and Paul.
Dataset citation Clickable link to Dataset in the archive Sarah Callaghan (NCAS-BADC) and the NERC Data Citation and Publication team
1 CHBE 594 Lect 16 Scifinder Scholar. 2 Objective Strengths and weaknesses of scifinder scholar How to use it to look up molecules or reactions.
Ontology and V&V Ursula Martin, Bill Rider, Carol Woodward, Kate Evans, Sarah Michalak, Sergey Formel, Blake Barker, John Bprwien, Ron Boisvert, David.
Mali Medical in the publication world Prof. S. Sidibe Editor in Chief of Mali Medical Chair of FAME.
Brian Hole COASP, Riga, 20 September 2013.
Björn Brembs, Julien Colomb Universität Regensburg, Freie Universität Berlin
Publication Ethics Webinar: Jan 2016 (Ethical) framework for author-driven publishing Dr Michaela Torkar Editorial Director, F1000Research
OPEN SCIENCE PUBLISHING: BEYOND OPEN ACCESS MAX PLANCK OPEN ACCESS AMBASSADORS CONFERENCE, 4 December 2014 Michaela Torkar Editorial Director, F1000 Research.
Practical Steps for Increasing Openness and Reproducibility Courtney Soderberg Statistical and Methodological Consultant Center for Open Science.
PARTHENOS-project.eu EOSC market demand for art, humanties and cultural heritage Amsterdam– EGI Conference– 7/4/2016 Franco Niccolucci Scientific Coordinator,
Sara Bowman Center for Open Science | Promoting, Supporting, and Incentivizing Openness in Scientific Research.
ScienceOpen: Scientific Publishing for “Generation Open” Open Access Ambassadors Conference, December, Munich Dr. Stephanie Dawson, CEO.
Kathleen Shearer Data management: The new frontier for libraries.
| 0 Scopus content selection and curation processes Susanne Steiginga, MSc. Product Manager Scopus Content 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference.
The Reproducible Research Advantage Why + how to make your research more reproducible Presentation for the Center for Open Science June 17, 2015 April.
Theresa Gabor Contra Costa County Office of Education.
Björn Brembs Universität Regensburg
Committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature
F1000: Open for science Hollydawn Murray
BPK 304W Scientific Method
Bibliometrics toolkit: Thomson Reuters products
Center for Open Science: Practical Steps for Increasing Openness
Open peer review as educational resource for science PhD students
Gain Global Exposure: Partner with EBSCO to Promote your Scholarship
The peer review process
Open research: from the perspective of Wellcome
A cloud platform for interactive reproducible computational experiments Siddeswara Guru Data Science Director.
PBPK & Systems Pharmacology
Rebecca Lawrence Managing Director, F February 2018
The Steps into creation of research
Being an effective consumer of preclinical research
What, why and best practices in open research
Open Access to your Research Papers and Data
Dealing with reviewer comments
Montclair State University Digital Commons: An Institutional Repository Overview.
Scientific Publishing in the Digital Age
Dealing with reviewer comments
Introduction of KNS55 Platform
Open Access and.
for research reproducibility
Immediate Publication
Washington State University
Chapter 4 Summary.
Improving management of neonatal infections
Data + Research Elements What Publishers Can Do (and Are Doing) to Facilitate Data Integration and Attribution David Parsons – Lawrence, KS, 13th February.
Presentation transcript:

Data visualisation for reproducibility BioJS Conference, 3 July 2015 Rebecca Lawrence Managing Director, F1000 Research Ltd rebecca.lawrence@f1000.com http://f1000research.com @f1000research | @rnl_s

open science publishing platform Author-led publishing: Immediate publication Transparent refereeing No editorial bias Data & software included

Reproducibility problem Begley & Ellis 2012 (Nature): 53 ‘landmark’ studies  only 6 (11%) replicated. Failure to adhere to good scientific practice: blinding, randomization, replication, sample-size calculation ‘Publish or perish’ culture  emphasis on impactful statements Lack of supporting data shared Lack of methods/technical detail Journals starting to address these issues, e.g. eLife, F1000Research

Not just sharing, but making it reusable Sharing data alone isn’t adequate Need detailed protocol/methods Need data in an understandable and reusable format For computational studies, need details of environment Replication can be time consuming and expensive Peer review of the data can be time consuming and therefore not (properly) done

Full data integration with research articles Datasets within article are citable and downloadable.

In-article data manipulation

Figures that don’t exist Simply data + code Creates opportunities to change the definition of a figure, and ultimately the journal article Colomb J and Brembs B. Sub-strains of Drosophila Canton- S differ markedly in their locomotor behavior [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/3is] F1000Research 2014, 3:176

Living figures FIGURE 4. In: Colomb J and Brembs B. Sub-strains of Drosophila Canton-S differ markedly in their locomotor behavior [v2; ref status: indexed, f1000r.es/57i] F1000Research 2014, 3:176

Lack of awareness of data formatting requirements challenges Lack of awareness of data formatting requirements Lack of programming expertise in many research groups Quality of the code – time and expense Reusability of code: Lack of standards Vast number of data types, output types For many publishers, complex publishing systems that are licensed in and hard to change/adapt Industry-built code often not open source Often not possible to embed visualisation tool within article page

@f1000 | @f1000research | @rnl_s Thank you! rebecca.lawrence@f1000.com @f1000 | @f1000research | @rnl_s